mr. mendlesohn as to why you compress the amount of doctors included and maybe you can keep a sharper eye on them. well, maybe, on the other hand, this gets more to the core of this, the decision about what constitutes good care. the decision not being made by you and your particular preferences, but more and more by some centralized authority, whether it is an insurance company or the independent payment advisory board that you spoke of, ipad, the one that people said was false death panel. but it certainly is not really what it was supposed to be, which was more patient centered. it seemed in that respect, at least, not to be. >> we haven't even gotten to the days of ipad, we're not even there, brit, this chestnut awaits the american people. and there is a real question on how it will play out. of course, you think of nancy pelosi, we have to pass the bill before we can see what is in it. americans are starting to see what is in it. they can't keep their plan or their doctor, they can't keep their hospital. and now, it may be that they actually have a bureaucrat telling them what tests