you've got up until recently universal health care you have the n.h.s. which is the jewel of the post-war welfare state you could say. but is it true if you look at the economics of health care for a second if you're trying to deliver health care which means a lot of pills a lot of bandages a lot of scalpels a lot of stuff a lot of doctors is the best the government go out into the market and buy stuff on a wholesale basis and then deliver the savings to the health care user in other words. by breaking it up and by having all these competing special groups privatized groups by definition they're going to compete with each other and drive costs up i mean isn't the point of having government backed health care that it's cheaper so you know. speak on the little bit no absolutely you know and that was the original vision is a national system and you touched upon you know national procurement on the n.h.s. needs to a lot better but basically in h.s. isn't so much a monopoly it's what we call a monopsony it's you know it's it controls the buyer's market we shou