pornographic movie ever made and i am getting a lot of to it that you said oh gosh ok redwoods are bandar bush this was our band it was star banner because you said oh should be shot from a distinctly jewish grandmothers point of view sushi to measurable of hunger of consumers of porn once and for all i mean i have to ask you why do you think that there is this narrative that women don't like or watch porn and that all female porn stars must be forced into the industry somehow. while that's a huge question and that's a huge question that involves trafficking and mind control and drug addiction and being molested when you know that that involves patriarchal analysis to so i don't think you have time for that one but i do know people that you know have chosen to to do it and you know they're pretty intelligent. and. you know. some of them have lived but most don't. you know let's hope you'll be breaking that right heroes and if you decide to go with that i'm trying to combat it the most pornographic thing for women what would what would the most sexually stimulating thing for women be i'm thinki

report of a meeting between the current saudi intelligence chief bandar bin sultan better known as bandar bush and vladimir putin back last july where apparently according to these leaked reports bandar bin sultan directly threatened in and russia with the expanded terror attacks if the attack on syria did not go ahead and as we know of course syrian military intervention by was put off the table earlier this year meaning that potentially this is sourcing back to the saudis it london that tongues were carried out by islamic radicals in your opinion is that the same case handle the ground. well of course the islamic radicals are the ones that tend to carry out these attacks but the ones that are directing funding fostering and training them tend to be elsewhere located elsewhere and of course we have for example the testimony of former f.b.i. whistle blower sabella edmonds talking about operation gladio b. earlier this year she was talking about how this this operation was a nato fund is an ongoing nato funded operation in cooperation with the pentagon to stir up islamic radical terrorism speci

the bush family was close personally and politically to the royal family. prince bandar was close personal friends with george w. bush senior and he was bone as bandar bush, and they had business dealings in the carlisle group. saudi arabia was an ally. we relied on them for oil, revealing the saudi connection would have been explosive and damaging to both the saudis and the bush administration. >> banda was a popular guy, speaking english beautifully, there are reports that money me may have sent from people that supported the hijackers. senators led by chuck schumer demanded that it be declassified, saying protecting the saudi arabia regime for for given to terrorists would be a mistake. do you think that the issue is that it's circumstantial evidence that's not enough to pin a sponsor of terrorism on the saudi state? >> you know, i have to believe if saudi arabia were not an alply, we would have found more reason to suggest it was a state sponsor terrorist attack. i think there is plenty of evidence, some circumstantial evidence. but it adds up to the least, members o

he was known as bandar bush. the business deals, and the carlisle group, and saudi arabia was an ally. we relied on them for oil. they revealed the saudi connection at that point would have been explosive and damaging administration. >> he was a popular guy, speaking english, and there are reports that some money he may have sent to people that may have supported the hijackers. a decade ago. 46 senator led by chuck schumer in new york demanded that he be classified at 28 pages. >> do you think that the issue is that it's circumstantial evidence that is not enough to really pin a sponsor of terrorism on the saudi state? >> you know, i have to believe if saudi arabia were not an ally, we would have found more than to suggest it was a state-sponsored terrorist attack. i think there is plenty of evidence. some of it may be circumstantial, but it adds up to the least, members of the saudi government were supporting hijackers and/or supporting the men i told you about from saudi arabia, were living in the united states

and as elliott was saying about bandar and bush, it's best to lead them, guide them, influence them. but at what point when the saudis are saying, as elliott was describing, at what point are they right? it's either we need you as the superpower leading, or you're wrong on syria, you're wrong only iran. so how do we distinguish the noise from when they're correct? >> look, i mean, you could argue -- and be they would certainly argue -- they're already right in this regard. and i would just respond in terms of, again, back to u.s. strategic interests and how, again, having a clear plan of then how does this end and where does this go. can -- if you wanted to go into an all-in strategy in the way that, again, i don't think -- it won't happen. i almost, can almost say for surgeon just based on my own assessment. from the u.s. side. >> yeah. >> look, you look at sort of the fallout from what would have been a failed vote in congress, i think, on very limited strikes. so selling this case to the american public will require a fundamental change in something that happens on the ground of,

bandar would call up at 3 p.m. and say i need to come over at 4. [laughter] and it used to annoy me a lot. why should they have this kind of access? but actually president bush once said he's not influencing me, i'm influencing him. you know, keep them close. this is how i get a message in an hour directly to the king. this is how i get a reply from the king. and it was, actually -- it worked. it worked. a little bit of discounting because you knew some piece of the message was bandar, not the king. basically, it worked. and i think i fully agree that i think tom donilon was for a while the point pan for the saudis. and finish man for the saudis. and the system had not been fixed so there's somebody whom they and we view as the key intermediary s. and that's very unfortunate, was we do want to influence them. even punching under their weight, they obviously have a lot ofen influence in, for example, syria. they have an active syria policy. they have a very active bahrain policy, and we want to maximize our own influence, and we're probably not doing it right now. >> yep. and i think to respond to your, the u.s. having an active role in steering the saudi dir