following russ bridge's testimony, the same committee announced it had summoned andrew parker, the head have mi5 to defend his claims. parker will face questioning this coming week. >> when someone says the word drone, it is usually followed by the word strike. given the stories we keep hearing out of pakistan and yemen, we've become conditioned to think of drones as weapons of war. they are also becoming tools of the jumpistic trade. more and more news stories, particularly those on television now include video shot by drones. there are still a lot of issues to be worked out, some techological, some ethical, but drones are becoming part of the news gathering process and because they can provide a different perspective, you can bet they are here to stay. we will talk about some of of the pit falls. >> in the philippines, a camera carried by an unmanned vehicle floats overhead, high enough to capture the scale of the destruction. the footage, shot by a bridge freelancer was picked up by cnn, who hired him to shoot their report enon the scene.y1 >> in the hands of journalists is quite sig

as andrew parker describe what you in your newspaper did, "a gift that our enemies needed to evade us instructors that will," and i'm sure you've heard "our adversaries were rubbing their hands with glee." all heads of the security services were clear in their evidence to the intelligence and security committee that you had result this country as a of what you had done. clearly, other editors may differ decisions. we know it is been in "the washington post" and "the new york times." do you recognize what you have done? do you accept that this has damaged the country? this is severe criticism that i haven't seen before from the head of our security services. >> i think it is important context that editors of probably the world's leading newspapers in america, "the new york times," took identical decisions. this is not a rogue newspaper. it is serious newspapers. the problem with these accusations is they tend to be very vague. they are not rooted in specific stories. i would like to quote for people who have told me that there has been no damage. you took evidence last week from norman

andrew parker described what you and your newspaper did as a gift that our enemies needed to evade us and to strike us at will. and i'm sure you've heard this phrase before. john's lawyers, the head of mi6, said that our adversaries were rubbing their hands with glee. all heads of the secure the services were very clear in their evidence to the intelligence and security committee that you have damaged this country as a result of what you have done. clearly other editors took the decision as well. we know it's been in the "the new york times" and the "washington post," el pais, le monde and other newspapers but they're not be forced today. be recognized what you have done? d. except that this has damaged the country? that this is a very criticism that i haven't seen before from head of our security services? >> i think it is important context that editors of probably the world's leading newspapers in america, the "washington post" and "the new york times" took virtually identical decisions so this is not a rogue newspaper. it is cities new papers have long dealing with national securit

few -- a few records and for public record, we -- the committee has decided andrew parker, the head next 5 in open session year. hopefully -- >> do you have advanced notice we're asking ns you today? >> i wasn't, i was told that general areas of concern. to recall stunned having an open meeting, all of he intelligence and security meeting with their carefully manicured questions and answers, and to a committee that is accused of being a poodle to the -- many governments, including the cheerleaders for the iraq war. think this raises the question that the two -- the provided by that committee is inadequate and we reform? said, lots of people, including former chairs said we relook it up and he look f said he wants to into his own committee and get an o i hope this will be opportunity for people to talk about how oversight could be there's no ause question that it should be. >> the united kingdom overnment's reaction to this story has been very different rom any other government and the united nations special -- government, his response is, i quote, unacceptable in a new ratic society and

and just a few -- a few records and for public record, we -- the committee has decided to call andrew parker, the head of mi-5 in open session next year. hopefully -- >> do you have advanced notice of the questions we're asking you today? [laughter] >> i wasn't, i was told that general areas of concern. >> were you stunned to recall having an open meeting, all of the intelligence and security meeting with their carefully manicured questions and rehearsed answers, and to a committee that is accused of being a poodle to the government -- many governments, including the cheerleaders for the iraq war. do you think this raises the question that the two -- the scrutiny provided by that committee is inadequate and we need a reform? >> as i said, lots of people, including former chairs said we need to relook it up and he himself said he wants to look into his own committee and get it so i hope this will be an opportunity for people to talk about how oversight could be improved because there's no question that it should be. >> the united kingdom government's reaction to this story has been very diffe

andrew parker described what

thea andrews is off tonight but nina parker is here. >> hey, guys.y now and then something grabs your attention, your eyes focus, the hair stand ups on the back of your neck and next thing, you're obsessed. >> we're breaking down what had us hooked this year. our television obsessions. and that would be "breaking bad." i don't think there's ever been a drug dealer who has been as beloved at walter white. >> people paying tributes to him now. 10.7 million people who tuned in to watch the science teacher turned methmaker meet his demise. >> i want this. >> then do it yourself. >> didn't try to do anything too crazy in the sense it didn't go the sopranos route and leave anything really ambiguous. it didn't drag anything too crazy nuts. it was just a nice capper for walter white's

andrews. >> i'm kevin frazier. we'll also sit down with the ladies from "duck dynasty." >>> but first, former "basketball wife" star evelyn lozada is speaking out since pictures surfaced showing a very pregnant tummy. nina parkermaking interview with the reality star. they talked about everything from her turbulent past to her new start with a new man in a new place, and let's not forget, the new baby. >> oh, big news. >> very big news. >> you're pregnant. >> i am. i'm very pregnant. i'm just going into my sixth month. >> surprisingly, evelyn managed to keep her pregnancy quiet. the same goes for the baby's father, but i'll get to that in a minute. first, it's important to