mr. emerick. i will start. senator thune will follow, and then senator koets and we'll proceed from there. according to your website, and i'm just going back to some basic stuff, student athlete health, safety, and wellbeing remain our top priorities. yet, in court papers filed for a lawsuit in which a family sued the ncaa after their son died from a brain injury suffered in a preseason football practice, the ncaa asserted that, quote, the ncaa denies it has a legal dp duty to protect student athletes, close quote. i find that extraordinary. now, i know what your answer is going to be, and that's going to upset me. but the question is, how do you reconcile your website's publicly stated priority promoting health and safety with your private legal arguments which you have declared somehow are different? that the ncaa doesn't have a legal duty to protect student athletes? you either do or you don't? >> i will not quibble about the language. i think that was at the very least a terrible choice of words created by