i. commissioner hurtado. commissioner honda >> thank you. the vote is 5 to zero this matter is continued until january 29th. >> we're going to call 7 a and b interest the subject property on 19th avenue. the requester asked we take jurisdiction over the matter which of the issued on june 21st, 2013. the appeal period end and the jurisdiction request was filed on july 11th. the permit holder is here and the project is to complete work completed under a permit. to erect a single-family dwelling. and the next is for the building inspection on 19th avenue protesting the ordinance on july 13th to obtain the final construction under the ordinance. seeing all work is completed and 8 b is filed by affordable housing have the same property address protesting the ordinance of an alteration permit and to change the foundation design tomato foundation. this is a vision to application permit in 2013. and with all 3 matters being heard at the same time the requester and her agent have 17 minutes to present >> so before you commence our statement i want to

but i agree with commissioner hurtado as well that maybe we are not the body that should hear that? >> yeah, i mean, i think march 2012 was the initial application. that's almost 2 years. i think that the department has been reasonable in their actions and has sent two certified mail notices one of which i think was received, one was returned and the other one was received and also an -- e-mail and mr. castillo but for lack of resources he knew he had to pay the money. i don't think the department's actions were unreasonable. i would defer to their administrative discretion on this one. >> is there a motion? >> a motion to deny the appeal. >> you can deny it on the lack of subject matter to jurisdiction. >> that would be my motion, yes. >> you wish to make that? >> yes. >> mr. pacheco? >> are you voting on this appeal or dismissing this appeal? >> we are dismissing this appeal? that's my motion. >> the denial would be you are accepting jurisdiction. >> my motion is to reject the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. >> and there would be a refund. >> right. >> thank you for the clarificat

i want to do that in order. >> item 7. >> i'm willing to move we deny jurisdiction. >> so on that motion to deny the jurisdiction president hwang commissioner hurtado sxhvdz commissioner honda. thank you. the vote is 5 to zero and the jurisdiction is denied no appeal is available >> he let me see if i can craft this. i'm going to move that we grant the appeal >> both appeals. >> both appeals and uphold the permit with the following conditions: one is that the construction permit set of drawings be provided to the appellant, and two, that the agreed upon 24 inches between the bottom of their footing and the bottom of the under pinning be maintained as per dbis review. >> to reflect on the drawings that - >> it doesn't matter it's a condition that's required now. >> could you restate just the item two for me, the condition two. >> yeah. >> would you do that. >> between bottom of permit holders footing. the bottom of permit holders new footing >> between - >> and the bottom of the installed underpinning of appellants property. >> the bottom of installed underpinning of appellants property. >> right. >> okay. i think - and is that clear mr. duffey. you

i move to close into closed session. >> there is a motion to move into closed session. mr. pacheco, please call the roll. >> on that motion from commissioner hurtado to enter into closed session item 12, commissioner fung, president is absent, lazarus, honda. the vote is 4-0. the board is now in clos >>> >>> we are reconvening in open session and i will state that no action was taken during the closing session and the matter is whether or not to disclose information in the session. >> i will move that we not disclose the discussion based on attorney-client privilege. >> mr. pacheco, if you can take the roll on that? >> on that motion from commissioner hurtado to not disclose the content of the closed session, commissioner fung, lazarus, honda, aye. the vote is 4-0 to not disclose the content of the closed session. >> there is no further business. we are adjourned. thank you. >> >> [ meeting is adjourned ] >> >> >> >> >> hello, i am with the recreation and parks department. we are featuring the romantic park location in your backyard. this is your chance to find your heart in santa and cisco with someone special. -- san francisco with someone speci

i will move to adopt. >> any public comment on the minutes? seeing none, mr. pacheco, if you can call the roll please. >> on that motion from commissioner hurried -- hurtado to adopt the january 15, 2014, minutes. commissioner fung, lazarus, honda. the vote is 4-0. those minutes are adopted. >> thank you. before moving on i want to make sure the parties to item no. 9 are here. with the vice-president's consent i would like to suggest the board to consider whether this item 9 should be heard tonight. a demolition permit. the permit holder is requesting the matter be rescheduled. with the vice-president, we can give the parties to discuss regarding the hearing date. if the matter is heard tonight, it can be heard in a normal order. if not, they can not sit through most of the meeting. we would start then with mr. yee. who would have 3 minutes to speak on the date of the hearing. >> good afternoon. i'm with the parks and recreation. the parks and recreation department request that we reschedule this hearing to make a decision on the design. the committee has a three phase review on the process. the project has already received a phase 1 and 2 approval. however, it ha

i move to deny the hearing request. >> we have a motion from commissioner hurtado to deny these rehearing requests. on that motion, commissioner fung? >> aye. >> president hwang? >> aye. >> lazarus? >> aye. >> commissioner honda. >> aye. >> thank you, the vote is 5-0. and all three rehearing requests are denied and notices of decision in order shall be released. we continued item 5 to january 29th. we will hear appeal number 1 3-140, david polatnick, verses the department of planning inspection, with planning department approval, on 1532 coal street protesting the issuance on october 22, 2013 of alteration permit of addition of new office space in rear yard below associated patio and the natural grade and demo exterior rear wall and this is on for hearing tonight. and we can start with the appellant who has seven minutes. >> okay. >> my name is david and thank you for hearing this issue. we have lived at 1526 coal street for over 22 years. and we have a good neighborly relationship with peter and andrea for the last 15 years, an example of this relationship that has been you know, over all of these

i would move to deny the rehearing request. >> okay. mr. pacheco if you can call the roll please. >> on that motion from the president to deny this rehearing request, commissioner fung, aye, commissioner hurtado, aye, lazarus, aye, honda, aye. the vote is 5-0. this hearing request is denied and the order shall be released. >> before i call the next item, i'm going to ask the people standing to take a seat. we have to keep that area clear because of fire codes. you cannot stand on that doorway. we'll hear next items 5abcd. item 5a, 5b, 5c, 5d:the marsh, appellanttss vs. dept. of building inspection, respondent planning dept. approval 1050 valencia street. protesting the issuance on july 17, 2013, to m. rutherford trust / shizuo holdings, demolition permit demolish one-story restaurant building with 2,000sf of ground floor areaa. application no. 2010/12/27/7436. public hearing held dec. 11, 2013. for further consideration today and for the adoption of tentative findings and conditions. 5bb appeal no. 13-096 the marsh, appellanttss vs. dept. of building inspection, respondent planning dept. approval 1050-1058 valencia street. protesting the issuance on july 17, 2013, to m. rutherford trust / shi

and i apologize i didn't call the next 10 speakers, but i believe we have one of our commissioners here, board of appeals director arsenio hurtado, [speaker not understood]. julian harper. jerry elsters. marlene sanchez. karen druckers. pete wilson. manuel la fontaine. >>> good afternoon, supervisors. my name is tess davis representing hospitality house. we want to thank supervisors kim and cohen for their leadership on this important economic justice issue. as a part of the fair chance campaign hospitality house surveyed nearly 400 residents about their experience with housing and job discrimination. of those with arrest or conviction records, nearly 80% experienced job discrimination and 60% housing discrimination. clearly the fair chance act affects a lot of san franciscans. it's about fairness, it's p justice and it's about time. so, thank you. ~ >> thank you, ms. davis. oh, [speaker not understood], just come right up. >>> good afternoon, supervisors. my name is [speaker not understood] and i'm here in my capacity as policy advisor for the national center for lesbian rights. thank you, supervisor kim, for sponsoring this cr

and i apologize i didn't call the next 10 speakers, but i believe we have one of our commissioners here, board of appeals director arsenio hurtado, [speaker not understood]. julian harper. jerry elsters. marlene sanchez. karen druckers. pete wilson. manuel la fontaine. >>> good afternoon, supervisors. my name is tess davis representing hospitality h.

i will move that we not disclose the discussion based on attorney-client privilege. >> mr. pacheco, if you can take the roll on that? >> on that motion from commissioner hurtado to not disclose the content of the closed session, commissioner fung, lazarus, honda, aye. the vote is 4-0 to not disclose the content of the closed session. >> there is no further business. we are adjourned. thank you. >> >> [ meeting is adjourned ] >> >> >> >>adjourned. ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ hello and welcome to this presentation. i'm san francisco purrs since that time we've helped people clean up their criminal records. we created this to help you understand how this worked. we'll plan or explain all the steps. after watching this program you'll know what to expect after completing the process. hi, there are i'm deputy and i'm part of the clean slate team. the first thing we will need to know whether your despicable to have our convictions dismissed can't be on parole or currently charged with a crime or serving a sentence and it must be from san francisco. while your colleagues will get to know your circumstances there are 3 steps. getting the clean slate process started it simple you can get

i have a motion. >> so moved. all in favor, thank you, everybody. thank you. >>> >> joining me is the vice-president with commissioner hwang, hurtado and fong will be absent this evening. to my left is our city attorney and he'll provide any information tonight and victor pacheco. i'm cynthia goldstein, the executive board of director. we have matters before the board. carla is

i move to adapt the minutes. >> any public comment on the minutes? seeing none, please call the roll >> on that motion from the president to adapt the december 18, 2013, minutes on that motion commissioner fung. commissioner hurtado. commissioner lazarus. the vote is 5 to zero those minutes are adapted >> call item 4 next. michael schaffer vs. the planning department and the subject property is on cannon street to chris cob to repair and replace existing stairway and for the egress to provide new supports and imply with noticed of violation. commissioners you recall the parties asked for a continuance and the revised plans were needed. the patent has been here perhaps you've had more luck in reaching the permit holder >> i vanltd. i'm michael shaving by the way. at this time we have no news from mr. cob providing the plans i requested the plans but have not heard back from him and i will add we reached an inform agreement we'll actually pull our appeal and i wanted to hear back but everyone disappeared during the holidays. i spoke with many cob on monday he was going to discuss with his contractor and get back to us >> is it your view its detailed because of the holidays will you continue this. >> i'll think fine

commissioner bill brat on the. >> as a new yorker as a u.s. citizen, i can only express disgust at the actions of the individuals involved in this scheme. >> reporter: among those charged, louis hurtadot all while telling the new york police department he was disabled with neck injuries and psychological problems. he's accused of taking over $424,000 in 24 years. prosecutors say the total could reach $400 million. more than half the cases came from those claiming the events of 9/11 left them unfit to work. attorney brian griffin is representing esposito. he says his client honorably served the nypd. >> so this is a difficult time for him personally but, again, he stood up he stood against it and said the two most important words which is "not guilty." they were coached how to talk to doctors, fail memory tests and address member benefits. some go back to 1988. manhattan city attorney cyrus vance jr. >> any disappointment that it took this long to uncover? >> i would urge legislators to look at the amount of funds to investigate on an ongoing basis. i think it's fair to say they desperately need more resources. >> keep in mind even though this stretches back to the '80s it was only no