we would go forward with an omnibus bill from their, an omnibus bill that would recognize that we are limiting sequestration, that the money that we add is dollar for dollar so weic and defense, build our defense and invest in the strength of our country in terms of our domestic agenda. this would all be completed in a timely fashion for the next year. as we aree time planning the offsets to the top line, the committees would be will in terms of the appropriations committee doing their appropriations. it is a question of what the dollar figure would be, and is set up -- and that's a big question. >> isn't this a big distraction? it's more than a distraction. the fact is that that's one element of this. the presence of the united states will sign the bill, so president of the united states will sign the bill, so that's leverage is significant. that leverage is significant. different things in the press. approachesferent including bringing to bills to the floor on which is fine, as long as one is a clean cr. until the end of the fiscal year, there isn't a great deal of play. it is what

haciendo que el Ómnibus cayó al vacÍo. >> aumenta la proporciÓn por la seguridad del papa francisco.lmente la seguridad del paÍs. >> se estÁ demostrando que cada vez eran menos latinos al paÍs, sin embargo cada vez hay mÁs latinos en estados unidos. la mayorÍa son ciudadanos estadounidenses nacidos aquÍ. los mexicanos lideran las cifras de edad con un promedio de 25 aÑos. >> el informe nos dice que la poblaciÓn de latinos que puede votar estÁ creciendo. va a haber 25.000 latinos que podrÁn votar. >> buenas noches sin venidos, esos son los deportes. un golazo de carlos ochoa. >> la mÁquina está en cuartos de final de la copa. >> cristiano ronaldo anotÓ en tres ocasiones. vamos a liga nacional del bÉisbol. estÁn jugando en este momento en la 13 etapa empatÓ dos a cuatro carreras. >> ramoncito morales hizo bien las cosas, pero el equipo no es contundente . el entrenador es argentino . ♪ ♪ los bebés a los que se les habla desde que nacen tienen más posibilidades de lograr un buen futuro. leerles o hablarles durante sus primeros años tiene un enorme impacto en lo que harán el resto de sus

do we need to put it -- can we wait until the omnibus at the end of the year? looks like that's where we're headed is this -- is the reauthorization of the transportation bill in an appropriate way. but i would appreciate a specific recommendation as to the length of time that might be appropriate. is it six months? is it a year? is it two years? you deal with this every day. we're trying to deal with 100 things so i really would ask you to get back to us and provide some leadership there in terms of letting us know how industry can get this done. and i realize we spent a lot of time on this topic so let me switch -- let me be provincial then and ask you about gulf coast service. you know, the house and senate, we haven't quite gotten a bill to the president's desk yet but i think -- would you acknowledge that we have made it clear in legislation that it is federal intent to have a working group formed to restore the gulf coast passenger service that we lost after hurricane katrina? would you agree that that congressional intent is becoming clear based on the l

so we have the omnibus bill to deal with. we also have investments in our infrastructure of our country and our transportation. that will be an important bill that we will be debating at the same time, but has a relationship in terms of how we offset, how we pay for that. and then we have the issue, the ex-im bank, a great job creator for our country, and yet still unauthorized, long overdue for us to authorize it. and then before thanksgiving probably we will have the issue of a vote on honoring the full faith and credit of the united states of america. the last time that was put into doubt, it was unfortunate because it lowered our credit rating. even though we didn't follow through with it, even though the full faith and credit ended up being honored, just the hreat, the suspicious -- suspicion that it could be undermined lowered our credit rating. so we have really important work to do for the good of the people. again, let us honor our responsibilities in the beautiful spirit of pope francis, i say saint francis because

we are anticipating a short-term spending bill will be followed by something called in on the omnibus thatd an would push spending into sometime next year. in 2011 the past of the budget control act. those caps are still in place and the republicans want to undo the dispense -- undo the defense caps. fight for later in the year. the question about the cr is how long. we do not know what it looks like or if it will have planned parenthood on it or the length of time. host: other deadlines coming up, the highway funding deadline coming up october 29. another debt ceiling fight likely in the works mid december. all going to be covered by "the hill." appreciate your help this morning. guest: thanks for having me. host: we are showing viewers live shots of capitol hill this morning were preparations are underway for the pope's visit later this week. the pope speaking in a meeting of congress on thursday at 10:00 a.m. we are asking viewers this morning, do you consider religion when evaluating candidates? an already heated 2016 battle. your thoughts on religion and politics, in particular t

that requires passing an omnibus bill that will keep funding at the current year's level going forward or we will have a shutdown. host: with a couple weeks left in the fiscal year, what are the main sticking points? how come only half of the bills have been acted on? guest: the usual problems that we have in terms of deciding what level of funding the federal government should be operating at. forth aident had put budget back in the spring that increased funding for appropriations above what we call the caps that were established back in the 2011 agreement. congress wants to stay at those caps. the differences are around $40 billion in differences. the first issue is that we have a difference of opinion between the administration and the congress and what level of increased funding should happen in 2016. the second issue here is while congress,ship in speaker boehner and mitch mcconnell, clearly do not want to have a government shutdown operational,rnment the difficulty has come up with the issues such as planned parenthood, which i know you will be talking about later. that is fundin

will address this a cr may move through the house, work will begin on reconciliation, move toward an omnibusthe end of the year, you will see the funding components days -- take base. we would like to get in the numbers, and do some additional pairing back. and pearing back and reduction in spending we're just, wracking debt up like crazy, we have to do something with the entitlement, medicaid the largest. also looking at your trust fund. medicare, and social security. charles: right, senator brown. this establishment i my mind, bk on the heels, is there any chance that establishment reads the writing on the wall. puts a finger in the air, they are career politicians, do they understand what is happening across the spectrum of the republican party, there is no doubt where the momentum is. >> they do, they are good people on this conservative. and the problem is marcia said, there is a 60 vote flesh hold, with -- threshold, there has been many argument to blow it up and be like the house, senate of the the check and balance to a lot of the ups and downs of the house, for some of thesare issue

your motto is omnia omnibus, which is all things to all men that sounds exhausting.ops about climate change? >> well, we're trying to propagate the mission, or the message of pope francis. >> stephen: that was a papal encyclical. what did he say? >> he basically said we have to talk. he invites the world to a dialogue about the condition of our common home, which is the earth. and he says our time at home is in a bit of disrepair, and he says we have to get the relationships right. we have to get the relationships right with our-- with our earth, relationships right with our fellow brothers and sisters, and our relationships right with god. and when those relationships break down in any area, then we're in hot water. >> stephen: rising hot water, actually, is what are you looking for. is this particularly important to you as the archbishop of miami to do something about global warming because your diocese will disappear eventually. >> eventually. and we already have problems on miami beach with the king tides and miami beach has put in pumps to pump out the water so

then an omnibus.then we'll throw in the kitchen sink, and representative tom cole, who is a good friend, smart guy, ph.d. in political science, i think. he said before we went in on recess -- we've got three really tough votes coming up. we're going to break the budget caps, break the debt ceiling, and we have to do something with this six-year long-term transportation funding. how do you avoid taking three tough votes on those three, any one of which could cause headaches? well, you throw them all into one. i'm on the record giving numerous town halls. i predicted this six months ago, exactly what would, because it's on the calendar. at the end of this, there's this shiny object in planned parenthood. it's a false narrative. you find a shiny object to blame on the budget process. d.c. likes to break budget caps because they like to grow government. the virginia school, one of our noble laureates, he said the government's no different than you or me. we want to maximize happiness, individuals. firms w

either continuing resolution, or an omnibus appropriations bill, or a debt ceiling increase. each of those three are didn't must pass votes. and if you actually want to change law, those are the only folks of doing so. but i mentioned before you've got one side that is preemptively surrendered. republican leadership has said will never ever, ever shut down the government and suddenly president obama understands easy key to winning every battle, he simply has to utter the word shut down and republican leadership runs to the hills. so president obama demands of congress fund every bit of obamacare, 100% of it, and do nothing, zero, for the millions of americans who are hurting, lost their jobs, lost their health care, who have been forced into part-time work, millions of young people who have seen their premiums skyrocket. president obama says you can do nothing for the people that are hurting. senate democrats say we don't care about people who are hurting. we will do nothing for them. and here's the kicker. president obama promises to be try to do anything on obamacare i, bar

fiscal year ends and we have to have a continued resolution to take us forward as we prepare for our omnibus bill which will take us through the next year. >> what was it like at the first ever address of a pope to a joint meeting of congress? >> so overwhelming. going beyond any expectation. >> i'm told you have a folder that captures all of your experiences with popes going back to pope pious the xii. >> when i was a girl in eighth grade, my family went to the vatican. my father was mayor of baltimore. and our family had a private audience. it was pretty exciting. >> let's talk about his message for a second. he made his position clear on his opposition to abortion, but he chose to emphasize other things. >> yes. it was interesting when he talked about the sanctity of life. well, we can all stand up and applaud that. but he spent a longer time talking about abolishing the death penalty, the opposite end of the issues that the bishops advocate for. >> how does somebody like you who is a very strong progressive, but also somebody steeped in catholic school, how do you reconcile the pope's vi

this year, we will see another omnibus.isasters for the agencies, and to dig into those bills, you see all this -- actually un-american legislating, what i would call, because you are putting little things and that nobody knows about. there is no transparency and they are discovered months after they are signed and in effect. so i think that having appropriation bills, not doing things that the constitution says, passing a budget on time -- what is not happening today is we are not having the discussion because the next election is so important that we can't there expose anybody to making hard choices. while this country was built on the backs of hard people making hard choices. and the fact that washington refuses to make hard choices today tells you that we need to send a whole group of new people here. i'm an advocate of hard term limits. there is a lay one of our founders that didn't believe in term limits. and the rest of them believed that you didn't need to put it in the constitution. and that was alexander hamilton,

vehicles virus can linger in their office hours of after omnibus if you could be affected doctors sayor an addition to the class the crash had to our web site kron4news-dot-com and will continue updating the story. >> reporter: is have temporarily fix the car line that came crashing down last friday for learning new details about exactly what happened piquancy that accelerator truck officials tell me that a truck a tower of held up electric lines and cause of lines the see of the the air to come crashing along highway 101 is see the wood line that's been put up the power pole temporary effects eventually it will have the power like that the distance again this temporary fix now in place. >> reporter: 1 effect of excessive damage luxury at a community complex you can see right here a fire ripped through it this and tyre area on the campus of a middle school out here this area class's were cancelled on this monday but hopes to reopen by tuesday. >> reporter: construction delays but the move met nicholas center threatened to terminate the contract there approved by taxpayers in 2009 figu

and so with that, obviously we see our existing authorities, title three under the omnibus crime control and safe streets act which gives us the authority to intercept real-time communications. we also have the foreign intelligence surveillance act does the same thing with national security investigations. search warrants, criminal search warrants, and being able to access devices, all of those orders signed by a judge that enables us to get access or at least authorizes us to get access, unfortunately we weren't able to execute them more and more because of this increasing problem, this increasing issue and challenge that we have in our investigations due to the proliferation of technology. but with all that said, i do want to make it very clear here today that we don't have a solution to that and we're not proposing a solution to that. in our opinion, from the government's perspective, we really need the companies to try to come up with the solutions, to try the build the most secure systems, yet at the same time when presented with an order, with a search warrant, or with a court orde

we are hearing now that we will resolutiona team that gets us to maybe early december and then an omnibusll throw in the kitchen sink and representative tom cole who is a good friend at a smart guy knows what's going on in the inside with leadership. he said before we went on recess that you should roughly expect we've got three tough votes coming up and we will pick the budget cap, increase the debt ceilin with no discipline attached, and we have to do something with this six-year transportation funding. how do you avoid taking three tough votes? throw them all into one. that's what i predicted before the recess. i'm on the record giving numerous town halls. i predicted this six months ago because it's on the calendar. plannednd of this, parenthood and these conservatives over here and it's false. this whole thing is constructed on the calendar ahead of time and you find a shiny object to blame on the budget process. to break budget caps because they want to grow government. in economics, we have the virginia school, one of our noel laureates in economics jim buchanan who just passed awa

when debating the 2004 omnibus appropriations conference report, senator byrd said, quote, "why so deferential to presidents? under the constitution, we have three separate but equal branches of government. how many of us know that the executive branch is but the equal of the legislative branch, not above it, not below it but equal." end quote. i wonder what the former senator from west virginia would think of the ways the president has sought to diminish the role of congress with regard to the iran deal? according to mr. dershowitz, those actions including declaring the iran agreement to be an executive agreement instead of a treaty or joint agreement, promising to veto any congressional rejection of the deal, agreeing to submit the deal to the u.n. security council before congress considered it or trying to marginalize opponents of the deal as politically motivated, and dribbing the only alternatives to the deal as iran quickly developing nuclear weapons or war with iran. another discussion i found interesting in the case against the iran deal relates to the president's assertion that if we

most people anticipate the omnibus of last december happening again just before we adjourn for the holidays that was before the planned parenthood video. now a ted cruz and rand paul threatening no budget ever until planned parenthood is zeroed out. which provides about a third of the birth control for american women. so a spike in abortions and stds. god knows where we are going to go. we read your paper and learn nothing from it. good to be optimistic about it. [laughter] michael: very clear and compelling. to take us out of the beltway, since we do have a national c-span audience and the nation is focused on this issue, we know the federal workforce is national. how would you make the same argument to a skeptic who was watching this in the midwest where there is a little federal presence and thinks the government is too big and too expensive and has a hard time feeling sympathy for a few days of furlough. i am caricaturing what some people would say but i know some have that thought. you both have good answers to that. for me, watching across the river, the essence is the existential fig

some of us after we did this omnibus where everything got funded but homeland security, and then we wereng to hold back funding for homeland security and hold it hostage so if the president was trying to fund his amnesty, we wouldn't fund homeland security. as soon as that happened -- i may look stupid, but i'm not that stupid. i knew what was going to happen. we were going to get down to the wire and we were going to be told we can't fail to fund the border control and the tsa. there were some people that were saying those are essential public employees. you know who decides that? the president. he decides who's essential. you think he wouldn't leave the border open if he didn't fund homeland security? it reminded me of that danny devito movie where bette midler is his wife and he can't stand her. we'll give you so many million dollars and we'll kill your wife. he said great. that's what it reminded me of. really? you would do that? that's awesome. not a good idea. the old saying is you never take a hostage that the other side wants you to shoot. that's how it goes. we knew what was com

do we need to put it -- can we wait until the omnibus at the end of the year because it looks like that's where we're headed. is the re-authorization of the transportation bill an appropriate way? but i would appreciate a specific recommendation as to the length of time that might be appropriate. is it six months? is it a year? is it two years? you deal with this every day. we're trying to deal with 100 things. i really would ask you to get back to us and provide some leadership there in terms of letting us know how industry can get this done. and i realize we spent a lot of time on this topic, so let me switch. let me be provincial, then, and ask you about gulf coast service. you know, the house and senate we haven't quite gotten a bill to the president's desk yet but i think would you acknowledge that we've made it clear in legislation that it is federal intent to have a working group formed to restore the gulf coast passenger service that we lost after hurricane katrina? would you agree with that that congressional intent is becoming clear based on the legislation so far? >> yes, sir.

what assurances would you want that the omnibus would not include sequestration -- what does that look like. what does the c.r. debate look like? ms. pelosi: the leverage we have is the president's veto and it's sustained by the unity of the house democratic caucus and the senate democratic caucus. so where the leverage springs from. you would hope it comes from a balanced approach to choices we have to make. nevertheless, wherever the lverage comes from, we will accept it. i have said that in the interest of getting the job done in a timely fashion, i don't know why we have to do things -- we are going to have a c.r. and then have a number. why aren't we trying to arrive at some number that we can from day one -- to enable us to finish our work. the term of the c.r. is not to bring our work the day the c.r. begins. my purpose in saying is saying we would like to reach a number. holy days, the pope and all of that, we can be working and communicating with each other about a ball park figure as to what we will be operating under as we go forward. the sequestration really is something th

which we need to deal with this week, the debt ceiling, a transportation bill, a budget agreement/omnibustenders. all five must be dealt with. and they're going to require a bipartisan coalition to pass them. everybody knows this going into the debates. i believe the next speaker and the next majority leader are going to have to come to a bipartisan agreement before they put the bills on the house floor and make this as least painful as possible. that's my view. >> do you think, though, that as we think about a government shutdown coming, you are on the house appropriations committee, is speaker john boehner right he is confident there's not a government shutdown come october 1st? >> i don't believe there will be a shutdown but accidents happen around here. it would be a terrible mistake to shut down the government. whether you like planned parenthood or not, that's not the issue. we shouldn't shut the government down over there. i believe that now that the speaker announced he is not serving the term, i think that takes pressure off and should lead us to a resolution and still could be d

we are anticipating a short-term spending bill will be followed by something called in on the omnibus thatd an would push spending into sometime next year. in 2011 the past of the budget control act. those caps are still in place and the republicans want to undo the dispense -- undo the defense caps. fight for later in the year. the question about the cr is how long. we do not know what it looks like or if it will have planned parenthood on it or the length of time. host: other deadlines coming up, the highway funding deadline coming up october 29. another debt ceiling fight likely in the works mid december. all going to be covered by "the hill." appreciate your help this >> is this marion berry's place? yeah he comes in here all the time. i went back to the office, called him up and said, i just went to club 55. don't you realize people are watching where you go and what you do, they say you sit there all the time and watch naked dancing girls. there was a pause on the phone and he said, it's nice, isn't it? ry this sunday night on "q&a," porter tom sherwood on corruption in governme

did you put bills on the president's desk to repeal obamacare for an omnibus energy bill, for tax reformd they're furious and that he helping to fuel the outsiders. >> let's spin the calendar forward beyond -- if many people believe that this makes a government shutdown less likely for the reasons we just talked about, let's spin the calendar forward to december 11th which is the date on which the debt ceiling has to be raised or the government could potentially go into default. does it make -- does his departure, john harwood, make that battle more fractious and contentious? >> i don't think it makes it more fractious. it might make it somewhat less because the scalp has already been claimed, which would have been on the line for the debt limit, but i do think it's a problem, and ultimately republicans aren't going to solve their governing problem until the faction that larry was just talking about comes to an accommodation with political reality and realizes what they can do and what they cannot do. what tactics will be counterproductive that will hurt the republican party, hurt their

saying -- so they put an amendment in the omnibus appropriations rider that just passed saying washington, d.c. may not spend a penny to tax or regulate this. and what they've done and this was done by a tea party republican from maryland named andy harris who wanted to make a name for himself so he inserted an amendment in the back room deal because he didn't have the votes in open debate and got that into the appropriations budget. but the initiative was self-enacted. so on the fourth when they voted for this, marijuana became legal to possess and to grow up to four plants and to have simple possession that became legal. republicans prevented us from regulating it now. so this is a really a extreme libertarian dream of having extreme mosh and not -- marijuana and not regulating it. i want more control over the substances and not less and keep them out of the hands of children to have good zoning policies, et cetera, et cetera. now we have -- we're probabling go to end up with a bit of anarchy. >> a bit of what? >> a bit of anarchy. and d.c. is important. because the voters passed this o

un autobÚs escolar, en houston, texas, desde un puente cayÓ el autobÚs, los metales retorcidos del omnibÚsn paÍs que se niega a cambiar los hÁbitos alimenticios. un reporte del gobierno revelÓ estas cifras nada alentadoras, y dijo que se trata de los mismos nÚmeros registrados aÑos atrÁs, tampoco se ha modificado la cantidad de calorÍas que los niÑos reciben de la comida chatarra, es asÍ como ante papas fritas, pizzas, hamburguesas y mucha grasa, la obesidad infantil sigue siendo de los problemas principales de salud para los estadounidenses. y precisamente en relaciÓn con ese informe de gobierno que alerta sobre la obesidad infantil en estados unidos, les queremos preguntÁramos todos ustedes ¿cÓmo controla el consumo de alimento de sus hijos de comida chatarra?. envÍenos sus comentarios a redes sociales utilizando el hashtag o etiqueta #preguntada, y mÁs adelante leeremos algunas de sus ideas, seguimos con mÁs de despierta amÉrica, adelante, chicos. johnny: que difÍcil es controlar, especialmente como nosotros vivimos, que vivimos tan ajetreados, que si los niÑos, que si la casa, que si l

there are a lot of questions about whether we can get any omnibus wrapping up fiscal year 2016 approachdecember or if there will be pressure and do a one-year cr. compared to putting the government on autopilot. we will go through some of these big questions that come up and the road. we will start with dale calling in. caller: i am calling in reference to the dysfunction of our government officials in washington, d.c. if i operated my business the way congress is, i would not have a license. it is almost like children playing in a sandbox. one thing i took away from the fact the pope addressed congress , the underlying message he tried to get across is unity and working together to get things done for the american people. same year, this is the problem. those of us who take care of citizens, assisted living it is unreal that people we elect, they are supposed to be intelligent people. integrity to do their job. this is what this is about. it is not republican or democrat going on. -- i am a registered democrat -- i am watching donald trump. honest, we are tired of the so-called people

that requires passing an omnibus bill that will keep funding at the current year's level going forward will have a shutdown. host: with a couple weeks left in the fiscal year, what are the main sticking points? how come only half of the bills have been acted on? guest: the usual problems that we have in terms of deciding what level of funding the federal government should be operating at. forth aident had put budget back in the spring that increased funding for appropriations above what we call the caps that were established back in the 2011 agreement. congress wants to stay at those caps. the differences are around $40 billion in differences. the first issue is that we have a difference of opinion between the administration and the congress and what level of increased funding should happen in 2016. the second issue here is while congress,ship in speaker boehner and mitch mcconnell, clearly do not want to have a government shutdown operational,rnment the difficulty has come up with the issues such as planned parenthood, which i know you will be talking about later. that is funding for

we should be doing, it's all going to be cobbled together in one monumental matter, one monumental omnibus bill or continuing resolution, the president's going to veto the entire government funding because he doesn't want $28 million. he wants it to be spent like he wants it to. so i think we should tell the president, mr. president, you've got your powers. you can sign an agreement not valid beyond your tenure with iran even though we disagree with it. substantial majority in both houses oppose it. but apparently you have the lawful authority to do so, but you don't have the lawful authority to spend money on an entity, not even a government entity that congress chooses not to spend money on. this is our business. we're in a bad trend here of congress just capitulating in favor of the executive, by any historical standards. i've never seen a more supine pong. so shall we fund this program? i say no, don't put it in there. and i think we should send a note to the president, dear mr. president, we funded the defense department, we defended medicare, we defended medicaid, defunded it. hundre

do we need to put it -- can we wait until the omnibus at the end of the year?oks like that's where we're headed is this -- is the reauthorization of the transportation bill in an appropriate way. but i would appreciate a specific recommendation as to the length of time that might be appropriate. is it six months? is it a year? is it two years? you deal with this every day. we're trying to deal with 100 things so i really would ask you to get back to us and provide some leadership there in terms of letting us know how industry can get this done. and i realize we spent a lot of time on this topic so let me switch -- let me be provincial then and ask you about gulf coast service. you know, the house and senate, we haven't quite gotten a bill to the president's desk yet but i think -- would you acknowledge that we have made it clear in legislation that it is federal intent to have a working group formed to restore the gulf coast passenger service that we lost after hurricane katrina? would you agree that that congressional intent is becoming clear based on the legi