at 300 hours, the accused disclosed this to johan sanders when he requested him to come quickly to his house. at 3:22, he told his story in the company of his father. a few minutes later, the same information was relayed to the doctor when he arrived at the accused house, and lastly, it was told to the police at about 4:00 in the morning the same day. counsel for the defense correctly argued it was highly improbable that the accused would have made this up so quickly, and be consistent in his version even before he had access to the police docket and before he was privy to the evidence on behalf of the state application. the question is did the accused foresee the possibility of the resultant's death, yet persisted in his deed, reckless whether death ensured or not. in the second sentence of this case, the answer has to be no. how could the accused reasonably have foreseen that the shots he fired would kill the deceased? clearly, he did not subjectively foresee this as a possibility that you would kill the person behind the door, let alone the deceased as he thought she was in the bedr