. >> mr. frye, our agenda says approval but you say we'll see it again and approve it the second time. >> we are going to adopt a resolution. >> i move we adopted the resolution

. >> mr. frye, our agenda says approval but you say we'll see it again and approve it the second time. >> we are going to adopt a resolution. >> i move we adopted the resolution to initiate designation of the american swedish hall. >> second. >> commissioners, before the commission secretary chiems in, would you want to include in that resolution direction to staff to amend the character defining features indicated by commissioners pearlman and johnck, i don't know if there is anything you want to add about the plaque program or changing in the designation? >> i think we are going to wait. >> i would say yes, we would include you -- the additional changes that commissioner pearlman mentioned but the name of the designation, maybe we'll ask staff to investigate whether that's the swedish american hall feels it's appropriate. >> is that amenable to the second? >> yes. thank you. >> okay, then commissioners if there is nothing further there is a motion and second to adopt a recommendation to initiate

mr. poore. i believe you are represented by cathy frye, is that correct?. >> unlike cedric whose public defender is likely to be carrying a heavy case load and have limited resources, james poore has hired a private defense attorney. >> miss frye has been in this morning. not guilty plea entered on your behalf. good luck. >> thank you. >> after the arraignment, the two brothers try to talk. but an officer notices the exchange and separates them. >> did that go the way you thought? >> oh, no. i didn't know nothing about no attorney. how is his court process moving quicker than mine. >> you tried to talk after you were arraigned. what were you trying to say to him? >> how did you get an attorney? how were you able to afford an attorney. i know i'm scrambling to try to get an attorney myself. >> you gonna be cool? >> i don't know if i'm going to be cool or not. >> it never hurts to shed a tear especially when you're a man of deep feelings. >> catch up, catch up, catch up. >> on the advice of his new attorney, james declined to discuss the case any further. bu

frye? >> commissioners, apologize for interjecting. one item that would be helpful to clarify at this hearing in anticipation of the next one is that while we certainly agree that mr. goldberg's association the this building is apparent, the designation from the city attorney listed before you list only under architecture. if you believe different, there is no opposition from us, but we would like that clarification because it does have ab an impact on the ordinance moving forward. >> commissioner pearlman? >> i'm not sure it matters. it's in the ordinance and talks about rue goldberg. i'm hoping there will be some plaque if there is ever a rue goldberg museum. as long as that information is presented to the public and that's not lost, which it seems almost impossible to lose it at this point, i'm not sure that it's that critical because it does immediate -- meet the requirements of being a landmark under article 10. >> commissioner? >> i agree with that except this one point. i do think that if not critical, it's important that we do not designate buildings as landmarks for reasons that are not well supported factually. so i think that we should leave it as it is