normally travel with a security detail. the moirlt has been deploying so-called guardian angels in response to this threat of so-called green on blue attacks instituted other changes as well as allowing u.s. forces to carry their own weapons into afghan ministries to possibly protect themselves. while these steps have greatly reduce this had kind of attack, this he have not eliminated them as admiral kirby was telling us today. afghanistan still very much a battlefield. in the measure of the trust he says is still strong later today after this attack, u.s. forces went out into the field on operations with afghantorss at their side. >> still about 30,000 u.s. troops in afghanistan as we speak right now. stand by, jim sciutto reporting. you would think there would be very tight security when high ranking military officers visit a facility like this. let's get more from pentagon correspondent barbara starr. you've been to afghan army training camps. you've seen what's going on and done some checking. what is going on over ther

needs and the security threats. and i want to make sure as we move forward and build these embassies that security considerations are part of that ongoing process of assessment. so if you could sort of address that, starting from who was on the initial commission and whether that involvement and security continues and mr. green, if you could gives your assessment as a security expert yourself. >> i'm not really a security expert. >> you led the committee that was asked by the arb and i think that you have some very valid comments that i would like to hear about in terms of security in the design excellence program. but i like ms. munoz to start, if you don't mind. >> as i mentioned earlier, the founding commitment with this program as with any other programs that would evolve over time relating to embassy and consulate construction is we meet all the security standards. change them over time. whatever they throw at us, we're going to implement because that's our responsibility. i want to make that point very clear.

sponsor abilities for security. to put pressure on israel to put an end to violence, the shedding of palestinian blood and to lift the gaza blockade. and of course to relaunch the peace process in conformity with the agreements and the arab peace proposal. thank you. >> next speaker representative of iran's speaking on behalf of the movement. >> thank you mr. president. i have the honor to speak on the half of the movement. the movement condemns the lethal indiscriminate and excessive use of force by israel and the occupying against palestinian civilians and civilian infrastructure in the gaza strip and pays tribute to the heroic steadfastness and unity of the palestinian people in the face of this brutal aberration. the movement demands the immediate and unconditional cessation of this aggression and the collective punishment of the civilian population in gaza as well as throughout the rest of the occupied palestinian territory including east jerusalem. it calls for serious collective efforts to ensure an immediate

forces and kurdish security forces. launchrobably cannot strikes against united states. but senator john kerry -- but secretary john kerry was saying that isis is a threat in the region and could be a long-term threat to u.s. 30. -- u.s. security. why is the goal not to defeat and decimate them? why is the goal just to support a government that, as you said, is in shambles? >> i don't think i said they are in shambles. ofaid they are in progress creating an inclusive government which is the key to reducing the potential that isil can attack the united states both in that region and eventually around the globe. >> i don't know if you saw this documentary where isis officials say that we will humiliate them everywhere that god will and we will raise the flag of all in the white house. >> i didn't see those comments. president spoke forcefully about commitment and the willingness to use military force to support the efforts of iraq's security forces to defeat them from using iraq as a base of operations but also to ensure

require additional security per 75 patrons and post security outside during entertainment. no entertainment out doors. club malibu must provide entertainment calendar to sfpd and neighbors and the entertainment commission every month and require additional sound proofing to baffle the lights and the eventing on the roof. >> thank you very much. yes commissioner. >> one thing we're changing the one security guard per hundred people by this possible conscience i have here. says club occupancy is 200 so it's not going to up any security if it's one in 75 if the club maximum is 200. i mean maybe if we did one to 60 if we're looking for another security guard and another thing on that line when one of the owners up here they talked about the people having a guard card and part of the security thing but we heard from her and the different jobs at the club i want to make sure the security guard is a security guard and not a bartender with a card doing a dual job. >> i have a question. so it's one security guard for up to 75 people so that the first 150 are two people and wouldn't

social security and medicare are fundamentally secure and will remain that way in the years ahead. the report reminds us of something we all understand -- we must reform these programs if they want to keep them sound for future generations. the projections in this years report for social security are essentially the same as last year. when considered on a combined basis, social security, disablement, it is desiccated funds to have benefits that a nice 19 years. that, the projected that tax income will be sufficient to about three quarters of the scheduled benefit. social security programs have dedicated funds to schedule all benefits for two years. the medicare hospital insurance 2030 orl be until project until last year's report and 50 more years than was projected in the last report since the prior the passage. the trustees report underscores the importance of making social security. as a large generation of american history and during retirement, the pressure is growing and we must make manageable changes so we don't have to make drastic changes later. the president is committed

he more secure any one of us becomes, the more secure all of us are. this is a joint responsibility. and only by working collaboratively and together will we meet this challenge. but i am confident that those of you in this room understand that. that's why you're here today. that's why you're going to be here many of you for the next couple of days. and i thank you again for the work that you're doing and for all of your help as we tackle this significant challenge. thank you very much. [applause] so i do, i talked longer than i meant to for which i apologize. but i am happy to take a few questions. i see david in the back of the room, which reminds me why you should never try to recognize people, because i certainly meant to call out amongst the talented people that we have of ssint secretary many you know and has really been with us i believe since its inception if not the day of certainly very shortly thereafter and brings tremendous expertise to that role and energy and passion. and david, who works with her iscd, ead of the infrastructure security

we want to work with them to secure what needs to be secured. we understand we have to share a significant amount of our technology to do that. we are ok with that because the government understands the flipside of sharing that technology is a trust issue of observing the proprietary nature of the technology, making sure they are not damaged by working with the government, and ensuring the government gets the best value. everyone who has had their eyes bleed reading the cards, raise your hand. all of us have at some point or another. the reason they are there -- they are really effective pieces of legislation -- are to allow the innovation partnership to take place. they may be really tiny words and may be painful to get arough your head, but we have really strong basis in the united states for fostering that sort of partnership. you want to say thank first. rarely do i hear people use the word innovation in the government. eco-cities, -- east coast is, we are not innovative. thank you for acknowledging it. i appreciate it. one of the most impor

it is security. it is the threat level that is dramatically increased along with the active participation of the cio as being involved and engaged in their organization as a cyber threat. before, it was really easy for the cio to give your organization the reigns to go do what they needed to get done. has to be deeply engaged in the partnership to make a change around security. some of the things we mentioned already, it is a balance between the innovation peace. how are you bringing new tools around security and keeping the day today going and addressing the needs around security? that continues to be a big effort. budget issues, i am fighting those weekly. buying some of the other tools. you?is important to at is finding that true balance of what works. a lot of it is not so much the technology, but the process and the people and getting them educated and learning to think about security from the beginning. that has really been a challenge over the years in getting these units to embrace security a

today's witnesses will testify for the needs of the department, and security to develop a plan to secureerica's borders and help us to carry out that plan. research and technology are key components to securing america's borders. in september we will hear from the department of homeland security undersecretary for science and technology they position created by this committee in a joint hearing with the homeland security committee. we are working with them on draft legislation to set priorities for science and technology directorate on how to secure america's border. i look forward to working with my colleagues to turn the school into a reality. while there may be mixed feelings about the current situation on our southern border we should all be able to agree that we can and we must secure america's borders with the help of technology. thank you mr. chairman and i yield back. >> thank you chairman. if there are members who wish to submit additional statements are statements will be added to the record at this point. this point i would like to do so witnesses. their first witness dr. jack

by agency security. now these agencies each have committees. these committees, of course, consist of personnel who are no more than the people who work in the building and none of them have any security background training or knowledge. is that not the case? >> yes, ma'am, that's correct. >> but they have some significant responsibility for security in buildings. would you describe the role of these lay people in security? >> yes, ma'am, we have done some work that's a couple years old now. it takes a look at the committees and explains that the individuals who make up those committees, as you said, rather tend to be the tenants of the building. and the tenant that has the largest footprint in the building typically chairs that committee. i have gone to and my staff has gone to a number of committee meetings over the years, and they do tend to be made up of lay people. they tend to be, for instance, perhaps the administrative assistant or office manager for a specific agency. people like that. it tends t

i think the real problem is that secure communities makes us all less safe .olks are afraid are calling 91 un, that's exactly what the result of secure communities does it makes us all less safe a study out of chicago say 44% of latinos are less like there on reach out to police when they are victims witnesses to crime. any law he be enforcement professional will tell you if you have no trust between how enforcement and the community, nearly half of the population that is a crisis. >> aj that's a common criticism of safer communities it makes people fearful to call 911, do you agree? >> no, because the secure communities only runs a background check immigration check on someone if they have been arrested or detained for criminal activity. so see how or where there is statistical evidence that that would intimidate something in to not reporting a crime. if they are not the ones being did hdetains aura rested for committing a crime they have nothing to fear. >> we asked our community if you could use one word to describe the relationship what would it be ? >> ho

that is a security risk.just the process of getting people to come forward and register is a benefit to all of us for our collective national security. there are significant economic benefits to the tax revenue base. we will be coming out with a report in a couple of weeks. in line with this national security point, i think it is important to know this is not -- in the process of fixing the system through executive action is that about providing a benefit to an individual as it is about trying to rationalize and make more functional what is sadly a grossly dysfunctional system. with theno idea administration is planning to do. i have heard the rumors everyone else has. one of the things is i hope they will look at the currently artificial barriers that prevent people from getting regal status -- legal status. we have built up a collocated --tem that allows complicated system that allows laws on the books. congress passed the cuban adjustment act. to adjuster status under this act, you have to be paroled. the

on tuesday the government released its annual report on the outlook for medicare and social security and naturally conservatives sound of the anarcho arm but what does that report released say and what can we do to make sure medicare and social security are around for decades to come and economists and policy experts always talk about how we need to keep growing the economy but what if economic growth was no longer possible that and more in tonight's conversations with great minds with richard heinberg. the us as usual conservatives have been proven wrong on tuesday the government released its annual report on the strength and outlook of the medicare and social security programs and much much to conservatives disappointment both programs are showing signs of improvement according to a two thousand and fourteen social security trust report trustees report social security's retirement program is fully funded through two thousand and thirty four and while social security's disability insurance fund is expected to run out in two thousand and sixteen it's also experiencing its lowest grow

good night. >> number one who does the department of homeland security answer to? >> then is the big question help their now there are incidents the department of homeland security actually investigates the office of inspector general that investigates that and been bigger cases there is a couple of shooting cases people were controlled from the department of justice but the whole idea of accountability was a pretty sharp debate of what was happening now and there is a report to coming out a couple weeks ago that they identified 800 cases and 97 percent of those, there was no discipline taken of what would be considered some sort of abuse. very few of those were. very few were disciplined. >> i have a statement it may not be a popular position but i grew up in tucson. we went over the border. nobody asks for people from mexico when work then go home. they cannot go home now so they are stuck when they come to work. i think they would like to go home but they cannot. that is a lot of the problem and perhaps that man did not understand that. >> yes. there has been a

as it relates to supporting the ongoing efforts of both kurdish security forces in iraq he security forces. >> are those meetings related to this? >> i don't have an update when he does return. i wouldn't be surprised if he does have a conversation on the topic when he is back in the white house not next week but the week after. the president planned to return to the white house before the recent announcement. there are other meetings to. >> and you said that the top priority is protecting the american serving -- the top priority is protecting american serving overseas. if that is the case why not simply evacuate that's one way to make sure there' there is imt work that's being done at the consulate and the joint operation center that i mentioned earlier. >> at the top priority is protecting americans. >> if we are in the position that we can conduct the kind of military action that will protect americans that allow them to do the very important work that is underway and that is what we would like to do and that is again what we are pursuing right now. >> you can check with the department

social security ain't dumb. that money they have been collecting in excess of what they send out, they don't just put it under a big social security mattress. it is in t bills, treasury bonds. this is the way it works. the people who say there is a fiction in the trust fund and its funny money, you pay this. social security gets that money. the treasury says here's the social security money we got for this month. treasury says thank you. here are treasury bonds to replace the cash you just gave me. treasury bonds earn 2% interest, not much. lower right now because interest rates are so low. but it earns interest. how much has the social security money we've not used over this last several decades earned in interest? close to $2 trillion. how much today is in reserves in social security that has not been spent that is available? close to $3 trillion. social security is not broke. there's a challenge. i see the challenge in the room. i am the challenge as well. i'm a member of the baby boomers. there's a whole bun

social security gets that money. the treasury says here's the social security money we got for this month. treasury says thank you. bonds totreasury replace the cash you just gave me. treasury bonds earn 2% interest, not much. the social security money we've not used over this last several decades earned in interest? to $2 trillion. in much today is in reserves social security that has not been spent that is available? close to $3 trillion. social security is not broke. there's a challenge. i see the challenge in the room. as well.challenge i'm a member of the baby boomers. there's a whole bunch of us. me,re retiring now -- not not yet -- but we are getting close. we did not have that many kids. so we don't have as many people working paying into the system for social security and now with blip of baby boomers retiring, all of a sudden it's a little offkilter. we need more people paying into make up for all of the people retiring. $3about 20 years, the trillion in surplus will be totally depleted. what happens the da

people get social security benefits. now, most of those are retirement benefits. that's almost one out of five americans. about 11 million get disability benefits. and so, you know, last year social security paid out over $600 billion in retirement benefits and $140 billion in disability benefits. one of the problems with the disability program is that it's, the finances are not secure right now. in two years the trust fund that supports the disability program is scheduled to run out of money. and at that point disability will only collect enough in payroll tacks to pay about -- taxes to pay about 81% of benefits. so if congress would do nothing, that would result this an automatic 19 percent cut in just two years. congress can do a simple fix, and they've done this many times in the past. social security is supported by payroll taxes, 6.2% directly from you, 6.2% that come from your employer. and a portion of that goes toward retirement benefits, and a portion goes toward disability benefits. congress could redo that fo

increase your security. what it says is assessed for cyber security cap and were never that for step, which is identify, identify your risks and the things you need to protect, right? assess how you are doing across that spectrum of things that you ideally would like to be able to wouldcapabilities you like to have, come up with your aspirational profile, so you are here today, where would you like to be, given your assessment of your risks, your risk management analysis? here's where you would like to be. now you can use this far right column, the compilation of best practices, help you get from a to b. when folks really get into it and take the time to read it and understand it, the response has been very positive. there are a lot of companies out there of all sizes that look at this and say we are doing really well, we are really where we need to be, we think, with regard to this. but there are a lot of companies , again, of all sizes, that do not know where to start or think they are in good shape, but w

privacy motion security play you call the usual. questions that no one is asking with the guests that you deserve answers from. politic you. marty. welcome but now computers smartphones tablets we use them for everything but just how secure are your electronics last week the boom bust team attended the blackout conference in las vegas and it's a meeting of the best collective security minds on the planet and what we learned there. seemed to always be one step ahead of security which certainly isn't good for any of us need tells us more. experts from around the world recently gathered at the black hat conference in las vegas to discuss events ments in technology and information security in the post snowden era meetings like this explore some of the most pressing issues of our time like whether or not privacy is at all attainable in the digital age the black phone the first allegedly fully encrypted smart phone was hacked after one expert at the conference found two new flaws in the device and this comes after a recent study released

security council. the congo is also the mediator as between the armed conflict and the opposing political forces. my country has also offered a lope to the central african -- a loan to the central african state in order to insure at least minimal functioning of its public administration. ladies and gentlemen, whatever the presence or the intensity of armed violence and terrorist threats, we can never forget the many other challenges that africa must face and take up in order to insure its security in the long term. and this brings me precisely to the second main point of my speech to you today; that is, the multidimensional character of our security challenge. as independent nations that we are, most african countries are only about 50 years old. this relative youth for us africans cannot, certainly, excuse any mistakes or weaknesses on our part, but it is useful, i believe, to bear it in mind in the overall historical perspective that i believe we must take. and i would like here to insist on the need

so that means -- those palestinians, from abu mazen to his security chiefs, have justified security coordination on the basis that there will be an end to the occupation, not in 30 years, but in five years. that has become justification but that is not the case. if the israeli view is we are going to have to stay there for 30 years. for the palestinians, that is equivalent to forever. that puts another nail into the coffin of the two state solution. for those like me, who have always looked for the pony in the pile of shit -- [laughter] >> that is a diplomatic term of art. >> there is a hope that israelis will see that abu mazen is much better, even a partner because of the way that he behaved during the kidnapping process and the way hamas has behaved since. so maybe they will be supporting israel to help abu mazen eventually take control and gaza and that will unite the palestinians. and abu mazen's leadership will form the basis of negotiations for a two state solution. it seems to me that the right wing in israel is going after abu mazen for a reason. that is why lieberman has come out again

you know we don't feel secure when we're under surveillance so privacy becomes a part of security and security becomes a part of privacy you can't have privacy without security so when we look at both government surveillance and corporate surveillance the trick is going to be getting both privacy and security and there are lots of ways to do that and privacy is not necessarily in opposition to security we don't get more security when there's more surveillance and this is one of the important lessons of all the n.s.a. surveillance that it didn't actually get us more security it didn't make us safer it didn't catch terrorists so when i look at this security and privacy i look to get both how can we ensure our security and ensure our privacy now i understand that russia has offered a one hundred ten thousand dollar bounty to crack the tauren on a miss network so isn't this a perfect example of how state actors everywhere are looking to undermine privacy and security. it's interesting yes we know the united states that the u.k. and now russia are all trying to break tor this anonymity ser

as today's reports make clear, social security and medicare are fundamentally secure and will remain that way in the years ahead. the report reminds us of something we all understand -- we must reform these programs if they want to keep them sound for future generations. the projections in this years report for social security are essentially the same as last year. when considered on a combined basis, social security, disablement, it is desiccated funds to have benefits that a -- next 19 years. after that, the projected that tax income will be sufficient to about three quarters of the scheduled benefit. social security programs have dedicated funds to schedule all benefits for two years. legislation will be needed to avoid the struck the production for this horrible population. the outlook has consistently improved since the passage of the affordable care act. the trustees have reduce the spending for near-term growth. they also project did at the medicare hospital insurance trust fund will have resources sufficient to cover benefits year 2030 or additional and 13 more years than was

[applause] border security, after all, is the nearest front of national security. and i'm sorry to relate that this front is today, largely undefended. so many people come across the border without us ever knowing about it. from a certain angle, the cartels, as vicious and brutal as they are, they might be the least of our worries. what other bad actors are coming here? or for that matter, have arrived already? where have they come from? what have they brought with them? behind all of the political opportunism that has marked this debate is a profound sense of false security. after all, we are watching this crisis and our border at the very moment that other crises far away demand our concentrated attention. just consider the events in syria and iraq, and other places in the middle east, they should have us thinking about the possibility of another terrorist attack in this country. we have been put on notice lately by the jihadist army that is right now charging across the country, we were told, was secure and stable. and the astonishing seizure of territory these

they are the hope of our homeland security security project now for almost six years and we're grateful for their key roles in making this whole report possible. and we're grateful to catherine jamson and the annenberg policy center. they made important and substantive contributions along the way. michael herly and adam coastline helped us immensely in the drafting of the document and grateful for many other former 9/11 commission staffers who voluntarily pitched in along the way to make this report possible. we also want to recognize and we've talked about it and we should talk about it a lot, the contributions of the leaders of the families of 9/11. we're humbled about everything you've done and the fact that here you are once again, here today, we used to refer to you as the wind in our sails. and ten years later you're here with us again and we're very, very grateful. last fall, we began considering how we might observe the tenth anniversary. first the idea of getting ourselves together and then the idea if we got ourselves together, maybe we could do something useful. so we all wan

the department of homeland security headquarters that cause the chief security officer to take this action, and are there similar problems at the other 9600 vender buildings that the fps provides security for? and finally, could you explain why fps security is inadequate for dv but good enough for the other agencies? >> yes, sir, i don't think it's an indictment of fps security. i think t a matter of efficiency and managing a contract. we're going to continue to provide security there. it's not the issue. this is, again, as the office of security, i believe, is looking to fulfill the secretary's vision of how they will streamline and better conduct business. >> today, who is in charge of security at the dhs headquarters? if there were an active shooter incident right now, who would be the incident commander on scene, and will the first responders know who is in charge? what would be the role of fps in that situation? >> yes, sir. in that situation, the office of security and the federal protective service share a partnership. so it could be -- it could be either the office of securi

for the own security. the united states and this president is willing to the vote signet -- devote significant resources to this ever. >> a complex array of other issues -- >> i do not know what you mean. >> if it takes the iraqis to do this, if we are not going to be the iraqi air force, and the other partners in the region did not come in a way they are not coming in, does isis gettys they? get to stay? >> the overriding dynamic is making sure that the national security interests of the united states of america are protected. that is always at the top of the agenda. consistent or not? >> that strategy requires the iraqi government to do the things that will unite the country to face this threat. the good news is they are making those steps. prime minister maliki was a prime minister a few weeks ago. he is not prime minister anymore. beq's leaders seem to pursuing an agenda we would like for them to pursue. they got to form a cabinet, but that work is underway. we saw iraq's security forces and the kurdis

second, security in africa is a matter much vaster than military security alone. it is multidimensional. america has a, great deal to offer africa. but it also has a lot to receive from africa. madame president of the world affairs council, esther president of the national press club, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen, let me thank you very much for your kind attention. [applause] >> thank you very much for your speech. le now will have our traditiona question-and-answer session. we are just a few days away from the u.s.-africa leader summit. what do you think this gathering will achieve? well, i think i expressed that expectation in the five propositions that i made. let me certainly begin by stating that it is a deep honor for us to lead with president obama. we thank him for convening the summit in the framework of his ongoing efforts. but in terms of my expectations, per se, i really some them up in the general remarks i offered and the five proposals i made toward the end. >> thank you. the african governments and the united states have a serious eco

i think that the core of the issue is the expansive national security state.ne can make an argument that in the name of national security, you can do x, y, or z. you can censor speech by classifying certain information and so on. the problem is the number of classified documents has increased exponentially since 9/11 and that has turned into something where information that is embarrassing to the government becomes classified. i know this in my experience as an attorney representing guantÁnamo detainees and later representing criminal suspects in the united states. had you asked me five or seven years ago if i thought my expertise in national security or in guantÁnamo would make me suitable or be the value added to joining a case where i represent a journalist -- just think about that. i get calls from journalists that want me to represent them because i represented guantÁnamo prisoners. that is perspective. [laughter] >> i've got another question for james -- i know you don't want to take any more questions, but could you talk about the harassment you faced u

social security is facing financial problems. more money is being paid out of social security than is coming in in taxes and by 2033 the trust fund that has been built up is going to be depleted. when that happens, social security is only going to be able to pay 75% of the benefits it has promised. one of the solutions as beverly said would be the raise the payroll tax. we raise the cap on the payroll tax. it is now $117,000. if you make more than that your benefits are not subject to taxes but also not benefits either. so the argument has been well if we were to raise that tax, beverly is right, a lot of social securities and problems would disappear. that is if we don't give benefits on additional taxes. if we don't give benefits on additional taxes it means that high income people don't get a good deal from the system. and you might say maybe that is not so bad. the risk you run is social security becoming a welfare system. it has broad support because everyone is getting something out of it and it is good deal for almost ever

that's the number experts are using you for the latest internet security security breach. russian hackering stole user names and password combinations for more than 400,000 websites. the hackers are based in russia. they also stole about 500 million e-mail addresses. a small portion of that data is being sold online. but most of it is used to send spam on social networks like twitter. if you are worried, you should change your password, and whatever you do, do not use the same password for multiple sites. >> i have so many passwords i have to write them down, and that's going to get stolen. >> me too. where's that little book? you don't want to put it on a thumb drive, because then you can lose that. >> now you have me worried. >>> let's talk about our forecast. people like nice weather. ooh, except in san francisco, there's a lot of fog. the. >> but that's par for the course this time of year. might give you some relief from hotter temperatures technology. we'll tell you how hot the interior valleys will get. >>> i'm gerard moncure in the sports net comcast studios. what

[applause] border security, after all, is the nearest front of national security. and i'm sorry to relate that this front is today, largely undefended. so many people come across the border without us and ever knowing about us. and the cartel, as vicious and brutal as they are, they might be the least of our worries. what other bad actors are coming here? or for that matter, have arrived already? where have they come from? what have they brought with them? behind all of the political opportunism that has marked this debate is a profound sense of false security. after all, we are watching this crisis and our border at the very moment that other crises far away demand our concentrated attention. just consider the events in syria and iraq, and other places in the middle east, they should have us thinking about the possibility of another terrorist attack in this country. we have been put on notice lately by the jihadist army that is right now charging across the country, we were told, was secure and stable. and the astonishing seizure of territory these past few months

national security policy in very fundamental ways. we you a remember that to the extent that we -- to the extent that we remember it because that is where the phrase "military industrial complex" was coined. when you go home tonight, carrying your bushel basket of my books, and when you get hope and put the bushel basket down i want you to go to your computer or wherever and google the farewell address and take 10 minutes to read it. that is all it takes. 10 minutes to read it. and notice the phrase which i won't be able to quote from memory, which says that the necessary response to the dangers posed by the military industrial complex is that we must have an alert and knowledgeable citizenry. he said, it is your job, meaning, it is our job, to rein in the tendency if we are to have any chance of reconciling the military power which he fervently believed we needed in the context of the cold war, with the potentially unintended consequences of that military power compromising our liberties. and i think one of the things that troubles m

we're in software as a service security, and as well as cloud security, and particularly we're trying to find the needle in the haystack right now. we funded a company trying to find the needle in the haystack. >> you sit on that board as well. >> yes. >> what do they do that you said we need to give this company some money? >> if you look at our companies, we're trying to focus on how do we enable people in this kind of new world to do cloud computing, mobile, and in particular right now there are so many alarms going off right now in the enterprise that people have information overload. that's where exit beam comes into play. >> how much of your portfolio companies are working on defending companies against cyber criminals like you say and how many of them are working on things that -- for products for people who are worried about spying or government security kind of types of situations? >> i think right now it took a generation to convince everybody to wear seat belts, and i think right now it's going to take a generation to educate the consumer and the enterprise right now to hav

and last you are secure in your house unless you're secure in your papers you can't have your freedom and the government says oh it's only boring old business records to care think about your visa bill they say it's not protected by the fourth amendment they said they can look at everyone's visa records everyone's data if i look at your visa record i can tell do you drink do you smoke what medicines you today what doctors do you go to this is all very private information and i have no problem if the government thinks you're a terrorist and they call a judge and they get probable cause they can look at all of that but i don't want to looking at the records of three hundred million innocent americans. some other news from around the globe for you now u.n. peacekeepers from the philippines have been attacked by syrian rebels in the golan heights this comes a day after more than forty united nations peacekeepers from fiji were captured in the same area by the same rebel group the golan heights is disputed by both syria and israel and u.n. troops have been on the ground that for four decad

second, security in africa is a matter much vaster than military security alone.s multidimensional. third and last, america has a great deal to offer africa. but it also has a lot to receive from africa. madame president of the world affairs council, mr. president of the national press club, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen, let me thank you very much for your kind attention. [applause] >> thank you very much for your speech. we now will have our traditional question and answer session. sir, we are just a few days away from the u.s.-africa leaders summit. what do you hope this gathering will achieve? >> well, i think i expressed that expectation in the five propositions that i made. let me certainly begin by stating that it is a deep honor for us to meet with president obama. we thank him for convening this summit in the framework of his ongoing efforts. but in terms of my expectations, per se, i really summed them up in the general remarks i offered and the five proposals i made toward the end. >> thank you. do you think african governments and the unit

the american bar association continues its homeland security conference with a focus on cyber security. the government challenge and the dressing security breaches, this afternoon at 3:10 eastern. weh friday night this month, travel to historic places and we hear from authors that shaped the nation. tonight we focus on the civil rights movement and focus on the 1917 race, riot, and here at the civil right movements. >> he witnessed a lynching when he was only 12. his father said that is what they do. so he said, i am sure he was a little bit angry and hurt. getting away from it, getting away from mississippi, he enlisted into the army when he was only 16. he said defending america doesn't matter about the color of your skin, until he came home to mississippi. he tried to register to vote. he and his brother charles. he said a group of white men turned them around with shotguns. dave ran and did not go against those men. >> the entire program on civil rights, a look at the letter from birmingham jail and the 16 street baptist church bombing coming up tonight at 8:00 eastern here on c-sp

i think that the core of the issue is the expansive national security state. one can make an argument that in the name of national security, you can do x, y, or z. you can censor speech by classifying certain information and so on. the problem is the number of classified documents has increased exponentially since 9/11 and that has turned into something where information that is embarrassing to the government becomes classified. i know this in my experience as an attorney representing guantÁnamo detainees and later representing criminal suspects in the united states. never -- had you asked me five or seven years ago if i thought my expertise in national security or in guantÁnamo would make me suitable or be the value added to joining a case where i represent a journalist -- just think about that. i get calls from journalists that want me to represent them because i represented guantÁnamo prisoners. that is perspective. [laughter] >> i've got another question for james -- i know you don't want to take any more questions -- questions, but could you talk about th

security. there isn't really an option to opt out apparently and given some of the changes in the cuts and billions of dollars from aca, accepting medicare and i'm watching this with my parents, the rules are constantly changing. if people want to pursue a different kind of health insurance after 65, why are we not permitted to do that? guest: you can. you can opt out. very few people do because it's such a good deal. it's economically not a smart move for most people. but you can opt out of part b which is voluntary. 99 percent of people take it. part a is financed by social security. everybody pays 1.45 percent payroll tax and your employer pays the same for your whole life which finances the part a side which is hospitaled. there is a private insurance part of medicaid which is called medicare advantage. i think 40 percent of people in western pennsylvania do that. that's a growing option. when i took under the program 12 years ago, it was just 14 percent and now it's 31 percent. that's a gr