the dow gained almost aokxd 46, the s&pÑi rose six points, health care stocks were one of the biggest even though the oiljf prices gushedok high y with crude oil rising axd dollaa barrel, exxon and chevron were among the only three decliners in the dow. >>> Ñiwell, among the biggest walmart, shares rose about 2% after it announced an all-new 4 service. for years, walmart has put out competitors with their low-price strategy on retail goods. nowe1 it is taking direct aim a banks offering a low-cost checking acco.)p to consumers. mary thompson has more on thejf retailing giant's latest push into finance. >> reporter: everyonet( knows y can get almostt( anything at xdÑ walmart. socks, groceries, tvs, and come the end5aof nextñ=9q!a checking account. >> the customer will be able to come to walmart and pick up that account and forxd a5a $2.95 fee purchase the starter account. >> with that fee they can open up a starter accounte1 managed green dot, a company that walmart holds stake in. >> there are no nsf fees. if you accidentallyfá bounce a check no overdraft fees, no balance requirements

turns on the question of what the congressional statutes -- i forget the long form of the name, see pni, customer proprietary network information. their regulars is the protect that information. that includes our call records by unrelated access to. i don't think anything turns on that question. i think this is another way of saying the third-party records doctrine. i don't think that doctrine has never been an on off switch and the way you are suggesting. inre are frugally context which information is shared with a third party. the person whose privacy is reported in that information, nonetheless is recognize to have an expedition of odyssey. -- privacy. >> could you illustrate? >> our phone calls are routed through verizon medications. arecontext of our calls protected by federal statute. no one has ever suggested that verizon's ability to listen to the content of our can occasions extinct is our recordation of privacy. the same is true of our e-mail. our e-mail is routinely stored on the parties'servers. i think the courts are just now beginning to grapple with the question. despite