you seem to esther categorical jurisdiction over implementation of the king power plant for the air quality regulators seemingly that was convicted by what mr. gray said. is the decision for state legislatures or has that already been decided in your mind? >> i think we are saying the same thing but i will let a check speak for himself. under the clean air act and the intersection 111 d, state air regulators have the legal responsibility of developing a plan and implementing the plan. we of course will be working with state utility regulators and state energy officials in pursuing the kinds of programs they both outlined and it may be that the state will have to take action with utility commissioners, concerns and energy officials concerns in mind as part of the plan but the ultimate responsibility lies with the state environmental agency and until we are told differently that is our responsibility. >> i don't disagree. clearly the lot is the law and air regulators are responsible for dealing with the environmental impact but that doesn't obviously the requirement that the state's improve w