what i noticed in this case is that darron wilson's supporters are quite silent.'m very surprised that he doesn't have a lawyer whose being vocal, not necessarily with the facts of the case but at least give darron wilson a face, give him a support so that people know there are two sides to the story that are coming out and i think it's very important that we balance it. in the zimmerman case it was so important because we knew we would face a jury and we didn't want the jury to only hear one side of the story, same thing here. >> neal, do we know if the officer has an attorney? there is a defense fund, raised some $176,000 so far, has he hired an attorney yet? >> i have a finger on that pulse and i'm sure he's represented by counsel but no one announced publicly they are representing him. in light of mark, and this is important. fy were advising him, i would tell him and the family to keep quiet. the narrative is so far ahead of him. any information will be argued about and discredited. >> wait to whatever happens -- wait to testify in the grand jury, wait to wha

darron wilson under suspicion for nearly two weeks.e clear, we do not know what happened. we don't have forensic evidence and only a hand full of witnesses have come forward and they have interviewed to come forward publicly, at least, most likely they will be testifying before the grand jury and may have spoke ton fbi, as well. michael brady the man i talked to yesterday was the latest in a string of person close enough to the deadly encount tore see it and at least parts of it and in all likelihood wish they hadn't. michael brady certainly does. in all their stories, one thing stands out. the simple fact none of their stories precisely agree with the others. they all differ, someways large, someways small. these are narratives that have spoken publicly. we have not heard from that investigators have. you would think there is nothing more reliable or consistent than eyewitness testimony. the evidence, history says precisely opposite. in a moment you'll hear from a leading expert in the first. first, a small sampling of what some say t

the that officer's name darron wilson. there was an incident report on an alleged convenience store robbery and video purportly showing brown doing the crime, allegedly stealing small cigars and brown shoving a clerk. they call it a strong armed robbery. there were mixed messages from the police department. earlier in the day, police chief thomas jackson laid out a timeline that left the impression officer wilson was responding to the robbery call when he shot michael brown, that as you might imagine set off anger in the community. people calling it victim blaming. character assassination and a distraction from the central question, did officer wilson shoot an unarmed man who had his hands up in surrenderer. the alleged robbery had nothing to do with the officer's decision to shoot and then in a true bombshell late in the day, chief jackson changed his story. >> there were two separate officers. this robbery does not relate to the initial contact between the officer and michael brown. the initial contact between the office

a third autopsy, the grand jury investigating officer darron wilson's decision to shoot michael brown and questions about the prosecutor in charge. there is a lot of ground to cover in this hour. we'll start the hour with steve here in ferguson. you've been out here for quite awhile now. you were in the thick of it last night. explain what happened last night because around this time last night things were calm. the crowds were larger than they are now. what set it off? >> so, at some point, the crowd, the protesters have been marching peacefully for within about a mile circling back and forth. >> what is police are telling them to do, keep moving. >> keep moving is what police say. when they got down the avenue and heading towards in the direction of the command post, the police formed up again and they stood their ground this time. they did not move in on the crowd as they had done on previous nights. but suddenly some bottles started flying out of the crowd, water bottles started flying in the direction of police and elevated the attention dramatically and that's what we saw dozens

a powerful push to learn why officer darron wilson killed michael brown last saturday. police saying the officer didn't know the unarmed 18-year-old was a suspect in a convenience store robbery when he shot him. tonight the fbi is interviewing witnesses but for so many demonstrating and taking frustration straight to the governor, the answers just aren't coming quickly enough. there is another big rally scheduled for tomorrow. we're told michael brown's parents will be there again asking for peace and insisting that officer wilson who is in hiding tonight be charged. marcy gonzalez, abc news, ferguson, missouri. >>> in oakland last night a protest in support of those in missouri turned violent. sky 7 hd shows protesters marching down the street. one officer who responded was assaulted and injured. several businesses were damaged. abc 7 news reporter cornell bernard has details. >> it's shocking for a friday night. >> reporter: the game store owner says it looked like a war zone friday as protesters threw rocks at businesses on telegraph avenue smashing windows. >> about

it began with the naming of the local police officer, darron wilson who shot and killed michael brown. it was accompanied by surveillance video released by police taken at a local convenience store showing two african american men, brown and dorian johnson stealing cigars and brown shoving or man handling the clerk and confuse from thomas jackson leaving the impression officer wilson was responding to the robbery call when he shot michael brown, then later today contradicting it. >> there were two separate officers. this robbery does not relate to the initial contact between the officer and michael brown. the initial can tact between the officer and mr. brown was not related to the robbery. >> why did he stop michael brown? >> because they were walking down the middle of the street blocking traffic. that was it. >> having said that, chief jackson then gave the local paper and me yet another version. the officer he said actually did know about the robbery but was not aware that michael brown was a suspect, that is, not until he might have seen the cigarettes in brown's hands. as you mi

. >> reporter: a confrontation at officer darron wilson's police car and then shots fired. for those who claim to know what happened to michael brown, that's about all they agree on. at least three eyewitnesss remember a scuffle at the officer's car. though an anonymous woman who did not witness the shooting but a friend of the officers says michael brown was the aggressor, which cnn confirmed matches the account officer wilson gave authorities. >> michael bum rushes him, shoves him back into his car, punches him in the face and then then grabs for his gun, michael grabs the gun, shoves it away and the gun goes off. >> reporter: also in dispute was brown shot from behind or was he charging officer wilson? it's still unclear. tiffany mitchell told cnn brown was on the run. >> as he runs, the police get out of his vehicle and he follows behind him shooting and the kid body jerked as if he was hit from behind. >> reporter: this woman who took cell phone video of brown's body in the street told cnn brown was shot from behind. >> while he was running away from the officer trying

we also learned from an inside source that officer darron wilson's injuries were not as severe as someith 70,000 signatures renewing the call for the prosecutor to take himself off the

the that officer's name darron wilson.enience store robbery and video purportly showing brown doing the crime, allegedly stealing small cigars and brown shoving a clerk. they call it a strong armed robbery. there were mixed messages from the police department. earlier in the day, police chief thomas jackson laid out a timeline that left the impression officer