any major construction project, will phase challenges and prosido parkway is no exception. i would say that probably the single greatest challenge facing the concessionaire now, is working with collectively working with cal transand the prosido trust, it is landowner and it is very demanding and they are very protective of park interests. and they can be exacting and the source of data, that they have asked the contractor to produce before issuing the permits or granting design approvals and the concessionaire has worked to try to establish an effective working relationship with the trust and i am pleased to report that it certainly is going much better now than it was at the beginning of phase two, we are seeing progress and we are optimistic that it will continue and the parties will continue to work together effectively and the project will stay on schedule. and the transportation authority is working to engage in diplomacy and the opinions that arise among the concessionaires that the city trust and cal trans. that concludes my presentation and i would be happy to take

on the prosido parkway, the project under deputy director, and his team's work in collaboration with cal transmoved forward into the phase two pthree portion of the project, and phase one was just our design build, and did build, excuse me, and phase, with cal transthat opened up on april, 2012 and we began the year, phase two portion that is the p3, with the partner and so that partner continues, a pace. and i encourage you to come out and tour, and let us know if you would be interested in that. >> on the central subway, we saw the launch of the tunnel boring machines. we are seeing a lot of work in the area and it is also been a very strong project in terms of the construction and it is construction management and we are trying to work on finalizing the funding plan for a remaining gap as well as dedicating ourselves to partnering with the city and transbay, joint powers authority on the dtx portion of the phase two portion and trying to come up with the strong plans for that. electrickfiation moved ahead and our project and our work ahead this year, on the island ramps and we jus

just my two cents on this as a close observer of doyle drive and the prosido parkway my bias is to feel favorable about the availability payment and the design build finance maintain, i think you know, i hope, i hope that we can work something, like that out. and i do think that the question about the structure of the agreement, between the cal train jpa and the transbay jpb is the whole question, at this point, the d, is being done by this agency. and hopefully, with complete input in concur ans with cal train. and i trust that that is okay. and as we get into the other end of the operate and maintain, and it is very clear to me that the operation of the rail service in the main nens of the rail line is going to have to be one entity, there is a clear line at the terminal. and there can be a different entity to prepare and operatele terminal itself. and as we get into the builds though there are interesting questions and i would really like to understand the options and other kinds of deeper coordination and in general i like the structure of your report today where you are giving us a

and it connects to the interchange with prosido parkway as it approaches the golden gate bridge. but that is, if i am understanding it correctly, that is not the dethank detour, it was reconstructed under phase one and it is completed. there are some traffic or lane adjustments that are being made to the approaches to the golden gate bridge as part of phase two construction, but those are construction phasing activities that, the really is not, you know, other than the fact that phase one itself is serving as a detour, that is the only facility that constitutes a detour on the project but what they may be referring to is the fact that one of the ramps was closed at the beginning of the project, and it connects northbound one to southbound 101 and that will remain closed until it is completed. >> 2016? >> we expect the traffic shift to occur in late 2015. and the january 2016 date, and the substantial completing and that sort of for everything and the actual traffic shift to the facility should occur, late 2015. >> thank you. if are there are no other questions, let's open up up f