start public comment. item 5i, commissioners there is only one grant that you will be accepting stowed from the menage foundation in the amount of $20,000 for the recreation and park department scholarship program and no. 2 from big billy, inc., doing business as as slims is not on today. so i need a motion as amended with 5a. with that, is there any member of the public who would like to comment on the consent calendar? being none, public comment is closed. commissioners >> entertain a motion. >> moved with amendment. >> second. >> moved and seconded with amendment, all those in favor, say aye? >> a. >> so moved. >> we're now on item and although there is no presentation today, it's the san francisco zoo. would anyone like to make public comment on the san francisco zoo item today? being none, public comment is closed this. was discussion only anyway. we're now on item 7, the union square ada enhancement award of contract >> good morning commissioners. project manager, capital division. i'm here for a dis

public comment on items not on the agenda today. >> public speaker: . jeff brooks. this is sort of a related item very important and coming up as an imminent issue filling of the final seat on the sf puc by appointment. that final seat is the seat that is required to have a person that has ratepayer or consumer advocacy experience. and i think it would be, i'm pretty much directing this at lafco. i have a feeling this won't be entirely wrapped up by the end of february and it might be a good idea to in case it's not resolved why it to schedule an a discussion of proposition e in 2008 whiches the proposition that gave the board of supervisors power to vote on this. the vote was loud and clear in proposition 8 that we want the public utilities commissioners. for example commissioner vietor has clear environmental just -- justice experience. i have to put on my consumer activist hat we have to do more digging. we may apply for a different sfpuc. we must honor that ballot measure and if we get to lafco meeting time next month, if this decision hasn't been m

what's the second public housing what's our third priority public housing i couldn't be on this san franciscooard of supervisors in such an incredible position remembering where i came green from but people suffer suffer in public housing today not only in care of their unit but the neglect of providing the services that exist all over this city over $8 billion into the city how are we taking care of those residents how are they getting the services they need in order for them to prosper in their neighborhood we have to do better today with a lot of hope in my heart saying we're doing better that is over $50 million of city funding this is unprecedented never before has the city made a significant attraction because public housing has always been treated as if it's public housing and the housing authority we're past those days and bringing up the families back together again with the public housing families we're residents we're part of this city and all residents will benefit in this city through the wealth and the things that exist because we're a city that cares taking care of of our resid

is there any additional public comment? seeing none, public comment is closed. we are done with this item unless there is a requested action? >> jason fried, the one thing that lafco may want to do is accept the report so i can communicate it to them so there might be a month eggs to -- motion to accept the report and let enernex done. >>supervisor london breed: is there a motion to accept the report? moved by commissioner campos. is there a second? second by commissioner crews. wow objection the item will move forward to accept the report. madam clerk, can you please call item no. 5. city clerk: item no. 5 status of pacific gas & electric companies application before the california public utilities commission. >> i just want to report that yesterday the california public utilities commission approved the green tariff program that were mandated by senate bill 43. this is the program for pg & e this is the program that will allow them to have a green tariff product that they provide to their retail customers where they will have an opportunity to purchase up to 1

safety and the public's right-of-way so i'm asking that you really consider it. >> are you finished. >> yes. >> what is there about this business that impacts the public safety. >> what he is selling and what he side effects my business one because of odor. >> the odor. >> a lot of people don't see that happening i have a strict no food or drinks in the business additional 24 i'm looking at the long term outside but the drug dealers when the cops come where are you here if you get a hamburger the cops can't touch you i- >> my question to this gentleman's business is that something. >> let me finish. >> is this somethings that has happened or you fear. >> it has i fear it will happen again. >> and on your establishment is your door on in terms of do you have a door. >> it's open. >> but you have a door. >> yes. >> you can close the door. >> no handicap i don't - but you can klass close the door and on it if someone disabled comes. >> yes. >> the day he was illegal operating it's amazing how the drug dealers are flocking when i went down to dbi i told them they would call him and get h

right now it's based on public works projects that are publically funded. buildings like our new emergency safety building, some of our street work, public utilities commission work, paid for by public dollars and maximize workers from san francisco who receive jobs. up to 30 percent currently. last year we expanded the local higher policy to include private development on public land and so now we are seeing there are many more opportunities that our local residents invoice getting jobs in construction. we are looking at still collecting information where we have a percentage that might be difficult to achieve. we want to be able to pause at the current percent of local residents getting jobs for construction while we assess the information. we are still gathering that and we hope to have support at the controllers office and hope to be able to work together to look at numbers to see how well we are doing in our local hire effort. we know it's successful and as we start is to increase the percentage we are seeing that those percentages are too onerous to b

seeing none, public comment is closed. this was discussion only. it is starting to get a little crowded in here and i know we're running out of seats. so if there is any staff that can move into these seats, so we can allow the public to be seated, we would really appreciate that. and after this item, i will go pull some chairs out of the back. thank you. so we are now on item 7. commissioners >> you lost a few commissioners. >> should we wait? >> we probably should. >> okay. >> let's do item 8 and come back. >> okay. we're now on item 8 eugene friend recreation center agreement with trust for public land and once this is done, we'll go back to item 7. >> good morning, commissioners. and director of policy and public affairs melinda stockman, capital and planning division. very excited this morning to be presenting to you for discussion and possible action the approval of an agreement between the city and county of san francisco and the trust for public land. under which tpl will provide rec and park department a grant including in-kind services wi

for why organizing the public labor markets in this way benefits the broader public. that it benefits the public workers themselves and it would be surprising if it didn't do that. but what benefit to the consumer's of the public services, i have not seen the strong principled case but it does do that. i have seen some negative cases that it doesn't have the negative effects but i haven't seen a powerful first principled case and i would leave it there. >> thank you. i want to thank the organizers for inviting me and thank you for the opportunity to talk about the working for an important issue. it's an important we were chatting just before we came out of that the study of the unions and have seen very little attention from the political so this is a welcomed opportunity. i should say i'm not a specialist in the public-sector unions or debater by trade. we are going to try to play the role as best we can. i should say we are here in the introduction and the reason for the director of the center for the labor studies at the university of washington that is the current

is there any additional public comment? seeing none, public comment is closed. go on to our next item. city clerk: item no. 6, public comment. >> general public comments related to lafco. if anyone would like to further the discussion on recommendation. that would be welcome. seeing no one coming forward, we'll close public comment. >> next item. city clerk: future agenda items. >> colleagues, any future items? commissioner crews? >>cynthia crews: i was going to ask something from the department to come and talk to us about cleanpowersf in addition to types of efficiencies that customers can do now through pg & e. >> great, that sounds really great to do. if director fried, if we perhaps can look into that for the next lafco meeting. i think it would be a good time to do that next month. if you can work vice-chair crews and the department, that would be great. >> i will try to get them for next meeting. >> thank you. we'll open this up for public comment. >> commissioner crews opened this up and it's really important. eric brooks, san francisco clean party, san

is there any additional public comment? seeing none, public comment is closed. can we take the other item that we need to move forward came to the board after the agenda was posted. can we have a motion to move that forward. moved by supervisor farrell, second by supervisor cohen without objection. can we take both of those findings, we already did that and now on the substantive imperative agenda item, can we move that item forward without objection. without objection the imperative agenda passes. mr. clerk can you read the in memoriam. city clerk: on behalf of the late rosy lee and on behalf of the full board for the late morales and for the late dorothy adams and laura lie. >>supervisor london breed: okay, colleagues, we are adjourned. [ meeting is adjourned ] >> >> as registered voter in san francisco before each election you receive a voter information pamphlet in the mail it has the digest for each local proposition on the ballot how does a context sometimes proposition get semido if i had. >> inning. >> i don't know the specific process. >> it's done by a

that's public domain, he said. so forget hollywood paying you anything. >> very quickly there are some great films that are historically based. i'm thinking about the one by raoul peck. obviously, "selma", "12 years", "the butler." >> the historian can jump in after the movie comes out. the movie creates an opportunity for a conversation about subjects people are not usually talking about. so selma, now we're talking about voting rights and how does the grassroots impact policy-making, like most people are just not focussed on this on a daily basis. and now there's a big debate. historians write op-eds, et cetera. and that creates space for discussions about serious issues that otherwise it's low on on the agenda of most americans. >> thank you. >>> okay. i'd like to begin by appreciate appreciate what you said. you mentioned hoffsteter. i feel that you did not go far enough, because he was very very influenced by psychoanalysis. with regard to the professor, many years ago i corresponded with you and you wrote bac

comment is there any public comment on item 6 introduction to new items seeing none, public comment is closed. and go on to our next item. >> item 7 public comment. >> our next item is on for general public comment seeing none, public comment is closed. prior to our adjournment i want to thank sfgovtv broadcast jessie larson and nona melkonian thank you for your services our next item. >> item 8 adjournment. >> colleagues, we're adjourned thank you. >> only mark from ecology good morning, everyone all right. let me begin by thanking everyone for coming out today 0 for this great event this event is about streets but it is a partnership that has city staff from many agencies mta, public health and public works police department, along with the mfrnts and everyone what does business or enjoys stockton street is our fourth yes, we try to do better a couple dialysis we were at the a meeting with one of the merchant one thing we discussed opening up more opportunity to the side streets i promised we'll explore that we heard of so many great success with the program i definitely wants to

thank you very much thank you. >> opening it up for public comment no public comment public comment is closed. and commissioner antonini. >> mr. de'mario 10 he have a question on the pie chart and the works program i guess those are not the same thing but the percentages look diversity on zoning administration you have 20th century 1.92 but it is only 17 on the work program 17.5 or for 2016 i on those positions are not yet fund but the two seem to be different numbers. >> keith martini staff my apologies 2 should be 19. >> 19 i guess. >> actually, the pie chart is wrong it should be 6.12015-2016 that annual listed ftes to 2016-2017 my apologies. >> it should be open the pie chart 167881. >> correct. >> thank. >> commissioner richards. >> thank you so much for adding those 3 positions to the short-term rental program this is a good investment thank you. >> commissioner johnson. >> thank you very much yeah. we've gone over this with a fine tooth comic based on our presentation i know we have an informational predict only one capital request for the work through 2016 that's correct you're

the legislation digest has a quarterly reporting so the public has a public record for consultants. >> the st. john gibner would like to comment. >> john gibner, deputy city attorney like to follow up on the possibility it didn't go to our question supervisor jane kim about how the departments are admonishment but in terms of what the remedies are the contract for the project will exterior the contractor comply with the construction so non-compliance will mean suspension or the contract or - or for potentially departure time a process that follows a hearing so a ranger of options and also non-payment we can suspend payment to the contractor so there are ways to terminate the contract permanently. >> do the agency feel like they've got the capacity i like the ordinance i know our office on a daily process gets e-mails from the public regarding violations to the planning code and they're real violations and follow-up with the departments they don't have the resources to actually enforce against the violator so it becomes a frustration within the law enforce the law and we get kind of or

and vision zero the mayor for vision zero we also, of course foster the approach and courage the public safety in our neighborhood we support the local businesses and are strong with partnerships and working with the stewards so businesses are part of the process so we also support the local business we have the program has many functions and generally our idea and our work is reidentified and facilitated through the community issues to create the public spaces we assess the potential we look at the geography equity and moetdz modes of transportation below our capacity to the strpd we offer the design and work with all the agencies of the city and the elected offices and the stakeholders we do enforce the very thorough and strong standards design standards for operations maintenance also and we do quality controls to look at post elevations and provide leadership nationwide as you'll see in the rest of the presentation our criteria they're both physical and social so it is important to us to look at places that have very wide roadways that are underutilized and look at the neighbors the

or they have lack of greening in general and we also take advantage of the leadership to improve public safety we want to make sure that any projects we initiative is is strong i want to ask robin to present another part of the presentation were going back over the principles and we'll talk about our project portfolio. >> good afternoon, supervisors so as laurie mentioned be moving forward we're meticulous about examining where in san francisco we can focus our effort to maximize our goals of providing open space throughout the city this past year the paperwork alliance helped us to identify a number of facts and circumstances where we might start looking at specific areas of the city we also work with a variety of sponsors and sponsor types of we're familiar with the cafes but particle moving forward we're looking forward to creating deep and meaningful relationships with nonprofit we have projects with the museums and art galleries we will get into later our response depended on the types of projects they're working with the city we have a dive type of responsibilities to their instal

we segregated this public. we have a right wing, left wing, but we don't want to acknowledge that the left is segregated. we can do something about it as public intellectuals by calling people out that we've got to converge and have conversations with each other. it's not just "the new republic." it is other forms that have not allowed queer people or people of color to be part of the debate. >> back to mike's comment and nelson's question, the right did invest a lot of money in creating outlets for public intellectuals, and i know there is a disconnect with part of the anti--- anti-intellectualism in the conservative movement. i think now the left in some ways, whatever the left is at parts of the left, have tried to rip it that, whether it is "american prospect" or the center for american progress. i don't know if they have caught up, but it is a period that is probably interesting to study. the right, i think there are parts of the right that take ideas very seriously. i'm sure many people you don't like or

is there any additional public comment? seeing none, public comment is closed. can we have a motion on the minutes? the motion of supervisor mar and second by commissioner crews. we'll take that without objection. next item, please. >> city clerk: item no. 3, election of the chairperson and advice person for 2015. >> velgd. -- very good. this is the time we do the election for the chair and vice-chair. commissioner campos? >>supervisor david campos: thank you. this is a very important role for the agency. and i would nominate chair avalos to continue in this chair. you have done a great job in that capacity and moving that community choice aggregation forward but also other various initiatives. i know that it's very challenging role because it's not only do you have to you know work with the rest of us on this commission, but you have the san francisco public utilities commission and the supervisors office and the mayor's office. i would like to make a motion to nominate chair avalos to continue in that capacity. >> great. thank you for your support and i would

we're ready for public comment. >> any public comment on item 6 seeing none, public comment is closed. >> supervisor cohen. >> i have a few closing remarks thank you to you and your department staff i believe the legislation does a good job of striking a balance of allowing office support and the maintenance of those historic buildings without displacing tenants or cannibalizing the wblgz we need to maintain some of the incentives that the property think owned have to allow them to have office space in special circumstances we can't lieu the can onlytion of truly value and could have at the time space so you've heard this is this is essential to our blue-collar jobs and not adding this in his own the work we've done to support the businesses in this city i move we adapt those because their substantive we need to put this off one week. >> we'll take the amendments with a positive recommendation and what date and february 2nd. >> no, i thought oh, watt wait. >> it's february 2nd not the 9th and okay. so the motion so continue item of one week to february 2nd without objection the item i

any other public comment? >> pacific islander berry this proposal adds debombardments from c from for impermissible hides i bids this will debar a contractor from a city contractor for a specific period of time this is a hash penalty when applied to regulatory schemes such hash penalties should are for penalties and decreeing from for other penalties and violations. >> we shall move to number 6 oh i'm sorry. >> good evening, commissioners i would speak against addressing the penalty of c from commissioner andrews talked about in my view is the have you you have a volunteer of a board of directors that gets money from the city is the completely unaware their nonprofit gets money and decides to support a captioning candidate and makes a hundred dollars contribution the result is a nonprofit that otherwise is doing negotiating for the city debarred and that's a bit harsh it seems like this will allow the city upon the recommendation to go after the worse violators if you had a city contractor laundering money to

any public comment? seeing none, public comment is closed. next item. >> item from the consent calendar, item 10 a, request approval of travel for member of san francisco port commission with members of port staff to shanghai, china, to attend a 2015 conference and visit the newest system port for development. item 10c, request authorization to amend contract with langan engineering and environmental services regarding termination to ground leases and to (inaudible) south beach harbor, lincoln park and other improvements and related financial terms due to the the repayment of the south beach harbor revenue bond. >> can we bifurcate item 10a from 10b and c public comment? seeing none, public comment is closed. >> i move for approval. >> what one are you on? >> 10 a. >> so are you pulling -- you are voting on 10a and that was public comment just for 10a >> yes, sure. motion to approve of 10a >> so moved. >> second. >> all in favor, aye. opposed? 10a carries. . >> while we're waiting, i would like to disclose that regarding item 10c, that the de

>> actually this is a public hearing for you to take action, so you would close the public hearing and take possible action. >> why don't i have a resolution in here? >> no, not taking action? we were. >> there should be a resolution in the agenda item. >> i don't have one. >> it's on the back of the agenda item, just a short resolution, item 9. >> on the back? >> oh, it's the next item item 10. >> no, item 9 is actually the public hearing on the 10 year financial plan. >> right. >> and item 10 is the 10 year capital plan. both of these are public hearings to hear the financial plan and the capital plan and close the public hearing and take a vote to adopt them as required by the charter. >> oh, i see. >> can i ask a question? i have a question. so i know that we are moving forward, i guess, with some version of clean power sf and that that's connected with the business plan that may or may not have an effect on the rate structure, potentially, and some of the things that are currently being funded and the assets that we have may become part of that program. how -- i mean once we've he

item 1112 public comment. >> any public comment on this item? seeing none, public comment is closed item 13. >> adjournment. >> we are adjourned thank you very much . >> a hi, i'm karen fry a project manager and sfpuc and the bureau of environmental management honestly i've not considered a public sector job i realized this was an opportunity to work on large capital projects from san francisco all the way to our hetch hetchy and the yosemite national park i work with engineers and city attorneys and scheduled and we all work tom nolan e together on the project. >> the excavations are in red we'll have the interference to go under the street. >> my next project is the largest project in the water system improvement program this is the southeast plan that involved a lot of kworpthsdz with the community groups and public when 9 commissioners such the planning commission and the board of supervisors or this ftc commission they help us in city hall this is a beautiful building it really is the inner workers of the building you feel you're in the hea

comment on this item any public comment on item 3? okay seeing none, public comment is closed at this time colleagues any further discussion all right. motion made by supervisor kim for a with a positive recommendation seconded by supervisor wiener this motion passes unanimously thank you very much without objection madam clerk call item 4 >> item 4 a hearing on the pavement of parks program. >> great, thank you thank you, supervisor wiener is the author of this item and will present and lead the discussion. >> thank you, madam chair i called for this hearing on the xachlt program to receive an update on the program how it's pressed and this champs and make sure it is succeeding in the philanthropy as i'll recall the pavements and parks program is a innovative program that was start in san francisco about five or six years to make sure that we are creating great new public spaces both by taking underutilized street spaces and thank you for the opportunity it into plaza spaces and one the great parts about the new urban itching we're s

that want to speak so ask our vice chair if we can close public comment. >> public comment is closed. wanted to give time to colleagues to make my closings comments. >> thank you, supervisor kim and for her ongoing efforts around this very important issue i thank you the h s a and the department of public health for their presentation i know that ms. crumb and mr. walling ton are conscious and the last thing i'll is to the department of public health is that further analysis of the data that i have i think would be really helpful and if there are ways to create additional strategies in terms of how to address the needs of the some of the populations is very helpful to i supervisor kim. >> thank you supervisor campos i just wanted to thank the members of the public that came today it was a lengthy hearing as also an important issue and an issue with a lot of different angles and i think that you know beyond the meetings we've been engaging in it is important to have the members of the public to active gave me and an opportunity to educate the rest of the board as well as the public th

is there any additional public comment? seeing none, public comment is closed. there will be three 3 minutes for the appellant to make a rebuttal. >> thank you, supervisors. i'm not sure where to start. i think you have hit on the ridiculousness of preserving one side over the other. can you imagine preserving one side of the white house. nothing more needs to be said about that. as far as lead certification cutting down four shade trees to cover their windows on the west side contradicts their efforts to be energy efficient. it makes no sense and that's been pointed out to the league organization already. we'll see what they have to say about that. you have as far as the ilwu, my understanding is i'm not part of the union so i cannot vouch for this but i'm told most people here are speaking for themselves. there is no resolution and no formal finding, but you have a resolution from the internal ilw at their international conference where they voted on it, on saving this building. as far as the architect, we know the architect. our architectural historian has re

[gavel] >> following public comment madam president. >> is there any public comment for -- no we would only -- okay got you. thank you. so those meeting minutes will be approved after public comment. okay mr. clerk can you please call the consent agenda. >> items 1-9 are considered rout. if a member want to remove one from the consent agenda. >> seeing none can you call the roll. >> on the consent agenda. supervisor breed. >> i. >> supervisor campos. >> aye. >> supervisor christensen. >> aye. >> supervisor cohen. >> aye. >> supervisor farrell. >> aye. >> supervisor kim. supervisor mar. >> aye. >> supervisor tang. >> aye. >> supervisor wiener. >> aye. >> supervisor yee. >> aye. >> supervisor avalos. >> aye. >> there are 10 aye's. >> okay. those items on pass on the first reading finally passed and adopted unanimously. mr. clerk next item please. >> item 10 is respond to the civil grand jury for contained in the 13-14 civil grand jury report titled ethics, promise or pretense. >> all right. supervisor avalos. >> thank you madam president and colleagues. i want to thank you for allowing t

comment madam chair may we close public comment. >> all right. any discussion. >> i want to thank the department for the helpful presentation this is a successful program optometry levies and it is popular which is why we have staffing challenges to make sure we have the resources necessary to make the program a success so i hope we'll keep that in mind i know i will as we powerful move into the process madam chair i'll move item 4 to the call of the chair. >> i have a motion to move to the call of the chair and cemented by supervisor kim this motion is made madam clerk , any other business before this commission? >> there's no further business. >> thank you. this committee is adjourned. >> good morning and welcome to the san francisco transportation authority meeting i want to thank sfgovtv for broovrt today's vent jonathan and jonathan madam clerk my had

public-sector unions. i tried to give as much empirical data. this is on how much public employee unions spent on campaigns, how much they give to candidates, how much they spend on initiatives and referenda campaigns, what is their lobbying spending. i look at their overall political advantages compared to both private-sector unions and other interest group players that are trying to get their way in american politics. those differences include they have easier access to politicians, they have much more easy to mobilize their membership for election campaigns and protests, rallies, because they are public workers themselves. they have a much more steady and stable revenue stream through dues and legal provisions. we can explain what those are later. fourth as i said up until the great recession, they were operating in a low visibility policy environment without a lot of media or public scrutiny. not only do they have a lot of political power and just to give you a couple of examples, the california teache

and i guess i would just finish with promoters of public sector unions or defenders of public sector unions haven't, as far as i can tell, really made a positive case for why organizing our public labor markets in this way benefits the broader public. that it benefits the public workers themselves is clear, and it would be surprising if it didn't do that. but what benefit rebounds the taxpayers to the consumers of public services i have not seen a strong, powerful, first principle case that it does to that. i've seen some negative cases that it doesn't have certain negative effects, but i haven't seen a powered first principle case. and i'd just leave it there. >> great. michael mccann, ten minutes. >> thank you. i want to thank the organizers for inviting me here. i want to thank you for the opportunity, daniel to talk about public sector unions. it's important, we were chatting just before we came out, we're both political scientists. the study of unions in general has received very little attention from political scientistses, so this is a welcome opportunity. i should say i'm not

rose colleagues if no questions any public comment on item one seeing none, public comment is closed.> can you have a motion to accept this item as amended. >> we'll take that without objection. >> madam clerk call item 2. >> a resolution retroactively for the defendant's counsel to enter into the department of transportation to accept a grant of one medium and one shuttle vehicle for the period of october 12th to 25 and mr. facing from the dph. >> can i have the overview. >> you can if you want to. >> i'll give an of explaining we've applied for a grant 5310 and the grant is administered by the california department of transportation in california we seek to procure two class b medium sized vehicle and one class a shuttle vehicle to transport our staff and visitors and residents between the laguna hospital campus and public transportation stations nearby and also transport residents on community sgrargs housing to services located into the community actually, it's no funds being grant the procurement will be in the vehicles themselves. >> okay. great thank you very much. >> colleague

on to public comment on this item is there any public comment on this item on the legislative agenda seeing none, public comment is closed. and we have a motion on the floor. >> on the motion to amend the masking. >> supervisor avalos supervisor campos supervisor cohen supervisor kim supervisor mar masking is amended. >> okay. the motion is amend the masking 83 is amended and the underlying can we take that without objection? okay. so we'll >> i also wanted to amend the eric mar so. >> thank you leo. >> next item. >> state road charge pilot update that on a informational item. >> good morning here to talk about the charges you've read in the news this modern and some earlier in the week california is preempting for a new pilot program we want to talk about the proposal and what it monies for california so california is exploring a charge that comes out of key group that mark mentioned the elements to move forward the pilot and sb 77 we established a technical advise committee that met for the first time last month to implement a pilot program at the beginning of 2015 this is somethin

any further public comment on this matter? okay hearing none public comment is now closed. i will beg your indulge anc e. public comment should have been called at the end of item five. please call line item 5 b so any of those items that you want to speak to will happen at that time. >> discussion and review of recent activities and occ's 2014 first amendment compliance audit of the san francisco police department records pursuant to general order 8.10 and fiscal year 2015 and 2016. >> director hicks. >> good evening president loftus and vice president turman and members of the audience. we have no recent activities to report but we do have 2 reports in the packet the first one is the occ's first amendment compliance audit of the san francisco police department's records pursuant to department general order 8.10 both deputy director and attorney conducted the audit of sfpd's records that pertain to department general order 8.10 regarding when the police department conduct a criminal investigation of a first amendment activity. the report is in your packet. if you would lik

will keep that will be sensitive to the concerns of just not picking up some innocent members of the public who has finds a candidate having an appeal and raises as a fundraiser for them and that to that end to link the bundling regulations in with the requirements upon the candidates and also perhaps link it in with what we're going to be taking in item 4 the public benefits that the person is doing the bundling is someone that might be interested in a pro so we don't burn the good government person that decides to bag a mr. smith they want to send to wosh. >> second to that motion. >> all in favor, say i. >> opposed the motion is carried let's turn to 3 enhanced private right of action. >> commissioners by way of clarification at the end of our discussion we can tube sort of the when and - >> okay. thank you the next item has to do with enhancing the counter private right of action found in c section that allows a voter to sue a candidate or city person to sue the c from as long as the city attorney decides not to sue so this was made and the san francisco grand jury over the past year th

any public comment on this item? >> colleagues any additional discussions on this item seeing none may i entertain a motion. >> shall i put my name. >> i'm sorry supervisor wiener. >> i want to thank everyone that came out for the presentation for all the very moving comments by the members of the public san francisco is a city we provided ourselves in being good environmental steward and not only good environmentalist about but on the leading edge and acting the way we want outside the to act around the country and world to make sure we have a sustainable future for the entire world we also are a city that deeply respects all beings on this earth and building in the humane practice of animals 2, 3, 4 san francisco we support the agencies and nonprofits and it is a key value here in san francisco so i think for a lot of of us to know this city with the values we are also such a significant center of illegal trade and in irony and rhino horns i think frankly it's cilician when we see what is happening in african for t

let's open this up to public comment any members of the public wish to comment okay seeing none, public comment is closed all right. colleagues do we have any recommendations i mean supervisor yee >> thank you chair katie tang it seems like i'm other than the rules committee you have again multiple candidates that are very qualified to be part of this cac by the way a katie used to run from chinatown to the castro area where in the morning on the we understand when i was a kid to get to my grocery store and generally i beat transportation again, i think people will qualify but the people that strikes me who angela has been known ton on the transportation committee a furious and that probably is the element that sets her apart from the other two candidates to you would be happy to recommend angela miller. >> thank you very much any other recommendations or comments from colleagues. >> commissioner christensen. >> i want to thank the explained has someone that worked in a volunteer capacity it takes a lot to make the offer of the official assistance and come down here is appreciate i trus

i determined there was no public for public schools because they didn't create their public. i don't want to go into details , but creating a public for public schools made a big difference. the rand foundation report, high schools of character pointed out to me that as i look around the country, i ask the question why do these choice schools work? why is it in my school district the specialized schools work why is it magnet schools are working so well? why is it schools of choice are working so well? i concluded it is because the people that work in those schools are there because of their choice. students who are in those schools are there of their -- there because of their choice. the things they study are things they chose to study. this situation of choice became more and more a situation i thought made perfect, perfect sense. as i look around about forces that are driving change in our society, there's two you cannot escape from. one, technology. the second is choice. this is an idea whose time has come. we can continue to limp along as we're doing. if we really want to

comment any members of the public to comment on the election seeing none, public comment is closed mr. clerk will you please call the roll on the vice chair elections >> in favor of electing supervisor cowen for vice chair supervisor avalos supervisor breed supervisor campos commissioner christensen supervisor cohen supervisor farrell supervisor kim absent supervisor mar supervisor tang supervisor scott wiener supervisor yee okay. she is elected vice chair. >> congratulations commissioner. >> thank you, thank you (clapping.) and supervisor cowen would you like to make any comments you don't have to parking garage. >> item of compressors the second consultant contract of the north consultant and stan consulting inc. and increase the contract by 8 hundred plus thousand not to exceed for the non-material acquisition this is a non-action item. >> any public comment on item 6 seeing none, public comment is closed and seeing no commissioners on the roster mr. clerk will you please call the roll. >> same house, same call? great okay same house, same call? we'll take that without objection. >

is there any public comment?o public comment all those in favor signify by saying aye. >> aye. >> all those opposed? it's passed unanimously and that we do not disclose. >> number 5. >> now we're at item number 5. >> item 5 action item vote to elect whether to disclose anything from closed session. president president. >> i am ready to entertain a motion. >> i move that we do not disclose. >> is there a second? >> second. >> it's moved and seconded that we do not discuss the discussion item. is there any public comment? hearing no public comment all those in favor signify by saying aye. >> aye. >> all those opposed? so ordered. [gavel] we're now ready to move to regular session. i am disturbed they're not moving in here. what is the problem? are they going to march on the house or something? >> [inaudible] >> okay. we will take a brief pause. >> send the

comment is there any public comment on item 2 seeing none, public comment is closed could i have a motion to or is that a roll call on the minutes. >> on item 2. >> supervisor avalos supervisor breed supervisor campos supervisor christensen supervisor cohen supervisor farrell supervisor kim absent arrest supervisor mar absent supervisor katie tang supervisor wiener supervisor yee absent this item passes. >> okay item number 3. >> chairs report this is an information item. >> colleagues this is a few things i want to mention the first yesterday we held a hearing on the release of our last night transportation report that was paired by the last night transportation working group we as you recall we had a hearing at the land use commission economic development community around the challenges felt last night transportation and the needs for improvements sitting at the board of supervisors adapted the legislation to trigger a working group and ultimately a plan working group did an interpretation work in the leadership of the office of economic workforce development as well as the entertainmen

filings thank you. >> any other public comment? >> good evening. i'm robert i was with the sill grand jury the staff makes an important point about building the confident you may want to get briefed on the legal challenges and what the elements should be in the record by the way if you don't build the record beforehand you you know what's going to happy it will be hard so you want to build the best record you can this comes up here and another item we'll did you say momentarily it is important to get into the habit of building the record in terms of getting the right people to speak at meetings and awe literally the information and building historical information as appropriate thank you. >> thank you any other public comment. >> consistent with our earlier comment any commissioners want to make a comment. >> i move we go forward at this point and uphold the necessary interested personsometers that the chair that the staff determines are necessary to build a record relating to this and that we at our next meeting hold that material

item 167 and item 16 public comment. >> is there any general public comment? seeing none, public comment is closed okay. at this point mr. clerk if you'll call items 12 and 13 and move into closed session. >> item 12 public and employee outbursts and the next is the executive director through september 30th action items. >> do we need a motion to go into closed session so there council? yes, a motion okay. is there a motion by supervisor mar or commissioner mar to go into closed session a second by supervisor campos and colleagues kaksz session. >> okay. we're going back in open session thank you to the public for your proficiency no action agrees were taken in closed session so, now items 12 and 13 have already been called we'll take a vote together great so if we can please call the roll obtain items 12 and 13 i'm sorry public comment on items 12 or 13 seeing none, public comment is closed now we'll call the roll. >> on 12 and 13. >> supervisor avalos supervisor breed supervisor campos commissioner christensen supervisor cowen supervisor farrell absent super

okay any public comment on item 3 seeing none, public comment is closed. one question i have for planning which i don't know if you'll be able to answer but i'll ask it. >> okay. >> partially rhetoric and partially really the one area that will still require secondary review in terms of the issues is the restoration we've seen a number of just because i know it's true for all my colleagues when their challenges and stuck in the planning department and taking too long for whatever reason we see them coming through our office it is by far and away it's not close call in the top source of of the things getting stuck and becoming dramatically more expensive has to do with historic preservation review it's highly frustrating to the members of the public and to me and i everything to people in the planning department i want to make sure of course everything has to think thoroughly reviewed when a reasonable accomodation is being requested but what confidence level in a situation where someone who like the historic preservation commission that touches everything