ms. keneally. >> is that correct? >> my understanding is under sections 6105 and they are the internal revenue code we cannot address specific responses. >> okay. do we at some point have they test of the swiss government's ability to provide u.s. client names in a test case for them? >> senator i would have to problems responding to that. one would be timing and it would be brought by 6105. that's my understanding, yes senator. >> okayed go back and look at the document if you would and take a look at paragraph 3 of that dot emit. to assess the feasibility of such agreements the department of justice reasonably expects to produce safe february 14, 2012 complete account records for 100 to 150 accounts covered by 1026, 2011 treaty request. do you see that? >> it that is directed to me, i see it, yes senator. >> so that is our.ment, right? >> that's my understanding. >> we made reference to a treaty request. does this violate the law? >> i don't know, sir and i don't have personal knowledge of the document or the treaty

ms. kathryn keneally talk about it. we don't know how many people really put that in there.we knew we would be more federal we know it is a sizable number. >> senator, all i can say on that is the set this prominent place in late august. 106 swiss financial institutions can forward. you had asked me in august or september i would not an anticipated