i think that he says serious things inter%red with unserious things.he actually imagines to say some stuff that makes sense on foreign policy. announced syria isn't too far off. then he says other things that don't make any sense like i'm not going to tell you what my plan is because i don't want them to know or nobody is bigger or better than i am on the military. these kind of outland dish statements plus the whole birther thing that he takes credit for the fact that he got the president to have to release his birth certificate. this is not serious stuff. >> what we heard tonight, did you hear anything that you feel was unserious in your words from him tonight? >> well, what i just said. i think the way he is talking about you know nobody bigger. or won't talk about what his plan is is. >> he did in a round about way saying is he going to cut off othe oil revenue to isis. >> i have to say one thing that he said that i think will resonate with people, i don't think is he going anywhere. he has 57% disapproval rating. >> that could drop though. >> but,

these were used in the west to ridicule mosadek and immediate him seem like an unserious person. but actually in iran y shiite practices have sent people on public displays of emotion, this only happened to endear him even more. he seemed to suffer with them even as he was chastising them. mosadek offered the british the chance to carry out the nationalization of the oil company according to british law. if you can remember in the late 1940's and 1950's the british were nationalizing their own industry. they were nationalizing the coal and the railway industry. they had a very elaborate system to develop who has to compensate who. so let's just put it in front of what is your tribunal and we'll decide who owes who money. the man of the oil company was abstinent. the friends of the oil company in iran had by urging the oil company to avert this crisis and compromise. the american con sorshume -- consortium reached a deal with saudi arabia and they gave saudi arabia a 50-50 split. this was an agreement that had the air of fairness that a common person could understand. and many of

think rationale of his campaign which is that he believes he is a grown up in a field of unprepared, unserious candidates and in that way his candidacy is oppositional in nature. he wants to save his party, the republican party from people who he thinks are less serious. that's come through in conversations i have had with people who know him for a long time, his aides. i think running a campaign like that is not by its very nature going to be a joyful, exciting, positive upbeat experience. >> the one place where he seemed to be most animated i thought was surprising and a window into the strategy of jeb campaign in this primary is when he talked about the little sisters of the poor and this lawsuit that has to do with a conscious exemption in the affordable care act. it occurred that one smart thing they come up with is they find a sliver of vin diagram where they can lean into giving the religious rite particularly red meat and leaned into that and was an indicator we see a lot more of that in this campaign. >> that is true to a certain degree. i don't know if it was just a play to the relig

he is not an unserious person. he's incredibly successful. he's had a lot of experiences that would inform a good campaign and a potential presidency. if he shows up and it's, you know, more of the donald trump that we know from television and fox news, kind of just, you know, saying preposterous things -- >> pontificating. >> i don't think we should take him seriously and i think that will be evident and obvious fairly quickly, but again and you can see him walking up to the stage, he wants to talk about some serious issues. >> let's take this in. let us watch donald trump declare his candidacy for president. >> that is some group of people. thousands. so nice. thank you very much. that's really nice. thank you. it's great to be at trump tower. it's great to be in a wonderful city, new york, and it's an honor to have everybody here. this is beyond anybody's expectations. there's been no crowd like this, and i can tell you some of the candidates, they went in, they didn't know the air conditioner didn't work. they sweated like dogs. they didn

party this time around unlike maybe in 2012 is willing to tolerate anything that comes across as unseriousnessi think -- or incompetence, if you will. but he could very well end up on that debate stage. and he could push off somebody like lindsey graham or john kasich. i think not planning for that on the part of any of the other candidates would not be smart. >> could trump trip up the gop? >> you can make a lot of establishm establishment people very nervous. but there are, though throughout history, bigger than life people, colorful people that make a splash on the stage. >> there are. i mean perot is the great example. you had a billionaire with a populous message. that was different year it seems to me. and you had someone, his celebrity came not really from the entertainment complex as much as from the business complex. perot came from this straight talking western thing. the pattern here is populous candidates burn brightly and they figure out what is working in the message. they take it and incorporate it in the populous candidate. >> ross perot is the best example in '92. >> he was a

beyond identifies unseriousness. the audit identifies many practices in which the agency repeatedly dropped the ball. weaknesses call into question whether the agency can effectively identify and investigate potential safety problems and carry out its safety mission. especially disconcerting given the scale and complexity. i am pleased to know administrator rose kindest concurrent and has admitted to implement them. far too many troubling recalls which is why have worked with the center to pass our motor vehicle safety whistleblower act. resulting from safety defects. despite a long vacancy you have been looking for ways to improve. there have been assessments and a plan for a path forward but now is the time for accountability. agency, automakers suppliers, and dealers in congress must work together to reduce death and injury. his committee will continue to conduct oversight of the recall and vehicle safety efforts. i appreciate the general cooperation of toccata. we just received the production documents. i'm sure

theses a pebs of his personality were used in the west to ridicule mosadek and make him seem like an unserious person. but actually in iran where centuries of shiite religious practice have sensitized people to public displays of emotion that are far beyond anything with which we're accustomed in the west, these aspects of the personality only seemed to endear him even more to iranians. he seemed to suffer with them even as he was chastising them. mosadek offered the british the chance to carry out the nationalization of the oil company according to british law. if you can remember, in the late '40's and early '50's they were nationizing many of the industries at home. they were nationalizing the coal and the railway industry and hay they had an elaborate system for deciding who had to compensate who. so mosadek offered to them let's put it in front of your one of your tribunals and we will decide who owes who money. know, the management of the oil company was famously obstinate. for years the friends of the british in iran and the friends of the anglo iranian oil in iran had urged them to com

these were used in the west to ridicule mosadek and immediate him seem like an unserious person. but actually in iran y shiite practices have sent people on public displays of emotion, this only happened to endear him even more. he seemed to suffer with them even as he was chastising them. mosadek offered the british the chance to carry out the nationalization of the oil company according to british law. if you can remember in the late 1940's and 1950's the british were nationalizing their own industry. they were nationalizing the coal and the railway industry. they had a very elaborate system to develop who has to compensate who. so let's just put it in front of what is your tribunal and we'll decide who owes who money. the man of the oil company was abstinent. the friends of the oil company in iran had by urging the oil company to avert this crisis and compromise. the american con sorshume -- consortium reached a deal with saudi arabia and they gave saudi arabia a 50-50 split. this was an agreement that had the air of fairness that a common person could understand. and many of

but a large number of the republicans are trying to kill this program as indicated at how unserious they are about doing something about it by focusing on the defense bill, an amendment that they filed and moved to table their own amendment just so they could check off the box. well, we tried to do something on export-import bank. cybersecurity. mr. president, we are being hacked on a daily basis. we're not only -- they're not only hacking businesses, they're hacking our government, everything. and to show how unserious the republicans are about this issue, which we have been trying to do something as democrats for four years. the republicans file an amendment on this bill knowing that the president has already said he is going to veto the bill. mr. president, i'm so disappointed how the republicans are being really ungenuine in trying to move forward on this legislation. the bill's going to be vetoed. the president said so. but the other thing i think is important for the american public to understand and make sure that all members of the senate and their staff understand, this is an au