so joe saw deborah morse as out to get him, deborah morse saw joe as out to make her life difficult,and we were off to the races. what it says is the same thing that a lot of other student rights cases say, and that is that student rights are qualified and dependent upon the educational context within which they take place. and necessarily then, student rights are limited. they are not the same as adult first amendment rights. which is sort of a difficult pill for a lot of people to swallow because the language of the first amendment so absolutist, tiffany. congress, i call it ten little words. congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech. well, what part of "no law" don't you understand? well, the court understands that no law can be, must be interpreted contextually. so it differs from context to context. and in the educational context, student rights are dependent upon those rights being exercised in ways that don't disrupt the educational mission. that means drug speech in joe frederick's case, that means lewd and obscene speech in matt frazier's case, that means th