nailed down the truth that jonathan dach had a sex worker in his room that night? >> no. what it says, there was information presented by the secret service to the white house, that this information exists, that the woman was registered to this room. there was additional evidence in a separate investigation by the inspector general. the question is, what did the white house do with the information? that's the accountability question. >> do you share the skepticism from the witness here? >> i think it's worth reviewing. and the question to the white house, did you review this thoroughly and and they said none of their staff members or travel associates on the trip were involved, when the agents were being disciplined, said all the team with him has to be held to the highest standard. the question is the whether the white house looked thoroughly into that question, even though they were saying they had done so. >> do you believe he was given

. >> k.g., i want to read this statement from richard sauber, the attorney represented jonathan dach, the kid that was over there. >> the aide. >> that apparently was linked to prostitution. he says the allegations about any inappropriate contact by jonathan dach in cartagena are utterly and completely false. he's ducking the question. when he arrived he was met at the airport by embassy staff, driven to the hotel, went to bed exhausted. it's kind of change he gets a plum job, all these guys get fired or demoted but he gets a great job. in a weird way it shows how the white house is willing to protect the mother ship at the expense of the agents. >> you're exactly right. it's a double standard, right? and it shows the hypocrisy of the administration because they fired secret service agents for the same conduct even though they said, well, listen prostitution is legal in cartagena in colombia so this is okay. as always it's the cover-up that's the most agregregious ofe crime, that aspect of it. why are they saying he's okay to work for them if the secret service agents are not? why? an

yet neither jonathan dach's name nor his signature appears on the hotel log." and as the post reported, another instance of a mistaken hotel log wrongly implicated a secret service agent as well." except some were used to damage the careers of ten secret service agents who lost their jobs. >> all the exposure landed on the laps of those who put their lives at risk, while others whose parents may have some kind of connection to the white house were somehow spared from both the public humiliation. >> dach's father leslie is a democratic campaign donor and a former lobbyist for wal-mart, who partnered with first lady michelle obama's let's move campaign and now works at the department of health and human services, while jonathan dach is now at the state department, working on global women's issues. meanwhile, then-white house counsel katherine rumler, who is now on the short list to replace eric holder, conducted her own probe two years ago and concluded there was no wrong doing. >> did the white house counsel check the hotel records in colombia to see if any whit

that advanced team member, named jonathan dach, declined to be interviewed by the "washington pos post", but through his attorney denied hiring a prostitute or bringing anyone to his hotel room. he started working this year as an adviser in the state department. josh earnest tweeted "supposed wapo "exclusive" was previously reported at various outlets two years ago." "as was reported more than two years ago, the white house conducted an internal review that did not identify any inappropriate behavior on the part of the white house advanced team." now, nearly two dozen secret service and military members, as you may recall, were either punished or lost their jobs after an investigation concluded that secret service members brought prostitutes back to their hotel rooms. >>> so, at&t is going to have to shell out more than $100 million after the federal trade commission says it billed customers for bogus charges. for anyone with at&t, this could mean money back in your pocket. nbc's peter alexander has those details. >> reporter: have you ever heard that familiar ding? [ dinging ] checked

. >> student and volunteer jonathan dach, 25-year-old yale law student at the time. facts tell a different story. so does the inspector general. >> jay carney was asked about this whole thing. these are allegations today in the "washington post." jay carney back in 2012 was asked about did anybody at the white house know about this, that there was somebody from the white house involved? and he said this. >> was the president aware that there were allegations like this before the news report this morning? >> i don't think so. i doubt it. i don't know that any of us were aware of it 'til we read newspaper reports. >> okay. that as it turns out is absolutely a lie because according to the "washington post" today, senior aides knew after the scandal, the weekend after the scandal that there was apparently a white house assistant, a volunteer, per diem kid, the son of a big donor involved. the person who -- one of the key people, according to the "washington post," who knew about it was the white house counsel, katherine ruemmler. she had an investigation over the weekend

jonathan dock had a sex worker at his hotel room on that trip to colombia. quote, the hotel logs for dach'sy, showed that a woman was registered to his room at on april 4, including an attached photocopy i.d. of the woman. it matches that of a woman advertising herself as a prostitute. dach has denied hiring a prostitute or bringing anyone to his room. this secret service agent who is added to the witness list, along with the hotel logs, is he going to come forward? >> he came forward to talk with the investigators. his eyewitness account stands as far as, the question is whether they'll continue to talk about this publicly, i don't know. but as far as the inspector general's office is concerned, it's an open question as to what happened. what the white house is saying, they interviewed johnny dach more than once and he said he did not have a woman in his room. other people on the trip said they did not see anything suspicious. so the white house dropped the investigation. but i think what we're seeing is that there's plenty more evidence, from -- >> those other people from the white house

few moments ago saying the bases it with the name of a prostitute and a room number, nor his jonathan dach's name nor his signature appears on a hotel log or any piece of paper with a foreign national. he works at the state department working on global women's issues. gretchen. >> you can't make that up, actually. all right. ed henry, thank you so much. >>> well, for some real talk now on all of this, let's get the real story with dan, former secret service agent for president obama and author of life inside the bubble. he is now an international security consultant. let's start with that, dan. what do you make of this new revelation that the white house may have been involved in this in some shape or form and maybe tried to cover it up? >> gretchen, i wrote a year and a half ago that everybody on the ground knew there was a white house staff member involved in this. this is a protect the crown -- they worry about the bub government platform, and, yet, so readily throws the rank-and-file members of the government, including the people who would protect him with their lives, under the bus. he