but these are mostly people who recently left the government so for example mr yeltsin nuclear used to be at the head of the parliament ms tymoshenko or was the prime minister and you shankar was the president so why didn't they sign their so sation agreement with the e.u. when they were in power there was no one to prevent them from doing that they would have done it in their due time and there would be no question arising today why didn't they do it after all. it's one of those i think i've got a legitimate suspicion that this has nothing to do with association with the e.u. this is rather about domestic politics. and the e.u. association is only a trigger all the pretext. so we believe that whoever wins in this political struggle whatever is. there in the future for ukraine we are going to cooperate with ukraine in a format that will be acceptable to the ukrainians themselves but are we going to go are you ok we continue with the questions. and a colleague from siberia. yes it was from the original workers think you think it's a new cause zusak from the city of alms is to put in our

mr. yeltsin, in the first chechen war. the war is deeply personal thing.to call president george w. bush after 9/11. it was out of this sense that we are in the same fight together. but unfortunately russian government policies both federal and regional, have i think exacerbated the socioeconomic problems in the northern caucuses in close proximity to sochi and the other element being of course the radicalization of islamic individual and groups there. jon: right. this umarov, the guy described as the bin laden of russia, in july i'm told he lifted what had been a moratorium on attacks on civilian targets, basically said, anything is fair game to try to keep the sochi olympics from taking place. >> umarov is a curious guy. he claimed responsibility for major terrorist attacks on the moscow metro years ago, the airport in moscow, the train between moscow and st. petersburg. none of these have been confirmed but i think he certainly represents the public face of a very, very loose network of individuals and groups that shares the same ideology. it is not one