the business report to san francisco and how will this new state audience have a different requirement or is that the same. >> employers covered from the san francisco ordinance report to our website. the difference is and this is what we've been going the outreach the difference is if you're employer of 49 or more you'll be reporting to the m t c regional website. >> colleagues commissioner gravanis. >> it goes without saying it is good to hear another example of how san francisco has taken the lead and our staff has been putting the work in its yes, ma'am last day in other places and the region so congratulations to our staff and congratulations also to the air district for working hard to make that work. >> i'll point out too new york city is working on a come take care for lessons leader for our program. >> i have a quick question if then the partnership and i imagine the answer is question working with david and his take place helps to provide additional capacity to sf to share and support the efforts here mutually and support the effort of the region it's a win-win it's not like we're expanding and providing additional challenges for rsv staff but as we

state and here in san francisco noe that there's just not enough space to farm particularly in san francisco given the expense and scarcity of land in our 7 by 7 city. this ordinance which was crafted with significant input and city staff of ab 5511 is a an important step to addressing this issue. it would use for their land, allowing them to pay more property taxes in exchange for committing for at least a five year period, exclusive agricultural use of the land. i want to thank supervisor cohen for her cosponsorship as well as lands use committee for their recommendation and ask for you support. >> any further discussion? madam clerk, role call vote. >> item 63, kim i, mar i, tang i, wiener i, yee i, breed i, supervisor campos i, chiu i, cohen i, farrell i. there is ten is. >> this ordinance is passed on first reading. why don't we go to role call? the >> supervisor kim will submit. supervisor mar. >> thank you. i have a couple of items. i'd like to thank supervisor david chiu for address r dressing these issues with a stakeholder group he's been working with for some time now and look forward to coordinating my efforts with his as well. as the miller bill moves

extend for people across the country i encourage you to continue san francisco's leadership and to support the lgbtq equal housing ordinance >> thank you. >> good afternoon, commissioners i'm here from the san francisco human rights commission. teresa submitted a letter for your consideration in the packet i believe before you today, i wanted to introduce myself to the commission and echo the sentiments in director sparks letter it's at agency responsible for enforcing the ordinances against discrimination last year about 20 percent of our 0 his or her discrimination complaints were filed on sexual orientation or a gender identity. as some of the previous speakers stayed the there's no federal protections combinls this form of discrimination and the human rights commission does view this ordinance as something that will have a positive impact on the lgbtq community throughout the united states. the simple pleasure will provide for a key point of information that's currently mercy housing from the national discourse interest or. so the data collection will not be onerous and they'll find the measure to be a report for the b

labor and workers fought for universal health care in san francisco, put sick day ordinance on the ballot. no one considered these landmark legislation and now others are joining san francisco's rank and implementing the policy. san francisco has a lot to be proud of. we not only push the boundary to respect the work of our workers within our city boundaries, we impact the lives of workers throughout the country. having the strongest minimum wage proposal in the country isn't enough. it has to be effective. we can't work this hard to pay better wages and not pay attention to where the money is going. we want to ensure it ends up in the pocket of our wage earners. therefore we are presenting this today and the mayor's office and all have worked on to make sure we are highlighting the city's enforcement priority for this minimum wage measure. i have submitted those amendments to the members of the rules committee as well. to be clear about what the ordinance is actually about, this is how we are amending the minimum wage ordinance . one, we are increasing the minimum wage wage to $12.25 on

ordinance was indeed violated by his representative. that admission comes from the representative here tonight and i don't think we should drop this. we wouldn't be doing our duty to the citizens of san francisco in terms of telling them that we take seriously the fact that a particular department when it's told to turn over materials that the sunshine ordinance and the open government act require them to turn over that they just blow it off as was done here in a number of situations and if they blow it off -- well, there are a bunch of hearings that will occur by different departments, by the sunshine ordinance task force, by the ethics commission. there will be lots of words expended but nothing will happen, no consequence so i think when we finish up with the discussion tonight we should have a finding mr. mr. rahaim violated this ordinance. >> >> i just -- chairman i just wanted to build on commissioner keane's point which is simply this and i agree. i think this was a clumpy and ilelegant referral that has us talking about not the substantive component of it but as i heard it recounted in the department there was untimely responses to the submission for the request for documents. you have

san francisco superior court, case no. cgc-11-507528; entitled joseph luebberke vs. city and county of san francisco. ~ in superior court. >> same house, same call? this ordinance is passed on first read. [gavel] >> next item. >> item 60 is an ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by maria reyes jimenez de melendrez and amulfo jimenez against the city and county of san francisco for $90,000; the lawsuit what filed on september 11, 2012, in san francisco superior court, case no. cgc-12-524112; entitled maria reyes melendrez de jimenez, et al. vs. city and county of san francisco. ~ in superior court. >> same house same call? this orctiontionv is passed on first read. [gavel] >> next item. >> item 61 is a resolution approving the settlement of the unlitigated claim filed by amy blackstone against the city and county of san francisco for $28,544; claim was filed on march 3, 2014, additional material terms of said settlement include title transfer to the city of the artwork created by amy blackstone as a sculptural fence for father alfred e. boeddeker park, the guaranteed physical delivery of the artwork to the city on or before june 30, 2014, and a

san francisco superior court, case no. cgc-11-515615; entitled mark morgan vs. city and county of san francisco, et al. ~ in superior court. >> same house same call? this ordinance is passed on the first read. [gavel] >> item 59. >> item 59 is an ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by joseph luebberke against the city and county of san francisco for 100,000; the lawsuit was filed on january 21, 2011, in san francisco superior court, case no. cgc-11-507528; entitled joseph luebberke vs. city and county of san francisco. ~ in superior court. >> same house, same call? this ordinance is passed on first read. [gavel] >> next item. >> item 60 is an ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by maria reyes jimenez de melendrez and amulfo jimenez against the city and county of san francisco for $90,000; the lawsuit what filed on september 11, 2012, in san francisco superior court, case no. cgc-12-524112; entitled maria reyes melendrez de jimenez, et al. vs. city and county of san francisco. ~ in superior court. >> same house same call? this orctiontionv is passed on first read. [gavel] >> next item. >> item 61 is a resolution approving the s

san francisco is one of the most expensive cities in the country. second, we request that you strengthen programs for formally incarcerated individuals. through the fair chance ordinance which was recently passed, which is san francisco's band the box ordinance, the city stance poise to provide its population with a second chance success. we ask you that invest in community based, employment and training programs, specifically $80,000 for funding through the sheriff's department. this represents an investment and an opportunity to best serve all of san franciscans. thank you. >> next speaker. >> good afternoon, supervisor. i'm jackie from hospitality and co-chair of the -- i want to support all the budget justice coalitions budget priorities today. and especially the 1.5% cost of the doing business increase and the $11 million for the house proposal. as you know the need for homelessness prevention and subsidies is well documented. you've heard a lot about it today. there's daily stories of people being evicted or harassed out of their homes and people are sleeping in dangerous situations suppose as subway tunnels and shelters are full. our family waiting list is long

san francisco where we saw the birth of the sanctuary movement in the 1980s when san francisco provided a safe haven for central american refugees fleeing civil war. since the passage of the sanctuary ordinance in 1989, san francisco has held the distinction of being a sanctuary city and i think that consistent with that tradition today, we need to be on the record saying that what's happening with these kids is simply wrong. we in san francisco benefit from a rich network of culturally competent organizations and service providers that have the expertise to address the needs of these children. so, this resolution calls upon the following. first, it calls upon the city and county of san francisco to commit its resources to address this humanitarian crisis. it also calls upon this city to urge our congressional delegation to make sure that there is humane treatment of these children by our country and that the treatment reflects the values of the united states which has a long history of nation of immigrants welcoming kids like the ones that we're seeing coming to this country today. we also ask that when this resolution is approved, and hopefully it will be unanimous approval for this resolu

. >> many of those taking part in today's celebration helped san francisco pass its living wage ordinance back in 2003. >>> san francisco's fillmore district celebrated its jazz heritage today. ♪[ music ] today was the kickoff of the 30th annual fillmore jazz festival. this year's festival celebrates the contributions of women in jazz. people enjoyed live music on three stages along with arts and crafts and food for body and soul. >> our first time being here. actually our first time in san francisco. it's actually a lot more fun than i thought. great food. great drinks and just great music. >> back in the 1940s and '50s, the fillmore district was a magnet for jazz fans with legendary nightclubs. organizers say the festival pays trit to that history. the jazz festival continues tomorrow at 10:00 a.m. and admission is free. >>> now to a story that absolutely just creep me out. no one was injured, but plenty of people, boy they were surprised in florida this week. >> a 12' burmese python showed up uninvited. the massive snake was spotted in a florida city gated- community. one whom woman wh

of the supervisor campos in helping san francisco once again to be a leader in housing discrimination protection we saw it before in the domestic partnership ordinance and have seen it in san francisco response to the hiv. >> in terms of employment we need more jobs and hate ashbury young people youngest soldiers of angels that's why i intend intend to help the young for them for them what happened to them i think we have to engage in a more open alternatives to make this a job opening for everyone in time and in plays in the occasions everywhere everywhere everywhere. >> thank you. next speaker. good afternoon, supervisors bryan with the aids housing alliances i'm here to ask you to support this it was born out of a deep concern about the displace of employment in san francisco and we currently live in a system where oneself within these wealthy and access to income concerns ones housing in san francisco and those hower not having the opportunities get disunderstated they've built the passage of human rights we enjoy those pioneers are being put in areas they don't enjoy the same civil privileges our denominations that policymakers have voted for i

i move that we find the director john rahaim violated the san francisco administrative code sunshine ordinance section 67-point two one a. as custodian of the records he didn't without unreasonable delay permit a public record to be expertd and examined. i am use the statutory language mr. chair. >> [inaudible] and non willful. >> i mean i second that motion and i agree with it. i think mr. pilpel has raised some very important issues about who we find responsible in these kinds of cases as we've had discussion about this on several occasions, but in this case i have to say i do agree with mr. hertz and in the end we have no recourse other than to hold the director of any department ultimately responsible. i mean i think that is true that the buck stops there and to try and to decisive and unspool the thread of who rejected or didn't do a timely response i think can get a little too complicated. i think the simple thing is that a executive director of any department is responsibility, end of story, whether it's willful or non willful is the other matter that we can certainly discuss. >> the pu

inadequate for lgbt now we have 1 out of 5 homeless again, we can't let this happen in san francisco i think this ordinance will add to the protects and he should continue to protect this community that's been here for 20 or thirty years. thank you for supporting this ordinance >> thank you. >>

again over the last two years we've take the opportunity great steps to make san francisco safer we passed the retrofit ordinance last year just to remind you this protects 60 thousand people in the city and 7 thousand local workers that are employed we have legislation that established legislation for poorer people and gives low interest loans this is the same effort that takes a specific change to the rent owners and amends it for tenants that are unable to park in their parking spaces only when a mandatory parking issue. it provides a clear mechanism for the landlord to sever parking services during the retrofit and this is unclear we have been working with the tenant activist community to come up with a fair and balanced framework if you have any questions, i'll be happy to answer them and as well as the director of the rent board is here as well >> thank you, sir. did you have anything to add or are you here for questions >> terrifically colleagues if no questions or comments we'll open open this up for public comment on item 5. come on up >> good afternoon supervisor i'm charley representing the san franci

annual budget and appropriation ordinance appropriating all estimated receipts and all estimated expenditures for selected departments of the city and county of san francisco as of june 2, 2014, for the fys ending june 30, 2015, and june 30, 2016. fiscal impactt city clerk: item 1: 14069: [proposed annual budget and appropriation ordinance for selected departments - fys 2014-2015 and 2015-2016] 1. 140619 sponsor: mayor proposed annual budget and appropriation ordinance appropriating all estimated receipts and all estimated expenditures for selected departments of the city and county of san francisco as of june 2, 2014, for the fys ending june 30, 2015, and june 30, 2016. city clerk: item 1: 14069: [proposed annual budget and appropriation ordinance for selected departments - fys 2014-2015 and 2015-2016] 1. 140619 sponsor: mayor proposed annual budget and appropriation ordinance appropriating all estimated receipts and all estimated expenditures for selected departments of the city and county of san francisco as of june 2, 2014, for the fys ending june 30, 2015, and june 30, 2016. fiscal impactt. 1234 item 2: item 2: [proposed annual salary ordinance - fys

annual budget and appropriation ordinance appropriating all estimated receipts and all estimated expenditures for selected departments of the city and county of san francisco as of june 2, 2014, for the fiscal years ending june 30, 2015, and june 30, 2016. item number 2, proposed annual salary ordinance enumerating positions in the annual budget and appropriation ordinance for the fiscal years ending june 30, 2015, and june 30, 2016, continuing, creating, or establishing these positions; enumerating and including therein all positions created by charter or state law for which compensations are paid from city and county funds and appropriated in the annual appropriation ordinance; authorizing appointments or continuation of appointments thereto; specifying and fixing the compensations and work schedules thereof; and authorizing appointments to temporary positions and fixing compensations therefore. item number 3, resolution approving the budget of the office of community investment and infrastructure, operating as the successor agency to the san francisco redevelopment agency for fiscal year 2014-2015. ~ agency. item number 4, resolution approving the budge

san francisco superior court, case no. cgc-13-530600; entitled jay korber v. city and county of san francisco, et al. city clerk: sf 11234 item 11: [hearing - initiative ordinance - planning code - city housing balance requirement]14071611.sponsors: kim; campos, avalos, mar and yeehearing held to consider the proposed initiative ordinance submitted by four of more supervisors to the voters at the november 4, 2014, election entitled "ordinance amending the planning code to establish, in the approval and construction of new housing, a balance of 70 >> okay. supervisors kim. you want to make some comments on this. supervisor kim show today. >>supervisor jane kim: first of all. i want to thank the rules committee. you have had a tough calendar. i didn't know i had quite the calendar that you had. i do want to thank supervisor tang and chair yee for all the many ideas and proposals that we have proposed for the ballot for november 2014. i wish this was one. i know we are going to have folks coming in to speak on the housing balance measure. i did want to give an introduction for this measure. this as i had mentioned earlier today is a big legislative year in san fra

in 10 yearscious the cost of hiring entry level in san francisco became 60 percent between minimum wage and health care security ordinance and cost on sick leave benefits. the result of that was a significant slowdown in job growth in san francisco until just a few years ago. in 2013, we hit 6 thousand jobs in san francisco since 2000. our concern is that there can be negative job impact, with not layoffs but perhaps slow job growth. we wish this had a broader, longer ramp up. we think we should have something for especially for smaller businesses, but at the same time, we do want to salute those that participated in making this possible. we know it's going to be a successful measure on the november ballot. thank you very much. >> thank you, mr. lapis zarus. >> hello, my name is barbara. i'm here from the scene 84 -- senior and disability action group. we advocate for their needs and help educate them and help organize around the various issues of the problems they are facing. health care issues, caregiver issues, ihs and housing issues. you will ask how does this impact the minimum wage. the whole city has been complete