programs and enrich, but the difference here between the countries that are good players, germany, brazil afghanistan, i'm sorry argentina, holland japan we are putting iran into that group. a bad actor my question is, what the option i see is doubling down on the sanctions that got them here in the first place we know it was crushing their economy we know it was having tremendous impact on their regime, and my question is is that not a viable option today as we look at alternatives to the deal itself? >> senator i think the reason the sanctions have had the powerful effect is that they are not just u.s. sanctions they have been international and that requires keeping an international coalition together to impose the kinds of tough sanctions that we have had in past debates we have gone back and forth with congress saying if you do more and it keeps other countries out then we are in the end doing less, and we have come to a good place on the rounds to grow the coalition, if this deal is rejected the other partner whose have helped us to impose those, will not be of like mind. >> of the $115 billion

germany, brazil, afghanistan i'm sorry argentina holland japan, we are putting iran into that group a bad actor like iran what -- the option that i see is doubling down on the sanctions that got them into the table in the first place we know it was crushing their economy, we know it was having an impact on the regime, my question t is, is that not a viable option to the deal itself? >> senator, i think the reason the sanctions have had the powerful effect is that they are not just u.s. sanctions they have international sanctions. that requires keeping a coalition together. we've gone back and forth with the congress saying, if you do more and it keeps other countries out we are then doing less. we've come to a good place to grow the coalition in the world. if deal the rejected, the other partners will not be of like mind. >> i understand the nuances of the categories of that cash, how much is that relative sanctions on other countries dealing with iran versus eu. i understand. i am try to go make a delineation. what percentage is due to u.s. sanctions vir sus the -- >> it's hard becau

but the dlination between the countries that are good players, germany, brazil afghanistan -- i'm sorry, argentina, holland, gentleman. japan. we're putting iran into that group. what option i see to this is potentially doubling down on the sanctions that got them to the table in the first place. i'd like you to respond to that. we know it was crushing their economy. we know it was having tremendous impact on their regime. my question is is that not a viable option today? as we look at alternatives to the deal itself. >> the reason i think the sanctions have had the powerful effect is they're not just u.s. sanctions. they've been international sanctions. that requires keeping an international coalition together to impose the kinds of tough sanctions we've had. in past debates over u.s. sanctions, we've gone back and forth with the congress saying if you do more and it keeps other countries out, then we're in the end doing less. and i think we've come to a good place on each of the rounds of discussions over sanctions to grow the coalition in the world. if this deal is rejected the other

but the dlination between the countries that are good players, germany, brazil afghanistan -- i'm sorry, argentina, holland, gentleman. japan. we're putting iran into that group. what option i see to this is potentially doubling down on the sanctions that got them to the table in the first place. i'd like you to respond to that. we know it was crushing their economy. we know it was having tremendous impact on their regime. my question is is that not a viable option today? as we look at alternatives to the deal itself. >> the reason i think the sanctions have had the powerful effect is they're not just u.s. sanctions. they've been international sanctions. that requires keeping an international coalition together to impose the kinds of tough sanctions we've had. in past debates over u.s. sanctions, we've gone back and forth with the congress saying if you do more and it keeps other countries out, then we're in the end doing less. and i think we've come to a good place on each of the rounds of discussions over sanctions to grow the coalition in the world. if this deal is rejected the other