i explained malpractice and he said the f word. shut up. we're not doing that and he explained why. when the ama says the public they come into my office what they beat out of this bill and they never talk about malpractice but how medicare pays doctors they never mention malpractice i am not doing malpractice because that will require we have to defend the democratic base and i did not know to do that. by the way the republicans come to negotiate. efface said that we would have done it but it was not the case. here you have a situation where on policy grounds it was for malpractice reform but in the interest groups and the republicans were not interested. but that is the way it wind up if doctors had said we'd understand pavement or the republicans said we will negotiate it would have happened but it is not the way it lined up but he had two elements in the joint session of congress we have the pilot program and to improve patient safety of more than $100 billion sandy affordable care act has a provision if i remember correctly that says we will give grants to states to reform malp

how do you explain that?look, this is what the attorney general is looking into. >> he has been looking into it for a year, sir. >> the president -- the president called for an examination by the attorney general. they are looking into that. we should not disrupt that by essentially having a secret session and having the materials given to us. >> you think there was not a smidgeon of corruption. was that right for the president to say? >> here's what he was talking about. the first hearing that we hilary clinton the chairman of the committee said there was a culture of corruption and administration interference. there's been zero, zero evidence that the white house had anything to do with what happened. >> the question had nothing to do with the white house. it had to do -- the question had to do with whether there was any corruption, and he basically gave the irs a clean bill of health when the investigation was still going on. you bring up a good point, and i want to bring -- >> that isn't what -- look. >>

>> host: you explain that very clearly. the health care system is a daunting enterprise and incredibly unclear and what's also interesting in the beginning of history and i guess you could go way back let's start with nixon and work our way up to clinton. >> guest: well one of the surprises i decided let's give people a feel for how long we have been trying to change the system. it does go back to 1912 but one of the surprises to me is to uncover how engage republicans weren't health care reform in 1945 at the governor of california at that time earl warren a republican pretty conservative proposed conference of health care reform for california and came within one vote of getting it passed in california. and he had gotten sick and said we really need to protect people from a cost of getting sick. when nixon got elected in 1946 the congress one of his first legislative ills he introduced was it till about conference of health care reform and here's the crazy thing. if i describe it to you you will say was he one of the arch

and the explained why not. he said when he ama, whatever thaw saw in public, they come into my moves and we're talking about what they need out of this bill and we're really cutting the sausage of legislation. they never talk about malpractice. all they ever talk about is what the -- how medicare pays doctors. they want that fixed so doctors can get more money. they never mention malpractice. i am not doing malpractice because malpractice will require that we have to offend in of the democratic base, and if i don't need to offend the democratic base to keep the doctors on board, i'm not going to do it. and by the way no republicans are coming to negotiate with me if they came and said part of onegotiation for our support would be pal practice, we would have done it. that wasn't the case. so, here you had a situation where, on policy grounds the white house was for malpractice reform and he wad to buy some reasonable proposals. the interest groups, the ama, and the politicians, the republicans, weren't intereste

how do you explain that? >> i'll explain it. it also does what i said to respond to your question as to what's going on here. more tea party groups and conservative groups applied for status than other groups. in 2006, of the 501 c organizations, only $1 million was spent on election campaign stuff n 2012, $256 million and two of the organizations were coke brother organizations and a third was karl rove. >> sir, it still doesn't explain -- you can say there are more conservative groups. it doesn't explain why 100% of conservative groups were examined and only 30% of liberal groups. it doesn't matter if it is 10-3shgs it was 100% of the could be servetive groups and 30% of the liberal groups. how do you explain that? >> look this is what the attorney general is looking into. >> it's been looking into it for a year, sir. >> the president called for an examination by the attorney general. they are looking into that. we should not disrupt that by essentially having a secret session. >> do you think the president disrupted it when h

that's why the one major issue of the bedroom door you cannot explain. explain that. you have to tell the court why you didn't take reeva out that bedroom window to safety. >> i don't know. >> out the bedroom door. i apologize. >> i don't know why i didn't do that my lady. >> you see, you did the opposite. you approached the danger. that doesn't make sense. it's not true. >> my lady, if you listen to miss taylor's evidence where she said when there was an intruder i went down stairs and looked. that's my personality. that's how i am. instead of running a way, at that moment i wanted to put myself between the danger and reeva my lady. i cannot explain. i wish i did. i wish i did all these other things. >> so you wanted to confront. that's me, oscar, i want to go confront, stand up for myself? >> that's correct. >> i'll shoot. >> that's not what i said. >> that's the entrance. i wanted to go con front the robbers. you did by firing. >> that's correct my lady. >> let us get this. you walked down the passage with intentions to confront the intrude intruders? >> my intenti

we can go through the whole message. >> we are going to. >> i can explain, try to explain. >> yeah. explain. lement us rather ask questions and get answers and is that okay? >> yes, my lady. >> because i already got one answer. you said -- i had to go to training. she knew i had to. it's all about i. all about mr. pistorius. she knew. why did she not run? is that what you mean? that's what she is trying to say. and you have agreed. i had to go to training. i had to go to lunch. it is about you. >> i had things i needed to do that day. i don't understand what he means when he says, why did she have to go run? i had plans that day. it was a saturday. after training on ape saturday. usually in the morning. i had plans. i needed to attend. >> thank you. thank you. i had training. i had to go to lunch. i had plans. that was three is. what was the scene about? what scene? let us say that is untrue again. we will mark all the entries. >> that was true. there was, if you've read further down. she was tickling my neck or hair. and i was agitated. that's what she interpreted in making a scene

this explains her capriciousness and her emotion.he starts everything with her own particular way. then of course the man in her life is america. after all, i see it as an older woman. she happens to have had a tumultuous background. because that tumultuous background has developed in her of course, weariness, suspicion, and even fear. the man in her life happens to be younger. he does not have a long background. like all young men, he occasionally is insensitive to her. he does not understand why she feels so badly. this younger man also likes to flex his muscles. it is not unusual that the two would find great difficulty in finding common conversation. the more i look at it, the more i see this. i have dealt with russia for a long time. i love russia for the right things. everybody in the world has defects. i do not hide these. i know the bad sides of russia as well. they have some things that will be very useful for us. they are not things that we generally value in the united states because we are so different. one of those thing

it was never explained. i needed somebody to explain that to me. that led me to the subject, i called some investor friends and i said do you know what high-frequency trading is? they said, kind of, sort of. the people explaining this to us the people explaining this to us is brad. >> they said brad is the guy. he is trying to figure it out. >> yes, this young man. he was at the royal bank of canada. he had taken upon himself to find out how the stock market worked. that was the question. >> he thought it was not working fairly. >> because he was a trader of stocks, he ran the stock market and in 2008 when all the craziness is happening in the financial sector, he notices a change in the market. it is a profound change that up to that point when he went to buy 100,000 shares of microsoft and it was scattered across 13 public exchanges in new jersey, he would look at his screens and it would be 50,000 shares offered at $20. he could hit a button and get the shares. the shares would vanish. it was as if someone knew, there was a ghost in the machine.

. >> we want to explain to your investors if they are going to get their money back? >> we exposed a bay area real estate agent accused of fraud. now action from the state. >> are they wrong? >> i can't say they are wrong. >> and we investigate double dipping by one bay area housing authority. how commissioners are spending taxpayer dollars. >>> here is chief investigative reporter tony kovaleski. >> thank you for joining us. for the next 30 minutes we investigate exposing stories, holding government accountable. we begin with the tragic bus crash on highway 5. a fed ex truck, a charter bus loaded with high school students and fiery head on collision that killed ten and injured dozens. while investigators continue to piece together what went wrong the nbc bay area investigative unit reviewed state records detailing the history of that section of roadway. >> reporter: the fatal crash involving fed ex and tour bus company occurred roughly 150 miles north of san francisco along i-5. there have been just nine accidents along that stretch of roadway since 2008, the majorit

we will endeavor to explain the drought of 2014 in a historical context. we will give you a reality check behind the numbers and talk about the impact of drought on your home and discuss the importance of rain and snow on the future of our water supply. and we'll give you a long-range look at where we go from here. but before we look at where we're going, let's start with where we are. the map behind me is a drought monitor map. there is not one part of the state that is untouched from the drought. everyone is gripped with bone-dry conditions across the state. many experts say we will likely end up as one of the top ten driest rainfall seasons ever. >> 2013 was the driest calendar year. and now we're on track for probably about the third driest rainfall season, so, and right now most places in the state are 35 to 45% of normal. >> and what i want to do right now is go ahead and take a look closer into the bay area. what you're going to find here is some parts of the bay are doing worst than others when it comes to the drought. this lighter color of orange

sullivan explained his views this way: >> never ask a hungry man about his past. i feed him not because he's good, but because he needs to do. >> tammany figures also challenged american expansion overseas at the turn of the 20th century. progressives like the sainted teddy roosevelt believed in spreading anglo-saxon civilization to places like hawaii, the philippines, cuba and central america. tammany boss richard croaker was among the most vocal opponents of america's imperialist designs. croaker retained a very irish and a very old-fashioned american view of imperialism. he once told reporters why he opposed overseas adventures. >> let me explain what i mean by anti-imperialism. it means opposition to the fashion of shooting down everybody who doesn't speak english. [laughter] it seems to be the fashion nowadays when a people don't speak english to organize ap army and send troops to shoot them down. >> croaker was criticized as numb skull for those views. years later when the same civic elites joined with cultural conservatives in an effort to restrict immigra

i'll ask one of the folks to explain his business much better than i can >> thank you. i'm scott madison one of the owners of the ecliptic cookery i have the material for the commissioners and staff. good afternoon chairperson johnson and commissioners and special hello to commissioner singh who's history with the shipyard is a history as my own. acting attorney. it's a pleasure to be here for our business that's also a milestone for shipyard redevelopment i'm hoping you will advance from the design stage in building one 10. i'd like to acknowledge the positions of folks. ecliptic cookery is owned by four partners i'll ask our ceo ms. susan heller who doesn't work in the business but is a silent partner and mr. bill robert and myself operates the business on a daily business we've been friends and partners since 2010. we've been led by the michael and others working with lanar ralph and building engineer lewis and kitchen architect mr. joe. they've worked in the fashioned of designing an unconventional kitchen to meet the needs of our business i want to thank paulette w

the architect i mean, the engineer will explain to you why >> the new owner how long ago did he - >> he's a prospective owner. >> it's owned by someone else. >> you need to come to the microphone and i'm dean we have a financial interest if the property and robby the architect left. he's helping us with the endeavor he's the one that dropped off the architecture plans we're following. >> okay. >> the engineer will explain the flaw. t the. i want to explain according to the planning department the roof was raised 18 inches because they probably upped the joy size to 2 by 12 the other 12 they probably bumped up and the other thing was the plans that show the permits as being 3 stories on one permit and 4 stories on the other this is a common thing that happens in san francisco being the attic floors the system they have in place with the pink forms it talks about occupancy floor is occupancy it should technically stay three to four but if you went from a 3 to 4 on a pink application it's different and dollars a lot of buildings that have 3 stories it's called 3 stories over dprarg and

our very own sam grobart explains. >> amazon announced fire tv.t is their streaming device to compete with apple tv and rocha. i wanted to find out more about it. so, i went to firetv.com. it is a streaming video site. it has more than 17,000 titles. those titles have names like "stick it to the man" and "sluttier and sluttier." you see, firetv.com is a tv site. and has been for some time, i am told. this gentleman running firetv.com may have run into a windfall. >> i love that guy. finally, in an exclusive interview with "market makers" anchor erik schatzker, barry diller shared his two cents on the set top box. >> for those of us who have apple tv, you know, no set-top box or a roku or any of them -- no set-top box. little tiny thing. no cables, no wires, no big deal. just plug it into the television set, have a broadband collection. amazon certainly would be a player in this. many, many others would be. i think it is great. >> diller also addressed the issue of whether we are in another tech bubble. >> we were in the bubble in the 2001 internet

it hasn't been explained to them why they need to do this. and beyond that, they say they're not qualified to do it, that they have training to help passengers get off the aircraft in the event of a security -- in the event of sort of a security situation on board the aircraft, help them deplane, but not provide security. and they feel that on board the aircraft, they feel they've been put in the front line of providing security and that there should be a, perhaps, better way of doing this with air martials. so, the crew here feel that they're being essentially unfairly and improperly tasked to do something that, the rationale of which hasn't even been explained to them, john. >> i understand if the rationale hasn't been that explained, but the measures don't seem all that different than what flight crews here in the u.s. have to do. doesn't seem like a huge burden, but nevertheless, as you say, if it isn't being explained, i can understand why they might be upset. nic robertson in l can. >> caller:. thank you very much. >>> the families of t

no one is explained it. and so as a result people like the owners of the subway sandwich shop protect their employees with bulletproof glass. that is sad. >> and the recent meeting of obama care and state insurance commissioners was so alarming many are raising red flags. ohio commissioner mary taylor explains next. scott: okay, neighbors, here's the top-drawer skinny. scotts wraps each seed in a brilliant water smart plus coating, that feeds, protects, and holds in moisture to make growing thicker, healthier grass easier. now let's spread your newfound knowledge! seed your lawn. seed it! good and close. help keep teeth clean and breath fresh. with beneful healthy smile food and snacks. he'll love the crunch of the healthy smile kibbles. you'll love how they help clean. with soft meaty centers and teeth cleaning texture, healthy smile snacks help keep a shine on his smile. it's dental that tastes so good. beneful healthy smile food and snacks. [ female announcer ] some people like to pretend a flood could ne

explain how the desert toretous got involved?ll, the desert tortoise is an excuse for all the bureaucracies to control. the desert tortoise does use the same habitat and feed as livestock, so they could be encountered, but my cattle ate all the feed. it's impossible to use up all the feed for the desert tortoise. >> we have an 80-mile look here at the "hannity" big board and the issue of the timeline. this started in 1993 as we went through the series of events unfolding there. this has gone on for a long period of time. the money that the federal government claims that he owes them. look at this fee. they are saying you oh $1 million in grazing and trespass fees. tell me if i'm wrong, this land is not being used by them, is it? >> no, let me explain the use of the land a little bit. this is the arid south, you know, the southwestern desert. there is a renewable resource out here that can only be harvested by a livestock, and what i do is -- my livestock eats the grass and it uses that to make an edible commodity for we the peopl

the executive director and the creator explain.iness, wele have a 11 channels, but we have in there for 15 years building those channels. great piecen have a of content. we can put it on and it can be available for everyone around the world to consume. it is a real democracy on these platforms. the great content moves to the top. the exciting thing is we can scale up quite quickly because we can reach everyone. this is not like the cable business or the broadcast business. if you have a great use of onset, it gets pushed all over the world. there is no one better at creating great content than ron o'brien. and also finding some of the great creative people to work with, which is a great part of this. >> i'm so excited about the collaboration. just as a consumer, i am out there. i am watching. i am absorbing. i am fascinated by it. it's great to have a really compelling reason to get involved and understand it and build upon it. >> one of the things that ron and brian felt about this was creating a studio, they will be running the s

we plan to bring a staffing plan for the personnel consideration to really explain how additional staff can help us additional. the proposal is next week for approval and then more often from there. thank you >> with that, i'm happy to take any questions. >> colleagues do you have any questions? all right. thank you for your presentation. >> madam clerk take public comment on this item. seeing none, public comment is closed. madam clerk, please call item 5 >> item 5 is the construction of new items. >> thank you. colleagues, any of you have anything to introduce. well, i have an item to introduce today. our city as it begins to reaccess our priority and refocus our attention on the pedestrian safety and bicycle safety i want to thank sfmta i'd like to i would like the sfmta to prioritize the caesar chavez and bay shore improvements. anyone that's driven or tried to bike or walk this intersection it's really dangerous. there's an existing 2012 study that details the background and the historical challenges that exist at the this intersection. the number of improvements it can enhance the

to explain why the poor were so poor. so a friend who grew up in poverty retained vivid memories going without shoes as a child. when he attained and influence he became a neighborhood legend for his charitable works, including his annual giveaway when the batteries poured my neck to receive free shoes. sullivan explained his views. >> never ask a hungry man about his past. i fear him not because he's good. tammany figures also challenged american expansion overseas at the turn of the 20th century. progressives like teddy roosevelt believed in spreading anglo-saxon civilization to places like hawaii, the philippines, cuba and central america. tammany boss richard kroeker was among the most vocal opponents of america's imperialistic designs on foreign lands. an immigrant from ireland, kroeker retained a very irish in a very old-fashioned american view of imperialism. he once told reporters. >> let me explain what i mean. it means opposition to know everybody who speaks english. it seems to be people don't speak english. >>

. >> do you want to explain to your investors that they're going to get their money back? >> are they wrong? >> i can't say that they're wrong. >> we investigate double dipping with one housing commission. >> for the next 30 minute, we investigate, exsuppose o posing stories, holding government accountable and uncovering issues. we begin with that tragic bus crash on highway five north of sacramento. inves gay tors began to piece together exactly what wept wrong. through past safety records and the companies were involved in the crash. we also reviewed state recording detailing the history of that section of the roadway. tp fatal crash occurred north of the city of orland. according today that we've obtained, there have been just nine accidents along that stretch of roadway. the investigative unit has also learned that head-on collisions along that road is very rare. the only other accident caused by a driver losing control and heading into oncoming traffic happened more than 10 miles away back in 2500le of. according to rourds we've obtained, fed-ex fragt has been sited m

even explaining to us who is allowed to carry weapons and who isn't. and just how important fort hood is exact to the military. so what we know right now, glen, whatever local affiliates there, let's be clear, we have not independently confirmed this, but one of our local affiliates there is reporting that one person is in custody, but we do not necessarily believe that that is the shooter. but somebody is in custody. with you talk us through what might be happening right now? >> sure. the other folks on the show right now is correct. protocol right now is getting people out, making sure that at this point everybody would be a suspect until proven otherwise which is in a crisis situation it sounds contrary to what we already do. it's critical to the situation. we don't know where he or she or where they're at. isolated someone who might be affiliated might have some connection or have something to do with this brief period of time. they're getting as much information as possible. the key is not just to capture somebody, it's really to prevent further l

can you explain that?>> i wasn't really a fan but in his obituary i read he was a farsi, i come from a really small minority in india, freddy mercury, balsara, a very common farsi name. he is a great performer. i'm not at home with his music. which is not also a criticism, it's just not my stuff. but he's a really great performer. and i'm sorry, i didn't meet him. >> rock 'n' roll you described as predictable. but what do you make of how popular it is and the effect it has on pop culture? >> while it has had a pretty long life, when it first started some of us didn't think it would last but it has lasted. but recently in new york, i went to a theater where i saw a musical, dedicated 90 minutes to jazz. now, jazz is a style which has been dying out. and people like winton marsalis has reinvigorated this old style. 90 minutes of jazz, i was in heaven. that was the pop music that i grew.with. when i was a student in vienna i would go to concerts of louis armstrong and suddenly my youth came back to me with th

it was cute at first, but-- well, abed explains it best.

and a big part of that making changes will impact that particular area and explaining to individuals you know why we're moving the parking in front of their street or cause champs with driveways in terms of deliveries. there are basic things if we're pro-active and explain it it would make all the difference so outreach is important and i want to thanks commander ali for his efforts. i've noticed only the enforcement efforts but a slight change in behavior of walkers and drivers being pilot enforcement is 0 important i'm looking forward to how we as a city can work together to move forward sooner rather than later. thank you >> thank you, commissioner. i think your points are well-taken. i know that the transportation authority is putting together a potential budgetary position so we're able to inform our neighborhoods for improvement projects that are going in on their block as you he mentioned getting the proper feedback and input but explaining how they're to make our neighborhoods safer and to commander ali i thank you for your work. yesterday, i saw a young mother she was excite

explain what high-frequency trading is. and why -- what is wrong with it, if there is something wrong with it. >> so it is a term of art, it's a catchall for all sorts of things. but i guess broadly speaking, it's trading at very rapid speeds, using computers, in the newly automated financial market place. there's nothing wrong with that, in and of itself. it's -- the problem is, as the market went into computers and went off the floor of the new york stock exchange, built into it was this scalping activity. and the scalping activity is, it is true. it's a subset of all high-frequency trading, was as brad katsiama finds out, it's a very big subset. it's certainly billions of dollars, how many billions, i don't know. >> so one of the things that struck me in the book, there's this gap between the people who are in on this and who are learning about it. and it was almost hard for me to believe this gap. in the sense that, you've got the exchanges on one hand, who are literally auctioning off physical proximity to their server

. >> so you don't have to explain yourselves? >> no. >> you're saying that not only do they not get compensation, but you don't even have to explain why? >> well, that's exactly what i said, that's the united nations policy. >> what would you say to a family member in haiti who has had somebody die as a result of this disease? >> i would basically say... as a un employee or as a human being? >> both? >> i would simply say, "i'm really sorry about your loss, i'm really sorry that cholera happened, we don't exactly know what the origins are but we're working as hard as we can to address the issue." >> but everybody knows what the origins are! the scientific community is united... >> our... our panel told us that it was due to a confluence of circumstances... >> including being brought to haiti most likely by un peacekeepers... >> that's not what it said. >> wait a minute. so the un still maintains that nepalese soldiers weren't the most likely cause of cholera in haiti? we asked one of their own scientists. >> the most likely sourc

kelly, explain what prosecutors are trying to do here.is it trying to establish -- the watches aside -- trying to establish that pistorius maybe didn't or shouldn't have had the extreme fear he claims he had about intruders or crime at his house? >> reporter: well, they're not suggesting necessarily that he shouldn't have had it, because that's what goes to reasonableness, which would be the lesser culpable homicide charge. what they're trying to do is establish the objective surrounding fact, that there was objectively no reason for him to fear crime, in order to suggest to the judge that the only reasonable deduction she can make from that is that, as a matter of fact, he was not afraid of crime. so, in other words, they're using it as a basis on which to suggest that pistorius is lying about his version of events. >> kelly, it seems to me up until this point, really until now, the prosecutor's been circling around, circling around, close in and closing in on pistorius, but he hasn't yet dealt directly with the primary issues dealing wi

the project ceo explains. we would never really understand it until we try to have a full small taste of it and experience it ourselves through the lived the low the line challenge. one of my friends challenged himself to do what for a month. he found it incredibly challenging. all of a sudden people started doing it all over the world. three years later, there will be 25,000 people around the world today and the next five days living one dollar 50 cents per day for food and drink to raise money to support some of the best anti-poverty initiatives at this website. >> how did you become involved in this? >> i met these guys at the u.n. they came up to me after i did my speech. i enjoyed what they had to say. they take something like this and did not just throw money at it but ask people to participate. you are forced putting your mind and body into a situation that is different than your everyday. making different choices and thinking about things differently. rex you have started this week. one dollar 50 cents

. >> but army still can't explain why lopez opened fire on his fellow soldiers at ft. hood, texas, the second mass shooting here in less than five years. >> we have very strong evidence that he had a medical history that indicates unstable psychiatric or psychological conditions. gone through all the records to ensure that that is in fact correct, but we believe that to be the fundamental underlying causal factor. >> 34-year-old specialist ivan lopez was a truck driver for the army, a nine-year veteran who first signed up with the puerto rico national guard and spent four months in iraq in 2011. he just arrived at ft. hood in february, getting treatment for depression and anxiety. he claimed a traumatic brain injury, but army says he was not wounded in action, and he was being tested for ptsd but had not been diagnosed with the disorder. secretary of the army john mchugh says the military has been focusing on offering more attention to mental health issues. >> if we failed in some way against our current policies, we need to be honest with ourselves, and with you and h

he explained to me why we are not doing that. and the ama, with the same public, they are talking about what they need out of this bill and cutting the sausage of legislation. they never talk about malpractice. all they ever talk about is basically how medicare pays doctors. they want a fix of doctors can get my money. they never mention malpractice. i am not certain it's because malpractice will require some of the democratic base and if i don't need to defend the democratic base to keep the doctors on board, i'm not going to do it. either way, no republicans are coming to negotiate. if they said our support would be no pack is, we wouldn't have done it. but that wasn't the case. so here you have a situation where on policy grounds the white house was for malpractice reform and we had to buy some reasonable proposals. but the interest groups, the ama and the politicians, republicans perniciously. people say no, no, no, but that's the way it wind up if either the doctors had said already, we understand panic, but here's malpracti

can you explain what's going on? >> sure.s might understand, yelp has to recommend reviews that they find reliable. the reason that there are a number of positive reviews for beverly's business that are not being recommended is because in fact 10 of them came from the very i.p. address that was used to claim her business owner's account. and one of them actually was for one-star review of a competing business to hers. so the problem is, business owners try to game the system and websites that don't try to filter out or remember -- reliable reviews can get gamed. that's probably why yahoo! decided to go ahead and use yelp as the de facto standard for search. >> beverly, do you have any response to this? >> yeah. first of all, in some cases clients are at your house and they can be using your i.p. address to write something. that is possible. so it's -- i.p. address isn't the best judgment. people can be at a cafe. i don't think the location of the person writing the review is relevant. i had one guy, for instance, that is in m

to be a bit unfair, you a great book in which you do explain that. i saw the opportunity to make fun of you. >> it's not like i helped kid rock help me launch the book or serving liquid shrimp to everybody at the party. for all intents and purposes, that show, i'll give you my quick review on it, it nails it very well in terms of silicon valley, almost too well that it makes it uncomfortable to watch. i came from that party and i talked to that guy. >> do you think it will be funny to anyone else? it's hilarious to the four of us. >> i wondered the same thing. is anyone else going to actually get the show? >> not that we're better than all those people watching in the midwest, but it's so spot on. >> too spot on. >> that's what makes it funny. if you don't know it's spot on, maybe it's not funny. >> as a kid coming back to silicon valley, there was the internship movie and the steve jobs movie and another one. i think hollywood at least finds us fascinating. >> i got caught on the radio recently talking about that horrible, horrible bravo show. >> th

explain what you have found.id, we found rise in the number of people can killed defending their rights to men the environment. people like josÉ and his wife maria. what has us worried, we feel this could be just the tip of the iceberg in terms of the scale of the real problem. information about what is happening to activists like we just saw as hard to come by and even harder to verify. on the back of that, there seems to be an enormous level of impunity attached to this problem. ,he majority of killings there's almost nothing known about the perpetrator and who was behind it. % of ourseen just 1 cases have seen conviction and brought to justice. and those who would protect the environment are being killed in greater numbers, and they should be protected as heroes. >> let's turn to a clip from the documentary "a fierce green fire" were we will hear from the brazilian rubber tapper and union organizer chico mendes who formed a workers union that fought to preserve the rainforest from cattle ranching and logging.

can i explain it? if i can't explain it, don't do it. later on, the head of strategic communication for general petraeus sat down with the hejazeera bureau chief, and said, here is what you guys were doing that caused us concern. era bureau chief said, they were violating our guidelines on reporting. hmm. the moral of the story is, why don't we start their? --there? have that conversation first. either use all the problem or we will solve the problem. do it where you are able to handle a situation with hubble diplomacy in mind before it pops into the open, before it becomes unflattering portrayal in this or that publication. that is the mindset we have to have. i am always an admirer of the marines. every marine is a spokesman, you know, for that service. i think we have to have that same mentality across government . that in today's world, what ever we are doing is going to become public. if so, we another. have to have a public dimension to what we are thinking, what we are doing, what we are communicating, and try to figure out if in

can you explain what's going on? >> sure. as folks might understand, yelp has to recommend reviews that they find reliable. the reason that there are a number of positive reviews for beverly's business that are not being recommended is because in fact 10 of them came from the very i.p. address that was used to claim her business owner's account. and one of them actually was for a review of a competing business to hers. so the problem is, business owners try to game the system and websites that don't try to filter out or remember -- reliable reviews can get gamed. that's probably why yahoo! decided to go ahead and use yelp as the de facto standard for search. >> beverly, do you have any response to this? >> yeah. first of all, in some cases clients are at your house and they can be using your i.p. address to write something. that is possible. so it's -- i.p. address isn't the best judgment. people can be at a cafe. i don't think the location of the person writing the review is relevant. i had one guy, for instance, that is in

no one is explained it.nd so as a result people like the owners of the subway sandwich shop protect their employees with bulletproof glass. that is sad. >> and the recent meeting of obama care and state insurance commissioners was so alarming many are raising red flags. ohio commissioner mary taylor explains next. is accused of understabling ukraine. in two seconds huckabee. >>> last week ohio commissioner and lieutenant governor mary tea lower joined the shrps commissioners as they met with president obama to talk about epirollment issues. she was unsettled in that meeting and here to explain. and joining me now is lieutenant mary taylor. i know this meeting was a significant one as you had a conversation with the president. you use the term unsettling, why? >> well, it was more of the same. there was no now information. the president and administration pushing at the insurance commissioners to hold rates down. they believed they were going to be held down for 2015. but they are putting pressure on us to do