and i think there's plenty of room where i understand walden thune and others are to negotiate the specifics of those details, they just need a partner to be willing to sit at the table and do that and that hasn't happened yet and i'm still hopeful that it does. so that's number one. i think number two, when i testified in the house recently on net neutrality i expressly said my industry wouldn't object to the prohibition of 706 being removed. i do find the court's interpretation of it relatively expansive and not so as -- so sure as an independent matter i would agree with it. be i think it's -- but i think it's a bridge too far to take it away. we have argued all year that you could adopt net neutrality under that provision, so i wouldn't be supportive of us to say now we don't want it. to be honest, i think a lot of legislators think it's what the tech community wanted. what no one's talking about is the breadth of the way 706 has been interpreted, there is no reason why the commission couldn't reach the conduct as well. no reason you couldn't reach google facebook, am, ebay or other -- a