has that been a good thing for the united states? >> i think the 14th amendment has been a good thing for the united states, for the six reason that it's a defining thing about us in the community of nations. we make it clear the moment you are born we don't give you a disadvantage. there are other dilenties, but at birth we don't gi you that. that is important in the interrogation in immigrants in the united states. >> and one that we day with at our peril. >> i think it's the thing that makes us distinct among other community of nations, if you look at countries in europe. you see people joined to a generation of people in those countries, and that creates a sense of alienation and discrimination proving to be close to members of the society. on balance, this is worked out for the united states because it makes things simple and straight forward. there's a small number of countries that give birth to citizenship. it works out for us. >> it has, but that doesn't mean that the acquisition of this rule is in agreement with our values.

europe inimical hostile to the united states. it would become more vulnerable eventually as technology was changing, more vulnerable to threats from europe. in any case on december 15 and , december 1915, wilson and his state of the union speech talked very focused, it was focused on military preparedness. he developed and approved a new five-year plan for the navy, which was approved by the senate. in june 1916, after a great deal of debate in congress, a national defense act was approved, which increase the army to 223,000 people. it had been an army of less than 70,000 people. this was a very marked increase. this was cast in terms of defense of the united states not of getting into war. you can see the similaritiesthis was a very between the debate that took place in the united states before 1941. a similar debate that the u.s. does not want to choose sides but should look out for itself in a world that is becoming very difficult. what you also got was an interesting debate in the united states about what the proper role for t

inimical hostile to the united states. would become more vulnerable to threats from europe. on december 15 and december 1915, wilson and his state of the union speech talked. it was focused on military preparedness. he developed a new five-year plan for the navy, which was approved by the senate. in june 1916 after a great deal of debate in congress, a national defense act was approved, which increase the army to 223,000 people. this is a market increase. this was cast in terms of defense of the united states not of getting into war. you can see the similarities between the debate it took place in the united states before 1941 -- that took place in the united states before 1941. what you also got was an interesting debate in the united states about what the proper role for the united states should be in the world. it is a debate i think which has occurred throughout the history of united states. i think we see it again today, a debate about whether the united states should be internationalist, whether it should get involve

the united states is not part of the airstrikes in pentagonyemen. the united states is providing intelligence. several other gulf countries are threatening to take action in yemen including turkey. there is no talk of ground troops. we are seeing the sunni countries relying on airstrikes. in iraq they are trying to push sunni isis militants out. we were on the sidelines because of the iranian involvement but it has stalled so they are helping out with just reporting intelligence from the drones. the united states is essentially on the side of iran-backed shiite militia in iraq and in yemen they had helping back the iranian rebels. it is very confusing. >> what a chess board that is. >> the administration's reaction to all of this is covered by kevin cork who is live at the white house. >> reporter: good morning to you. you are right about the complications in the region. there is no question it is a very difficult time there. the white house for their part continues to hail yemen as a model of counter terrorism strategy but is quick to point out the

france has been a little more hawkishh that the united states. they keep saying they want to have a longer duration for the agreement. they are talking as long as 25 years. the united states is saying 10 years plus another maybe five. this would be 10 years of limitations, and then sanctions over five years. and then start to lift the limits. they are being much more hawkish . they're going to twitter, the french diplomat in washington has been going to twitter like crazy saying, what so magical about march 31, why do we have to have an agreement by march 31 let's keep talking until june 30. the end of june is actually the deadline when the interim agreement expires. the march 31 deadline, which is tuesday, is more of a political deadline. it's one that -- they said they wanted to have a general agreement. it's more political for the united states with all the opposition that they had. host: we are talking with carol morello, diplomatic correspondent from "washington post." final question for you, what is the secretary of state schedule? was he st

at the conferences, the united states was there. the united states was often involved. i think if they had been more formally involved, it would have made the league stronger and served to educate american public opinion. it by the 1930's, the united states was in the league, i wonder if you would have had the same isolationist sentiment. there was a lot of sentiment in europe for peace. there was a huge peace ballot in britain in the 1930's were happy adult population -- half of the adult population voted in favor of peace. that does not necessarily translate into being isolationist. the united states welded it into isolationism in a way that did not happen in europe, that you can want peace but still recognize you have to be engaged in the world. i don't know. it is very difficult. i think historians are now arguing that even in the 1930's, the united states was not as isolationist as we might think. there was a lot of talk, but the united states is still involved, particularly on its own doorstep. the good neighbor policy is a 1930's policy. the united states was stil

israel depends on the united states to essentially block anti-israel resolutions at the united nations where the u.s. has veto power and up until now the u.s. has always done that but the u.s. is threatening not to do that. >> that is a great point the united states at the united nations may say these resolutions could go forward. other than bad publicity how does that hurt, there are people in the united states, certainly in israel and other countries that don't pay much attention to the united nations. >> there is some element of truth to that but publicity certainly is important. the reputation that israel has in the world is important. it cannot become a pariah nation which its enemies see that's what united states can block at the united nations passing resolution that unilaterally pass resolutions to refer to international criminal court or all sorts of things could be done. >> isn't israel already a pariah state? half of the resolutions in the united nations seem to conindex israel according to some reports. it's not like the relationship is getting any better with the rest of t

if there's a country that is a threat in the americas, it is the united states. use it has permanently invaded countries, societies and latin america. it has created coup d'États such as animal and -- panama. it doesn't have the most minimal possibility to constitute a threat to the united states, nor does it wish to be in that position. we have no desire a possibility to be a threat. what we want to do is live in peace. and to ask the united states to let latin america live in peace and democracy as is happening at this time. juan: can you tell us more about the offer of your government to mediate? >> it is really a request the government of venezuela has made that ecuador, and so far it is president pro tem, to coordinate with others to give impetus to dialogue with the united states in a decision adopted by the union of south american nations last saturday, which was a hard-hitting decision or clear decision by the 12 south african countries, we rejected the order by the u.s. government. we also called for a dialogue. we see the solution is not violence, the so

drugs to the united states. later on, there was an organization established by the department of ministry in cuba that was called mc. for marijuana-cocaine. huge operation. well eventually, cuban became threatened themselves when the soviet block broke up and there was no more money and there was nobody to support them. that's when they started to look at trying to control these flow of drugs in cuba. but that plan, which perez laid out in the very beginning when we discussed what was happening, the plan -- alpha for the normalization process, and plan b for basically upsetting the cuban community and creating as much difficulty in the united states as they possibly could. on april 14 finally carter established a blockade. the second round of flotilla floated in july. they went around the blockade. bring back up what was happening -- we're about done. the travel agencies, they were all cuban agencies that were involved and monitoringe everyone. cuba is now in the process. thank you, everybody. >> okay. we have no

first imposed, i think in 2006, the united states followed later. the toughest sanctions came in 2012 when the united states and the eu imposed tough sanctions. a really cratered the economy and iran. it's pretty much what health president rouhani gain -- helped president rouhani gain his election. he understood that the economy was hurting very badly and he would do everything he could to reach an agreement with the west to ease some of these sanctions. i think more of what we would see is very very harsh sanctions, again on tehran. host: what are the sanctions? what sectors does the united states and the world community target to put pressure on iran? guest: most of it is oil and has traditionally been oil. iran sells its oil to india, russia, i believe china as well. oil prices have been dropping. maybe that is not as hard as it has been in the past for iran. also, the gold market has been hit. the financial sector has been hit. the banking market has been hit. more so, -- obviously, the weapons sector has been hit. i'm not sure that would ever be

the president of the united states as to these negotiations. negotiations aren't even done with yet but he's already saying this is a bad mistake. this may be a mistake for the u.s. but for israel it could be the end of israel. he's not mincing any words on that. i'm sure the white house will respond. i know the president will be giving an interview later this afternoon to reuters and presumably he'll respond, susan rice, the president's national security adviser, will speak later tonight before this same group. she'll have an opportunity to respond. he didn't mince any words. he said this deal is a bad deal that could endanger israel's security and that's why he says he needs to speak up. >> it seems to me that he kind of started schooling the audience or maybe the television audience that israel is located in a part of the world that they can't take any chances with iran. >> you know carol, that's of course prime minister netanyahu's main theme. he's been saying that as he's been prime minister for nine years and most israeli prime ministers h

while they're having nuclear talks with the united states. for the past 36 years, iran's attacks against the united states have been anything but mock. the targets have been all too real. iran took dozens of americans hostage in tehran. murdered hundreds of american soldiers, marines in beirut and was responsible for killing and maiming thousands of american service men and women in iraq and afghanistan. beyond the middle east, iran attacks america and its allies through its global terror network. it blew up the jewish community center and the israeli embassy. it helped al qaeda bomb u.s. embassies in africa. it even attempted to assassinate the saudi ambassador here in washington d.c. in the middle east, iran now dominates four arab capitals. if iran's aggression is left unchecked, more will surely follow. at a time when many hope that iran will join the community of nations, iran is busy gobbling up the nations. [ applause ] we must stand together to stop iran's march of terror. [ applause ] two years ago we were told to give the foreign min

and so this plan for the canadians, build a pipeline like a strong through the united states to it tax rate export zone and get the oil out of the united states of america. and why is that? i will tell you right now. it is now $12 less if you can get onto the global market. get it out of the american states and you will make $12 more a barrel. the advocates for the pipeline say it won't happen. and so that is white and me not be a member on the senate floor. if you are going to take all the environmental risk, then we should proceed the benefits of the oil being here in the united states. why is that important? it is important for this reason -- the united states is the largest importer of oil in the world. china does not import as much oil as we do. we are the leader. now you might see these ads on television where the american petroleum institute and other oil companies advertise with regards to what a great job we are doing and producing more oil in the united states, and we are producing more oil in the united states. let's take note of that. but the truth is, we are 5 million barr

liberty mutual insurance. >>> welcome back to our viewers in the united states and around the world. from washington. recent tensions between israel and the united states have a lot to do with the ongoing talks with iran over the nuclear program there. secretary of state john kerry is in switzerland where the talks are taking place and had this to say about the progress right now. >> any deal that we would possibly agree to would make the international community and especially israel safer than it is today. that's our standard. so our team is working very hard to close remaining gaps to reach a deal that insures iran's nuclear program is exclusively and verifiably peaceful. we've made some progress, but we still have a long way to go and the clock is ticking. >> let's go to our chief national security correspondent jim sciutto joining us from switzerland. so when is the deadline jim and what are the major sticking points as far as we know right now? >> reporter: well two deadlines actually and a number of remaining sticking points. the end of this month were march, for a framework po

in once sense the united states hats to demonstrate to their allies that the united states has sufficient resolve, sufficient cape abouts to deal with the threats that exist to them. on the other hand, the united states does not want them to be provocative regarding china. and what is provocative depends on perceptions and so on. and this sense it seems to me that the united states is facing a kind of -- that they not before. and this will create all kinds of difficulties. one of them coordinating all of the elements. there is the economic, political, the military and so on. so so what extent do you think we are here, beginning to think creatively as to how to deal with this challenge? >> thank you, front row, please? >> i'm arnold zeitland. i have been teaching in china. i think david might be the first to respond to my question. i'm wondering if it is possible to compare u.s. and china military spending on the ppe basis for costs in china in some sectors that are much less. >> david you want to start? >> i was afraid someone would ask this question. i'm not an expert on the chinese mili

the united states [ inaudible ] preworld war europe and now this country, also the united states is about to lose almost all of the gains it has and russia is going to reverse what it has lost, the soviet empire, in cold war. this is incredibly dramatic and tragic situation which has been getting lots of attention but not quite enough of a reaction. i think that's the lack of reaction or adequate reaction that is basically causing all this tragedy. >> you and i have talked and i have listened to your theories on soft power smart power, over the course of years. i do not understand at this point why there has been an inability on the part of the ukrainian government to engage germany france the united states the united kingdom and to bring forward a commitment to defend the country against clear outright aggression. >> well, because there has been lots of officials in the west saying well, we are living in 21st century, cold war is over tanks will never roll into europe. here we are in 2015 and russian tanks are rolling into europe into largest country of europe unchecked and actually, the

it has evolved to the point where there was bafflement they were not grateful to the united states for all the freedom we brought them. this to me really underscores how completely muslims are excluded from anything we think about or talk about in the united states. themve debates about without their participation, we have discussions about what they are thinking without actually hearing what they are thinking. we have constant reports about who we are killing and how many people we are killing without ever stopping and thinking about who those people are or whether they have done anything that warranted that violence. so much so it was recently revealed a couple months ago by the new york times the obama administration has adopted a new definition of militants, which says that any military aged male and a strike zone, meaning any male who dies above the age of 16 or below the age of 55, is automatically deemed a militant without knowing anything else about them. this is how we have come to think about muslims, to the extent we think about them all, they die at the hands of our violenc

before the united states join the u.n.uncil in 2009 more than half of all the countries specific resolutions adopted refocused on israel. today we have held lower that proportion to less than one-third. but let me stress, the human rights council still adopted many more resolutions criticizing israel than it has on north korea, a totalitarian state state and roughly 100,000 people are currently being held in gulags and where children are forced to which the execution of their parents. at the security council we have also guarded vigilantly against any resolution that threatens israel's security or undermines the pursuit of peace. that is why in december we opposed efforts to pass a deeply imbalance security council resolution on palestinian statehood, and successfully rallied other countries to do the same. [applause] as i told the u.n. security council at the time the united states recognizes as do many israeli leaders that a two-state solution is vital to ensuring the preservation of a jewish and democratic israel. and w

the united states wantses to nail down a deal and there is a similar divergence with the united states that netanyahu has exposed on peace between israelis and palestinians. while a plurality of palestinians still support a two-state solution, nearly two decades of u.s.-sponsored negotiations have failed to achieve that. successive israeli governments whether on the left or the right have pledged to hold on to gentlemenjerusalem-- none of that is likely to change with israel's next government but the rift that netanyahu did so much to expose with the obama administration is going to confront whoever leads israel's next government. we go now to tel aviv and dana lewis. yesterday we spoke about whether or not this was a referendum over netanyahu's push for iran or negotiations in israel. do the exit polls tell us anything about which argument won out? >>reporter: well, it may be overly simplistic to say -- netanyahu certainly focused on the security issues in his campaign but also here at the headquarters of the left, they really believe that people caught fire with the economy and the e

was a student who decided to come to the united states to pursue a phd in nuclear engineering. he arrived at the university of missouri to study and obtained his phd and decided along with his wife he wanted to stay in the united states and work in the united states rather than returning to iraq. work as aand got research professor at the university of missouri, became an integral part of the columbia community. he and his wife ultimately had five children, all of them american-born u.s. citizens. the problem is beginning of the early 1990's, for the next decade, he had numerous family member still in iraq, including 11 siblings, along with his elderly mother who was blind. millions ofs and iraqis, his family members were not just suffering great deprivation, although they were, they were literally on the boundary of starvation, typically unable to feed themselves in any way that provides major sustenance. this is incredibly common among the regime sanctions. although he was earning a modest salary, he simply could not in good conscious live even what was really a lower middle-c

and for our form of government in the united states, the united states government does not own industries. now, some of the industries that are represented within the aec from other countries are at least partially or wholly owned by if state. there's a state interest in having those countries in there to be able to develop things within the arctic. we took a different approach. first of all, because of our culture, once again, our government does not own industries. secondly, if we start getting too close with industry, you start running into federal advisory committee rules that have to be complied with. so our choice, whether you like it or don't like it, our choice early on was to turn this over to the chamber of commerce in alaska. and the chamber of commerce selected three alaskan companies to be our representatives to the aec. and the aec has only just had its first meeting. so i think there are going to be some disputes on how the aec should be used. there will be questions about how we employ it. there will be questions about how much influence should it have on arctic council ac

document, which envisaged a state based on freedom, justice, and peace, as envisaged by the prophets of israel. a state that would be faithful to the principles of the charter of the united nations,". it is bitterly unjust that the u.n., an institution founded on the idea that all nations should be treated equally, is so often used cynically by member states to treat israel unequally. [applause] these attacks on israel's legitimacy are biased, they are ugly and the united states of america will not rest until they stop. [applause] now, as a few of you may have heard, the prime minister of israel is in town. [applause] rumor has it, he may be giving a couple speeches backup? you may also heard about tension in the relationship between the u.s. and israel. let's separate a few different issues. politics policy, and what the u.s. does each and every day to combat anti-semitism around the world, and fight attacks against israel at the united nations. [applause] we believe firmly that israel's security and the u.s.-israel partnership transcends politics, and it always will. [applause] that is a very important statement you have all made. it was the same bond that led presiden

>> just to be precise, he's here in the united states back in the united states, was deported from turkey to egypt back to the united states. is he in jail now? is he out on bail? what's going on? >> reporter: that's right. he's behind bars and expected to face a judge and plead not guilty according to his attorney sometime tomorrow. so authorities arrested him the day after he returned on u.s. soil in new jersey. he was a resident of new jersey apparently. we know he did live overseas for a period of time. he lived in kuwait. in kuwait he was an airplane mechanic. he also apparently lived in egypt for an amount of time. but the bottom line is this is a u.s. citizen who was in the united states air force and was an aviations mechanic here in the u.s. and overseas, wolf. >> very disturbing development. we'll stay on top of it. pamela brown, thank you. >>> other important news we're following, election day in israel will the prime minister benjamin netanyahu survive a very tough challenge or will his main rival prevail and what will the outcome of the election mean both in israel as well as

to the constitution of the united states. it's just that simple. the senate cannot confirm any individual must never confirm an individual to such an office as this the one most responsible for maintaining fidelity to law, who would support and advance a scheme that violates our constitution, eviscerates congressional authority. no person should be confirmed who would do that. congress makes the laws, not the president. in that regard, congress has repeatedly rejected legislation to provide amnesty work permits and difs -- benefits to those who entered our country unlawfully. if you want benefits of the united states, you should come lawfully wait your return. we rejected such proposals in 2006 2007, 2010, 2013, and 2014. president obama's unlawful and unconstitutional executive actions nullify the immigration laws that we do have that are on the books. that's the immigration and nationality act. and replaces them with the very measures congress refused to enact. that's just where we are. even king george lacked the power to l

president, this is the executive calendar of the united states senate. this calendar tells us the nominations that are pending before the united states senate where action is needed. it is one name to be found on this calendar on page 4, a name which has been sitting on this calendar longer than any nominee for attorney general of the united states of america over the last 25 years. this name has been sitting on this calendar for 20 days, which does not sound like an extraordinary long period of time, but it turns out that the previous nominees were moved so quickly on the senate calendar that the last five combined, by democratic and republican presidents, took less time to be confirmed than this one made -- one name. what is the name? it is loretta e. lynch of new york come up to be attorney general, a name that was submitted to the united states senate by barack obama to make history. a name, a nominee to make history. because, you see, this is the first african-american woman in the history of the united states to be nominated to serve as attorney gen

states, the congress of the united states met in the pennsylvania statehouse. but the soldiers were not stupid. what they wanted was to demand that pay and various other promises made to them. the new congress had no revenue. there was no point confronting congress. it was the states that had the revenue. they chose saturday because congress never met on a saturday, but the executive they surrounded the statehouse, and alexander hamilton, who was the chairman of a congressional committee to deal with this mutiny that had been going on now for five days got congress to call a special session. the congressman went into the building, because hamilton and congress wanted it to appear this was a demonstration against the united states of america. this was the horror of the republic, the military rising against civilian control. and that would appeal to the american people's feelings and they would come to the defense of congress. so, congress, even though they did not get a quorum, congress was not surrounded by these troop

they believe the soviet union was building a utopian state and they believe that the united states was a fascist state. they believe after the second world war that the military conflict between the united states and soviet union was inevitable, and they wanted to help the soviet union. that is the way i see it, and i think that is a critical thing. on to the non-nuclear technology. a word about this, this is julius rosenberg's communist party registration card. i don't know if you can see it but the critical thing is it is from 1940. anyone who was a member of the communist party in 1940, at a time when the soviet union was allied with nazi germany, that tells you about his allegiance and dedication. moving on, julius rosenberg's primary value to the soviet union is not information that he personally acquired, it was his talent of recruiting, managing and motivating spies and keeping them on track for years. he had 11 or 12 he recruited. this made the rosenberg ring and productive operation. many of them are quality control engineers, there -- their jobs were to understand how advance

socialist parties here in the united states and the communist party of the united states were powerful. they had a lot of people, and they worked together with the c.i.o. and together, they went to the government at that time, and they said 2 things: "we represent the mass of working people, and we don't want to suffer the way we're suffering in this breakdown of capitalism. you gotta do something." and they addressed themselves to a kind of middle-of-the-road democratic politician who had just gotten elected president on a program of a balanced budget-- franklin roosevelt. and they said to him, "you've gotta do something for the people." and the socialists and communists said, "you gotta do something for the people," but they added a little barb, "because we think that there's a better system, an alternative system, to capitalism. and if you keep performing as badly as you're doing in the depths of the depression, we're gonna try to establish that alternative." and they pointed across the ocean to the soviet union, said, "see? like them." that scared folks. and mr. roosevelt was a goo

i don't think the united states entered the negotiations premoo chiewrl. the united states has been involved in the negotiations for a long time. the the question of agreeing to an interim agreement which had a lot of positive stuff but stipulated principals for the final deal which is advantageous, that was a mistake. >> goldberg: tomorrow, israeli elections. how much about the visit was about prevent ago second holokansas and how much was about making sure that the israeli voters return him to power on march 17? >> to be perfectly honest, i'm not sure it's possible to disentangle these things. i don't know if in net nit it's possible to disentang ale these things. >> goldberg: does he believe he is the state himself, the guarantor of their survival? >> no, but h he clearly believes it is his mission, perhaps primary mission as prime minister of israel to prevent iran from getting a nuclear weapon and to do anything it takes to achieve that goal. so his role as prime minister is to do that. that means it's essential that he be prime minister. i think he ho

in 2012 alone, extreme weather across the united states cost nearly $120 billion in damages. when they hit the philippines a little over a year ago to the cost of responding exceeded $10 billion because the that is the bill for the storm damage. think of the added health care costs for the, the expenses that result from agricultural environmental degradation. it is time for people to do cost accounting. it's in the if then the price of the immediate energy needs. we have to include the long-term cost of carbon pollution. we have to factor in the cost of survival. and if we do we will find the person being clean energy now is far more affordable than paying for the consequences of climate change later. but there's another piece of reality to take into account. it's to compound and become irrefutable quite frankly. it's not only the solution to climate change guess what it's also one of the greatest economic opportunities of all time. you want to put people to work the global energy market of the future is poised to be the largest market for world has ever known. we are talking

kennedy accepted the nomination for president of the united states. opened up the windows of the world for me and for every young boy and girl in the united states. and then in 1962, ted kennedy ran for the senate for the first time against george cabot lodge. this was my political education, about how a campaign for senator could make an historic difference for massachusetts and for our country. the undreamed of possibilities that teddy and his brothers, president kennedy and bobby, shared inspired a generation of public service. the kennedy brothers taught us to give back to our country, which has given so much to us, and they taught us to be bold. that is what the legacy is of ted kennedy. and it was an honor to serve with and to learn from ted kennedy in congress for 35 years. teddy's compassion was unmatched. his mentorship without peer. his dedication to justice unsurpassed. his ability to work across the aisle the best of any member of the united states congress. and this institute, a hub of history, will take teddy's personal touch and at the p

he is the commander-in-chief of the united states of america. he is the elected leader of our nation and many cannot accepted in this chamber but he is the president of the united states and he deserves our respect. i respect the president george w. bush even when i disagreed with him and his policies in iraq and we should expect nothing less of the minority when it comes to this president as well. i conclude by saying the senate has an important role to play. but the president's role, speaking for the united states, trying to avoid a nuclear iran, trying to avoid a military conflict is something that should not be undermined for political ambition. i yield the floor. >> the senator from vermont. the views of the distinguished senior senator from illinois. this is a case of who can score political points about news broadcasts, we are talking about potentially the lives of millions of people. we are talking about the possibility of a cataclysmic mistake because create havoc long after any of us left this body. the representative of vermont in this

troops here in the united states. how real is this so-called hack attack. how serious is their so-call hit list targeting u.s. military personnel for death. >>> and later, the texas senator ted cruz he becomes the first big name to officially enter the 2016 presidential race but is an early entry an advantage? we'll take a closer look at what's going on. janet? cough if you can hear me. don't even think about it. i took mucinex dm for my phlegmy cough. yeah...but what about mike? (cough!) it works on his cough too. mucinex dm relieves wet and dry coughs for 12 hours. let's end this. i'm brian vickers, nascar® driver. i'm kevin nealon comedian. and i'm arnold palmer, professional golfer. know what we have in common? we talked to our doctors about treatment with xarelto®. me, when i had a blood clot in my leg that could have traveled to my lungs. that's why i took xarelto®, too. xarelto® is proven to treat and help reduce the risk of dvt and pe blood clots. i took xarelto® for afib... an irregular heartbeat that can lead to a stroke from a blood clot. xarelto®

house of representatives, a member of the united states senate, and the speaker of the united states house of representatives. [applause] ladies and gentlemen, the speaker of the united states house of representatives, the honorable john boehner. >> ladies and gentlemen, good afternoon and welcome to statuary hall. this place was once the chamber of the house of representatives. it is where lincoln served as one term in congress and where madison, monroe, and andrew jackson were sworn into office. since the 1860's, the tradition has been for each state to send to dope statues here in honor of their favorite sons and daughters. some were veterans, summer authors, some are veterans, some are pioneers and some are just great people. our honoree was all of these things and more. today is a dedication of barry goldwater from the great state of arizona. we are honored to be joined by secretary of state from arizona, michelle reagan. and members of the arizona delegation and members of the goldwater family. thank you all for being here. i hope you enjoy today's program. thank you. [a

martha: samantha power ambassador to the united states from the united states. l be making that stand himself. samantha power said moments ago the united states will never let iran get a nuclear weapon period. john bolton is former ambassador to the u.n. and it's good to have you here today. samantha power just made some strong statements. she got a lot of applause from the crowd. she says under no circumstances will the united states allow iran to get a nuclear weapon, period. >> that is what president obama has been saying for the last six years and it's simply not true. iran continues to make progress in terms of iranian enrichment and its weaponnization activities. in terms of its ballistic missile programs. the on thing that this point that will stop iran is a military strike. and the president although he says all options are on the table is not repaired to do that. i think the deal is really going to give iran a clean path towards getting nuclear weapons. rhetoric is not going to stop them. martha: how much of this has to do with the iran deal. it appears

to have any indication now of any scheme to attack the united states? no, but the smaller countries, they do not -- we take for granted in the united states that we have a functioning legal justice system, and fbi, layers of clean policemen and women. a lot of these countries do not have that. so when these people return, or where we canurn, monitor them, check them, know when they might be coming back to the united states, if they were from the united states, trinidad, jamaica, places like that, sir nine, small numbers -- surinam, they do not have the ability to take those folks. from a recruiting point of view, like our country in western europe, some get recruited or radicalized off the net, the homepages and whatnot, but there radicaluple of pretty mosques in the region. some of the places i just mentioned. that is how -- radical mosques in the region. 100 is not seem like a lot, and is not come up the little countries they come from, a total inability to do with that, that is what their concern is. reporter: those countries are the main ones -- gene

he had to sell this deal to the united states congress. the prime minister left the platform thinking he had done that. his critics will say, we've heard this before. his timetable, the american intelligence, the american political debate between the israelis, nothing new there. what was most effective, his goal was to put the president back on his heels, to make the administration now come out and defend its position. what was most effective was saying, he said the president of the united states is, quote, betting the security of the world on the hope that iran will change its behavior. his point was, get them to change -- i don't mean to dahl this the little stuff but get them to change the stuff they could change tomorrow, stop supporting hezbollah or terrorism or saying you want to wipe israel off the planet. why would you keep negotiating with these guys -- >> mike rogers, you served as chairman of the house intelligence committee until recently. you're a cnn national security commentator right now. you heard the prime minister of isra

that is in the best interest of the united states, our allies in the region. we also believe it is in the best interest of our partners in the region as well, including saudi arabia. the united states as we are doing right now in yemen has taken steps to support saudi arabia's national security and to advance their interests in the region. we do that in a way that is consistent with u.s. interests of course. we believe this is another way that we can do that. preventing iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon is in the best interest of saudi arabia. we say that because a nuclear armed iran is only more destabilizing. it only makes more dangerous the kind of support they can offer terrorist organizations. it only makes it easier and more dangerous for iran to meennace those countries the united states have strong relationships, including israel and potentially saudi arabia. we believe that preventing iran from obtaining nuclear weapons through diplomacy is the best way for us to get a good outcome. by good outcome, i mean an outcome that is consistent with national

kennedy accepted the nomination for president of the united states. ened up the windows of the world for me and for every young boy and girl in the united states. and then in 1962, ted kennedy ran for the senate for the first time against george cabot lodge. this was my political education, about how a campaign for senator could make an historic difference for massachusetts and for our country. the undreamed of possibilities that teddy and his brothers, president kennedy and bobby, shared inspired a generation of public service. the kennedy brothers taught us to give back to our country, which has given so much to us, and they taught us to be bold. that is what the legacy is of ted kennedy. and it was an honor to serve with and to learn from ted kennedy in congress for 35 years. teddy's compassion was unmatched. his mentorship without peer. his dedication to justice unsurpassed. his ability to work across the aisle the best of any member of the united states congress. and this institute, a hub of history, will take teddy's personal touch and at the pow

guy: our clients in the united states doing the opposite? is a booming region for the last three years. we can see the united states having a fast pace of growth. we have the benefits in europe. guy: do you feel that europe is turning a corner? you talked to people year ago, do you think the economy with low oil prices, is the economy beginning to turn? guest: we have a strong environment. we hope europe will recover. united kingdom is doing well for the last two years. we can feel it in the forecast. it is up 5%. we have a better germany as well. some countries are still in between. it could be a good year, it could be the turnaround year. guy: there are others that lead big advertising companies. you're not in that cap? guest: we maintain our investments. we are stronger today. we have maintained all of our investments. we can take advantage of the recovery. i would say i am reasonably positive. guy: you are hedging your bets a little bit. where is the innovation now? we have seen so much change the balance between content and advertising.

en then to bludgeon them into a rapprochement with the united states. that will not work with iran. have not changed their position and what is in it for them to have the lifting of sanctions with the new relationship with united states with constructive order in the least. >> through november 2013 with the interim agreement that corner bar again is there is a comprehensive listing of sanctions in exchange for constraints. they have done many of the things they have put on the table but we have the two experts underdoing that but it is sanctions in exchange for doing abc they want them released. >> immediate sanctions relief? >> with their agreement to have the constraints on their program we need to agree to lift the sanctions that is the core bargain and if we don't we will accelerate our loss of leadership with the international economic order in. >> host: new haven in connecticut for the democrat line. >> caller: how is everybody at the table? i simply one to say this to mr. mark dubowitz hillary or anybody else does not tell me how to think. i of an independent thinker. with the

produce waiting to get into the united states, it has reduced the wait times to a much smaller amount. that's because the united states government, taxpayers, have made an investment in improving that critical infrastructure. we team up with a better facility and we team up with more people and better technology. we can speed things through. and it is highly visible and certainly going on in nogales also. including the new agreement for the new facility in ti juana airport. i have been back to san diego four times and the first times the complaint about the wait times were there. this time, the complaints are from the vendors selling water saying people are moving through the line too quickly. there's always a complaint. [laughter] as i mentioned, our two countries signed a mutual recognition arrangement in october. our program in mexico's supplies programs, have a recognizable arrangement. and as we look at designing ports of entry particularly with mexico and canada, how can this be done in an efficient way. the northern border and united states and canada just signed a historic pre

and we are producing more oil in the united states. let's take note of that. the truth is we are still 5 million barrels a day short so this pipeline will be moving 800,000 barrels of oil from canada right to the united states which could reduce our dependence upon imported oil but it's going to a tax-free exports on so we know what's going to happen. why is that important? it's important because we export young men and women in uniform every single day to the middle east to protect the ships with oil coming into the night it states that we import from kuwait, from saudi arabia, from other countries around the world so why would we be exporting oil out of the united states while we are exporting young men and women in uniform out of america who then protect oil coming back in from countries in the middle east. that makes no sense. that is what this pipeline is all about. it's all about getting some benefit for the united states. climate change, a big loser, the dirtiest oil in the world. the canadians actually escaped paying the tax in