but if you change that difference in the temperature between the two regions, you change the speed of the large-scale weather systems that move around the planet. as you change the temperature gradient, these weather systems start to move more slowly through our atmosphere, and you can get more extreme conditions such as droughts and floods that just last longer in a particular region because these weather systems are moving that much slower. and so there is a connection between what happens in the arctic and weather in the lower latitudes. and we knew that if the planet started to warm and you start melting snow and you start melting ice, then you're gonna have this sort of feedback effect that's gonna amplify the warming because you're gonna warm up. you're gonna melt more snow. you're going to melt more ice. it's going to further warm everything up and melt more and more snow and ice, so you have this really vicious positive feedback. so we knew that the arctic was very sensitive to increases in temperature, and it's responding like you would expect it to as the temperatures have w

we're discussing climate change. the reports say it's di textible and threatening the lives of millions of people economically and physically. joining me now executive director of new jersey future, a group working on sustainable development in the state. in our washington studio, sherry good man, senior vice president of cna corporation an independent research firm and from new york, bor jn, let met starred with you. does it sound like the icpp is coming down to a view of the world that we have to get ready for what is happening now? >> no, i think oppenheimer pointed it out very well. when hurricane sandy hit we had a mayor that had talked a lot about climate change and talking about carbon emissions. get more wetlands, protective barriers, simple things that will happen, and help with all the hurricanes that have happened here that have nothing to do with global warming. smart things to do , adaptation and we should not let long term globalization get in the way of that there are unique places, tightly vulnerable

to make those changes. marcel ball chorus embarrass myself thanks very much and trent was in germany a bracing for major disruptions later this week when pilots with wilsons ago on a three day strike the airline has announced that counseling was four thousand flights a pilot said europe's biggest air carrier had been in negotiations over their pay packets for two years now their union says that all that time management has failed to make any concrete offers it's one of the biggest strikes in kansas history. the three day walk on is scheduled to start into the middle of the week to germany's biggest airline says it will make the stomach and legs but domestic and international flights on tuesday. this week the cabinet he would like to avoid this especially since it's the third strike in five weeks. will try to restart negotiations as soon as possible because the strike itself does not solve the problem is this weekend this time as the company's high lead to a pre testing data mining of the race and one of tho

changing your password, and especially changing any passwords that you've used multiple times is really the best course of action that regular users can take rights now. >> robert, why do you have to change them all? and why do you have to go to places that you don't use as often or go to places where you haven't signed on for a long time, and change the passwords even there? >> so the idea behind changing a password has been around for quite some time. aside from this particular issue. you should change your passwords periodically. at least semi annually if not annually. most corporations that have sensitive data requires their employees to change them quarterly. that's a good practice to get into. upper case, lower case, numbers, so forth. by changing your passwords you make it more difficult for a criminal to access your accounts as long as they are considered what i astrong pass ward. you should be changing your passwords quarterly, semi annually. for those websites that you don't really visit and there isn't much data on them. an e-mail is a critical account. for a bad guy to own t

chang. >> okay. great. so thank you. again ms. reynolds i want to talk about the double parking issue it is something that sfmta and sf pd can do given the pcos could do it's frustrating for cyclists so have trucks and major vehicles blocking the bike lane and parking in that area that's the only place they can park pushing bikers out into the street but important that vehicles can see around the double parking. the project delivery the flow charts will be helpful and the suggestions on how we can improve and what other cities are doing. and also you mentioned the use of consistence it's my understanding that dwp has been able to use consultant to help deliver their projects on time and budget and having that conversation with sfmta is incredibly important especially, if we're able to convince the voters to support the go bond and the vehicle license fees and if we push sfmta to deliver quicker is something that wyoming can help us. so at this time i'll open this up for public comment on item 4. if you want to speak step forward a

it isn't just climate change. there is a host of ways in which we are changing the planet on a geological scale so much you have probably heard we should rename the time we live in. we official live in the time before the ice age after people because people have replaced the great forces of geology of the past. these are big things. it isn't about spending more time helping the money or donating even though those things with great and i recommend them but it is matter of getting our minds around ways in which what we are doing that seems ordinary is just changing the planet on a permanent bases. thank you. thanks a lot. [ applause ] >> if you would like to get a book signed, we will line up in front of the stage right here. >> on the next washington journal we will look at the financial disclosure statements for candidates on how much money they are raising. the chairman of the federal election committee, lee goodman, will join us on how his case has been effected by the changes. and keith johnson will focus on th

nothing changed.ond with positivity and possibilities rather than frustration and being overwhelmed by the magnitude of problem. so human center approach. >> thanks. >> this is just incredible. i really -- and there are lots of words. >> of me as your question. exactly. it's clear why the children are open to this. but how do you convince the teachers that this is -- that this can work in that this is so important for the kids? can i convince you? there. i don't know. i just -- i am hopeful because of seeing that happen. begin 700 stories of change. this year will reach 10,000 because to go deeper because we get 15 and the stories of change. there is this need. there is this gap. people are feeling it, recognizing that they don't have to be ruthless leaders. and there's an opening to the concept of doing it is important. the spotlight on education was always aware the smartest, strong this. nobody was empathetic or concerned or kind of a jenners. are not saying you have to be the strongest. if we

no changes in forward guidance language.gest changes have to do with the economy, there is a sense that the fed sees traction in the economy. information received since the fomc

three changes are all of them -- three changes. all of them were editorial. none of them were substantive. there have been allegations that the white house wrote the talking points. there've been allegations -- >> cooking the books? >> cooking the books. there have been allegations that the white house made significant changes to the talking points. not true. even that they told me to make changes. not true. none of that is true. none of it. >> there is also mccain and graham suggesting you're lying. >> yes. here's what happened. i am really sorry that they came away with this impression. i have many faults, but one of them is not lying. here is what happened. here's what happened. he white house asked me to join susan with a meeting with john mccain and senator graham. >> at what point? >> this is in november. this is sometime later. this is in november when she is being criticized by them and others for the way she handled herself on the sunday shows. the white house asked me to go -- she wanted to go talk to the three of them and hear their concerns and be

emily chang. a major security flaw could affect two thirds of all internet servers and delete sensitive data vulnerable to hackers. we will tell you what you need -- asw. and will comcast gets grilled by senators on their deal with time warner cable. but first top headlines. tech stocks are rising tonight. the selloff has caused some tech titans huge numbers to read when you added up, the top billion dollars have lost $11.5 billion in the selloff. jeff bezos, mark zuckerberg, bill gates -- they all lost more than $1 billion each in four days of trading. m.i.t. has put a professor back on the stand as it tries to win a patent infringement case against samsung. he provides evidence that he says shows consumers are less willing to buy samsung products without the features that infringe on apple patents. and website registration and dy hasg company go dad lined up bankers for its ipo. it aims to go public in the fall. story of thelead day, editor-at-large cory johnson with us. were talking about this

and that is changing. in many places where i've been working in the last 10 or 15 years, this is startling in front of one's eyes. even before the report the number of famines facing already fairly dry places becoming desperately dry. higher temperatures meaning that the soils dry out of moisture because there's more evaporation taking place. and what i would stress, even beyond the very dire superb report, i think it's excellent in every way. the capacity of our societies to address this is actually less than the report suggests because the report talks about the potential for zillions. i see before my eyes for every day the potential for collapse. >> let me bring that home. >> rose: let me make sure i understood. i was right with you when you said the capacity to respond to this is worse. >> sometimes economists, my own tribe sometimes says well, okay, it's a bad shock but we're creative, resilient, we'll adapt. but sometimes you don't get adaptation, you get collapse. even from a relatively modest shock

it won't stop climate change.here people just don't believe in science, that is something that has to change or we can never effectively grapple not only with this problem, but whole raft of issues and are highly technological society. what the future holds in that regard is hard to tell. i'm not the first one to point out to you this country is polarized terrifically politically. this is a problem that if it is going to be solved, goes to the root of our energy system. we need a bipartisan approach to solving it. the political rhetoric and action that is freezing everything these days really gets in the way. before we continue, i would like you to talk about some of the work that oxfam has done and its experience with people on the ground dealing with the impacts of, change. you've spoken specifically about interrogation program in zimbabwe, for instance. can you talk about the impact already being felt in many parts of the world as a consequence of climate change? >> absolutely. oxfam is working in many countrie

this is a systemic change. when you make systemic changes it is risky for individuals, stakeholders and there are a lot of honest concerns in this room that we value and respect. that being said, this is a systematic change and this is the first time in memory that mta has a chance to redesign our muni from the ground up. when you have systematic changes picking it piece by piece is ineffective. we understand that there are real honest concerns, but i would ask that before we start knit picking apart this entire project, let's implement it and look very carefully at what doesn't work. because on balance it is our belief that these are really really good set of changes and the system of changes will affect 99 percent of muni riders and san franciscans for the better. thank you for your time and thank you for hearing our concerning. we encourage you to support the tep forward. >> hi, my name is marie sorenson. i live on 24th and new hampshire. is this the street scape meeting also for 24th? okay. i went to the me

there is no doubt that the climate is changing and has been changing for a number of years. you can see it both in the measurements that they have been taken rigorously over the last number of decades and also in the increasing number of events that are taking place largely in the water related events, whether they be floods or droughts or things like hurricane katrina or superstorm sandy. >> temperature changes. are we experiencing that? a number of studies conflict that we are facing global warming today. quite i did not think that is true. the studies also show that the temperatures are rising. i think you are referring to the fact they have not risen that much over the last decade. scientists talk a lot about why that is true. when we talk about climate change, people are focused very heavily on the temperature in the air. there are a number of different ways in which climate change happens. even when the temperature has leveled off in the air, it would explain this a variety of ways, the temperatures in the oceans have continued to rise. the melting around the poles has

the climate changes is happening and appearing inur lifetime. very soon society will have no choose but to address climate change now. if we don't take the responsible action we've been forced to react, down the line. this is great work on this report my concern is we have city government that's at odds with itself on one side of the aisle we have huge effort to flake to respond to the crisis of climate change and a report that lays out the steps and laid out the clear steps and retransacted some of the steps especially clean power sf. i think the work that the department has put out needs to be shared so i welcome the department to be here and welcomed the mayor's office but i've declined the environment director has decided not to come or has made an excuse not to be here. what's remarkable about the strategy we have a good strategy there's language in the report that was redacted that was a package in the original pdf we talked about the goals for renewable energy we wanted to be at one hundred percent renewableable energy on the commercial s

this is a systemic change. when you make systemic changes it is risky for individuals, stakeholders and there are a lot of honest concerns in this room that we value and respect. that being said, this is a systematic change and this is th

climate's always been changing. the earth's climate is changing since it was formed. it's happening now at such a rapid rate, you have to look at what human activity is doing to exacerbate that natural trend. and we're all going to be better off if we start to slow that down. and i'm starting to move away now even from talking to people about climate change as a major issue and how about clean air. if we can get rid of some of the pollutants and greenhouse gases contain them. mercury, carbon. let's say just for no other reason, i don't want to argue with you about whether humans are the cause of it. i happen to believe we're contributing mightily to this for how we're changing our land use by paving over open space, cutting down trees. all those things are having a major contribution. let's just talk about having a healthier life because we're cleaning up the air. >> this is fascinating to me. what you've said is i don't even think -- i can't talk to people about this because it's become so entrenched. i'm just trying to run around it and talk about clean air. we don'

if we compare the small change in position to the small change in time, we get a ratio, "dp/dt," andon is changing with time, which we commonly refer to as the planet's velocity. so if we use this ratio dp/dt, which represents the planet's velocity, to write a calculation of its velocity in relation to the forces of the sun, we create a differential equation. we call it a differential equation because it's an equation relating very small differences or differentials. this kind of equation describes how the planet's motion changes dependent upon its relative distance to the sun and the other planets. differential equations can be used to understand more than just the movements of the planets. they can be used to study other systems where physics describes the pushing and pulling of objects on each other. often the scale and complexity of these systems are such that it is only through mathematics that we can simplify and understand them. this simplification will take a big system and turn it into a system of coupled differential equations. these can then be investigated on the computer

so, yes, if we were to make a change to one without making a change to the other, it probably could be an ugly situation. again, this is going to be a systemic change, it's going to be staggered and put the in place so that you are not left hanging. we do understand and we under the policy and governance that people have built their lives around these transit lines and we note what supervisor wiener said about the letter about the wilder street and the 35 is that we want to connect that to bart. it's so important to make those regional transit connections and the bus has to go down somebody's street to get there. while we appreciate that, the people that don't have a bus on their street don't want a bus on the street and we also appreciate the people that want a bus on the street want to keep a bus on their street. i think the staff has done a great job in addressing those. i'm concerned about the lower haight concern. i know julie can address that. i saw the grid that came out in the e-mail exchange that came out. the jackson, we should look at the three rider ship and the reliability

the world is changing.am not sympathetic to is the idea of litigating try to kill versus take a step back, work with people and explore technology and bring efficiencies to the market. >> it sounds like you feel sorry for them because their business model, in your view, is dying. feeldon't think anyone can sorry for executives making $100 million a year. generalpathetic in a sense. i am aware that the market is changing and evolving. i think all of us are. >> unless they change, they are going to get caught flat-footed. maybe by aereo or whoever else. sayobody will sit here and it is not inevitable. it is inevitable it will transfer to online. there will be more choice. nothing online sells for $300 a month. except maybe a very small niche club. >> we will have much more on chet kanojia and aereo as your tv is on trial. we will be back. ♪ >> welcome back to our special coverage of your tv on trial in the case against aereo. the me is a special guest, former acting solicitor general of the u.s. and now a par

climate change and extreme weather that may be linked to climate change. damages from that amount to something like $1 billion in global domestic product a year already. that is projected to increase greatly in the future if we continue on the course we are on. >> it leads to the possibility of conflict over land or circumstances produced by the scarcity. quick sometimes it is just unbelievable. maybe it is believable but sometimes it is odd how these things play out. i happen to be for the u.n. in brazil at the beginning of last week. brazil has a major drought right now. the kind of disturbance one expects with more frequency and this one could be an example of that. the water level in the reservoirs is down to something like 15% of where it should be. real crisis. with everybody sounding the savings, nothing like that. they have the world cup coming up and they have elections. the politicians are terrified even to mention any change of behavior, any change of reaction, any response. the people in the know are just sitting there. are we really going to g

changes are being suggested. the only substantive changes are being suggested by the fbi and state department. the white house suggests two changes, both of them editorial. when the director saw them, he asked that they add two things. he asked that they add language reflecting the significant warnings that we have provided in the months leading up to the attack in benghazi. we had been writing for months that the security situation in eastern libya in general and in benghazi in particular was deteriorating. he also asked that we add the fact that we sent a cable to cairo just hours before the mob attack in cairo, warning cairo embassy that it was coming. he wanted that added to the talking points as well. at this point, i still don't even know they exist, i don't know they have been asked for. >> the director has added to the talking points. >> i don't know that he has done this, right? so about 5:00 on a friday night, his chief of staff comes to me -- >> 5:00 on the night of -- >> friday night, the night before

because he someone who created change over time and change that is still with us today. but there are other people and i just mention this is the 50th anniversary and thinking about people like bob moses, david dennis. there is such an amazing range of people who participated. and again the stories of people who would go into a battleground to try to create change. those are american heroes of the highest calling. but we forget sometimes the courage that they are exhibiting at the american dream. sometimes we forget people who played a larger role than doctor king. people who have been active in terms of the local naacp working with a woman by the name of joann robinson who was a professor at alabama state to put into place what king ultimately leads. join robinson has a strong and capable mind. you know, she had been involved with getting black and white women together in a women's local council in montgomery in advance and she was the person who had helped rosa parks get to the highlander school, which was a school that was educating miners and social activists around

it is the predicate for legislative change, social change, public opinion shift in your favor. i can think of two wonderful examples, everyone would be familiar with the letter from the birmingham jail by dr. king which is not only briton for the new york times also a pamphlet by christian groups, civil rights groups with the intent of changing public perception about the urgency or the need of civil rights protests and civil rights revolution in the country. did these people are agitators', they don't understand how difficult it is to change this culture, why do they foment these confrontations that lead to violence. so with king in much the way of any pamphleteer throughout history sort of nailing his letter to the church door and appealing to for a shift in the way americans thought about race and it would prove highly effective. the second example i would cite to you quickly comes from experience i recently had. it is in "eyes on the prize" but i went through an experience recently where a group of congressmen and women went south, 50 years, next year will be 50 years after

morell, we didn't have to change because you made the changes for them. that's why you're in front of this committee today. you made significant substantive changes for the white house, whether it was on -- but we know you are the ones that made the changes. not the individuals on the ground who had eyewitness testimony and who sent you a cable that it was not april 10th, that was an attack. those were intentionally ignored. so, ma'am, do you believe that we should have accepted the chief of station's view without question that there was a protest. >> i believe the totality of the information was obvious and there was a mis-intention of the public. >> if you believe we should have accepted his explanation of what happened, you need to accept his view it to could have been a video that motivated it that night. >> we spoke with him yesterday behind closed doors. he as adamant from the very beginning that this was not a spontaneous protest. we heard from him directly yesterday, that at no time did he believe it was based upon the video. it isn't just him. it

we also changed our assumption for the city to change, for the radio replacement project as well as our financial system replacement project. both of those projects currently have estimated cost of about $70 million each. so $15 million really serves as a down payment on any project of that magnitude. you can see also the cost of the homeless supplemental are in this projection. kind of stepping back to a higher level, the projection over all takes the budget that was adopted by the board last year as it's starting point. it doesn't, it uses that as the basis for projections. the projection assumes that the economy continues to recover and that's reflected in our revenue of growth projections, but the pace of that recovery will be dependent both on the national economy as well as what happened in our local technology industry in particular. we do not project a recession in the 4-year period, so every year of this projection, we assume that revenues will continue to grow. we make, we don't assume any major changes to service level and the number of employers beyond the levels that we hav

from the sunday improvement we have higher pressing responsibilities than traffic improvement not change the requirements but really just focus our resources on high priority needs that helps to answer the mayors call of addressing the concerns about sunday parking in prairie the high rate of citations and those have a high revenue impact but given the strength of the mayors resolve and the concerns from the community that pursuing one of the options would be a good faith gesture while preserving the meter. i made reference to that with discussions about market street and the evening rush hours generally using the beneficiary marks to which is one of the reasons the voters wanted this we want to focus on managing traffic at special events but throughout the city on daily events >> so >> some good news people are safest with the muni and people use the muni not only for work to get around the city. it's good information for us to have it's not at all a suggestion we should sit back in the if many people are unsatisfied but what we can do in the budget by enhancing the service and enhancin

i have to say i've seen every bureaucratic obstacle to making changes. and it's not just one department it's, you know, all departments at one point or another gets into the act of obstructing pedestrian improvements and at times bike improvements as well. it's incredibly frustrating in addition you've got a planning and community process and finally put together the money and have a great plan and run the bureaucratic gaunlt let another department swoops in and it's also, you know, someone who's, you know, maybe not talking to someone else in the same department and ends upococcus problems and if you don't have a supervisors office involved some of the projects die or get water down. it's a terrible system in terms of how we work among our departments pr i authorized along with supervisor yee a year and a half to create an enter departmental working group when you have disagreements that committee has not convened yet which is frustrating i know there will be subsequent agendas madam chair but i want to be sure we're including i've heard occupational yo

the latest governmental panel on climate change report last week made clear that climate change is hittingvery part of the world, every continent, and we're not doing a very good job of dealing with it. so we talk about the drought in texas in the third episode. we talked about the storm superstorm sandy. even when climate change is affecting people far away like in syria, it affects us in america. there is no escape. we are all tied together here. it doesn't matter what your politics is. that is another point i want to make. >> we only have a few seconds left in the segment. could you talk about why you don't have a segment on the xl pipeline? >> sure. work,y these tv series you have to get episodes done and in the can and headed off to showtime a couple months in advance. the president had said, as you may know, he said a month or two ago he was going to make the decision in a couple months. we were having to do these episodes, and knowing that would be broadcast -- they will be broadcast on showtime sunday night at 10:00 and then there are nine total episodes. it will go from mid april

and change. nicholas is a professor at harvard who found if your friends are obese, you are 45% more likely to be obese, yourself. if your friends are obese, it's 25%. if your friend's friend's friend's, you are 10 more more likely even if you have never met them. >> that's hour interconnected we are. when people feel a sense of love and support and community, they are much more likely to make lifestyle choices that aren't self destructive and be health. >> americans spent $329,000,000,000 on prescription medicine last year. are we focusing our resources on the wrong solution? dr. orn issue weighs in. he will answer your questions when we come back, like this one >> dr. ornish do you think there is too much focus on women's weight and not enough on women's health? >> as america strives for energy independence... >> we can't do it on just solar panels or some wind turbines... >> we look to alternatives >> you are sitting on top of a time bomb >> and the familiar... >> it's amazing what oil can do

it can be changed. and i think that that sort of where the problem lies that we have a lot more transient residents in many districts now. but i say, if you are in dog patch and you want something different, i say get involved with your group and go to your supervisor and make the change. it can be done. >> commissioner dwight's comments of neighborhoods changing, i'm in upper market with huge changes with all of this new building and more new buildings coming and the thing that worries me the most, that we do have a lot of ground-floor retail coming on the market. and with the neighborhood groups, sometimes people want something and we don't get it. 95% of the people wanted a traders joe and told no. 95% of the people wanted a chipoltes and we were told no. so what worries me with certain controls being tested, there i'm just afraid of what you said to see a lot of vacancis and developers -- and sometimes a formula retail can subsidize that. my neighborhood is definitely changing with 3,000 new people

if i can go through the changes from the larger scope changes to the smaller ones. will start in the lower right hand corner. we have modified the garage entry from what was previously approved in the december 7, 2011, hearing. we feel it's a better configuration for the garage. it's actually subterranean garage in the basement. it's a smaller garage door. the opening is 11 feet. the garage door is about 10 feet wide previously 16-foot garage door was approved in the level above that in the basement level. if you look at the top right hand corner, we made a series of changes to the 1940 addition of the building. if you see that corner that is a small in fill of the notch between the original 1895 structure and the 1980 addition. the decks were reconfigured slightly. the deck was raised 18 inches from the previous reconfiguration, to support the load of the new deck. if we head towards the front of the house, the entry porch we are proposing to repair the existing steps and landing. there is a decorative tile on the landing as noted. if you go to the corner, lower co

next is a change in maternal health funding. we got approval from the state to shift our target at management program to the state's maternal child health program. what this does is allows us to reduce some of the administrative burden because the reporting requirements for targeted case management was quite significant. in addition the reimbursement rate under maternal child health is a little more robust so it enables us to reduce our some of those public health field nurses to provide services under the nurse family partnership. and this is a more robust, intensive and preventive model of care where we actually do more intensive case management and we work more closely with high risk clients. it's actually evidence based and we have evidence to show there's improvement in outcomes and so we want to sort of put our resources into that. we will still continue a lot of the field nursing work that we're doing, but we just want to be focus more on the outcomes for our patients. next at laguna honda rehab and home health we're goin

so what's changing? again there's a lot of items before you and if you have any questions please don't hesitate to ask but there's 2 basic changes in setting rates so math and structure so the math part of it -- we're proposing rates for the next 4 years in terms of of the math that averages for a single family residential customers using 6 units of water average annual increase between 7.8 and 9.8 percent the structural changes, the bullets below i'll describe and the project has been underway for the past year and started a year ago and it's progressed to today with this rates proposal we've had our budget workshop held with this commission back in november to gain some input from you folks on what you would like to see in the rates package we've had 10 meetings and over ninety presentations to rate pay er groups and in terms of next steps important for the public to understand will present today action scheduled for may 13th the package has been delivered to the board of supervisors who have a right t

john: the problem is climate change? >> the problem is giving our kids and their kids a planet we'll be happy to give them and happy to live on giving them a better standard of life than our parents gave us. d-fashionened values and you as a conservative should be embracing not ridiculing them. john: well, just for clarity, i don't call myself a conservative, a call myself a libertarian. big difference. >> i'm sure there is. i'm learning that now. john: but -- don't you want to preserve the planet for your children? >> absolutely, we all do. our current path, as we saw in the clip. what is the path in it's a sound path. we reduced air emissions 70% since 1980 and the trend is going down, we're doing a great job. john: let's be clear, when people hear the crisis about greenhouse gases, they think the air is getting dirtier. you agree, as far as the bad stuff we inhale, the particulates, sulfur dioxide, that stuff has gone down. >> clean water does work. we have to keep making them work. the clean water act, all the rivers

credit risks, cultural changes. structural changes.ket reaction was quite neutered -- muted. is good news, if you like, the surplus of $7.7 billion. not so good news, exports. >> the premier giving an address to the forum. saying a lot of things. we have heard him down play the 7.5% growth target. we -- he seems to be going along with that message. >> what he was saying, it will be about -- magic word, about -- 7.5%. he is concerned about the slowing down. but they are aiming for it. he said, we can handle all risks and challenges. not resorting to short-term stimulus. can handle all possible risks, china doesn't fly giving us longer-term -- does imply stimulus longer-term. >> exclusive interviews live from the wealth management summit in doubles. manus cranny is there. mark, today date -- in doubles, wealth advisors. a public representation of what happens at the meeting every month. behind closed doors. ringing the guys and girls to go out there and talk to the voting errors. -- to the billionaires. we just heard from part of the asi

as mentioned before, there are some changes to the rate structure. tier one customers are going to increase and we looked at largely through a bell curve as commissioner moran indicated to see where that falls and we found changing to the 4 cf rate was the right way to go given that that's where the majority of the utilization was in the profile the customer base for single families the five service rate included customer service cost and we looked at how that was being done and we have recommendations, an observation on how future rates would be -- apologies sorry: cell phone ring. >> since we're smoothing out the rates for water, we thought we should smooth out the rates for wastewater over time. and then the revised methodology for calculating capacity charges we also looked at. information -- we felt that there was that we both as a body as well as staff had made considerable efforts to reach out to a despaired group to members of the public from landlords to homeowners and other interested bodies and meeting the requirements for the entire syste