kennedy's explanation insisted united. he said with the advent of the internet, disclosure can prevent shareholders and citizens with the permission deeded to hold corporations in elected officials accountable for their positions ian supporters. shareholders can see if it advances the interest to make profits in citizens can see if officials are in the pocket of monday interest. the first amendment protects political speech and disclosure prevents shareholders to react to corporate entities in a way but this enables the electorate to make informed decisions to give proper weight to to the messages so he said the deal was full disclosure but today we have only half and is justice kennedy says that is a problem for our democracy how can shareholders hold them accountable if they have no idea what is being spent? how can voters hold elected officials accountable if they do not know which interest are financing those officials elections? finally, how can the electric motors make informed decisions and give those messages says justice kennedy says, is something the court says it is important if voters do not know who is financing the verizon of advertising run by these groups? thank you. >> euronext panel member is for