affiliation, you know this is not the grand old party of yesteryear. these are going to be very, very conservative folks and they have recruited, as a result of this investment, more than 150 people of color and more than 300 women. -- they have increased largest major increase in the number of female in the state ure is 27% since 2010. there is major activity happening on that side and major investment. there is nothing equivalent to that on the democratic side. money fores not grant the purposes of candidate recruitment. there is no significant -- their program is called -- ironically, they have a name for the female program and not a name for the people of color program. but is called right women right now. they are one of the congressional level called project growth so there is additional investment and there's nothing on our side. donna doesn't get $3 million to recruit women or people of color. it just doesn't happen. so we've got to try to figure out that imbalance is well. democrats traditionally -- i mean, democrats have i think 1100 or maybe

charles dow created the industry, it was the dow to transport the -- the dow represents the giants of yesteryear. they're always slow in change in the index. they should throw in apple, amazon or google. they're not. they'll do it after they mature. there are ways for the average person to get excited. etfs that i can show you just social media, there are different parts of the market that products have been created to get people excited. most people don't know they exist can. >> you talk about these innovative companies out there. it's tough enough for the advisor -- we talk about them on the show. the technology. the individual investor never heard about the companies make what they find exciting run. charles: in addition to not knowing scottie, is the biggest barrier trust? they think of the slimy guys downtown they always get money or is it just a fear of risk? >> it's a little bit of both. you're already part of the market. even if you don't own stock, you are influencing the market because you go and buy and consume goods. get over yourself and get invested in the products that you support

education for these students in miami, florida looks nothing like the calisthenics and kickball of yesteryearnagers from american senior high school are getting ready for a workout at oleta river state park on biscayne bay. >> and then we have these back clips here. perfect! >> woodruff: preparing their kayaks so they can spend time in this outdoor classroom. >> good job guys, way to go. >> woodruff: and though you may not notice at first, all of them are students with autism. >> we grab a boat we put them right in the water, we get the paddles, the seats, we set them up. >> woodruff: it didn't take long for 16-year-old daniel hernandez to become a seasoned kayaker. >> i like kayaking because it makes me feel happy and fun. >> woodruff: daniel and his classmates, including 19-year old demetrius sesler, have also learned the basics of sailing. >> can you reach the line in the front of the boat the bow line? >> when i got on a sailboat for the first time i was, i was excited. and that was, and that was the same when i first got on a kayak. it was fun, it was fun. >> students with autism love wa

we know, whatever your party affiliation is, that this is not the grand old party of yesteryear. these are going to be very conservative folk. and they have recruited, as a result of this investment, more than 150 people of color and more than 300 women, and they have increased the largest major increase, they have increased it by 27% since 2010, including 2010. there is major activity happening on that side and major investment. there is nothing equivalent to that on the democratic side. they do not regret money to state parties. there is no significant, ironically, they have a name for the female program and not a name for the people of color program. women, rightright now is their program. there is also one at the congressional level called project growth. a similar investment is happening at the congressional level. there is just nothing on our side. donna just not get $3 million to recruit people of color. it just does not happen. we have got to try to figure out that in balance as well. democrats, traditionally, i think there is maybe 1200 state legislative seats held by wo

citizens are not going to accept policing from yesteryear. they want current, up to date policing. they can see what the police do, see what government does. it seems they're no longer going to tolerate things. the more you see the criminal justice system, not just the police, the more unsettling you'll find yourself. >> it's almost a misnomer because you saw an attempt to peacefully de-escalate with the population there. thank you. we do have back state senator nadal. are you there? >> yes, i am here. thank you so much. >> let's talk a little bit about -- you were saying when you lost your feed, what the protesters are telling you they want to see happen in the immediate future. >> well, of course, we've always wanted to have as much transparency as possible. we want this case to move forward very quickly. we want to know what the response from the grand jury is going to be. we also want to make sure that the rules of engagement, while protesting, are not changing every single minute. as far as that has happened from time and time and time again, and so right now we are determined

now, we know what every party affiliation, that this is not the grand old party of yesteryear. these are going to be very, very conservative folks. and they have recruited as a result of this investment more than 150 people of color and more than 300 women. in they have increased the largest major increase in the number of republican female state legislatures, by 27 percent in just -- says 2010 or including 2010, i'm sorry. so, you know, there is a major activity happening. there is nothing equivalent to that of the democratic side. the dlc see does not, you know, read grant money to state parties for the exclusive purpose of canada recruitment. there is no, you know, significant 55 they're program is called -- ironically they have a name for the female program and not a name for the people of color program. it is called white women right now. there is also one at the congressional level called project growth. so there is a similar investment happening at the congressional level. and it is just nothing on our side. you know, donna does not get $39 to recruit women or people of

henry ford said what happened to the robber barons of yesteryear if we were going to be the force of labor and consumption and now letting wal-mart and mcdonald's decide how much we are going to make it stick by 2040 almost half of the in the service industry. it's enough to get off of the subsidized programs like housing and food stamps. i want to give you $15. that's what we deserve. >> moderator: another issue talked about nationally and in the campaign is social security. the possibility of raising the retirement age has come up in those discussions. there's been some confusion. ms. stefanik can you clarify if you support the higher a higher retirement age and what it should be and also a little bit about your thoughts. stefanik: social security is an incredibly important program and when i think of social security i think think of not only seniors today but also future generations as i talk to seniors in the district they are not only concerned about the program for themselves but also for their grandchildren. my position is clear i would make no changes to the programs for 50 a

what happened to the robber barons of yesteryears that knew they had to take care visit were going tothere force of labor, and a force of consumption. nowadays we're letting wal-mart and mcdonald's decide how much we will make. i read a piece yesterday that by 2040 almost half of us will be in the service industry. aaron once give you $10.10 an hour purchase of to get you off all your subsidy programs, housing, food stamp to, food stamp to i want to give you $15. that's what we deserve. >> moderator: i think we will move on. >> another issue that's been talked about is social security. the possibly of raising the retirement age has come up in those discussions as well. there's been some confusion over the various answers of the candidates in this discussion. ms. stefanik, can you clarify for us first whether you support the higher retirement age and if so what it should be? and also a little bit about your social security program. stefanik: social good is an incredibly important program and what i think socia socials couli think of not only seniors today but also future generations bu