rh 1d? >> correct. >> okay. wanted to be clear. >> [roll call vote taken] city clerk: chiu, no, farrell, yes, kim, no, supervisor tang, aye, wiener, aye, yee, campos, there are 5 ayes and 5 no. >> that motion fails. >> can we have a motion? >> i want to thank supervisor yee for the time you spent on this. i understand the challenges that you have faced in your district. i have had conversations with many of constituents on this. colleagues, this is a pilot program that would not only exempt out major swaus of our city in rh 1 and 2. it would create a 50-unit limit. i think we can meet supervisor avalos in xelz yoer. let me take a moment to respond that some of the comments that supervisor kim has made that we should perhaps add more carrots or sticks to this legislation. we contemplated whether to make this a mandatory regime. the property is we don't know exactly what the cost are going to be to home owners and rather than enforcing home owners to legalize without being able to assist someo

it would require a report to be prepared by declining after 50 units are legalized in rh 2 and rh 3 zoning district. the total number of applications filed to legalize existing dwelling units, the total number of permits that have been issued to legalize dwelling units and total number of dwelling units to have been legalized. an evaluation of the types of units being developed and their affordability rates would be important to find out what this pilot project. this will lead to an informed proposal. >> do i have a motion and second to those. let's take them one at a time. supervisor yee, your 1st amendment, you can specify the topics? >> sure. the 1st amendment is in regards to prohibiting legalization of additional dwelling units in rh 1 d of zoning districts. >> we have an amendment regarding prohibition of rh 1d. do i have a second? >> second by supervisor tang. discussion on that? >> supervisor cohn. >> my question to the maker of the motion what do we do to the in law units that are illegal already zoned in rh 1d. there are illegal units that exist. what happens to those units? do w

neighborhood commercial district and within 1,750 feet of the district boundaries, excluding any lot within an rh-1 zoning district or any lot with 500 feet of block no. 2623, lot nos. 116 through 154; authorizing the zoning administrator to waive density and other planning code requirements in order to create the in-law units, and requiring the department to monitor rents and publish a report evaluating >> ordinance amending the planning code to allow the construction of an additional dwelling unit or units entirely within the existing built envelope as it existed three years prior to the time of the application of the residential building or auxiliary structure on the same lot on any parcel in the castro street neighborhood commercial district and within 1,750 feet of the district boundaries, excluding any lot within an rh-1 zoning district or any lot with 500 feet of block no. 2623, lot nos. 116 through 154; authorizing the zoning administrator to waive density and other planning code requirements in order to create the in-law units, and requiring the department to monitor rents and publish a

1d in rh 2 and 3 zoning district that it requires additional planning review. >>supervisor john avalos: i believe there is a withdrawal of the motion? >> if supervisor chiu builds in language to assure to look at check in points that i'm willing to withdraw my amendment. >> supervisor yee if i can read the language in the requirement, that there is a point every year and every six 6 months for the first 3 years after the effective date. the zoning administrator and the director of the inspection shall issue a report on the dwelling unit during this program and after 3 years the report will include in the city's housing report and screening forms and building permit applications filed for the first 3 years copies of this report will be submitted to the board and the mayor and controller. when you say what can we do to strengthen this, i'm open to hearing sfrugsz -- suggestions from you on that. if we want to hear a report, that might be appropriate. i'm happy to get feedback from you on what you consider appropriate to do that. >> i think to have a hearing would

the property is zoned rh-3 residential, house, three-familyy and is in a 40-x height and bulk districtsf 101234 >> hello commissioners. shelley. department staff. the project before you is for appropriateness request originally approved by the commission in 2011. the project sight is located at the corner of grove and steiner. it's to allow the construction for the three new buildings. after the 2011 certificate of appropriateness was approved the property was sold in 2012 and the new owners began work under the existing permits. during the work, design modifications were developed and were completed. and the project sponsors also decided that they would like to modify the conditions of the certificate of appropriateness even further. the request today is to legalize the project as completed and further approve further alterations which are window replacement and replacement of siding and trim, modification of the proposed garage design and landscape improvements. the scope of work is fairly complex and i have outlined in your case report. in the architects are here to go through plan

anybodcould join the o rh, and anybody di with thousands of small-scale prospectors, drillers, and finerspetg, the supply of oil was plentiful. prices were low, and so were profits. rockefeller had been doing well as a cleveland produce wholesaler, but he thought he could do better in oil. ruth sheldon knowles came from an oklahoma oil family. and her book "the greatest gamblers" told the industry's history. rockefeller stayed out of the drilling end because he didn't want to lose any money. he was the one who always wanted to -- he wanted to make the money. and when he saw that there was such a thing as drilling dry holes and you could lose money, it was obvious to him in the beginning, that there was going to be as much money lost in looking for oil as there would be made by finding it. schoumacher: rockefeller bought the oil that other men drilled, refined it, and sold it. by 1869, he had the largest refinery in the country. and a year later, standard oil of ohio was born. when competition squeezed profit margins, rockefeller squeezed the competition. willing competitors were bought. u

less concerned with the realities of what took place on the ground and you had high level people like rhes. and it was passed on to jay carney and other top white house advisors concerned with the president's image and wanting to make sure the president came out of this looking like a strong steady steadfast leader and less concern with the actualities of what is on the ground. it was a political document. >> they were nine weeks out from a major election and that was on the bubble and could have gone either way at that point. was this all about insuring that the president looked good in advance of his reelection. >> the e-mails showed what we assumed. officials in the state department becomely describing this as an attack. you had others in the administration saying it was clearly in the intelligence community saying it was a terrorist event and perpetrated and well planned. and you had cia talking points scrubbed and edited and rewritten and susan rice said it was a video and the president and secretary of state state when they welcomed the bodies home. it was not revealing so much new

executive producer about to kick my tail, stroeu say thanto say, thank yoe that up next time, co colonel rh peters. >> friday's on-line poll result we asked do you think that the economy is headed in the right direction, 96% of you said no. and tonight's poll, do you think that relatives of former presidents should find occupation thundershowe other tl candidates? we're just curious. and later we'll have veal quotation of the day, and word of the day, i hope governor bush is listening. >> world's largest democratic elections kicking off in india, more than 800 million voters going to the polls, expected to cast their ballots over next 6 weeks, that is more voters than united states, brazil, and indonesia combined. world's biggest democracy. at the polls. and for first time ever voters will have b option of rejecting all of the candidates and checking one simple box, think about this one, none of the above. never happen here. we'll be right back. stay with us. >> stock market turb length, the economy's sluggish and president focusing on income inequalty, former reagan economic advisor, altea

that's rh