mr. freeman got cold feet, if you will and decided he didn't want any part of it. and as he was running away, freeman said he heard the shots. >> the police charged freeman and thompson with murder. the local prosecutor wanted the death penalty for thompson, but knew it would be an uphill battle because thompson had never been convicted of a violent crime. that was about to change. >> on december 28, 1984, 19-year-old jay lagard, and his sister who was 16, and their younger brother, who was 12, went to the super dome for a college basketball tournament. after the game as they were getting in the car, an african-american man jumped into the backseat, pulled out a .357 magnum and said i'm taking your car, i want all your valuables. jay deliberately caused a car accident. the carjacker then leapt forward with the gun and jay turned around and met him, and they had a fight. jay is pressed with his back against the driver's side door. and manages to kick the carjacker in his face and out through the passenger side door. the carjacker drops the gun and gets away. that cri

mr. freeman? you still have 2 more minutes. >> can you answer the question of has anyone looked at the history before the bought the building >> as far as i know orders of abatement show up on a title report but in terms of the specifics i don't know what was and wasn't-- >> you brought that up as if it had anything to do with the current status of the building and i'm saying when you buy a building you buy as is and still have the issues. >> i understand that but what my point was different, my point was if the property and property owner is already punished for not having corrected these issues why are we punishing the property owner again for a new order of abatement for the same issue? as a matter of double jeopardy that seems wrong. if they have existing ish oo uzwhether they know or not that order of abatement exists and don't need the- >> i think we have to go through the procedure because there is a new owner. >> i did have a question about the demolition of the fronts stairs do you know w

mr. freeman arrives, 60 -- truman arrives, 63 days are climaxed by the signing of the united nation's charter. first is china, the first nation that suffered aggression. the delegation of the soviet union, the ambassador signs for russia. great britain is represented by her delegation chairman halifax. the republic of france acting delegation chairman joseph. 38th of 50 nations to sign is the united states. secretary of state. [applause] >> ladies and gentlemen, we are all aware that this is an extremely historic occasion. the charger for world peace -- charter for world peace has been completed. but this is not the end, it is only the beginning. the great task lies before us, and it is our solemn and sacred duty to see to it the united nations comes into being and fulfills its promise. with faith in our cause and goodwill in our hearts and determination to work unceasingly towards this end, i am confident that with god's help we shall reach our goal. [applause] >> senator donnelly -- connelly is next to sign for the united states. senator arthur vandinburg. [applause] >> commander harold, fo

mr. freeman, for the following reasons. one. >> of course. >> i think it absolutely conflicts. there's a 1996 law, a federal law, and that empowers and requires the locals to cooperate with the federal government okay? that's number two. number three, cooperation is simply honoring a detainer. it's an immigration detainer. and all that says it doesn't say we're going to deport you. it's not an arrest warrant. it simply says to give us notification and it empowers the local government to hold someone for 48 hours. now, further, fredricka, this arrest apparently or he was returned on march 26th. they decided to drop the charges on march 27th. he was held until april 15th. what was to prevent a simple - phone call. >> is it likely they would have known about the track record? [ overlapping speakers ] >> i don't think they need a warrant. i disagree with the sheriff. there's no need for a warrant. now, i do agree that an immigration detainer is not at all a command. it's a request. however, in light of the fact that the 1996 fe

mr. freeman? still have 2 more minutes. >> can you answer the question of has anyone looked at the history before the bought the building >> as far as i know orders of abatement show up on a title report but in terms of the specifics i don't know what was and wasn't-- >> you brought that up as if it had anything to do with the current status of the building and i'm saying when you buy a building you buy as is and still have the issues. >> i understand that but what my point was different, my point was if the property and property owner is already punished for not having corrected these issues why are we punishing the property owner again for a new order of abatement for the same sue? as a matter of double jeopardy that seems wrong. if they have existing ish oo uzwhether they know or not that order of abatement exists and don't need the- >> i think we have to go through the procedure because there is a new owner. >> i did have a question about the demolition of the fronts stairs do you know when th