somebody who in ferguson moshgs month, the night of the riots tweeted a photo of law enforcement officers over the motto, the old motto the tree of liberty must be flesh with the blood of tyrants. i mean would a reasonable person foresee that is viewed as a threat about it police officers? again, i wouldn't want, you know, have a felony conviction against it. >> this is valuable first amendment language that has to be protected? >> i think there is -- >> or the kind of things that were quoted earlier? >> i think when you're doing it as a category, yes this is valuable language. virtually any language that uses forceful rhetoric could be penalized. as i say, the blood of tyrants quote. >> it has to reasonably put somebody in fear. >> exactly, a very low standard. >> a low standard. but to my mind, it doesn't eliminate a whole lot of valuable speech. at all. >> for example, another example i would like to reserve the remainder of my time for rebuttal f someone puts on the facebook page a picture of a woman walking into a family planning clinic over the phrase turn or burn, you know, maybe t