by a health care provider that is defined under the definitions of on page 7 line one as under the regulations of division two of the california business code so i just - so is it how i read this is it those liquor an acupuncture it is an accessory use not required by the depending upon to get a establishment permit but not listed in the planning code as one the exempted entities they'll be required to go through the conditional use even though they'll be seen from the planning code as a massage establishment. >> correct. >> okay. >> but we in terms of the that health care provider piece i believe this is likely going to be struck but u out in the new legislation it will be more clear who will go through the process. >> okay. so then that maybe something commissioners, if this changes is happening if there's any particular you heard the last legislation that was under the legislation. >> commissioner tour-sarkissian. >> yeah. about the amnesty program under the amnesty program they talk about the massages in my you might include an accessory eye for the amnesty program. >> i believe see just t

under the proposed amendment the department would allow sole source department contracts under the specified provisions outlined here which have to do with proprietary reasons there is only one source available. the follow on contract work, when they award to another contractor would result on substantial cost unacceptable delays, or warrant or statute of government regulation or expedited process to make sure federal or state funding is available. we say this is a policy decision currently under chapter 21, of the code which deals with commodities and services sole source provisions are permitted. and under some federal guidelines, sole sourcing is permits, this would be another con straks contract in the city. the second area we consider for policy decision to the board is the threshold amount. the threshold amount written in the code is currently 400,000, it does have a cost of living adjustments every five years, as a result. the current threshold is 440,000. they're proposing this go up to 600,000. the threshold amount is used to determine a number of things. one who does the work? curr

russell, about your difference as to whether it's-under-par this statute or under any statute? if you look at some of the instructions that are given just under the csa, not analogs, that some instructions just say you need to find that the defendant knew that he was distributing some kind of prohibited drug. they don't say a drug prohibited under the csa. using that as the analogy here that suggests that the jury wouldn't need to find the analog prohibited under the csa in the analog act, adjust that, knew it was prohibited by something. >> there's ambiguity in the instructions whether it's up lawfulness generally or under the csa. i think courts, what they really mean is under the csa, and in the cases where the defendant is come forward and say, actually, it was illegal under some other statute, in, again, in hussein, in the case of morales three of the seven cases, the court said, no, that's not good enough. that makes complete sense. now, it could be that in a lot of cases the government is going to protect evidence that the government thinks is a controlled substance gene

. >> jason fried lafco staff we now have a definite out that is under review today is the last day for people to be presenting comments i'll be on vacation i'll not mind i'll view the at that time as turned in today i'll add those items the basically a highlight of the what's in the report if sfgovtv put on the laptop there we go. >> the objective u objective to expand the underground wires and network within the city we've looked at major areas we looked at the old 96 under grounding program and 200 under grounding possible way to reduce the potential fund resources we go looked for while in doing this study the high-level viewing view it is funded through rule 20 pretty much all under grounding is done and rule 20 a a source money that taken out of all folks bills we get a small allocation st. system wide there's a 0 whole portfolio one small problem it is a small amateur of money to compared to the costs of doing the work the system got in trouble pr before they gave us a cost estimate of one million dollars it was more than 3 and a half million dollars going up to $5 million for $4

grounding program and 200 under grounding possible way to reduce the potential fund resources we go looked for while in doing this study the high-level viewing view it is funded through rule 20 pretty much all under grounding is done and rule 20 a a source money that taken out of all folks bills we get a small allocation st. system wide there's a 0 whole portfolio one small problem it is a small amateur of money to compared to the costs of doing the work the system got in trouble pr before they gave us a cost estimate of one million dollars it was more than 3 and a half million dollars going up to $5 million for $45 million we over spent the amount of money in that account and we're still paying that amount back 17 years more to pay back and that's where we end up where we're at we can't do any more under grounding so we look at the major obstacles not able to find funding sources that are not known about before the other obstacles f from pg&e were grossly under stated and the process that more pg&e's submits the bill to the uc and they sign off we can't get details they're not obli

some law under the csa. they think that's sufficient, we think it's not sufficient. >> okay. >> beyond that though -- >> assuming it's not sufficient, what else does the government have to prove? i think you differ on that. >> i don't think so. i think the government agrees that one way to prove the mens rea in this case is to show the defendant knew the krark cystics of the substance that made it an analog. >> which means the chemical composition. >> yes. >> and who would that reach other than the chemist, the underwound chemist would gain a position to know that? but an ordinary person would not. >> i acknowledge that giving the statute, what i think is straightforward and traditional reading does have the effect of making it substantially harder for the government to prove that mens rea for an ordinary layperson. >> my understanding, well, government will tell you, my understanding of the government is, it would be enough if the defendant knew the name, the name of the drug. or whatever else. and if indee

. >> reporter: but the duggars are a family under fire after josh is accused of sexually molesting under-aged girls when he was a teenager. now saying he acted inexcusably. tonight the fallout. >>> indy 500 used to be a man's world, but not anymore. tonight, we hit the track with the independent women, gaining ground on the guys and changing the face of racing. >> no problem. >> reporter: it's a bird, a plane a flying camera. >> always spying on me. >> reporter: people now facing new privacy concerns with the invasion of the peeping drones but first the "nightline"5. >> how fast are allegra gel caps it relieves your worst symptoms two times faster. allegra fast. guaranteed or your money back. when eating healthy and drinking water isn't enough to ease constipation i trust dulcolax tablets. i take them for overnight relief. ♪ (music throughout) ♪ sfx: (smash) sfx: (roar) ♪ sfx: (roar) sfx: (engine roars) >>> we start with a clash between old fashioned values and reality tv scandal. josh duggar and his family are portrayed as a picture of wholesome perfection now. the show has been puld as josh

bombardment near the southwest border with yemen came under renewed mortar fire and last week eighte were killed by houthis and after that the saudi-led coalition said the houthi rebels crossed a red line and we spoke to the foreign minister and said yemen's former president is only looking for his own from and the houthis have no desire for a ceasefire deal deal. >> and saleh is warning of the political chapter and to end his life and simply he will be part of any future discussion about yemen. he has no chance at all. that is one thing. the other thing houthis are talking about early ceasefire and not willing to do any kind of discussion or negotiation or whatever. >> reporter: state news agency is reporting that one of its fighter jets taking part in the saudi-led air campaign has gone missing and a statement from the armed forces says an m 16 similar to that one came under fire but it didn't say by what or by whom and it's not known if the pilot ejected and joined the coalition the early days of the campaign against houthi rebels with six fighter jets and we are live in the capi

if you look at the program under the clean air act under section 202 to regulate mobile sources you might if you look at that quickly come you might think that is the classic end of the pipe measure. ..

he's at ten under, tied for fourth, and simpson my pretourney pick he's at 14 under. alone in second place and in distant second mcilroy said he wants to prove why he is under one and i would say he proved it. at 18 under, he leads simpson by four. >>> and the crew, 33rd second and sigh he'd, second yellow, that equals a red. and then off the face. sixth of the season 99th in his career salinas score and the quakes leading 2-nil in the 81st minute. and cal lose to make you cringe. and under armor pulled from shelves after a social media fire storm. >>> and the largest pin ball show in the nation happening this weekend at the dixon fair grounds. check it out, it is a pin ball lover's dream. dozens of games are available at pin ago go. one of the popular games, star trek the next generation. it goeston tonight and through tomorrow and benefits charities in solano county. >> i remember a dukes of hazard one. >> thank you, everybody. thanks ♪ rhythmic music. ♪ electrifying dances. ♪ vibrant costumes. ♪ for over three decades carnaval san francisco has set the stage for ma

do you feel you're under direct threat? >> because we're part of nato. i don't believe we're under imminent military threat however, irng i think that we need the deterrent and the mrens of allied troops. they increased the number of controls of our allied forces. the patrols would provide the necessary deterrent so we wouldn't be talking about the threats. so i believe that what has been done has been the right decision but i also believe that the theory that thinks if they get more escalation than we need to think about increased presence. that's something that certainly we should consider. >> you mentioned article 5 of nato. that's really the cornerstone of the alliance and the attack on one nation is an attack on the whole alliance. how confident are you that if it came to actually nato would come to the rescue for the baltic states? >> i think that this is what is best for nato first of all, and i think that this is the understanding of all nato members that have been participating in foreign minister's meetings also at the nato summit. ij i think t

america's fourth largest city is right now under water. massive flooding have absolutely swamped houston like never, ever before. at least two people have lost their lives here. five statewide. cars entirely submerged. look at this -- one after another after another, not going anywhere. completely swallowed up. homes swallowed. dozen of vehicle lined up on the side of the road after more than ten inches of rain swamped the city in less than 24 hours. highways, they're washed out. public tra

and under the tax code. let's stand up for their fair treatment and well-deserved retirement benefits from the men and women who work so hard to protect us. the american federation of government employees writes, on a daily basis federal firefighters correctional workers, customs and border protection officers federal law enforcement officers secure our federal buildings safely. handle the most dangerous offenders behind bars, patrol our nation's borders. when these federal employees meet all the established requirements for federal retirement, they deserve full access to their government retirement plan. . let's honor the faithful commitment these officers have showed us by showing our commitment here on the floor of the house. i urge my colleagues to support this bill. and with that, i yield back. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman yields back the balance of his time. the gentleman from washington. mr. reichert: i would yield as much as much time as he would like to consume the gentleman from minnesota

and chinese entities under the 1-2-3 agreement. taken together, these elements, not included in the 1985 agreement, provide an unprecedented level of insight into commercial transactions. since the preceding agreement was signed 30 years ago, we've witnessed china make significant strides in its nuclear program. china now has over 20 nuclear power plants in operation over 20 under construction and dozens more plant. in fact, over one-third of nuclear power plants currently under construction in the world are in china. china increasingly seeks services technology and equipment from u.s. and other foreign commercial companies for its civil nuclear program. we believe it is in the best interests of the united states to support u.s. industries' ability to compete in this fast-growing and expanding market. americans companies have numerous joint ventures with china as well as significant assets on the ground there. they are also supplying china with equipment and components as well as a broad range of services, including engineering con

it's under assault in the private sector it's underassault in the public sector.w enforcement needs to have tools to do what it needs to do, but is the responsibility of government to protect as best it can the privacy of its citizens. i'll give you a perfect example of something talked about not too long ago. there is a database for law enforcement. and for the banking finsen. and they collect all the suspicious activity reports from banks, and there is limited access by law enforcement. but it is to help the banking community understand some of the strange things that are going on in banking. and you could, by writing a czech check to a contractor, because you wanted to pay in cash and save money, and the contractor had their own specific reasons why they wanted it in cash. you could end up on a suspicious activity report because you wrote a check for $10,000 in cash which brought into mind is this money laundering. what is in? >> there was a move afood to have regulations adopted that would allow the intelligence agencies access to the database. i'm not sure wh

delivered but to maximize to generate in producing power there's a lot of assets that probably fall under that and so they felt that was you know benefit for the power and also customers are not benefiting from the power there was an effort to trying to determine each one of the assets what is the value as it relates to generating power for the power enterprise and how much for water so through a whole list of assets they came with the official category of 55, 45 so if we see one asset that's not right we pretty much put all that in the basket some maybe hire and some lower with 45 you can't go wrong is that - >> yeah. i think you've described that well i was a young cubby was here but not involved in that negotiation you described my understanding of that perfectly so you end up with i think this is an important point to make with replaced to the mountain tunnel it is less true when you make it statement system wide you have joint financing and conceptual issues in general if we build a new power house or a new transition line nothing on the waterside that constraints our activity. >> we

currently it operates under the framework under the 2001 at umf it might be in the arabian peninsula in yemen but that's what they have given. the words associated force don't appear in the 2001 atumf. i think it would be good. it would codify an existing practice. one thing remarkable is a conspicuous omission of the element of the test. the united states has been operating for several years and what jay johnson the former counsel of the department defense said other organizations that join the fight alongside the principal group similar to the way the terminology is used it /* that's the definition we've been operating under which gives a lot of justification to why the united states have been in conflict with al-qaida and another organization operating out of yemen that joins the fight. what is conspicuously absent is the term cobelligerency. in fact what the administration has said without this cobell i think rensy test there is a concern for slippery slope. maybe they aren't connected in a cobelligerency cooperating with isil but organizations that might pop up and assert they a

all you have to do is say that under the illegal under the law they're being charged all you have to do is say they did something that makes it look like they knew. they did something that makes it look they were sufficientspicious. if we can find any law in the code that makes that illegal, we can prosecute them for what we want to prosecute them for, even though they didn't know the facts fell under the provision. >> you don't have to prosecute them for the actions they took that broke the law. >> yes, and part of that prosecution is you must show that they had the requisite mens raya. you're saying we can do that by showing the jury they were acting sufficientsly. >> we have to convince the jury that the defendant in any case believed what he was doing, the relevant conduct in this case, distributing the drug, was illegal. you have to prove that beyond a reasonable doubt. suggesting that the defendant was acting suspiciously is not going to get the job done in most cases, and it's easier to prove that the defendant knows the fact than it is easy to prove that he knew it was illega

when the furnace lit off in our hometown of phoenix, arizona 6,300 providers under contract under pc-3 leaned forward at the site of the v.a. medical center to assist in eliminating the backlog. and by august, 14,000 veterans had moved through that process. around the same time, we got a modification to add primary care to those contracts. and within 90 days we stood up a network of primary care providers. we now have over 100,000 providers across 28 states and the pacific under contract along with 4,500 facilities and we're not finished. the reason why we're not finished is that we need to make sure the networks are tailored to match the demand that exists in a particular market that's not able to be met by the v.a. facilities itself. the fact is that was a complicated program to set up. it was done under very short order. but it was training, if you will, for what was to come next. on november 5th after 30 days of work we were to stand up in support of v.a., the choice program. we had to partner with v.a. to receive a list of all eligible veterans. we had to design and produce a car

you'll see how they played this set of three holes, fowler 6 under, garcia 6 under, kisner 1 under. kisner will have the honor to play first. >> this is going to flame out to the right. this is going to miss the fairway. >> chances are that will force a layup. >> kevin kisner next to play. >> garcia next to play. >> this one started up the right-hand side also. he hit it a little bit high. >> that one missed the fairway as well. so opportunity for fowler, perhaps, to jump out in front here. with a good drive. remember he made three here. in regulation. >> well, that's all three of them. this well right as well. maybe the furthest one right. >> okay. so no one able to hit the fairway on the first playoff hole. garcia, fowler and kisner, a three-hole aggregate playoff to determine the players champion. it begins from the the second we're born.er. after all, healthier doesn't happen all by itself. it needs to be earned... every day... using wellness to keep away illness... and believing that a single life can be made better by millions of others. healthier takes somebody who can power

chile leadership is under intense pressure to deliver.th al jazeera, santiago chile. >>> as always you can keep up to date with all the news on our website, al jazeera.com. get the latest on all the stories we are following. al jazeera.com. >> one person killed and more than two dozen injured as dangerous storms swept through texas. coming up next with the the risk for severe weather that is still around the corner. >> i wish every day lord take him. >> a community mourns the death of two mississippi police officers shot and killed in the line of duty. four people now charged in connection with their deaths. >> and heavy bombing in yemen just a day before saudi arabia's proposed ceasefire is

they are no longer under observation. they have thrown caution to the wind and it has been a reckless act. again what we are talking about is an attempt to close guantanamo down and i believe what he is believing to do is transfer it back to cuba. under these circumstances. >> i was going to ask that. does it go back to cuba? is it part of the deal with the resumption that they get guantanamo back? is that a valuable area? >> well, we have a long-term leasing arrangement there. one of the things we are trying to make certain of is we pass legislation that guantanamo not be closed and not be returned to cuba by this administration. all evidence right now points to a real fixation on getting that closed. >> what would we do with it? >> what we would do with guantanamo? >> if it's emptied out. >> the point is what we use it for is to hold those who are taken into custody overseas trying to kill americans or kill our forces overseas. it beats bringing them here to the united states and giving them a platform and making a targ

it is our job under the constitution. in addition to that, i think we have a moral obligation to the men and women we send out on these dangerous missions to have the full cloak of constitutional authority and moral backing of the country in supporting their missions. so i think we have a responsibility to try. i had conversations today about maybe next steps going forward. and i want to try to contribute to that debate, as i said even though it doesn't technically come out of our committee. >> what are those next steps coming forward? >> to it see if there is a version of an authorization to use military force that would work in the field that could get the support of republicans and democrats now pass in the house and the senate. i think there may be more discussions about that. i can't tell you all of the steps in the legislative process. it is my opinion however we need to really try to do this for the reasons that we just have been talking about. it's our job under the constitution. >> how do you think it should be d

the ratio is 30 to 1 under a central estimate. under a highest mate of benefits, it is 90 to 1. this doesn't happen by accident. this kind of program, this kind of statutory implementation happens as a result of firm but sensible interpretation of broad statutory provisions. it is mystifying to me that opponents of clean power plan are criticizing epa for exhibiting the same flexibility that has served the clean air act so well for 45 years in this country. >> thank you. appreciate everybody's testimony and i will begin with questions. attorney general morrisey let me ask you a question. we obviously have a difference of opinion here. the supreme court recently said it is skeptical when an agency long statute and power to regulate, a significant portion of the american economy. i guess my question is, how long has 111-d existed and has it ever been used outside the fence line to overhaul an entire sector? >> miss chair womanwoman this is an unprecedented he haveeffort and we've never seen this in both its scope and willingness to regulate outside the fence but also the legal aut

i think that right now it's pretty clear where the administration is having under section 111. i think the amount of energy in the time time that has gone into set the standards and the process that launches going forward shows that they are not intending to move forward under section 115 but nevertheless that authority does remain and it is a potential backstop in the future and a potential way to get roger emission reductions. if we continue to need to use administration authority in a post-25 period. >> thanks. if no one wanted to weigh in i would close out by just that i could ask anyone if anybody here here, what they saw the prospects for getting action from congress or involvement from congress between now and november 2016, if anybody thought that was remotely a reality for a process that could happen? correlates on your to-do list. >> i would doubt that between now and november 2016. >> the house and senate are looking at some energy bills this year. both of them have titles to promote energy efficiency. it's yet to be seen whether they can make an aggressive -- [inaud

i think that the key under both the fourth amendment and under the relevance test under the statute, in both lines of cases, the court has made clear is a tally of the circumstances type inquiry. what is relevant under the circumstances. what is reasonable under the circumstances. >> come on isn't it at least as relevant to you whether somebody that you have some reasonable suspicion is engaged in terrorist kwexconnections, used his credit card last week to buy a ton of fertilizer, as it is to find out whether he called his gym on using his verizon cell phone? >> so i think -- >> or even to find out who his other colleagues are. there's clearly relevance in the sense that you're talking about it. in fact, if you had that guy and you wanted to get his precise credit card records, is there any question you'd serve a grand jury subpoena to get that? so i don't understand why the same jump that says you can collect all the stuff in advance essentially to make it easier quicker. i'm not denigrating that interest. to make it easier and quicker to make the inquiry and find out what the conn

the court has said that even under these lower standards even under these standards of saying it would be relevant, that all of the stuff they're collecting is precisely irrelevant. now, people say, well, they're not looking at it. they're not listening to it. it's the tip of the iceberg what we're talking about here.

it is our job under the constitution. in addition to that, i think we have a moral obligation to the men and women we send out on these dangerous missions to have the full cloak of constitutional authority and moral backing of the country and supporting their mission. i think we have a responsibility to try. i have some conversations today -- had some conversations today about some next steps moving forward, and i want to contribute to that debate, even though technically doesn't come out off our committee. megan: what are those next up stucco rep. thornberry: to see -- those next steps? rep. thornberry: to see if there is an authorization of force that could pass in the house and senate. there are a couple that have been introduced. i think there will be more discussions about that. i cannot tell you all the steps in the legislative process. it is my opinion that we really need to do this, for the reasons that we just talked about. it is our job under the constitution. megan: how do you think it should be drafted? rep. t

a brilliant shot on 16, pushing him to 22 under par. he finished a tournament record 21 under.won by 7 strokes. rodgers and simpson. now, shelby miller, one out away from the no hitter. but, justin spoils it, a base hit, 2-out single. miller, would have to settle for a 2 hit shutout. the braves win 6-0. after the game, struggling marlins manager was fired. a tough way to go. >> help me out on this. initiation, when you are a rookie. silent treatment. tough law, you hit a homer and that is it some. >> you hit your first home run, no big deal. give you the silent treatment. the a's have bigger things to worry about. >> not at all. >> game day tonight at 11:00. >> don't miss that. thank you very much. captioning funded by cbs and ford >> the $500 million national museum of african american history and culture is rising on the national mall. the complexion will be rendered in shades of bronze. a building of color, against history's white marble. >> this is not the museum of tragedy. it is not museum of difficult moments. it is the museum that says here is a balanced history of amer

it looked like there was a bumper under had his car. it was kind of flapping and as i got closer too it i realize it was a human body. i can see a foot. >> that is when strangers took action, jacking the truck up off of the motorcycle who was clearly terrified, screaming for his life as the rescue continued. an off duty firefighter/paramedic was one of the people that jumped in to help. >> it was high anxiety moment. >> reporter: they managed to get the man out from under the truck before the ambulance arrived. it is still unclear how the motorcyclist ended up under the truck but the good news fire officials say he only suffered minor injuries. reporting in chino hills, cbs news. >>> for the first time in five nights people freed to room the streets of baltimore. the city lifted the 10:00 p.m. curfew. protesterred filled the city streets ever since learning of the death of -- protesters filled the city streets ever since learning of the death of freddie gray. the police say they arrested 500 people during rioting. 100 officers have been

plus we'll look at how the united nations is coming under criticism for failing to investigate allegationssexual exploitation of children by french peacekeeping troops in the central african republic. >> specifically that's strange for the u.n. anchor: and we go to texas where at least 20 people have died in record flooding. will this force republican presidential candidates including texas senator ted cruz to rethink their climate change denialism? all that and more, coming up. welcome to democracy now! the democracynow.org, the war and peace report. i'm amy goodman. an explosion has struck a shiite mosque in the saudi city of dammam, killed 21 people at another shiite mosque marking one of the worst attacks to hit saudi arabia in years. the united nations has passed a nonbinding resolution aimed at curbing the cultural mrundering of iraq. the resolution adopted unanimously by the 193-nation general assembly. it applies only to iraq not to syria, where isil controls the ancient city of palmyra. isil posted video showing the destruction of iraqi sites, incl the ancient assyrian city of nim

an owner - the owners objected a full approval from dbi to verizon and hogan expend it's property under the permit the occurrence of those two items happening at the same time flattened unfatiguing faith motivates after consulting with the rent board and the tenant right union this was apparent this man was not acting in going to on the option of the organization m i notice to renotice the permit that will correct the relocation fees open the rent board calculations that were incorrect their attorney steven refused and threatened us with an unlawful detainer that was never filed they knew they had no good faith basis the months later 38 they accepted our check with a threatening letter from the new attorney from zach's and freedom about a 7 minute off by the way in their rebuttal package raurgsd our requests was quoted out of context that was a private and confidential communication been the 20 years you'll this aside our communication were gerald ignored and our attorneys did not speak until the landlord hired an engineer to obtain permits to remove the illegal twelve mr. the gentleman

the world's biggest hotel is under construction.you might think it is las vegas but it could not be further away. it is being developed in saudi arabia and will have 12 towers, 70 restaurants, and multiple helipads, and 10,000 grams. -- 10,000 rooms. it is slated to open in 2017. the mgm grand has more rooms than anyone for the time being that it is only half of what the rom pacifica this is democracy now! >> he's is more than simply the absence of war, it is the presence of justice. the peace movement is the ultimate movement. peace is the superior idea, the umbrella movement of all movements, the peace movement because to come together under the banner of peace forces us to

you know the authorities under which nsa can collect.it doesn't use any technical capability to do things it's not allowed otherwise to do. >> anyone else with a question? >> thanks for all the panelists coming out today. really appreciate it. mieke, i'm former staff, and i did not work on the committee myself but i worked for one of the committee members mr. holt who, bob, i think you knew and had quite a bit of interaction with. and one of the things he always complained about was this 20 questions problem. but the thing i want to ask today and this is my 20 question moment has the icig by itself or in concert with the other igs taken a comprehensive look at all of the surveillance programs and activities carried out "o" under all these authorities that you have discussed whether patriot act fisa or whether 12333 and >> the answer is no. other outside bodies have been doing does, president's review group and so on. two, the resource implications of that and frankly the number of taskings that the icig gets from congress are such to mak

how would that fair under your argument? >> if the records -- if what the government is asking for is information, this is not going to be a taking. if the records are themselves of historical value as they were in nixon vs. -- >> i don't know of their historic value. they are physical objects in the same way the raisins are physical objectance the government wants records. >> the government does not take permanent position of records. if i'm in an irs audit and they ask for records. i show them the records, they see the information it's not a taking. >> you're saying that the government couldn't ask you to deliver records to them? >> i did not say that. they can ask me to do that. and it is not a taking unless they've taken a permanent possessory interest. if they sell the records the way they sell the -- >> they're keeping the records. >> if they're keeping the records forever i'm not sure but i doubt very much that would be a take. again if the value of the records is the information which is what i assume it is in a regu

is under actual imminent attack. presidentialists argue that the president can choose to use armed force in a wide range of circumstances if necessary to further the national security interest of the united states even in the incidence of an actual or imminent attack. so this leads me to my second point. while president obama campaigned fairly described as a congressionalist, he is pretty plainly and unan polgetically embraced the presidentialist view in his administration's defense of military actions especially in libya in 2011. so as colonel and professor goodman discussed, the main military action of the united states is involved in during president obama's administration have been actions in iraq and afghanistan, both of which had specific statutory tori zags by congress. but in 2011 when the united states and allies intervened in the civil war, there was no authorization and president obama did not seek an authorization from congress. in fact, his department of justice office of legal counsel issued a legal opi