mccullen was sort of passing the buck. was looking for cover from the grand jury rather than trying to bring a case, which is certainly an unusual setting for a prosecutor. the only thing in this process that's been quick has been the actual deliberations by the grand jury, two days given a many months long investigation is not, in my opinion, a very long deliberation. >> jeffrey, but also remember we talked about the grand jury started to ask questions and they wanted more evidence and they brought in another expert witness when, you know, as mark geragos was saying, usually in his estimation grand jurors or grand juries are usually the hand maiden of the prosecution. or the prosecutor. but if they are starting to ask questions and develop their own mind and want to hear other things that may not be so. this may be a grand jury that's going to make up their own mind regardless of what bob mccullen may want or what the prosecutor may want. >> that's true. it is possible that this could be an aggressive grand jury. i think

mccullen but a representative from prosecutor's office did call both attorneys anthony gray and ben crumpey were on a conference call. they were told that a decision has been made. they were not told what that decision is. they were also told that about 5:00 some sort of announcement would be made. he then also told me, though, that, again, the first time that the family heard that a grand jury decision had been made was from me about at least an hour before anyone from the prosecutor's office contacted the family. >> all right. sunny, here's your interview. let's listen now. >> at this time the only information we've heard about a decision or anything has been from the news sources, cnn and that's all we've heard. we've heard nothing from the prosecutor's office at this time. >> we've been told or we've heard from you and from others that there was an agreement that the prosecutor's office would give you or anthony gray your co-counsel at least a six hour window when a decision is reached. is that accurate? >> well, they said they would give us notice. the time has varied how much notice

police department, with planned parenthood to amend this buffer zone law so that it is compliant with mccullen, but still accomplishes the twin objectives of allowing women to safely and securely access reproductive health, but at the same time protecting the first amendment rights of these protesters. i believe that our law today strikes through that balance. this legislation will continue to allow quiet consensual conversations between anti-abortion counselors and women seeking services without subjecting planned parenthood's patients and staff to scary and intimidating harassment and conflict. my legislation does the following. it prohibits anyone from following and harassing any person within 25 feet of a reproductive health care facility. it prohibits impeding access at the door of a reproductive health facility. it prohibits individuals from shouting or using amplified sound on any public street or sidewalk within 50 feet of the property line of a reproductive health facility. and if an individual violates any of these prohibitions after a written warning, a police officer may require th