. >> carol followed by todd perish and then randel. >> i'm a resident of oakland. i hate to say how long about, but in the mid 1970s i was apart of the bart study which was the muni adjustment to fit bart. that was a popular study because even though muni lost revenue, it also cut cost because the downtown lakes were replaced with cross towns. i was asked to do the second study which was bigger called the palm study. i was the director of the muni marketing study and if this case muni got into it a big way. the financial and manager said, if you want to add service go, ahead but you cut it some where. it had to be equal. in your case it's not that way because you're restoring service that was cut so there has to be increase in cost. i want to point out there was a huge amount of cost discipline imposed upon on back then. i don't think your planners knows the cost effect of this. another one which i'm reminded because of what i've heard today, field work. we did a youth -- we did a huge amount of field work. they had talked to the individuals out there and they knew

i said to acknowledge randell knox he was a former commissioner at the board of appeals in the destroying - sfoifks were that the introduction of the new conditions i assume you're asking us to incorporate the things in red under the condition part and i was concerned a lot about the long wall on the adjacent building which i think it being taken care of of with acoustic materials the block wall is that part of the building that's adjacent shall be covered one hundred percent with acoustical material. i don't know if you can put stuff open the adjacent building because you don't own it >> it's an automobile shop we have access to that. >> it applies to a property adjacent so i'm not sure that's enforceable from our standpoint it, it's a good thing to do you also have a separate agreement with the neighborhood; is that correct. >> that's correct. >> i guess with that i'll go ahead and make a motion to approve with the conditions including the additional conditions that were passed up by staff and to make note that condition - which one is it - condition 3 under enjoys the eastern concreteb

i have to comment the city planning department in the form of randell and the others arc closets did american people exceptional job to move the process the fact that document was approved overnight is really remarkable we're in debt to them with virtually no impacts to the schedule. along the lines the pcm team who got us to this point out the folks and the turner jack adams have done an excellent job of making that smooth it's a racket effort on all folks parts >> go plan ahead. >> i thought the excavation had been completed. >> no, it didn't start until that past tuesday. >> what part of the project was still being - the court: yeah. so the remains were discovered during the trenching and 3 and a half foot down to install that had we not had the gore thermal system this wouldn't have been discovered. >> i'm wondering it sound like the analysis is to be done any guesses you're willing to share and now and the likelihood of finding more. >> to answer the question between the time we met with the m l d and the plan approved we brought in a geoarc closet that analyzed the stones and t

the only democrat i found attractive in the last few cycles has been ed randel.the unions. he is relatively candid. he obviously has broad appeal. [laughter] >> here is a question. who is your pick for 2016? >> a response to something mickey just said. right before the 2008 elections you and i had an ongoing and vicious debate out over which one would be more enthusiastic about amnesty, mccain or obama? i will admit it is close in the end. obama is trying to do everything he can. it is not elected republicans. it is the american people stopping republicans. that is probably the best hope. they used to think everything was about sex. now i realize everything is about immigration. it determines every single other issue. of course that is how we have to pick our presidential nominee. mitt romney was the most aggressive on immigration. in a way it was very appealing. in the first debate he had one of the best answers. he had two weeks to write an answer. do you want to give them driver's license? they had already done that. mitt romney said i will not appeal to hispa