dr. carroll that this was not the typical case. this was a man who was on a very, very steep trajectory for future violence. >> the psychiatrist's warnings, as noted in gardner's manifests significant predatory traits to underage females. the defendant would be a continued danger to underage girls in the community, and it would be unlikely that the defendant would be amenable to treatment." the psychiatrist recommended the maximum sentenced allowed by law. >> in my experience, i don't think that i've ever seen a psychiatrist make a louder and clearer call. >> and the doctor who evaluated gardner was apparently so concerned about it, he followed up his report with a phone call to gardner's probation officer with yet another warning. "the defendant does not suffer from a psychotic disorder," he said. "he's simply a bad guy who is inordinately interested in young girls." such calls are rare, says dr. kalish. >> when psychiatrists become desperate, we pick up the phone. >> yet, despite those warnings, the prosecutor, probation officer and judge all decided that john gardner should get a midlevel sentence of six years rather than ten years, which would have been th