. >> jj rosenbaum uncovered the cari program in some case file documents. >> it's not normally given to people, so we think it was an accidental release... >> what she found, she says, appeared to be a blueprint for collaboration between local law enforcement and ice officials that launched nationwide in 2012. >> when we see ice vehicles driving around predominantly latino areas of town, arresting people, and continuing to drive the vans around until they fill them up, that's not targeted enforcement, that's racial profiling. >> in november, the immigrant community took their anger to streets in cities across the country. >> this protest culminated in a blockade of rush hour traffic in one of new orleans' busiest intersections - for three hours. >> i got a job! get one! >> just behind us another truck is trying to make it through the intersection and the protestors have put themselves in front of it. the protesters believe that obama turned on what they call an immigration dragnet -- and he can turn it off. >> police are circling around. they just started their first arrest. the crow

rosenbaum. >> mr. chief justice and may it please the court, northwest claims that the world perks contract allow to terminate rabbi ginsberg's contract and take away the miles he had accrued in reliance on the frequent flier contract. that allowed it for any reason or any whim to deprive him of all the benefits of the frequent flier contract bargain. our position in contrast is that northwest's actions breached its obligations under the contract, specifically the contractual obligation to perform in good faith. because this is a question of contract interpretation, rabbi ginsberg's claim -- >> a lack of good faith is what you're claiming. if they thought he was abusive, or what are you saying? what action? >> the action was terminating him from the program and taking away his miles. >> it can't be that. >> without having due cause. >> what are you saying was the bad cause here? assume their answer, that he was abusing the program. >> well, we do not think he was abusing the program. in -- >> so you're

rosenbaum. >> mr. chief justice, and may it please the court, let me begin, justice kennedy, with the questions you raise and then come to the question that chief justice roberts raised. to begin, justice kennedy, there's no way to distinguish the seattle case from this case nor the hunter case. both those cases have to be overruled. here is why the seattle case is -- is identical to this case. both issues -- both cases involve constitutionally permissible plans which had as their objective obtaining diversity on campuses. seattle was a k through 12 case. this case is a higher education case. but in both instances, the objective was to obtain diversity. no constitutional mandate to relieve past discrimination. rather, in fact, as the court said, seattle, tacoma, and wasco were attempting to deal with de facto segregation. >> is that an accurate description of seattle? i thought that in seattle, before the school board adopted the bussing plan, the city was threatened with lawsuits by the department of