helen: after the klimt picture. charlie: she got it back. she was 94.elen: she was older than me when this was happening. she was in her 80's. i think they were longing for her to die so they would not have to give it back. as we kind of say. it was an incredible journey. charlie: a story of justice. helen: of justice, of memory. and above all, justice, and reclaiming your memory. your life. from the people who took it away. brutally. charlie: your costar said it is a love story. helen: it is that as well. this strange relationship between randy and the lawyer and maria altmann,, two people who come together, heat -- he rediscovers his roots, which i have a line in the film which i wrote, i improvised. anyway, it was a wonderful script. i wanted the line because people forget, especially the young. of course they do, why should they remember? you have to remember. we have all listened, you set an listen to your parents going on about the second world war, do i have to hear this again? then the reality begins to hit home as you get older, and more knowle

mirren, decided that she was going to sue the austrian government because the painting -- the gustav klimtue story about -- she and this young lawyer, who i play, who took this fight all the way through the supreme court and beyond into austria and had fought to get this painting back. and there was so much more associated with the painting than just value. it was her family -- lost her whole family and her friends and her life. yeah, it's an incredible story. >> jimmy: it's a beautiful movie. we have a clip. here's ryan reynolds in "woman in gold." take a look at this. >> we're very sensitive to the government's concerns, mr. chief justice. the "can of worms" argument. but each country is different and poses different conditions. unlike, say, cuba, in austria's case, there's a treaty. so there's no dispute as to what type of law could apply. we recommend opening the can and extracting just the one little worm with a pair of tweezers, and then quickly closing it shut again. the defendants in this case have continuously tried to frustrate our attempts, raising every possible objection, thre