paragraph 74. our submission that the court need to accept the version as reasonable possibly two before the court can commend evaluating the defense. our argument that is so unreasonable that his version could never be accepted as reasonably possibly true. even in the event that the court would accept the accused version, it is not to the finding, arming himself while approaching the danger, pursuing the possibility that he then should kill someone. the possibility by going on and then firing through the door. can we just -- page 1769. that is his version. so you wanted to confront him? that's me oscar. i want to confront him. stand up for myself, that is correct my lady. i wanted to go confront the ladies. that's correct. you did it by firing. that's correct. that's what he wanted to do. that's what he just did. i go there, forsee the possibility that i might, arm myself, go there. forsee the possibility i may have to shoot somebody, i did. so my lay did i did, even on his own version. but we say

we deal with in paragraph 11 of what happened in the car, we deal in paragraph 12, my lady, of the positionthe ammunition. we will deal with this in detail later, but at this early stage we would like the court to take note of the fact that the accused asked about a shooting incident december 2012 until the shooting of the deceased displayed a blatant disregard for the lives of others. my lady, one cannot see this as anything but, as a blatant disregard, handling a firearm in a restaurant full of patrons. my lady, in paragraph 15 we will get back to the metaphor we used there. we say that in keeping with the proficient of the accused as an athlete, we argue that the accused was on a relay run. he started the relay run with a bat. my lady, you have to hand over the baton to the next athlete to complete the race, but if you drop that baton and if you stumble and life causes you to drop the baton which it did, you cannot compete the rest. you started the race by giving evidence. you have to complete the race, my lady. without the baton of truth, you cannot complete the race. we say, my lady, i

nat/4:30 mooney says: use that as an example and boom, your paragraph just got long." ellos son estufiantes que quizas necesitan mayor atencion, y quizas un empuje. todos son ninos de crianza. el profesor mooney les da ese empuje. sot/4:48 mooney says: you're falling behind." pero tambien los anima para pero tambien los anima para que se sobresalgan. sot/12:01 mooney says: es muy importante para mi, para la community, la comunidad." 15:36 lopez says: este programa ha tenido mucho éxito." el doctor david lopez es miembro de la mesa directiva de la agencia silicon valley chldren's fund., el programa rise de la agencia le presta apoyo a los ninos de crianza para asegurar que no fallen en su educacion. esa es una de las razones por

to some of the language in 5 the word very say recommendation 57 in our response the third full paragraph from the bottom at the end you have the same problem it size the commission and director note that the campaign i would strike the words the director the commission notes this is a response to the commission not the response of the executive director with with all respect to mr. sinclair. the other thing i would mention in order to have a more civil tone to our response going on along with what i said at the beginning up under paragraph 3 on page 4 where we say disagree partially we say this assertion is not completely true i ask we use the term not completely accurate to say something it not tell you there's an implication the grand jury is being false and i think that would be unfortunate unfortunate for us to do so i ask that change. those are my observations as to four and five >> thank you commissioner keane any other comments from the commissioners? i have a question about both of those. and i confess is made me i maybe deficit in my technical capacities but i find it surprising

young chinese paragraphers are gaining worldwide attention for their distinctive portrayals of modern china. here hundreds of people frolic in the ocean, a sign of rapid social change. pictures such as this that portray a repressed youth being open can't be found in mainstream markets. anything in print and on sale in china is censored with criticism of the government strictly forbidden. material that the country considers potentially disruptive to public morals is almost never approved. these young photographers are an empathy for the chinese youth of today. this only way for them to get their work out into the world is by promoting themselves in the internet and publishing books overseas. >> we follow three young chinese photographers who are striving to capture the reality they see in a changing china. ♪ >> lin, alias number 223 has been taking pictures since he was a high school student. 223 was introduced to the subject through a friend. he comes from farming village in hunan province and only realized he was gay after migrating to the city. until then, he didn't even know the wo

several paragraphs about all the things they were doing to combat cholera, and then a paragraph at the end saying they were not going to respond justly to cholera victims. >> human rights lawyer brian concannon says he'd been expecting the un would try to avoid paying compensation, but that the lack of any explanation caught him completely off guard. >> it was also a slap in the face to the 660,000 haitians who have contracted cholera, and the 8,000 who have died so far, or at least their families. >> the un announced its decision to the world in a brief, 5-minute statement. there was no press conference and since then - as in haiti - there had been no further comment to the media. >> now i've asked several officials who can actually talk to us inside this building, and the one person we've been told we can interview is a spokesperson for the secretary general. >> claims found to be outside the scope of section 29 of the convention are "not-receivable". the consequence of a finding that a claim is not-receivable is that the claim will not receive further consideration by the organizati

here's a paragraph about bondage using handcuffs, ropes and blindfolds for sex games. about 2,000 parents signed an online petition to stop the district from using the book and attorneys also sent a letter on friday about a potential lawsuit. the superintendent sent out a statement on the same day saying, health classes at the district's high school also use their previous texts on an interim basis. he goes on to say, the administration has been in communication with the book's publisher, who has offered to modify the textbook to better meet the district and its students' needs. but parents say, that's not enough. they say the entire textbook is inappropriate for freshmen. >> it would make more sense to look for another book. >> reporter: the district's superintendent was not available for comment. so we don't know how much of this textbook will be modified and when that modified version will be used. live in fremont, i'm da lin,

so i read the first paragraph.n the first sentence, there were two howlers, two dangling modifiers of the kind in, which walking down the street, the empire state building looked beautiful. i have been to the top and bottom of the empire state building and have yet to find any legs on it, but this writer put that in it a dangling modifier a really serious error and i suppose not. it can cause miscommunication, but what it says to me is that here's a writer who really didn't care that much about craft, and i can't read anything more if i think the writer doesn't respect craft. i see it all over the place in all the arts. listen to music, you name the genre and i can see people really, i think, are not respecting craft the way we used to. definitely see it in writing. so i went farther in the book and read a couple more pages inside, and it wasn't any better. it was somebody who i think has not taken the time to write the best book that he or she could write. we have writers today who are big names, john updike being

and i think alexander hamilton puts it best in the first paragraph of his first federalist essay, and i confess you to, i read this paragraph in some way in almost every class that i teach at yale because i think it captures the mood and the spirit of the moment so well. these are hamilton's words: it seems to have been reserved by the conduct and example to decide the important question whether societies of men are really capable or not of establishing good government from reflection and choice, or whether they are forever destined to depend for their political constitutions on accident and force. the crisis at which we are arrived may with propriety be regarded as the era in which that decision is to be made and the wrong election of the part we shall act may deserve to be considered as the general misfortune of mankind. now think about the sense of responsibility that goes along with that statement. they believe they are deciding for all time if you can put a bunch of men in a room, have them calmly create a just form of government and put it in motion in a calm and deliberate proc

. >> my motion would follow-up on what i've said reinforcing before in regards to that paragraph as to one a we san diego and goes on to chase tis the grand jury for not citing specifics i'll take that whole thing out and our response to that we agree that the ethics commission lacks sufficient resources to handle much of its work. it's necessary as the chair indicated it fails to specifically address those specifics with the grand jury puts there as an example put that language in so the resources to handle is most of its work that includes major enforcement cases cases alleging misconduct and the language in the paragraph >> what about the last sentence in one a you want that deleted? >> i'd leave that in there this is appropriate in terms of the commission saying we had this commission like many agencies in have full resources just that language itself contradicts what we're doing fine we have plenty of phone number money leave that in while the ethics commission awhile agencies does not have the full resources to carry out its mission its productive because the commission the staff

i got to the end of the first paragraph saying he controlled the secret fund and what it paid for. mr. mitchell said, jesus christ, all that crap, the publishe eer stairs will get her tit caught in a big fat ringer. i jumped back from the phone worried about my own parts more than hers. then he said, what certainly is the most chilling moment in my years in journalism and i think bob's as well, when this campaign is over, we are going to do a little story on you two boys, too. and he hung up the phone. we were 28 and 29 years old. we knew whatever it was that he was going to do that he meant it. but what it really was was indicative of his attitude toward a free press. i called ben bradley

chair for the language on page 16 recommendation 25 in the middle of the paragraph the director notes i'd change that to the commission notes. >> anything else? i would - i have a couple of amendments on 24 on the recommendation it is sort of seems like it's not responding to the recommendation i mean that be directed to the mayor and the board of supervisors if that he direct it to the to court we should provide it to them but it is nonresponsive as written in my view. i would propose an amendment in the mayor or board makes a request i ask we comply with it. on 25 the recommendation i mean, i think to see what commissioner keanes comments that is sort of apple pie here, of course, if we had the resources shouldn't we do the things that be suggested in recommendation 25? and so i would change the recommendation to say provide with sufficient resources the commission could and would do the work - do more work as indicated by the findings of something to the effect. any comments from the commissioners? is there a motion to amend 24, 25 as proposed by commissioner keane and commissioner

chair for the language on page 16 recommendation 25 in the middle of the paragraph the director notes i'd change that to the commission notes. >> anything else? i would - i have a couple of amendments

, in the middle of the paragraph there is a sentence referencing the preserve america grant. if you recall that grant expired a couple years ago. this is meant to refer to the cog grant that i just explained to you. so that krog grant will be available. so if you have any questions, or you would like to discuss this further at a future hearing, i would be happy to do that. i wanted to make sure you had this information at this hearing. that concludes my comments unless you have any questions. thank you. >> thank you, commissioners any questions for staff on this? >> seeing none, mr. frye, i do have questions but with landmarks, we'll take it up there. it's about conversations about how to move stuff forward by guaranteeing hours. we'll take it up under that item. seeing no other comments we'll move on. >> that places you on commissioner matters, item 2, announcements. >> i have no announcements. >> item 3. corrections on adoption to the minutes of the meeting . >> any correction? any member of the public wish to comment? seeing none. >> i move we adopt them. >> second. >> tha

nat/4:30 mooney says: use that as an example and boom, your paragraph just got long."s necesitan mayor atencion, y quizas un empuje. todos son ninos de crianza. el profesor mooney les da ese empuje. sot/4:48 mooney says: you're falling behind." pero tambien los anima para pero tambien los anima para que se sobresalgan. sot/12:01 mooney says: es muy importante para mi, para la community, la comunidad." 15:36 lopez says: este programa ha tenido mucho éxito." el doctor david lopez es miembro de la mesa directiva de la agencia silicon valley chldren's fund., el programa rise de la agencia le presta apoyo a los ninos de crianza para asegurar que no fallen en su educacion. esa es una de las razones por las cuales "rise" recibio una beca de 25-mil dolares del programa 21st century solutions de nbc universal. sot/15:54 lopez says: los estudiantes se encuentran con personas como el maestro mooney, que tiene mucho conocimiento, pero también tiene altas expectativas." adriana jaquez es tutora de los ninos de crianza. sot/29:10 con tal que ellos no usen eso como excusa, tiene la p

. >> good morning, supervisors if you look on page 2 of the digest, the last paragraph, indicates when we dealt with, and first of all the people who are placed on electronic monitoring were limited to those that consented to it and that has been addressed. in addition the committee requested, that the electronic monitoring in lieu of bail be offered only to inmates charged at low level offenses and that has been incorporated. and finally, the committee requested that the ordinance requires that the superior court approve the placement of inmates on the electronic monitoring in lieu of bail in the district attorney objects to the placement, we have incorporated that and if you look at the ordinance itself, on page 3, section 13.63, you will see that we have limited to those who want to do it voluntarily and further down at section 13.64, the paragraph in there does indicate what is defined as a low level offense, and misdemeanors a person in custody, and 30 days, at least. and those charges of felonies and are those that will be eligible for sentencing pursuant to the section, 1170.h,

on russia and judging by the transcript it was keen to move on to other questions but in that one paragraph he seemed to downplay russia's role in the world so the us president offered his perspective of russia in these words quote russia doesn't make anything immigrants aren't rushing to moscow in search of opportunity the life expectancy expectancy of our should male is around sixty years old the population is shrinking well those who looked at the statistics have pointed out a few inaccuracy is in that one paragraph about immigrants according to the un department of economic and social affairs russia hosts the largest the world's largest population of him after the united states so second to the united states most people who've been to moscow couldn't help but notice the huge influx of immigrants the life explained expectancy of those melees indeed said li lo but it's not sixty years old as the president said but sixty five ways you know it's a big margin of error when you talk about such data also according to president obama russia's population is shrinking but if you look at the lates

shrinking well those who looked at the statistics have pointed out a few inaccuracy in that one paragraph about immigrants according to the un department of economic and social affairs russia hosts the largest the world's largest population of him after the united states so second to the united states most people who've been to moscow couldn't help but notice the huge influx of immigrants to an extent when immigration reform is one of the main topics in the country's political discussions the life explained expectancy of the russian male is indeed said li lo but it's not sixty years old as the president said but sixty five you know it's a big margin affair when you talk about such data also according to president obama russia's population is shrinking but if you look at the latest numbers it's not shrinking it's actually growing on russia's population has been growing for at least the past five years due to various factors it may indeed shrink in the future but now it is it is not about. you know not not making anything well russians themselves are very concerned about their economy being

he was reviewing his speech one more time, and he got to that paragraph, and he turned to me and said, "it is going to drive the state department boys crazy, but i am going to leave it in." "mr gorbachev, tear down this wall." ronald reagan basically ended the cold war and brought gorbachev to the table so we got a negotiation. [applause] >> since i was a chief of staff, i will give you a small element. i just got appointed chief of staff, and i was at home, and i think this is about 2:00, 2:30 in the morning, and i got a call from the secret service, and the secret service said, "mr. panetta" -- you know when you get a call at that time of the evening, it is not good news, so, "mr. panetta, i hate to tell you, but a plane just went into the white house." and i said, "what was it? was it a 747?" and they said, "no, it was a light plane, and i think it may have damaged the jackson magnolia tree," and i said, "wait a minute. this could be a terrorist attack on the president. were there explosives in the plane?" and the answer was, "well, according to cnn news" -- [laughter] and i said,

do you really want to strike paragraph 1? let me know how i should proceed. will the gentleman from texas please answer? >> i would be pleased to answer. i thought i had made clear to my distinguished friend from new jersey that in the interest of debate are getting the facts about just what happened to the irs. how it was used, who told them to do it, what they did, that i thought that we ought to have this motion so that the people of this country and so this committee can fully evaluate just what happened and i want you to have every advantage of a full 20 minutes to discuss why it should be inincluded. >> that's fine. but i'm still motion passed? if you want -- >> you offer a motion for debate purchases, you're not necessarily confined to wanting it pass, and certainly, i do not. >> stop using my valuable time. the public now knows what you're up to. >> i get you that time. >> i'm not going to yield you any more of that viable time because it is obvious this is a game. in fact, we have been involved in quite a few games here. and you aren't any more serio

but a lot of times we'll just read the headline and the first couple of paragraphs of an article, getmove on to the next one. who has time to read all this? but the truth is, sometimes there is really valuable information if you read the entire article. and tonight we want to show you what we're talking about in a new segment we're calling "the last line of the news story." ♪ [ cheers and applause ] >> seth: so let's get started. so here's an article from "the new york times." "impeachment on gop lifts, animates democrats faith." in the first few paragraphs, it talks about how republicans are thinking of impeaching the president. pretty standard, but let's see what happens if you read all the way to the last line of the story. "when reached for comment, a visibly weary obama took a drag from his cigarette, stared wistfully out the oval office window and said 'impeachment? sign me up, man. sign me up.'" [ cheers and applause ] you see now? you see what you missed when you don't read the entire thing? like, here's some health news from "the boston globe." "can running five minutes a day

the last paragraph sums it up.his chapterlose with the question of curiosity which has been continuously operating in my mind involving the query as to whether or not the naval petroleum reserve number three is eventually , any substantial amount of oil will be found there. while it is speculation, i am of oil,osition that any especially in the upper sands, will have found to be have drained off through the intense operation of the adjoining salt creek fields. the circuit court of appeals overturned t blake kennedy's decision because they clearly found there was bribery involved in that particular contract. on appeal by sinclair to the company to theuntr supreme court of the united states, the supreme court affirmed the judgment of the circuit court of appeals and allow the government to rescind the teapot dome oil drilling contract with mammoth oil. there has always been a question as to how much president harding has known about the teapot dome affair. it is pretty clear that albert fall had to get president hard

do you really want to strike paragraph one? let me know how i should proceed. will the gentleman from texas please answer? >> i thought i made it clear that in the interest of debate getting the facts, how it was used, who told him to do it, what they did, that i thought we ought to have this motion so the people of this country and this committee could fully evaluating what happened. i want you to have every advantage of a full 20 minute to discuss why this is concluded. >> that's fine. i want to know, do you want your motion passed? by for debate purposes you are not necessarily confined to wanting it past. certainly i do -- it passed. certainly i do not. >> the public knows what you are up to. >> i am glad to give you that time. >> i am not going to give you any more of that valuable time. it's obvious this is a game. we have been involved in quite a few games. you are not serious about striking his article. >> i would do so even though and abuse has not been entirely unknown in past administrations because that would not entirely constitute a defense now ev

two paragraphs because the legal strategy was so brilliant in its simplicity that be summarized in a very short number of words. a lawyer's case is his ship. his wind is the law that he must command.s gifted attorneys sometimes persuade courts to extend existing law but rarely to reverse it. while often heralded as a long-standing jurisprudence, the supreme decision in the cases gathered as brown v. board of was in fact an extension of the court's earlier decisions. brown expanded existing law and launched by charles houston 20 years earlier at last unchartered shores. in 1935, however, the wind blew steadily in the opposite direction. separate but equal schools and constitutionally permissible under the plessy v. ferguson decision. to challenge plessy would be the mission of a doomed fool so when walter white asked houston to present a plan by which the a sustainedlaunch legal campaign to end agregation, houston chartered novel course, to defeat the law of separate but equal he would enforcement of separate but equal. in southern states, he would argue that segregation's mandates ne

then they will quote a paragraph in some blog. [laughter] i think one great advance in presidential press relations would be to remove the presidential ipad. [laughter] >> i agree with that. >> interesting question. what one piece of advice that you gave the president that he rejected that you almost resigned over? you might have to think about that. [laughter] i think probably the way to ask it is, did you ever feel you were close to walking out of the place? >> i did not agree with every decision the president made. i respected how he made the decisions, and i respected they were his decisions to make. in terms of a tough decision he objections voiced my was around stem cell research. this was not an emergency crisis type issue. this was an issue presented in the context of the federal budget. no money had ever been spent on stem cell research by the federal government. nih and other institutions were looking to see if they could spend money on research. it was presented as a budget question the president said he would take unde

: it's essay righting team in this summer class, part of the rise program. >> boom, your paragraph got long. >> reporter: these are students who might need special attention, perhaps a nudge or two. they all come from foster homes. mooney gives them that nudge and makes a few uncommon accommodations. for instance, he allows them to listen to music or text during class. it was a compromise. >> i was fighting it the first few weeks. so i made a deal with them. when i'm talking or when we're having group discussions, all electronics off. when they're working independently, i give them the choice. >> he has the highest expectations for these stewed th -- students. he does it in a very personalized way. >> reporter: dr. david lopez is board member of the silicon valley children's fund. the rise program gives foster children the support they need to keep them from falling through the cracks. it's one of the reasons the program received a $25,000 grant from nbc universal's 21st century solutions. >> i completely see myself in there. i always wanted it, so i made the choices to be there. but i

requires a building permit not a plumbing permit there's nothing that says its illegal and in the paragraph 6 of the regional occupancy two family dwellings there's no pending 90s notices on the non conforming status the september 2013 nova didn't mention it i'm going to be showing you a data sheet hopefully, you'll see that after two recent inspections on june 24th and july 9th any public comment? 2014 the inspections were inclusive as to the existence of a violation of the housing code with respect to the legitimate of the unit. after further use on july 21st entry the housing inspector said it shows an r-3 d 23 facility the legal description further indoctrinates defines two residential units on the ground floor. in fact the housing inspectors findings says the housing unit maybe a legal conforming unit the permit holders allegation it's illegal is in dispute and can't be substantiated without the involvement of the planning department through the discretionary review thank you. >> yeah. >> thank you we can hear from the permit holders. >> thank you. good evening, commissioners. i think