. >> item 61, larry wasserman vs. city and county of san francisco. item 17, ccsf vs. pacific gas & electric 18 conference with legal counsel. 19, existing litigation, restore hetch hetchy vs. city and county of san francisco. >> 20, existing litigation, city and county of san francisco vs. pacific gas & electric. >> 21, existing litigation, city and county of san francisco vs. pacific gas & electric. 22, existing litigation, pacific gas & electric. 23 existing litigation, pacific gas & electric. 24, existing litigation, pacific gas & electric. 25, existing litigation, pacific gas & electric. 26, existing litigation, pacific gas & electric. and 27 will not be heard today. >> okay. are there any comments? public comments on the items to be heard in closed session today? >> noreen ambrose city attorney's office. i just wanted to ask for a motion to recuse commissioner courtney from item 16. >> correct. may i have that motion? >> so moved. >> second. >> all those in favor? >> aye. >> opposed? the motion carries. i also need a motion whether to assert -- >> move to assert.

. >> item 61, larry wasserman vs. city and county of san francisco. item 17, ccsf vs.pacific gas & electric 18 conference with legal counsel. 19, existing litigation, restore hetch hetchy vs. city and county of san francisco. >> 20, existing litigation, city and county of san francisco vs. pacific gas & electric. >> 21, existing litigation, city and county of san francisco vs. pacific gas & electric. 22, existing litigation, pacific gas & electric. 23 existing litigation, pacific gas & electric. 24, existing litigation, pacific gas & electric. 25, existing litigation, pacific gas & electric. 26, existing litigation, pacific gas & electric. and 27 will not be heard today. >> okay. are there any comments? public comments on the items to be heard in closed session today? >> noreen ambrose city attorney's office. i just wanted to ask for a motion to recuse commissioner courtney from item 16. >> correct. may i have that motion? >> so moved. >> second. >> all those in favor? >> aye. >> opposed? the motion carries. i also need a motion whether to assert -- >> move to assert.