the third thing i would call, i would call it the merlin parkins are mutual of omaha files. for those of us old enough to remember, marlon perkins hosted mutual of omaha's wild kingdom but he never got dirty down with wildlife. it was jim. jim would go down and do all the hard fighting. we will just go out on other armies to do our fighting for us. all we need is an advisory capability. an incredibly important capability but not in and of itself a solution to the problem of future war. the fourth thing that bothers me i think is this id you can opt out. this is really a narcissistic approach to the problem of war, warfare that really, that we can just decide ourselves and it doesn't give any agency to our enemies, which i think is dangerous, and, of course, we would i think engage in that wishful thinking at our own peril. so the degree to which these fallacies gain traction, we risk i think decisions that would've imbalance our forces and not give us the kind of capabilities we need to prevent conflict, to deter conflict, to respond to crises. and then and really which was