. >> thank you and i'm patrick shaw i'm hoping the ethics commission will find a way since you passed putting a ballot measure on regarding expenditure lobby that you'll find a way to put a measure to strengthen the whistle blower protection ordinance because my hunch is under the current assignment and at the board of supervisors they're not going to take action i just finished up my menu article that focuses on the you go will i truth to retarlts keep their city employment awhile those who are wrongfully retaliated against don't i followed up with the city attorney's office dr. curry submitted a records request in 2012 seeking records on prohibited personal practice lawsuits that were filed against the city as time i wrote an article in april of 2012 hundred and 5 such cases in the last 3 years under mayor ed lee it has soared and another hundred and 87 cases have been added for a total of 2 hundred and 92 of those while they have been only 14 wrongful terms cases between 2007 and 12 there are have been 23rd settled in the last 3 years and 9 outstanding a total of 46 we have an epid

>> patrick shaw i was disturbed you were reaching a different findings than the commissioner my recollection of the testimony before the notification eir ethics commission by rec and park representatives was that they were just following the good government guide as commissioner renne has rightfully noted carries in weigh in law i don't think if you're reaching a different finding than with john was i tenderloin with our guidelines for hearing sunshine cases but i'm flifrm of the opinion that department heads are responsible for the actions of their subordinates no matter how you dice your interpretation of the sunshine ordnance i would strongly speak against this motion i think you need to do the exact opposite and find that mrb /* mr. ginsburg violated the ordinance. >> thank you. any other comment? i'm going to summarize what at staffs recommendations on this particular matter. >> certainly. >> at the lastly time this was horde there were two issues one to this consideration of whether the mr. gibner staff was properly noticed in terms of the flying sunshine matter and an issue to putting

. >> patrick shaw i see ms. wriths comments are once again amazing me she claims two issues a lack of training for the tier work two employees and sensitivity to their privacy because they've filed at the department the members of the public can place recordings requests to on them they're typically provided as electronic pdr attachment and the complaints about privacy is muted her concern about lack of ethics training is nuns nuance to only file form 7 hundred electronically didn't go far enough tier 2 designated should be required to buy no be ethics train in the ended requiring both may well reduce both sunshine complaints and the number of retaliatory wrongful termentsz they need to be trained they can do the training in the comfort of their offends on line like the department heads do training is set up on and on online and the department heads take the training and civil right those in the confront of their own offends. >> i'm aware that some city departments have tipping not required the contractors where

. >> >> good afternoon, supervisors i'm patrick shaw on personal time i understand this origin requires the developers of group housing projects to be subject to the requirements of building 12 to 15 percent affordable units on site or have to pay the various inclusionary housing fee so i commend you for this ordinance since the inclusionary fee legislation was first implemented over hundred and $70 million in fees have been paid by developers into several inclusionary fee fund accounts this community needs to rapidly hold a hearing on what the market values has spent the one hundred $70 million on and not spent the m h 0 cody's what they're doing and details san francisco spell needs the board of supervisors to over and place a city chart change to on the ballot to create a connection in charge of total oversight of the entire moh cd it is not good enough on angle set forth body to the successor agency to the root development swoeshgs agency what is mou h cd doing with the housing fund they're separate and the hundreds of millions that have been collected from the inclusionary housing

. >> patrick brad shaw i'm speaking 40 in support of the motion on the floor although i having would have preferred some of the family amendment had not think adapted you know if it is covered goodwill stale if we have anything commiserating we have a drought not because we have a procedure in place to identify improper expenditures san francisco is an out layer you need to fix it is what your job is i attended the interest persons meeting and was quite concerned about allowing the board of supervisors to make any amendments to it and the reason for that is back in 1989 the voters passed prop q requiring the health commission to be notified with the health facilities wanted to reduce the sodas the voters passed it given the health commission a marking order they could only reach a fine point of the reduction would or would not use will or using will or not having a detrimental impact on health care that law stood until june 10th when the house commission in its wisdom and wouldn't release an attorney past, present, and future it communications not a written city attorney thinking out

. >> >> good afternoon, supervisors i'm patrick shaw on personal time i understand this origin requires the developers of group housing projects to be subject to the requirements of building 12 to 15 percent affordable units on site or have to pay the various inclusionary housing fee so i commend you for this ordinance since the inclusionary fee legislation was first implemented over hundred and $70 million in fees have been paid by developers into several inclusionary fee fund accounts this community needs to rapidly hold a hearing on what the market values has spent the one hundred $70 million on and not spent the m h 0 cody's what they're doing and details san francisco spell needs the board of supervisors to over and place a city chart change to on the ballot to create a connection in charge of total oversight of the entire moh cd it is not good enough on angle set forth body to the successor agency to the root development swoeshgs agency what is mou h cd doing with the housing fund they're separate and the hundreds of millions that have been collected from the inclusionary housing