. >> richard stender claimed his home was a primary residence and qualified him for help from habitat in the first place. we have records he voted in scott plaintiff november 2012. >> habitat is there for people who lost their primary home number one of people who are at a certain income level. i understand the last time he presented the story that their combined income is higher than what would qualify for habitat to do any of the work. >> absolutely in the point is richard was the one who made the application. an interesting thing we can point out as well the architect has a different view of this. >> the bottom line is the story has gone now from uncovering the fact that habitat was involved in the demolition of their home for an income that would not have otherwise qualified to someone lying about where they lived, to habitat wanting their money back and now the state attorney general looking into it. there's a lot more to come to the story on chasing. >> a high-speed chase. michael. [laughter] it was put on the internet. we just came across it now. therefore it is ms. . i applaud