. >> susan b. anthony first which is a real case and then the decision lands. >> and then announce the decision and justice sotomayor gives a first dissent from the bench and it's -- it was actually quite a powerful dissent and it was interesting moment and it's something that like you said, neither broadcast and she did not release -- sometimes justices release bench statements. if you weren't there, you missed it and a lot of reporters were there so when the stories you had this explanation of that, that you normally on any other day if it was a, you know, a run of the mill sort of habeas case or something nobody would have been there and missed it and not be able to see it so there is a value in being there but you can't always be there. >> so in a situation like that, bob, what do you do? do you stay upstairs to watch the arguments in these two important cases? do you run downstairs and file a story? >> i went downstairs because i thought it was a dramatic moment and i thought that it was a case that p

i said i'll do the susan b. anthony first amendment one and not knowing that justice sotomayor is about to present this great dissent which matters to me both in my day job and in this side project book on her. so after she says what she says and i know it's huge, i'm thinking, i promise i'll stay for the susan b. anthony oral arguments so my editors are hoping for that but i also know i have just observed this big moment i want to be woven into whatever story we're putting out on the michigan affirmative action case and you have to make a series of calculations and what i did is i thought my colleague lawrence hurley will do whatever we needed to do for the first hour and more important to have one of us up there for the relatively important first amendment case from ohio and it was tough especially since the first two rows emptied out completely because the bob and adam and david and everybody else knew it was wiser to run down and kimberly and i knew for our purposes even though it's a tough decision to make and fran

i ended up writing a story about the susan b anthony case by reading the transcript later in the day. it is not the same as being at oral arguments, but you get the high points and understand where the justices are coming from. that helps a lot. >> they have alluded to this. we are in two different businesses. bob and adam and i. i'm not sure about kimberly. we are serving a website that wants newsly -- immediately. we also work for a newspaper that wants to be more reflective. i stay downstairs and get the opinion, but i do it the as of the website. my choice would be, i would rather go listen to them deliver. but as long as there is a demand for the website to get some been up immediately, i don't feel there is a cost to it. you take a half an hour or 45 minutes. every days torn thinking i have two different jobs. court wasred if the showing a little consideration for the press, although not as much as if they spread their work around. >> the answer would be no. >> there were never more than three opinions a day. and maybe throughout the whole term. they have been -- there have been

i ended up writing a story about the susan b. anthony case by reading the transcript later in the day. it is not the same as being at oral arguments, but you get the high points and understand where the justices are coming from. that helps a lot. >> they have alluded to this. we are in two different businesses. bob and adam and i. i'm not sure about kimberly. we are serving a website that wants news immediately. we also work for a newspaper that wants to be more reflective. i stay downstairs and get the opinion, but i do it because of the website. my choice would be, i would rather go listen to them deliver. but as long as there is a demand for the website to get some been up immediately, i don't feel there is a cost to it. you take a half an hour or 45 minutes. i am always torn every day thinking i have two different jobs. >> i wondered if the court was showing a little consideration for the press, although not as much as if they spread their work around. >> the answer would be no. >> there were never more than three opinions a day. and

women susan b. anthony was the first one to appear and a circulating coin.nd clark guide sack is on our dollar coin. martha washington is the only woman to appear on paper note. what woman do you think should appear on paper currency. head to myfoxphilly.com click our facebook link at the top of the home page then post you think it should be. we're going to have the results what you think on fox 29 news at 10:00. >> i don't know whose on it as long as i have the money. >> women spend money so with to the. >> exactly. >> the weather was good today. but we're in for some changes as we head into the weekend. >> we are looking at that humidity iain and lucy on the increase as well as showers and storms. in particular during the day on saturday. but look at the temperatures. we're in the mid 80s. so warmer conditions right now than what we saw pretty much all week. remember yesterday's high was 80 degrees. the average high for this time of year is right around 87 degrees. so we were pretty close to average today. humidity right now at 40%. the low temperature thi

make it a crime for a woman to terminate a pregnancy bases on the race of her fetus like the susan b. anthony douglas prenatal nondiscrimination act. didn't make that up. that garnered 100 co-sponsors and came pretty close to passing the house of representatives in 2012. this is an ongoing strategic attempt to shame african-american women out of getting the reproductive health care of their choice. black women have disproportionately high rates compared to white women. but when these opponents to reproductive rights are successful in changing policy like when their state passes a law that will close clinics or when the nation's highest court strikes down buffer zones outside those clinics or makes it harder to get contraception. african-american women and other women of color are often those most affected by those choices. with me at the table are dean, who is columnist for "daily beast." eisha moody-mills and david cohen professor of law at drexel university. eisha, i just made a claim that african-american women -- is that a valid claim? >> absolutely that's a valid claim. i mean, we have t

. >> it was susan b. anthony which real case. so we're hoping to be there for arguments and then the decisi decision wins. quite a powerful and interesting moment and something something that is not broadcast. release justices will statements that have their remarks. if you weren't this you missed and it just so happened a lot of reporters were there. when the stories you had this that that you itmally in any other day, if was a run of the mill sort of habeas case or something nobody they have been there and would have missed it and wouldn't be able to see t there but value in being there you can't always be there. >> in a situation like that, do you do? do you stay upstairs to watch the argues in these two cases and rundown stairs and file a story? >> i went downstairs because i a dramatic moment and i thought it was a case that people were going to be really wanted to in and i get something on the web. so, even though i had thought at would stay and watch the arguments i decided that it wasn't worth it. it was more important to