but it doesn't help the epa at all. but it comes from this brought too an exception of a statue in the statute providing that it's not the statute that imposes a requirement. >> this is a statute on which the epa gets its financial deference. but why couldn't we read that language essentially means subject to the same procedural ironman as the original? >> because that caveat does not appear. >> it's not a caveat, it's just a different understanding of what that language means. i mean, you say that it has to be in the exact same way that they acted. and i guess i'm saying that could mean subject to the sutro bierman. or is that not clear when that. >> at your suggestion is that the epa could rely on this procedure act. >> whatever procedural acquirements and strained the epa wanted to prove this, those were the same procedural ironman that constrained the epa in this way. and we are just asking. both have to be subject to the same procedural requirements in the epa can act differently as long as they are acting within t

>> i haven't asked the epa about that. i expect that to be the case. >> that is a critical component of where we can see reductions. , thee low hanging fruit energy efficiency hanging side. we have picked some of that fruit. we are not looking hard at the multiyear initiatives. some of the deeper investments. i think it is critical that we look at those areas when we are talking about it. >> they went way beyond reggie. they take in the carbon. the whole the carbon. it is critical. i knew the energy master plan. those type of things are critical. ask, are there tensions at the state level between those who regulate air, and those who regulate power? in many areas, they are in different agencies. i assume those that have been involved in the air study environment, they been the people involved in the discussion. all of a sudden, you're the kingpins. does that give rise to tension? logical tensions, because we are charged with a different approach. we have already worked with the department of natural resources. we will have

epa has acknowledged that. another is that marshes can grow more quickly above rising sea levels against particular ravages of rising sea levels. i would just point out that there are differences on this committee about the effect of co2 on climate change. no one is suggesting that co2 causes lung disease, asthma, or the kind of smog that the chairman talked about. i will tell you what we do agree on. we agree that there are some mighty fine programs that the administration is posing cuts for. the budget of the administration proposes cutting $430 million from the clean water revolving loan fund. $150 million from the drinking water fund, $5 million from the brownfield program. this is something we can all agree on. these are proven programs that are well received by state and local communities that have encouraged to work with communities in a cooperative manner. these are more troubling considering that some estimate the amount to bring local what -- local water infrastructure with compliance is over $2.5 tri

we've been working with the epa. we're still trying to get the message out that overdependence on fuel, gas is very volatile to pricing and is not as reliable. the other concern is that there is not any discussion in the value proposition of the reliability services provided by base load units of : nuclear such as inertia, balancing, control. the more we move this out into distributed than non dispatched and not can centrally controlled resources the harder and harder it is going to be to manage reliability on the grade. that is what we're seeing. units that are allowed to operate whenever there would like to operate creating the price issues and not adding to reliability. our role is to get that message out there. >> when you're saying it basically you can bring it on, turn and often on as far as the nobles, but you cannot turn off mix and you cannot turn of coal. once it goes a just got to go. >> that is where the base comes. >> senator. >> i'm so sorry. >> that is okay. it has been really -- [laughter] and we have

here's -- it's not just the epa. the epa issue i think now reading into it is a serious one. i think it's something that is concerning. i'm not sure how far the reach will go. it is a concern about pollution. we want to clean up the country and clean up the planet. but when you look at what's going on in other parts of the administration, you look at what's going on out west where the government pointed out he owns 92 or 90% of the land. erect solar farms. we have private businesses really unlocking oil and gas. 20 to 30,000 private businesses, that's the thinking in the administration that they can do better than what the little guys, the little business guy can do. >> bill, that's it. it's the micromanagement aspect of all of this. the administration is always out thing it's tax incentives et cetera. but then they come in with regulations that not only wipe out those incentives but make it worse for the housing industry. >> well, here's a question. how did they end up redefining navicable waterways. there was once a famous case where the california fish and game commission

>> absolutely, when it comes to the epa. it's the term that fits. it's kind of like obama's animal farm with many of these regulators. all the animals are equal, but some more equal than the rest. the daily color this past week had an article about how many of the board members drive suvs and gas guzzling jaguars. if you want to have a green footprint, you'd have to kill yourselves, so you need to use the earth to live and prosper. >> how about you, michelle, do as i say, not as i do? >> typical democrats. it's ridiculous. they are constantly trying to get us to ride bikes, but it's totally okay for them to go on their jets. the president on earth day burned 35,000 gallons of fuel flying from washington, d.c. to washington state and then, he went all the way to asia. but it's totally okay because he's the president and he can do what he wants, but all of us got to live like we're cave men. >> i know other presidents have taken boats. you're probably right. >> bob, here's the point. this is the epa's -- >> you want to go back to the days, you don't w

the epa and army corps engineers want to give the epa jurisdiction over streams and wetlands. you can find more about that at 8:30 a.m. we will bring you these segments as "washington journal" continues after this. ♪ >> whether it is an award for good journalism, as a politician i do not want to make a judgment on that. but an award for public service for possibly the greatest betrayal of our national secrets of all time strikes me as quite bizarre. and i do think there's a real danger of the very cozy media world patting itself on the back without fully understanding the consequences for the dangers that we face in a very dangerous world. i think there is a dangerous disconnect there. i am for the guardian newspaper itself, and my view was that if i, as an individual, gave the names of an operative outside of u.k. jurisdiction, that would be in breach of the terrorism act in the united kingdom. if that would apply to me as an individual, why would that not apply to a newspaper? >> this weekend on c-span, former british defense secretary liam fox on edward snowden government s

and that really the approach that epa used. it examined certain cost thresholds and said, at particular cost thresh holds we feel confident if everyone, downwind and downwind alike, makes pollution control efforts at these levels, the problem will be solved or almost sold but a because there would be residual nonattain. it seems rational to say the significant contribution is the amount over and above what would occur if everyone adhered to an approach which, if applied across the board, would solve the problem. >> thank you. thank you, counsel. the case is submitted. >> i know you give me grief from time to time but we wok around the clock trying to help you do your job. what other administration would make thousands of internal memos and documents available for your daily enjoyment. this is a representative sample. you a'll have them all tomorrow. here's a memo from harold to leon panetta. maxwell house coffee is on sale this week for 3.49. here's one, for $10,000 you can have a private meeting with vice president gore to dis

why has the epa ignored the concerns of sure unions when issuing regulations?>> we have passed the question numerous times meeting with the epa director, a staff, originally they sat with the 4.seven number that it is not that big of a deal. now it has come true it is a big deal. and day furthermore regulations. california to regulation regulation, coal ash and multiple. everyone has the cost and then recede more plants closing. >> as the epa takes this issue of job loss seriously when they issue regulations? >> it'll think they take into consideration the cost of their rules. no. >> in your testimony you talk about in sure ability of the electric grid how they could operate under the sub must run order to make sure it meets demand but you also note it must does not exempt from lawsuits are penalties under the clean air act so congress must address the double jeopardy issue between must run or they could be sued under clean air. which your union support legislation exempting to the of must run order under the clean air act? >> absolutely. >> it really has been

. >>> you expect the celebrities to be environmental hypocrites and why the head of the epa's tour is causing tush rbulence. >>> and why this democrat said that his military service gives him a sense of entitlement, and now tom cotton is bringing in the drill sergeant to drill back. >>> senator cotton says that my military service gives me a sense of entitlement. >> it is still drill sergeant, tom cotton. at ease. let quicken loans help you save your money. wbecame your business. passion... at&t can help simplify how you manage it. so you can focus on what you love most. when everyone and everything works together, business just sings. why relocating manufacturingpany to upstate new york? i tell people it's for the climate. the conditions in new york state are great for business. new york is ranked #2 in the nation for new private sector job creation. and now it's even better because they've introduced startup new york - dozens of tax-free zones where businesses pay no taxes for ten years. you'll get a warm welcome in the new new york. see if your business qualifies at startupny.com c

that petition is asking the epa to reinstate the suspension against the bp. following the deepwater horizon spill, epa temporally suspended bp while it was investigating the deepwater horizon oil spill. a few months back, bp been sued epa to lift the suspension so they reached an agreement which resulted in a five year probation for bp and then a few weeks ago, we had this other spill and lake michigan were about 1600 gallons -- it just further illustrates bp is unprepared to deal with the oil and gas development activities. >> jaclyn lopez, it is four years later. how do you think bp should be held accountable? >> we think the american people have spoken and the petition was signed by over 50 organizations representing millions of americans which was independently signed by another 66,000 people who all recognize that bp needs to be held accountable by being prohibited from future contracts with the american government. >> i want to thank you for being with us, jaclyn lopez, staff attorney with the center for biological diversity, speaking to us from tampa,

at the time epa was saint 4.7. all of this -- 4.7. not extensive modeling but came from us from commonsense looking at 40 euros plants under 400 megawatts that were not scrubbed, something would not be capable of staying in service. that number turned out to be pretty much right on the nose. that translates into over 50,000 direct jobs. those come from rail workers, plant workers and workers in the end she. you take a bls number, uses about four to one for any electrical generation employees so we got about 250,000 people losing their jobs over the next two years. the impact of the lost generation will be severe. already talked to him and of those plans were running during this older vortex. we believe -- polar vortex. we could make sure we will be in deep trouble. we been told that ferc can address the issue but we are also told that you can't be alleviated a civil lawsuit under the clean air act. so where are the utilities going to be ?-que?-que x i totally agree with mr. akins that we know from the inside as you start closing a pla

coming up how the epa is messing with our fragile housing market.o mary barra making first public comments since her capitol hill grilling. one congressman has more questions over the gm recall. there he is right there. ♪ ...work with equity experts... who work with regional experts... that's when expertise happens. mfs. because there is no expertise without collaboration. but i didn't always watch out for myself. with so much noise about health care, i tuned it all out. with unitedhealthcare, i get information that matters... my individual health profile, not random statistics. they even reward me for addressing my health risks. so i'm doing fine... but she's still gonna gi me a heart attack. innovations that work for you. that's health in numbers. unitedhealthcare. a short word that's a tall order. up your game. up the ante. and if you stumble, you get back up. up isn't easy, and we ought to know. we're in the business of up. everyday delta flies a quarter of million people while investing billions improving everything from booking to baggage clai

now the epa, the epa is getting in on the act, and some of those conservatives aren't only complainingsuing because a lot of this stuff is worse than anything the irs was pulling. who knows better than, well, the attorney suing. chris horner from the energy and environmental legal institute. chris, what were they doing? >> well, quite clearly, they're treating different parties differently under a law that doesn't permit disparate treatment, and it's also quite obvious thanks to some further digging we've done that they're singling out groups with whom they're not particularly pleased. neil: how does the epa do that versus the irs? i know the irs being the strong man with taxes and being intimidating can do it, but how does epa do it? >> right. they're throwing financial hurdles this the way of nonprofit groups to bar them from fulfilling their mission. for example, we operate on in the course of reck -- the courts have recognized this, i mean, they know that nonprofit groups make their bones on obtaining public records and broadly disseminating them. that's a large part of our mission

the epa is using this as a sidestep. and the builders have very upset. think many people realize the importance of the change in the definition of what is wetland and how it applies to building a new home or any kind of structure. i don't think people realize that yet. >> yeah. jerry howard, we spoke to him today, he said, look, by changing this definition, he said, you know, this is regulation over waters. it's ridiculous, laughable, it's not right, they're going to keep fighting it. stuart: that's extraordinary. cheryl, thank you very much, indeed. here's a tax day story for you. criminals using your social security number to file a false tax return, they take your refund without you even knowing about it. joining us now, coal fire ceo rick bacon. rick, welcome to to the show. i've got to keep this short because i've got all kinds of breaking news, but i am told that if somebody's got my name, my social security and my birthday, they can get out there and file a false tax return and get the refund for themselves. is that accurate? >> that is absolutely

you see it with epa. you see it with the national labor relations board. health care almost every day. you see it in finance and everywhere. laws aren't for them. they just do what they want to do. executive orders. in other countries they're called decrees. >> this administration has a policy trying to go around the checks and balances. >> every administration has that policy. look, let me say that right from the outset. absolutely wrong. this guy was kissing up to get a bigger job. they went along, wrong. >> we should mention, he has been put on administrative leave. go ahead and talk while we put up the statement of the sector of homeland security. >> what the guy was doing was wrong. what he was asked to do is wrong. but it does grate a little bit when this all of a sudden becomes this big obama administration thing. when everybody sitting here knows this goes on in every single administration. i don't care what party they're from. >> but sabrina look at the examples. this is more than administrative action, executive action that we have seen more of i

as you know epa is currently working on a lot of rule-making. that would include, it affects the utility sector. certainly the 316-b cooling water intake rule, the ozone rules, the particulate matter, 2.5 rules, regional haze, coal ash, let me ask you this with regard to those regulations what is ferc doing to help epa understand how these rules might affect grid reliability? >> well, we tried to be a source of reliability, expertise to epa. a lot of our work has been focused on mats because that has such short timelines. my colleague commissioner molar who is behind me will be on the next panel. >> next panel. >> co-chaired a forum that nate with naruc and epa and we had meetings on 316-b and coal ash and now a lot of focus is on greenhouse gas. i think as rules are developed we need to be come mentors in the -- comment ores in the draft stage, in greenhouse gas rules coming out on june 2nd i had believe to make sure the rules achievable while reliability can be preserved. look at our knitting, if you look at the greenhouse gas rules they could

it doesn't look bad at all but the state epa says there are many hidden factors that contribute to make this one of the worst offenders. the neighborhood around 33rd and mckee in san jose has neat homes, lively supermarkets and ann darling elementary school. but it's also a place with heavy industry nearby and heavy traffic on the street and adjacent highway 101 freeway which is usually gridlocked. the factors add up to make this one of the most polluted spots in the bay area and the state. >> most of the time it seems pretty clear. so we never really pay attention. >> reporter: california epa data shows many of the most affected neighborhoods are in low income areas of the central valley and los angeles. they include places with air, ground and water pollution problems. the worst areas appear in red on these maps. the darker the red, the greater the problem. >> it's all traffic, hazardous waste. >> reporter: the doctor from san jose state studies air pollution. he says dirty air collects and stagnates in valleys like this part of san jose. he also says it's no surprise that the most po

had epa made any kind of calculation on that? the clean air act, we were not allowed to take that into account in announcing a transportation or a land use control that would achieve the standard. removing that number of cars would have just devastated it -- economically. the air would have been cleaner, but there wouldn't have been -- people wouldn't have been able to get to the hospitals and other things. what was the philosophy behind the law that said, "we don't want to count cost"? the philosophy is just as i stated at the outset, that we thought we knew what the bad pollutants were, that we knew how to measure them, we knew the level at which the health and environmental effects occurred, we could get them below that level with a margin of safety, and we had the technology that could achieve that at a reasonable cost. all those assumptions are wrong. and if those assumptions are wrong, then the law that embodies those assumptions is bound to drive us to an irrational result. and it's just particularly obvious in a case like

the epa is kick off a claar 15 million project to resort slew, but even before it begins hauling awayuted mud it will begin hanging signs temporarily warning the public to stay out. >> the first goal is to make sure people don't get in, and if they do get in that they don't swim, fish or wade in there. >> reporter: for now people are getting in, slipping easily through the broken fence. one trespasser who didn't want to be identified calls the cleanup long overdue. >> all this land is just sitting here going to waste. make it to the little park for the kids. if they clean up this water, it will be beautiful for them to come play in. >> another neighbor worries about the toxic land purchased in what will be the middle of soon housing developments. >> all the waste and chemicals, it's unhealthy for the public and for this community. >> reporter: epa director jarred blummenfeld says it will take several years before the sledge is cleaned up and will become part of a green space and just like when the mud will become part of the past. >> coming up next, a paternity leave context surroundi

think there are things that the epa canoes to accelerate? how they can affect the compliant look of your energy-efficient the? >> it will be a tremendous aspect. certainly the work happening in vermont is a great example. the oregon energy trust to rate the arkansas banner in the south and south east. our energy efficiency program have really informed and influenced work in surrounding states. this were quite frankly as they went win-win. it is a win for consumers clearly, the lowest-cost form of energy. it is a win for industry. they are having to spend less on this and these power plants commercially to put these questions later potentially for those committing types of pollutants. and finally, it is a win for the irony. we really, i think, should hold up our efficiency program as the best we have to offer alongside a renewable work. but our work in energy-efficient the is something to which many states have been very committed. i have to also give credit to industry. they've really put her all into executing robust, proven programs are gr

draw any conclusions. >>. >> i think i would like to know if my son's cancer came from that. >>> the epa stresses drinking water is not a factor. >>> after the break, why some workers say they could be in danger of radiation exposure. >>> crews are on the middle of a may sdwror clean up at a former naval shipyard to make way for a massive housing and shopping development. these piles of dirt from the site are being dump ed in landfills across the bay area. >> reporter: trucks full of dirt have just begun moving tons of dirt. any contaminated dirt has been screened for radio active material. they're worried recent shipments have been sent out without proper testing. kevin jack soften is a truck driver who worked on the site last year. >> not all the parcels were packed. there's areas where we're digging specifically that were not. so that's correct. >> but the investigative unit says soil transplalted will be tested for yad you logical processing. it's a screening process workers insist is not happening. in this letter, consumer add voe kats say no radiological soil asse assessmented has

>> it is not clear that that is the case at all, i would settle for access to information from the epaaccess from the hhs, all manner of regulatory agencies, of the department of commerce that presently aren't able to say that the information they are denying the public is information that is somehow classified. or threatens national security, but i do belief the act was never contemplated as a tool to make it possible for people who have not been cleared and had special access granted to classified information to be able to achieve that. >> ryan right now you have about 700 in motion. and your dissertation has been declared a national security threat. >> sure. if i may respond to horace first. i agree that it was never intended to be a means to obtain properly classified information. however the drafters understood it was an attempt to get overly classified material. overclassification and improper classification was addressed as a major problem area -- >> is there more classified or unclassified information now? >> well, as the professor at harvard has demonstrated right now the univ

when epa officials arrived, they decided to take them hostage.ound,pass the word we're not going to do anything violent, just keep them in the house. nothing more than that, ok? don't let them out. if i was directly to epa representatives come out the store, does anybody know what would happen to them? >> i guess i'm here for the duration. >> meaning what? >> i guess until the white house gives the homeowner some sort of answer. >> i call it the white house and the lady starts giving this lecture about how the residents have blotted out of proportion and less people die of cancer, i hung up the-- phone. i'm thinking, i am crazy. >> [indiscernible] meeting with president carter at the white house. should have more information -- >> i went on the front porch and said, ok, guys, the president hears us and we'll hear from our congressmen. i think we should let them go and let them go with a very strong warning. , have called the white house and this is upon your approval, that we will allow the two epa representatives to leave, but if we do not have

the epa has estimated the rules could save up to 34,000 lives per year and result in tens of billions of dollars in health benefits. but after a major push by utilities and corporate groups, an appeals court ruled in 2012 the regulations exceed the epa's authority. on tuesday, the supreme court overruled the lower court in a six to two decision. in a statement, the natural resources defense council praised the ruling, saying quote: "the epa safeguards follow the simple principle that giant utility companies shouldn't be allowed to dump their dirty emissions onto residents of downwind states." the death toll from tornadoes in the midwest and south has risen to least 34. the storms have caused deaths in mississippi, tennessee, alabama, iowa, oklahoma, and the worst hit state, arkansas. president obama has declared arkansas a major disaster area. more than 200 people have been wounded and over 2,000 homes damaged or destroyed. strong thunderstorms are now sweeping the region today, hampering the recovery effort and threatening more damage. the national basketball association has issued a

now the epa is kicking off work to restore it. it's spending $15 million to remove layers of toxic soil and turn it into public open space. >> eventually there will be a blue-green way that goes along the coast of san francisco. you'll be able to bike and walk a a and reck reuation along there. >> they will remover and replace the soil will take several years. >>> another slice of hollywood in the bay area. this time a new hbo series about the silicon valley. >> if you want to live here you have to deliver like steve. >> jobs. >> i heard you. >> which one? >> jobs. >> he didn't even write code. >> this show is titled "silicon valley" created by mike judge. he also did office space. it's an amusing look at what happens behind the scenes. it was like watching a bizarro version of your own reality. it di bebuts sunday night. >>> it's a big weekend for sport pps the stanford women take on yukon in the final four this sunday. >> how two prominent vans are getting into the spirit. >>> we'll be back in a half hour. police in one bay area

how can getting this epa dose into your body help with pain? few years back, i took to hundred 50 patients a payment to my office complaining of neck and back pain, and all were on anti-inflammatories. i gave them and put them on a therapeutic dose of fatty acids. 60% ofto eight weeks, the patients returned and were able to get off of the nonsteroidal drugs. they have potential side effects. after grocers and other major problems. pain, i am absolutely convinced. i really use nonsteroidal in my practice anymore. healthy aging is extremely important to me. keeping my heart healthy and make joint bloomberg and i mind sharp, it is critical for me and my profession. that --his impression impressive that a neurosurgeon is no longer using these drugs. i am more of a believer hearing about that. we were able to catch up with your co-author and get it in right. fact is a health care worker, and author of a fish oil book, i get asked a lot about people having joint pain. one of my coworkers asked about joint pain for a number of years. she had been on m

grant funding for the proximity of the area and the eir processes that has to be mitigated and the epa support. sometime later in 1897 six the city staff determined the cost of the recreational facilities was doubled their original estimation and the proper maintenance would be impossible because of the elevation and form of the bayview hunters point community didn't support this aspect of the project. so for the next 3 years at the city and staff and community members developed a plan that identified mitigation measures consistently of can he recall greenhouse and a skills training center located adjacent to the plant. in 1981 the city went back to the board to amend the orders determining if the bayview hunters point community is also suffering and the series of the impacts of the decision to relocate freeways in the existing plant and those facilities generate a lack of pride in the community and the commercial greenhouse should reduce those impacts and in support of the bayview hunters point the folks say those facilities are necessary and they will might the impacts of the project

daniel saver/abogado de vivienda, community legal services of epa 6:35:21 claro, esa es la idea que serájen a personas porque existen estas protecciones y también es para mitigar los efectos negativos de un posible desalojo. los dueÑos de los apartamentos woodland park, equity residential, la empresa de su tipo ms grande en todo el pas, dice que no tienen planes inmediatos de reemplazar unidades en woodland park, y que si y cuando ocurra, cualquier proyecto se har con el consentimiento de la ciudad de east palo alto.. s.o.t. arisel ortega/residente de apartamentos 25:18:14 pero no me preocupa. por qué? si lo van a hacer, lo van a hacer.. jaime live blanca ---tiempo de la primera pausa , pero mas adelante... vo-blanca ---si usted suele distraerse cuando maneja, ponga mucha atencion porque podria haber un policia vigilandolo. take vo cesar ---se registra otro sismo en el sur de california que tiene a los residentes en alerta... topvo blanca --olas de gran tamano golpean la costa del pacfico suramericano luego del terremoto de 8.2 grados que tuvo su epicentro al norte de chile. --un sismo d

my guest the new epa administrator, gina mccarthy, i am going to ask about fracking.ut first, while we were off we missed some high drama. >> apparently cliven bundy, more sophisticated mother, al, more athletic brother, king kong. >> cliven bundy has been grazing his cattle illegally in nevada about 20 years now, about $1 million in grazing fees, penalties and fees, fortunately he is ignored court orders of cease and desist. >> the federal bureau of land management came to take his cattle, it is your standard cow has, boy has cow for 20 years, boy loses cow stories, or so we thought. hundreds of armed militia men rally to support the bend difficults. >> heading them off at gunpoint. >> he joined the protesters, he and other militia men are not afraid to shoot if necessary. >> we were actually strategizing to put all the women up at the front, if they are going to start shooting it is going to be women that are going to be televised all across the world getting shot but these rogue federal officers. >> jon: anyway, happy valentine's day, sweety. >> he seems kind of --

the blocking united nations funding, you know, keeping epa regulations from extending as far as they were intended. even not funding some environmental positions. these go both sides of the aisles. >> the other fiscal year spending bill 2015 will see in the house in the coming week, it deals with the military construction programs. any roadblock or big issues expected to come up? >> the criminal justice one will be the third. on friday afternoon we received copy of an internal memo that majority leader eric cantor laid out for the spring. to the point that you're making, these first three bills are the three most least controversial bills. therefore, they are being taken up. there's little desire, really, from lot of lawmaker, this election year to wrestle with some of the thorny issues such as health and human services, homeland security issues and that sort of thing. what's more likely to happen is they will do a handful of these bills and some time this summer agree that perhaps we should forward them into a continuing resolution that would allow existing funding levels to continu

they bragged about getting these awards from the epa, but they obviously don't like epa regulations of their companies. i presume a lot of employers don't like food safety regulations in their workplace, but i think this goes to something, lawrence. a lot of times you hear people complain about regulation in the abstract, but they very rarely say, well, i really don't think workers should have all these rules so they're safe at work. they can't say that. i think it is the right question to ask them. and you can quote daniel patrick moynihan back at them yourself. >> oh, no, i think the quote has been overworked now. you're not going to catch me using that. coming up, even john boehner says it should be harder for people with mental illness to buy guns but don't expect him to do anything like that. that's next. and a baseball player misses a couple of games for the birth of his child and gets attacked by sports talk show nuts for putting the birth of a child before baseball games. and "the rewrite" tonight, president obama rewrites paul ryan's budget plans in his own words. >> time for