does not shoelaces bother him either.e does it about seven seconds slower than me, which gives me time to go and catch the bus. -- time itime i and , mine -- time i tie them come undone. charlie ties them so they can stick. three, charlieut learned how to dress himself. after the war, the habit persisted. he does it alone from the first sock to the final tilt of his hat. buttoninginstead of it up in a regular way, handles differently with hooks. charlie can button but hooks do it better. this saves time. he wears a vest like people did in the past when people talked about dillinger and the model t. hooks are operated by the shoulders. next to his wallet. then his glasses. he polished them when he took them off last night. finally his coat. and if there were some floss on the panel he would pick it off. -- fluffs on the panel he would pick them off. in the pocket, and back it goes. he does these things as automatically as you would turn a doorknob. handkerchief in the pocket, and back it goes. he does these things as autom

>> no, you don't. >> so how does it -- how does it -- how does it advertise to the world that the president is contradicting himself? all you know is that the person was born in israel. could have been anywhere in israel? >> the world knows that we will issue thousands of passports to people born in jerusalem, identifying them as born in israel. and the world knows that we will be doing that because the congress of the united states required it and those actions -- >> it is not a communication contained in the passport itself, is it? >> yeah. you're just saying that this -- this piece of legislation advertises to the world what the situation will be, but you're not compelling the president to say that this individual was born in jerusalem and we are going to say he was born in israel, because you can't tell that >> you're requiring the president to make statements thousands of times that con that duct the official recognition position of the united states. now, it is true at a border guard in a country where a person is traveling won't know if this particular passport is one of them, i supp

it does not matter.he is pandering to the pueblos to get them on his side, but this is the source of some major fighting. is there something about the native american willingness to adopt? when they ares more or less likely to adopt catholicism or throw it off after they have adopted it? >> it is never really permanent when they adopt it, so a lot of the franciscans say, we will not convert you to catholicism, so we will convert you and you will get rid of everything, and that is not the case. the kind of adapted, they find it useful when they need them, and when things are going well, they do not needed as much, and they tend to not have two cleaved to the franciscans by following catholicism. the franciscans will struggle you with holy water, baptize you, and boom, you are a catholic. a you let americans, them do that baptism thing to you, but generally when things spanish, well for the he native americans are more likely to be willing to convert. when things are going back to the spanish, they are mor

what does he mean by purpose? what does he contrasted with? >> he contrasted it with tradition, which kind of made me think of ward, how we can make our own mark on the world instead of letting life bring us along? >> yes, ward, who we read in the late 19th century, showing some resonances here, absolutely. this notion of action, being very important. action that goes against -- the liberally -- tradition. -- deliberately tradition. look how he begins. tradition will not work in the complexity of modern life. something in that language to notice -- he says it will not work. not that it is bad or immoral. notice the emphasis on getting results. tradition is not going to work for us. what tradition anyway? there are so many different kinds of people in this nation who have many different fathers, right? you have the southern plantation, refugees from russia, this is not going to work. to just call on some imagined tradition. it might be useful to know that walter lippmann himself comes from a jewish-german family, so opens up to a sense of who a

before we are ready to execute the tifia loan and does that, how does that timing matter? and how would the federal government be looking at or defining the full project funding? >> any budget increase does need to funded in order for us to comply with the goldman sachs, as well as the tifia loan agreement and be able to disperse. >> how are we defining that? >> although the board has taken no action to change the budget or the scope, the current budget and the practice does not include the full scope because it does not include the roof top park and that alone and suggested and based on what is left on the agenda, it does not look like things will term bet ner terms of freing up the space in the budget to conclude the scope in the current board approved budget and which means that the board will have to take the different action, and we know that now and at what point. >> and there are two triggering points that we are waiting for so that we can come back to the board with the revised budget. and as you know, we are working with the mayor's office to identify the funding

does the rest of europe need to be more like germany or does it bendinate need to -- does germany neederminate to lead europe with britain. germinate needs to figure out its relationship with the eu. they are not prepared to deal with geopolitical risk. >> i keep thinking of the speech a few years ago, lead, germany. they've done a lot of bleeding after the euro zone crisis. that has looked like fiscal tightening. merkel has her own domestic politics. populism on the right is limited in what she can do. the beginning at the munich security conference. to get away from the postwar limitations and take on greater leadership. it has not gone anywhere. they do not appear ready. there are plenty of things getting worse for europe. there's not a sharp crisis that's going to force germans to act. >> sometimes it feels like a security blanket. germany is allowed to say we have a history we have to be aware of so we don't have to lead. >> you have an external>> environment that is worse for the europeans and then you have internal populism that will make europeans growth writer part. apart. far

does the public care about it? >> do we stop caring what an executive does on a friday night?ers -- bp don't of the oil in the world in -- dumped all of the oil in the and customerscean lined up. what about roger goodell and the nfl? money talks. our actions talk. if tomorrow tons of people theped using uber, and boycotts that people are tweeting about happen and uber saw the numbers going down, they would react, just like every business in the world. think it kind of comes back to the question -- why not just be quiet about it instead of -- >> i will give you an answer. company is getting bigger. they are probably having a meeting right now -- how are we going to address this? as it becomes bigger, you get slower. >> you do not want to. >> that is what is going on. travis did not wait. he jumped on twitter last night. >> are these ceo's putting themselves out there too much? before social media i did not know how ceo's felt. statement that went out to everybody. i think the statements are much more dramatic than the pr statements that we have had for 40 years. some people go

he does not need people telling him he is great. some of the stuff i say -- it sounds like praise, and you say, why are you criticizing him? it is a skill. it is skills he is lacking as a president in that washington is sometimes a town of glad handers. he admitted that it to me in the most revealing statement in the interview is, i don't get the theatrics right. i don't do it well. it had to do with the foley beheading and suddenly going golfing and not realizing that sometimes, the ethics matters because it dies you time and space to really do what you want to do. he does not need the glad-handing or back-slapping or favors. he does not understand -- i think he thinks that politicians are weak because they needed. >> for me, that is not simply not getting the theatrics. that is having a tin ear to the obvious. you don't go and talk about a beheading and then be photographed afterwards laughing on a golf course. >> george w. bush had that moment and stopped talking -- playing golf forever. talking about 9/11 and he says, watch this

some people will say that's not what the first amendment does. but it does do that. the supreme court has said we have to consider these types of harms and consequences. but many times people don't bring up first amendment questions. how many people think that spam s a first amendment issue? it's kind of a rare thing. how many think that dispose -- disclosing social security numbers is a free speech issue? do we think that what's going to happen the people are -- we're able to protect and the values we're able to support are more important than the few things that may happen otherwise. i don't want to underestimate about intimate consequences. no law can ever accommodate every single unintended consequence. there's going to be? measure in which we're depriving some people -- some measure of we can't simply say, we don't want to hurt other people. again, i think it is a question of how we traditionally treat privacy, intimacy, and why we are holding off on doing that ere. david? >> as a very quick response. obviously, this is a contentious, i guess, difference of opin

>> i'm hoping it does. as the stands, the majority that we see, it would not be available to them if it doesn't. in terms of social justice, we realise that we have to think of h.i.v. as a social justice issue, the right to health care and sex education, the right to prevention programs that fit individual communities, instead of a one-stop shop in making sure that we hold elected officials and health departments responsible for the type of services that our community is getting. >> before the black, you called out gilliad, the company responsible for developing the drug. what has worked in the past, aides drugs have come down. can't we expect that truvada would do the same. >> it's come down a lot in the developing world. the same drug that you are talking about costs less than $500 in an african nation for a year. it really is outrageous that we pay this sum. gilliad has made the money, it has its research. they could charge $1 a pill, and it would be okay. it's kind of the state of our affairs that we ar

does it make it right? does it make it wrong? as they say, to the spoils go the victor. >> narrator: investigators estimate that during his presidency, taylor siphoned off anywhere from $280 million to $3 billion dollars. eventually, he would be arrested and tried at the hague- but not for crimes committed in liberia - but for his role in the war in sierra leone. though at his trial, he was questioned about firesto. >> now, harbel is the location for what economic activity? >> harbel is the location of the firestone rubber plantation. >> and what was the significance of capturing that? >> oh, you had immediately a means that would provide the needed financial assistance that we needed for the revolution. >> narrator: taylor said that firestone gave him economic and political capital at a critical juncture in the war. >> so once we captured harbel, we then made it very clear to the firestone plantation company that they could no longer be permitted to exercise allegiance to the government in monrovia. so they became at that partic

how does that work? every election system we vote on who controls the reins of power and then they go out and they supposedly serve all the various interests of society. in practice how does this have to work? what is this ultimately mean in practice? to cut to the chase if you are a businessman let's say or any of the other interests i talk about, what is your natural approach to this? are you going to sit still and say yeah okay i will be destroyed by the government and if the election goes the wrong way that's just the way that went. my business will be destroyed. my hard-earned income will be handed to other people. you know the insurance business let's say and ayn rand will be completely collected by the government but am i going to sit there? of course not. i'm going to go out and try to influence this process and that makes perfectly good sense. .. >> the. >> the inevitable a result is a mad dash like a one-hour sale where prices are reduced by 90 percent. you try to access government as a regulat

we might try to defund what he does. we will try a lawsuit and there may be actions we can take otherwise. when he does this, he will poison the barrel and make it awfully hard to work with him on other issues, in particular immigration. if he wants to accomplish anything lasting on immigration he was to work with congress and not just issue these executive orders. >> there was a bill that was approved by the senate. it will not come before a vote because boehner said he will not let it. would you vote for that bill if it comes before you in front of the current congress in the session? >> the senate amnesty bill early this congress cannot be sent to the house because it is unconstitutional. it is contrary to the constitution for the senate to include revenue-increasing measures in their legislation. the reason the senate majority leader harry reid hasn't sent it to the house is because we cannot take it on. we are opposed to that bill. it never secures the border. we cannot have that kind of putting off the secure borde

that does it for "the cycle." "now" with alex wagner begins right now. >>> the biggest win for immigrants in a quarter century. it's thursday, november 20th and this is "now." >> it's been a long road to get here. ♪ ♪ >> president obama tonight will address the nation. >> to shield as many as 5 million undocumented immigrants from deportation. >> part of keeping america prosperous and keeping america strong. >> where does the president get to issue work permits. >> there's a human element to it. >> millions of american citizen families. >> many of those people pay taxes and love their children. >> this is blocking people's fundamental confidence in their government. >> >> this is what the president is facing. >> even the hits panic community is not happy about what he's going to do tonight. >> it's very exciting for the immigrant rights community. >> house republicans have indicated they're opposed to immigration reform. >> they should stop whining and start legislating. >> make no mistake when the newly elected r

will not worry about what congress does or says. i have been struck, as you have, by the aggressiveness of the white house in the face of a very bad beating in the election. gwen: so much to watch but for other subjects to talk about, good, old-fashioned politics. one thing we will spend time doing in 2015 is tracking ups and downs of the men and women who want to be president. one candidate who took a hit and kept on ticking is new jersey governor chris christie. >> governor chris christie has the persona that he asks the tough questions. so how come he didn't ask the simple question -- who closed down the freeway? if he can't ask the simple question, how does he expect to become president in 2016? gwen: pierre, you spent time covering bridgegate. i'm curious whether that is over. he's just overcome that? >> the justice department investigation continues. to be determined what they're going to do. when that shoe drops, good or bad for the governor, it's going to be a huge story. it's something a cloud that's still hanging over him.

what does it mean. we were talking about this before, i don't know how many people in congress are going to change their minds but it does give the republicans an argument. >> it certainly can impact american sentiments. he calls him snobbish, but how reflective are his comments of the intent of the administration? and how much are americans going to read into it and have a real distaste for the aca bases on this. >> it is total silly season. the less effective they will be in getting the types of changes they want to see through the law. this was debated every issue talked about was debated myself, and tevi believe. and many many other people, we talks about the transfer to young and old, we talks at a locket of thing i work in the immaterial ployier community, so what we learned as an mit professor is an elite snob that's not learning anything at all. >> you agree, it doesn't matter? >> i don't think it matters that much, i think the consequence of the silly season, which is right to characterize it t

doe eviscerated tolbert in bed.emboweled him. doe then invited the world's press to come to liberia to witness the execution of all the cabinet ministers that he could lay his hands on. >> it was very shocking, really, because of the way they executed the cabinet, who were old men, who were civilians. i think people would expect them to be locked up after a coup. they wouldn't expect them to be tied on the beach outside town and shot. >> the execution of the tolbert cabinet on the beach, broadcast live on liberian television, sent a pretty clear message that this was his country to control. (gunfire) >> for the first time since its birth, liberia was no longer run by these mulatto, lighter skinned libero-americans, but from someone from the interior. >> narrator: doe gradually filled government posts with members of his krahn tribe, many who were uneducated and ill-prepared to run a country. one of the notable exceptions was charles taylor, who had recently returned from boston, where he had received a degree in eco

and what does that mean politically?just touched on that a little bit, so let's talk about the political fallout and what that will be if president obama takes executive action on immigration. a new "wall street journal"/nbc news poll has found that 48% of americans are against the president doing this. anger is growing among the gop, many saying it could derail their agenda before the new congress even convenes. but republican congressman marlin stetsman of indiana urges his party to remain cautious in its response to the president. watch. >> there is a lot of frustration with the president. there's anger with the president. there's a sense that he has just violated the trust of the american people again. we have to, we have to guard our tongue. we have to keep the right tone because we are going to take the senate back and control that in january, and then we can really fix the problem. >> all right. so i want to focus in on what he just said about striking the right tone. andrea, what does that mean? what is the right

they are prioritize, just like law enforcement does every day. even as we focus on deporting criminals, the fact is that millions of immigrants in every state of every race and nationality still live here illegally. let's be honest, tracking down rounding up, and importing millions of people is not realistic. anyone who's a just otherwise is not being straight with you. it is also not who we are as americans. most of these immigrants have been here a long time. they were card. often in tough low-paying jobs. they support their families. they worship at our churches. many of their kids are american born, or spent most of their lives here. there hopes dreams, and patriotism are just like ours. as my predecessor, president bush, once put it they are part of american life. now, here's the thing. we expect people who live in this country to play by the rules. we expect those who cut the line will not be unfairly rewarded. we are going to offer the following deal. if you have been in america for more than five years if you have children who are america

this project does just that. the commission found the project to be consistent with the residential design guidelines and general plan urban designs. that's the concern. the housing element emphasizes the need to provide house he [speaker not understood]. it also does not remove any existing housing in order to do this. rather the project rehabilitates a unit. the property is substantially vacant and given the size of the lot and the skill of the hill the commission [speaker not understood]. the legal condid youtionses is not on the lot or the. it rather is a matter of [speaker not understood] there is no documentation [speaker not understood]. clearly not meeting life safety goals. in conclusion, for the reasons stated in above, the planning department [speaker not understood] uphold the planning commission decision and deny the appeal. thank you. >> thank you very much. colleagues, any questions to the planning department? okay, supervisor yee. >> just a quick question. the buildings that were there, i guess 18

you just described, does it have an impact in your operation?>> if the group has a performance guaranty united health care reports a monthly statistical audit report on the results and if they fall below performance guaranty then there are penalties on unit health care. >> you said there are standard levels for accuracy, when the performance is not met what do you do? >> >> we take these standards very carefully. we have quality management and we do have intense training for our claims processors and we constantly are updating our training documents to ensure that the most current information and it does change a lot is made available. processers go through an intense training class when they come to united health care and those trainings continue tullius -- throughout the year and web basing applications as well as classroom training if needed side by side process or training and we have an -- array of different quality controls to make sure they are processing correctly. one of our enhancements is smart audit rule which takes scenarios that ar

>> does not! does not! does not! >> there's a legality issue and we are trying to work through it. that is the subject at hand. >> i think americans can be called a lot of things. selfish does not come to mind. >> we are the most generous people on earth. 60,000 or 80,000 kids that came this summer. we footed the bill and put them in communities, educating them, housing them, all that. >> get ready to be more generous. with this action, you are encouraging them to get in this country. >> you hit on a key point. we could realistically assess, it's hard to deport tens of millions, whatever. i do think that the way this is being done and the brazenly political way it is being done, it does kind of get back to the stupid label. >> not only stupid, it's interesting how, all of a sudden, the narrative is skewed toward not the lawbreaker being the person who is wrong, but the person that objects to the law being broken being the person that is wrong. that is mind boggling. >> that is very well put. >> amazing how well -- >> let me write that down. i'm going to use it in other shows. go ah

he does have the final say. so if the house and the house and senate both pass the pipeline bill it would approve construction of the pipeline immediately. that would send the bill to the president's desk and obama will either veto it or he will sign it on through and landrieu says this evening that, yes, she has not received the commitment, she has not received any commitment from obama but she feels that he will, that he will sign it. and she is confident that, somehow because of the fact they're compromising, both republicans and democrats can convince obama to say okay to the pipeline. >> word late wednesday the house indeed will take up the keystone bill. this is bill being sponsored by bill cassidy. running against senator landrieu in rainoff raise in louisiana september the 6th. how is that expected to go in the house? that comes up for a vote on thursday. >> that's correct. the house will vote on a keystone xl pipeline bill from cassidy running against landrieu. that is expected to pass. the house has pa

does not adhere to this practice. in fact, nearly every major air quality regulation from this administration has been justified by data that it has kept secret. this means the agency's claims about the benefits of its rules cannot be verified by independent scientists. this incompludes the recent plan to regulate our entire electric system. this proposal will kill thousands of jobs and increase electricity costs. all for no discernable effect on global temperatures. this also includes upcoming ozone regulations which even the administration admits will be the most expensive in history. unaheaveable standards will -- unachieveable standards will result in economic hardship, stalled projects and burdened local governments. unfortunately, e.p.a. clearly sees transparency and accountability as a threat. speaking before the national academy of sciences, e.p.a. administrator mccarthy said her agency needed to, quote, keep the science from those, quote, not call foid analyze it, end quote. but the public deserves better and

what does it mean for you?ch more as opportunity to use our brand to support the organization and less for business. yeah, we still think you have to shave during the month of movember. it is about mustaches, not full beards. correct some people need help trying to figure out which mustache to -- >> some people need help trying to figure out which mustache to grow. movember helps. they have a list of styles. what someone referred to as the trucker, others might call the handlebar, or where i come from, the hockey star. why that as opposed to the boxcar or the rock star? >> i am in a discovery phase right now. last year i grew a pretty normal mustache. this year i thought i would try something different. it is an opportunity to see what might look best on your. >> right now, what is the most popular mustache out there? i like the whisk. it takes a lot of maintenance. good for your business. notood to know that it's anywhere to grow a mustache it would be a pencil-been -- good to know that if stephanie were to gr

asking a simple question, does that star-spangled banner yet wave? years ago? did it continue to wave 50 years later at the dawn's early light broke over a nation torn apart by a civil war? did that star-spangled banner wave over america troops in the trenches in france, the beaches of normandy? the simple question, did that star-spangled banner wave over six marines at iwo jima, three firemen and ground zero and one astronaut on the moon? did it wave over the supreme court ordering the nation's schools desegregated? did it wave over the schoolhouse in little rock where brave children tested that promise? did it wave on the shoulders of women marching for the right to vote? does it yet wave wherever voices are raised for equal rights in this country? does that star-spangled banner wave over every embassy, every forward position, every ship, every man and woman deployed in the service of the united states of america? >> yes, it waves. >> does it wave on the front porches of families waiting out the deployments like my wife did silently praying for the

does my right hon.agree that our united kingdom stands, above all, for freedom of speech, thought and belief, and that we must do all in our power to protect the persecuted and stand up to the persecutors, whoever they are? >> i very much agree with my hon. friend. and he is right to make this such a cause, and to pursue it in the house and outside it. britain has a proud record of political and religious tolerance -- and, of course, of freedom of speech. in our dealings with other countries, we should always make it clear that we believe that to be the right approach. there is an appalling amount of persecution of religious minorities around the world, and some now say that christians are more persecuted than other religions in too many countries, some of which my hon. friend has named. we should make sure that this key issue of religious tolerance is at the heart of our foreign policy. >> two ofsted reports released today show that local authorities are not equipped to deal with child sexual exploitat

>> yes, i this it does. i think when you--when you see the power of money in campaigns right now in our political system, it sets the table because the money that's being raised, the money that the president and his sur gates are raising right now, that money is not just for this year's election. that is for 2016. that's for governor's races next year. you can't take that civics class without that lecture in american politics. it does set the table for what we're going to see. this is the most it's ever been raised. >> does that difference between the midterm and presidential year electorate strengthen the hands of those constituents that we'll know tomorrow morning whether they turned out or not as we look ahead to 2016? demographics, so we state that more older voters, more white voters will participate in this election. that's part of the reason why we're anticipating republican victories in many places this evening one of the important things to mention is does it make sense to deploy it on television ad

it does make you feel a lot better. are so awful they would never happen to you, you hope. >> what do you think of amazon? >> what a loaded question. [laughter] into very are complicated conversation here because there is no doubt that onlishers quite depend amazon in many way to be an efficient distributor of books. side. the good the bad side is monopolies are bad. you don't want monopolies. he's written a book. he's a venture capitalist who made a lot of money. >> and he thinks monopolies are good. they think they become monopolies by creating superior products. >> that's not always true. even if they have become a monopoly that way, if there is no competition, they become lazy and they start exploiting their position. that's why you don't want commerce controlled by -- >> a hearty capitalist. >> within limits. competition is productive within limits. it gets to thee stage of the monopoly it does away with the competition and then people get lazy and exploitation. thingse are so many including this. the older you get

so what the court does it is a concept of religion that robb does of many different roles. accepted in the island rare circumstance and congress, the same approach. coming to information and privacy the best working concept that encompasses all of the important interests that privacy serves is control of the information. this concept avoid aids the why and that's how. and to the state-controlled the papers they are secure enough. if not she is not. with that ramifications' to control mightily what one shares of with whom the to share with my mother or a close childhood friend but that does not mean i have chosen to share that with the entire world include the nsa. sure they could wrap to meet out that might chop said fred has the problem i did not know about and could be an informant but the downside risk that my confidence and babied misplaced with the disclosures to everyone in the upper rhone is really what the third party doctrine is. second, you don't relinquish all control over information about your public activities but there is such a thing functionally speaking wi

i don't see how he does it.nion guys like you, you'd have new members, sign them up, pay dues, paying taxes, what do you think? >> i'm a trained skilled union worker, 30 years on the job. our union trains people, driving schools for the teamsters. the local electric workers send their guys to school for the new codes and the carpenter's union does the same thing. this is not good. they want to work cheaper, quicker and want to show us up here. this is totally a cut off at the knees for the union worker who the union machines have got stuffed to them too because they went out in droves and asked and begged and drove all of the union guys out to the polls to vote, and what does this guy do? 14, 15 days later? keystone gone, and what else are they doing? bingo. letting six million more people come, in neil. it's ridiculous! >> i hear you. >> i don't understand how -- it's not an upset to the union worker. one guy trying to keep a family afloat in the middle class, they keep saying they're in the middle class, they

what does this mean?, that is one that we are not particularly worried about with respect to the big u.s. banks. clear on having heard these messages over the last couple of years that they loss absorbing capital. 20%.are at or above i am not worried about it. weigh onhey will market making it capability. >> is the problem that there is some form of regulatory arbitrage? banks are not subject to the same regulation and it gives some banks and advantage? >> there is the risk of that. with respect to u.s. market making, there are some large european banks that are involved and not subject to the same regulations. degree that they are operating in the u.s. and do come under federal oversight, i am not that worried. >> this isn't going to spark banks to game the system. infinitely adaptable and anything they can do to keep the wills turning, they will do. >> loophole in susie us. >> they are very good at finding them. systemicer from a perspective, i much pressure of these banks under? we talk about regulator

he does not care what she does in terms of distancing. we asked republicans who they wanted as president. we asked with mitt romney in there, even though he said he is not going to run. a pretty dominant lead in a big deal. we took romney out, and you can see it is a three-way race, all bunched up around 15%. we asked a general electorate in 2016, which party candidate will care more about people like you. you see they are basically tied. do the republicans have a candidate or candidates who can do well, and that cares about people like you? >> potentially they do. you have chris christie, who before this bridge scandal was best known for his response to the hurricane sandy, hugging the president, in voting with people suffering in new jersey. clearly, he has got that potential. rand paul has made a great deal of effort to talk about reforming prison sentences identifying with a community of people that republicans in the last 10, 20 years have not traditionally tried to identify with. >> watch jeb bush. watch rob portman. i think they ha

does the political mix with the three logical, and when the conversation is strictly political, does the theological always stand in the wings looking over your shoulder? >> the theological has always been hovering above. you can't ignore it when you sit at the negotiating table. there have been over the years very practical proposals of dealin dealing dealing with theological on one hand and dealing with the political on the other hand. it's still very easy. pretty simple if the parties are in a good-will mode, and if they're willing to give--give it a shot. then it's pretty simple to divide jerusalem. to have the jewish neighborhoods for the jews and the arab neighborhoods for the palestinians. it's pretty clear that this is something that can be done, can be achieved. we need to have negotiations in good faith, and unfortunately, israelis and palestinians can't sit alone. they need a third party to go between them. >> when you say jewish neighborhoods for jews, and palestinian neighborhoods for the palestinians, those neighborhoods, where they are, would they be contiguous? would

he does it. he doesn't before the spending deadline or they have to move it. -- maybe he will delay it. >> they do fund the government, that will be be bad for republicans. they try to impeach the president, that would be bad for republicans. >> they could go to court. >> that is a holding action and i think that is the best move but that will not get them very far. is the best of times and the worst of times for obamacare, more than 100,000 people signed up at the same time the affordable care act has hit its lowest approval rating. the white house is facing questions of transparency because of some unearthed videotapes showing a barely known for faster at m.i.t. you can tell the president is getting sick of it. >> i would advise every press outlet here, go back and pull up every clip, every story and i think that it is fair to say that there was not a provision in the health care law that was not extensively debated and was fully transparent. >> i will ask you a question given everything that i

does a couple more brake checks. all for no reason.ally one last brake check causes a minor collision. >> the guy going too slow has the road rage. >> he just can't handle being passed? >> you're leaving the scene of an accident. >> anyone who ever cooked for a child or with a child is going to absolutely fall in love with this video. >> welcome to cooking with kids. today i'm going to show how to make a quick and clean chicken fried rice. you cook it with this ♪ cooking with kids. >> he is making a brilliantly delicious chicken fried rice for his little son mason. >> what you are going to need is a chicken breast. one egg. then 2 1/2 cups of rice. >> he gives us the recipe, tells us what he needs, gets in and out, it's quick and helpful. >> chicken breast off the grill. beat the egg. >> i could follow this. this is like bachelor cooking. >> how with will little mason like it? >> what? >> thanks for watching cooking with kids. tune in next week. >> that broke his heart. >> i feel so much pain. i've been through that, i don't know, 150

what does this mean for the war on terror? retired major general bob scales is a fox news military analyst. i'm confused as to what is going on. first president obama pulls troops from iraq and gone back to fight isis and now extending the troop stay in afghanistan. we have got the taliban and isis in iraq. had we stayed would that have changed anything? >> i don't think anybody knows yet but the point is well taken. these two are linked, had it not been for the meltdown of the iraqi forces when overrun by the islamic state, this extension of u.s. action in afghanistan never would have happened because, remember now, this is a political not a military decision. the last thing the administration wants is in 2015 before an election year for the afghan forces to collapse. so the u.s. militargiven for la, a year-long extension to continue to assist the afghan forces both from the air and i think most significantly from the ground. the question is, what are these advisers going to be allowed to do. and i think that's still an open

he does not have that authority. and you can go and look at article 2 and see he does no have that authority. and as we sit it seems that the president came out in 25 plus times he says one thing. well, either he believed that that was a lie and this was his true intention. it affects his credibility. so how can house and senate republicans ever believe this president because he will go out and say one thing and then come back and do a totally different thing. >> you made some comments if this were done in reverse by conservative or republican president, what would the reaction be? >> well, if it was done conservative or republican president you would see the "new york times" and every single progressive liberal media outlet screaming from the high heavens. making analysis to president reagan or george h.w. bush is apples and vegetables because what happened with them is they signed legislation. there's been no legislation signed. and the president has to understand that the legislative branch does not act based upon

it does not apply to copyright.it does not apply to electronic privacy communications, but it also does not apply to violations of admiral criminal law, which is like google, facebook, twitter all have to care about child pornography laws because section 230 does not write them a blank check for that. i think we can all agree that is probably a good thing. what i want to emphasize here is that while it is true that we unintendede about consequences, sweeping into much speech, we always have to worry about that. that is true with every single law. there is no such thing as a law that does not sweep in something that we are probably not going to like sleeping in. the question always has been not just in the first amendment context but also in criminal law generally, on balance, are we accomplishing more good with this law than bad? for us to suggest or to have a any of response that says time you suggest to someone that they might not be able to disclose whatever they want to a disasterhat means for us as a democracy,

the passengers here hope they does not cause delays. these workers that are going on strike right now are men and with men responsible forgetting checked bags scanned and tsa. you often see them loading bags off conveyor belts and carousals. there are 125 employees here at phl and they are employed by prime flight which contracts with individual airlines. these baggage handlers tell "eyewitness news" that they are currently paid $9 an hour instead of the $10.88 to promise. they voted to unionized and local 32bjsciu is organizing the work stoppage this morning as many baggage hand letters say they will step off the job until they get what they want. >> we bust our butts. people think we are not baggage hand letters. we're lifting back. i'm a female lifting 70, eight, 90 bags. for them to treat us, the way we get treated, we don't even have a break room. >> reporter: not all of the employees plan to go on strike, an airport spokesperson says that they have been in contact with as many as ten airlines that subcontract with prime flight and

run away. >> yes, he does. >> how far does he go? >> i don't know, i mean, around 30, 40 feet. >> at that moment, you've called for help. >> yes. >> why not stay in the car? he's running away. >> my job isn't to just sit and wait, you know, i have to see where this guy goes. my goal wasn't to arrest him. my goal is to maintain a visual on him. and i was worried -- >> you weren't going to arrest him alone? >> not alone. i knew i had backup on the way. >> and then he stops? >> he does stop. >> this special edition of "nightline" will be right back. ♪ music the volkswagen golf was just named motor trend's 2015 car of the year. so was the 100% electric e-golf, and the 45 highway mpg tdi clean diesel. and last but not least, the high performance gti. looks like we're gonna need a bigger podium. the volkswagen golf family. motor trend's 2015 "cars" of the year. i used to think a to kimouthwash had to burn.uth, then i went pro with crest pro-health mouthwash. it's scientifically proven to kill 99% of germs so you move to a healthier mouth f

money on spend this the admissions, does this money nes, where does it come from? is following the money. it always seems that is more and more money. guest: congress is appropriating the money, and i see your point. defence companies to profit a lot from operations such as this. the makers of the weapons, and makers of the aircraft they maintain the s to aircraft. they do make money off it. host: todd on good morning. caller: happy thanksgiving. drones and automated system, is the military looking at this as a way to cut costs for the future? and what a kill decision could system he automatic without the responsibility being put on place. >> right now, that is something that is very heavily debated be ther or not will adrian able to conduct a kill decision. is essentially, the drones iraq and other r a pilot you have driving it. the autonomy is very much something that is being talked about in the pentagon, it just major innovation, secretary hagel announced at the reagan library. to look at technology and the the pentagon is using, to give them an over the oppone

what does that say to you? >> i think what the president was trying to capture is what the essence is for us as a country and as americans. for him, i think we all recognize that that number is going to represent, ultimately, our values. and, for us, i know we've heard it's up to 5 million, possibly, people. that's a huge victory for so many of us, even though we know that not everybody will be captured in that number. we know that this is just important first step. but that congress can praelly now step in to finish the job. and that's going to be an important role that we hope they will take on because this is temporary, as you heard from the president. >> janet, rachel maddow here. i wanted to ask your opinion on how we should describe this? obviously, the last time we had something approaching comprehensive immigration reform, a major change to the law, was in the 1980s. we've since had some changes to the law and certainly changes in the add min str the administrative imp lemtation of the law. in the grand