i'm not sure if mr. wu has looked into this. we're not looking at it as part of the ca package, but it may be tied to linear feet as opposed to volume. sfwl could we advise the project manager we want some restraint? >> i could add -- i mean, model that was used for the cvs project at 2280 market street in the kas gastro was something we discussed with the project sponsor and they'll willing to do something similar. the size of the signage is limited or is established by the code but the project sponsor can -- has agreed to work with the department to come up with a signed program that is compatible and attractive with the neighborhood, so instead of installing letter signs, we could do a different type of sign that isn't as bright or is more appropriate for that neighborhood context. >> along that line too, since we got them to open up the building, do we have any control over the stuff that goes into the windows? >> we do. actually the code specifies that for purposes of transparency that merchandise be located a certain dista

mr. chairman, i would ask for regular order if we're not growing to allow professor wu to answer the question >> it is mr. issa's time. i indulged you with a couple -- >> to be honest any of them can answer any questions. the last one i think i got time for professor wu. >> time expired, mr. chairman. >> when the gentleman goes off the actual question it is not his time. chairman conyers is over there, i knows well. i asked professor wu to answer the question and be succinct. now the fact is the pertinent question right now and i don't care how much time the chairman gives professor wu to go on and disagreeing with us but the pertinent question is is the antitrust relevant market question. i would appreciate all four witnesses answering it. >> we'll give them a short time to answer. as your time is up. we will allow each witness a couple of seconds to go in and we'll recognize the gentleman from michigan, if anybody wants to -- >> i hate to do it tiff point, can you repeat the question? >> no. >> it is short. the central florida haven't market, in other words, how we define competition, is co

mr. chairman, i would ask for regular order if we're not going to allow professor wu to answer the question. >> it is mr. issa's time. i indulged you kwwith a couple >> anyone can answer the question. and i think i got the answers from professor wu -- >> your time is expired. >> when a gentleman goes off the actual question, it is not his time. chairman conyers is over there, and he knows well, i ask a question, i asked professor wu to answer the question and be succinct. the fact is the pertinent question right now -- and i don't care how much time the chairman gives professor wu to go on disagreeing with us, but it's a relevant market question. i would appreciate all four witnesses answering. >> we'll give him a short time to answer, and as your time is up, we will allow each wnitnessa couple seconds to go in, and then we'll recognize the gentleman from michigan. >> i hate to do it at this point, but can you repeat the question? >> no. >> it's short. the relevant market, in other words, how we define competition, is competition entire state or is competition what's available to you in you

wu. so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 7 to zero and places you, mr. commission matter questions or comments commissioners, i want to follow up on the matter that was raised at last week's hearing by commissioner moore for the conditions of approval on bush street i reviewed the hearing tape and indeed the staff presenter glen did indeed read the amendment regarding this affordability exponent on the presentation i wanted to follow up with you and the viewing audience. >> thank you commissioner antonini. >> yeah. interesting article that will be pertinent for the discussion that follows and it was in the new york times on sunday june 8th dealt with affordable housing in new york city the system is different then here that's a volunteer system if the building sponsor agrees they have to provide 20 percent affordable and they get 33 percent more square footage. it appears to not be very popular because it's optional 3 thousand units have been built in new york city between 2005 and 2013. i guess office of management and budget 3 thousand affordable housi

mr. chairman. >> thank you, professor. we'll go to professor woo wu. >> chairman, ranking member, members of the subcommittee, thanks so much for holding this hearing. i welcome the opportunity. i can summarize my comments in a few sentences. i have the highest admiration for the antitrust laws and the agencies enforcing the antitrust laws but i don't think they're equipped to handle the broad range of values and policies that are implicated by net neutrality and the open internet. j us to take a sample, what i'm suggesting is that when this -- when we consider internet policy what what we're really considering is not merely economic policy, not merely competition policy but also media policy, social policy, oversight of the political process issues of free speech. there are a wide range of non-economic values that i fear that the antitrust law, despite its expertise, despite the decades, indeed over a century of law making in that area simply does not capture and for that reason i think that despite its imperfections we should stick with the process