. >> everything that sko go wrong goes wrong. >> and a street performance gets backup during his performance. >> one, two, three, runaway. [son] all right,she has no idea. [man] no one told her,right? [son]hi! [mom screams] >>> when you're miles away from nothing, the situation goes from bad to worse is not a good situation to be in. these two guys, jase and simon, are part of a series called "all for adventure," a television show in australia and they're known for going to the most remote part of australia and exploring by boat, for wheeler. here they're trying to find a new fishing spot and they're trying to get through just a small patch of mud. >> oh, that's bad. >> swamps the truck up to its rear axel. so here comes simon with his truck. and simon starts to pull with his other truck. >> it's going down deeper. >> it looks like it's working, though. >> it is working and it's not getting the truck out and they notice that the tide is coming in. >> the tide is coming in. i'm good to go. >> come on! >> oh, no! >> everything that could go wrong is going wrong! >> holy [ bleep ]. holy [ bleep

sko psychologists call it social pressure. it's remarkably effective getting people to vote. if you have good data and strong analytics telling you who supporters are in the electorate but not necessarily habitual voters and a lot of volunteers who can put stickers on doors, you have a recipe for driving turnout even if you have terry mcauliffe who you would not think is an inspiring figure for his base. >> wearing an "i voted" sticker. governor, you wanted to say something there. >> i think sasha is right campaigns especially on the democratic side have become more sophisticated and that public pressure about did you vote yet works to a degree. but don't think for a moment that there isn't self-driven voters. the enthusiasm gap still matters. if you look at 2008 when democratic enthusiasm for president obama was at its highest level, unbelievable the turnout. in 2010, the enthusiasm level among democratic voters was way down. way down. all the good techniques in the world couldn't produce a good turnout. the interesting thing is in pennsylvania, we came fairly close even in

those of you on the web if you would like to e-mail your questions you can the e-mail to skos at -- .org. would you bring the microphone to otto in the third row there? >> otto with seapower magazine and several others. after 27 some years of covering you folks i have seen what congress does to make it worse and one of them was 10 or 15 years ago you did the attack on the pentagon and ordered a 25% cut in dod acquisition. that turned a whole lot of the acquisition process, are indeed initial design over to the contractors. it didn't work out particularly well and as far as expediting procurement, every time anybody suggests speeding up the process gao or congress gets in there and says no, no you are going to go to fast and we have got to regulate in slow the whole thing down. you mentioned part of the problem, we discovered the enemy and it is us so how do you get those contradictory things. if you turn industry loose they end up in some way complicating the process or congress and another bugaboo. gao, you can process anything until it's technology level 6 which means it's obviously