little bit about what we do. to kick things off, let me ask you a question. if i ask you, do you want to live in a country that maximizes peace and stability and well-being for all its citizens, i'm pretty sure your answer would be yes. believe inu, do you integrity, respect, responsibility and tolerance, and that they are important qualities to have, both as a person and as a nation, again, i'm pretty sure your answer would be yes. if i ask you what was the best way for us to promote and preserve these qualities, my guess is the answers would start to vary. that's because there are remarkably different and competing views on how to achieve those goals. that's what i want to talk to you a bit about this morning. for example, one vision is a vision that believes in life, liberty, and the pursuit of with minimal interference from government. another vision leaves most decision-making within reasonable limits to the individual. believesfferent vision that government must actively intervene. it's a vision that believes

and i'm at a loss almost to do that. need to connect him to the right places where he can take his passion and skill and go develop it. whether that is concept like the bunker, we've been talking to the bunker, other acceleratetors out there and help them thrive and as private organization i can come back and procure in source with them. >> what is recida doing? >> i have resources greg. i won't take too long, i promise. every community sba is there with free mentoring to counseling and legal advice and taxes. that is where you send them. >> what is first data doing? >> first data has been leading the charge with coalition of veteran-owned business which is first of kind platform to support veteran, service member, military spouse, small businesses by connecting them to entrepreneurial education and training. small business resources and products and opportunities for commerce and supply chain. and it was built ponch like the 100,000 jobs mission was bringing companies together to wanted to hire veterans and military spo

>> and we just tried to plea with him not to do what he was thinking to do. >> taking somebody else's life ain't worth it. if you do something to her it's worse. i mean it's going to be worse! you'll never see her again! you got a whole baby to think of. taking somebody else's life ain't worth it. >> at one point he starts looking outside. >> he saw the police, he was like "you guys called the police on me? i'm like "no, no, it's alright, it's alright." and the police was like "get out, get out get out! and i was like "oh my god, why?" >> get out of the house now. get out to the roadway! out to the roadway! >> get off of me! >> at that point he snatched her, and i ran out the house. >> he grabbed her. >> and then i heard the first gunshot, and then the second gunshot went off. >> the second shot was peter killing himself. >> "mama" >> that's kiya. >> we are with kiya and her kids every day. we talk every day. so it's noticeable that she's not here. it's noticeable that she's not in this circle right here, talking. you don't only hurt that person, you don't only take someone else's lif

so, the main thing to do is to look. if you see that a tick is just crawling, you can pick it off and remove it. >> okay, so we find one of these blood suckers on us. what do we do? >> if you see that a tick has started to -- is attached and it's not easy to take off, then what you need to do is get a tweezers and gently and slowly pick it at the body, the fattest part of it, and slowly remove it. >> so, how can you tell if you have a disease from a tick? >> so, tick illnesses can present in lots of different ways. fevers with others. the main thing to do is, if you've been bitten by a tick, once you've removed the tick and you are concerned that it's been on your skin for a long period of time, because it takes time for the tick to be able to actually transmit a disease, you can bring it to your doctor. you can call your doctor and let them know that you have a concern. if you do remove the tick and are going to bring it to your doctor, put it in a ziplock plastic bag just in case, per chance, it's still alive. [ chuckle

i just wanted to do it because i feel fortunate that i get to do something like this. and then we see it's actually good, it gets extraordinarily rewarding. >> rose: do you think the pope will see the film? >> that's a great question. right now, i haven't anticipated a reaction from the church. that said, we heard the vatican radio that they had not endorsed the film but had nice things to say on it. i'm not an expert but talking to organizations like snap who are an organization of survivors, their thing is they're just looking for more transparency in the church and more action, that they get into changing practice and policy and we're all excited about how pope francis is talking and speaking. he sounds inclusive and forward-thinking. >> rose: willing to take on some of the power in the church. >> absolutely, but i can't imagine a greater cause than taking observe the wellfare of children. i think this is something people on both sides are saying it happens. >> i think this keeps the focus on clergy sex abuse because the church needs to do more on the issue and all t

that's what we need to do. we lost over 400 young men and women last year just in the military to suicide. we lost over the 22 veterans yesterday, the day before, and the day before and we want to get it to zero. so trevor and john, thank you. to our panelists, thank you so much. thank you for your son -- sons who have served, for all your family has sacrificed and we're incredibly grateful for your help in trying to provide answers. thank you very much. [ applause ] >> thank you again senator donnelly for your comments and your true leadership in the united states senate to pro vent suicide among our veterans, military personnel and provide support to their families. next i'd like to introduce yoki dreazen. >> good morning. it's a pleasure to be with you on this rainy, rainy day. setting aside journalistic objectivity for a moment, senator, your leadership on this is a wonderful thing to see. i wish you were frankly not so often standing by yourself on an issue that matter a much as this one does. i want to tal

you got to trust the process. i do it to save jobs, and i do it to make money. thanks for your business. this is "the profit." just about 15 miles south of pittsburgh in a small town called mcmurray, pennsylvania, there's a fast casual restaurant known as my big fat greek gyro. michael: what can i get for you? woman: gyro and fries. lemonis: husband and wife mike ference and kathleen kamoyerou... kathleen: they prefer our sauce. lemonis: ...started the business 10 years ago. kathleen's parents emigrated from greece. man: we used to make the gyro by hand. lemonis: and she wanted to celebrate the culture and enjoy the food she grew up with. man: it's one of the best. period. lemonis: and mike wanted to turn the gyro into the next big thing in fast casual dining. they've already sold four franchises around the greater pittsburgh area. andreas: if you could just sign that for me. lemonis: and now kathleen's sons, michael and andreas, are in the process of buying the original flagship store. andreas: it's what happens when you got two young, strong bulls who are read

so, there are four things we are basically trying to do. this is one of the reasons why i chose to become the speaker. number one with, i want the house. >> you actually appear to be kicking and screaming. >> it was not what i had planned on doing. it was not my first idea. but i basically talked with my colleagues and realized that i had a duty and obligation to do this because i think the moment for our country is just so dire. number one, i want the institution to work like the founders intended it to. we have other 100 amendments just this week on the highway bill. we open up the process so everyone's representative can participate in the process. that wasn't happening. number two, in order to do things for the country now, we have to see if we can find common ground without compromising our principles to advancertjt ideas. number three, i think we need to do a better job of being an opposition party. catherine was just talking about you know fort hood. we need to do a better job of holding this government accountable bringing more trans

we need to do more. clearly, we need to do more. think we need to incentivize business leaders to actually do this, because it is great for the business. and i am convinced that it is going to be not just good for the woman but good for the companies. francine: in three years, where will you be? and where will the bank be? ana: so we are setting ambitious targets. so we want to be, in terms of financial targets, i think in a very ambitious place, but very importantly, i want us to be the best bank in many more markets. so we are already the best -- and when i say the best, the best for our people, customers, shareholders, and communities. i think in some of the smaller countries, like portugal or chile, we are already there. we want to be there in many more of our 10 core markets. and we define "best" as i said, not just for our shareholders, but for all of our stakeholders. francine: ana botin, thank you so much for speaking to bloomberg. ana: thank you so much. francine: thank you. ♪ >> coming up on "bloomberg best ," thee stories

to say, you got me. i don't even know what i'm doing. ay. >> we got to go. >>> outrage over a terror propaganda assignment for middle school students, stay tuned. i have asthma... ...one of many pieces in my life. so when my asthma symptoms kept coming back on my long-term control medicine, i talked to my doctor and found a missing piece in my asthma treatment. once-daily breo prevents asthma symptoms. breo is for adults with asthma not well controlled on a long-term asthma control medicine, like an inhaled corticosteroid. breo won't replace a rescue inhaler for sudden breathing problems. breo opens up airways to help improve breathing for a full 24 hours. breo contains a type of medicine that increases the risk of death from asthma problems and may increase the risk of hospitalization in children and adolescents. breo is not for people whose asthma is well controlled on a long-term asthma control medicine, like an inhaled corticosteroid. once your asthma is well controlled, your doctor will decide if you can stop breo and prescribe a dif

they want people who want to do the right thing and work but those who want to work can go do something somewhere else there are people willing to come into ruth the v.a. to work. yes. >> bank's breuer excellent questions. [applause] >> you can do anything you want to. if you get paid after due the first lady is supposed to do. but you can do anything that you want. is such a great opportunity solidifies the first lady to do what she wants to do she will be criticized a matter what you do. the white house poured tea have a reception i would have been criticized. and i got a lot of criticism but you learn to live with that. never let it influence the. >> texas legislators and officials talk about the hispanic vote and its role in upcoming elections. as well as voting rights and turnout across the country. from the annual texas tribune festival in austin, this is about one hour. >> good morning, i'm a reporter with the texas tribune. i'm happy to welcome you to the fifth annual texas tribune festival. we are happy that you decide to spend your saturday with us and you are here with 8:30 a

that's what you're trying to do, connect americans. you're going to be as cost effective as you can and use your budget as effectively as you can. do it in an efficient way. the fcc is making progress in this. i think that's really good. >> that comes with as i mentioned earlier, with levels of pr risk. >> absolutely. >> which is probably why you see some people, you know, wanting to stay within a known quote/unquote measurable framework. and that's part of i think of what outside forces could help us with. because we will never get close to nirvana by doing things the same way that, you know, a -- work marginally. i will continue to push that even again that target grows. >> there's actually an interesting difference between -- because i was involved in both of these things. the part of the problem with rus in transition was they had to do things that were timely targeted and temporary. part of the changes at the fcc reflect that we were a bell to step back with the plan. with the help of folks like scott and you and others actually bu

had the ability to do it. i think that unifies us. >> in terms of doing things differently, the last vote, you voted for the budget deal, after saying long and loud, this whole thing stinks. >> it did. i think the process stunk. here's what happened. >> but ooii've talked to severa republicans, if you can say that about the budget deal and yet vote for it, then under your speakership, it will be business as usual. >> my colleagues who know me think differently. we were coming up to a deadline on tuesday where we could have had a potential default. we were coming up with a deadline on appropriations on december 11th. what happened was leadership presented us with a bill a few days beforehand. we should not be doing business that way. i've been the first among many to discuss that. what i think we need to do as a republican congress is develop a strategy early on and involve all members of our conference so we can think about these issues ahead of time and not get right up to the deadlines to prosecute a strategy

attraction is the answer to the question what do i need to add to in order to give for? an exact parallel with that inverse deduction, deduction is how you from doing that is the human and humans are mortal. this is going from the general knowledge here about humans to the specific -- the inverse of that is saying if it's in my data that is human and i also know that socrates is mortal but am i missing an order to be able to go from one to the other? of course the answer to that is i need to know that humans are mortal. these rules are written in english and computers don't understand english at supper the computer the rules are written in formal logic. the general idea is the same. then you can learn a bunch of these rules from different data and then you can do something that none of the other paradigms can do which is even combined rules in arbitrary ways to answer new questions to things that you have never seen before. this is the basic idea behind symbolism. here is an example of what you can do with symbolic learning. guess who the biologist in this picture is. it'

what are you going to do? >> move legislation through my committee, not just on arming the kurds, but also on the issue of a safe zone and we're also going to try to push this administration to use air power effectively and hit the isis targets. >> thank you. >> thank you. >> thank you very much for joining us. we want to get to eric shawn who will give us context on this impending bill in the senate. good morning, eric. >> good morning, everyone. so how do we respond to this human catastrophe? the choice seems to be balancing a humanitarian welcome with the fears of terrorism. >> if you lay terre wier it witd more bureaucracy, that doesn't actually make us safer because it doesn't do a better job of screening. but simply makes it almost impossible to have process individuals who are coming in, then you're effectively ending the refugee program for people who desperately need it. >> we have been here before. millions desperately fleeing turmoil for the safety of our american shores. during the holocaust, the ms

want to know about the "times"? do you want to know why they don't have a better section here, whether there is somehow a kind of bias that kind of is not readily available? do you want to know whether they're influenced by forces that we don't recognize, having to do with training, experience? what do you want to know in an investigation of the "new york times"? >> i think if i was in outside media journalist and wanted to do an investigation of the "new york times," i would probably examine how fit the "new york times" is, how well built it is and its strategies for the future, to survive in the future. >> rose: this is about survivability. >> yeah. >> rose: this is not about report. >> i don't think there are any -- i don't think most people who are honest -- >> rose: you've got to. here's why. because you want to make the paper better. >> yeah. >> rose: to make the paper better, you have to find the weaknesses in the paper and fix them. >> that's a big chunk. >> rose: exactly. that's right. so that's what i would i

what we have to do to improve all this life. how can we in good conscience continue this quote sure raid of responsibility knowing what we are doing to their future. if i had time i would get into the fiscal gap and of the implications of that and what the implications of the debt is on the fed and how they are irresponsibly printing money and low interest rates are hurting the airport and the middle class, putting money into a savings account, held them to make money, people who have a risk tolerance which allows them to do that and talk about regulations and how every single relation costs money for goods and services and impacting the middle class here and poor people, doesn't matter for wealthy people with a bar of soap goes up $0.10 but it matters a lot for poor people, you think about that regulatory burden and who is hurting. it goes on and on and on. we are promoting the general welfare. those of the kinds of things we have to be thinking about and thinking about mechanisms for allowing the downtrodden in our society to e

i want to do better. he challenge is channeling that energy into something that's a legitimate enterprise and then also like literally, like figuring out a way to get them, you know, just the sort of basics like a halfway house, my halfway house was worse than my prison. i don't know what yours was like. but my halfway house was crazy. you know. and when you put people right back in that place, you know, 650,000 people every year come back to the doorsteps of our communities, the same communities where they've already failed except now they've got the added stigma of a prison record and they're broke and they have to pay for their halfway house rehab, and they have to pay for their drug testing, and they have to pay for transportation and clothes to look decent at a job interview. it surprises me sometimes that one out of, you know, three people don't reoffend. you know, how they're able to get back on their feet. you know, we need much -- we need practical, we need therapy, you know, therapeutic resources

i do want to talk about the debate. there's a big meeting in northern virginia, talking about changes in debates going forward at the debacle on wednesday. what changes do you want to see? >> i want smaller groups on the stage, better questions, and let us all be heard from equally. reince priebus is a good man, he's rebuilt the republican party, but this debate structure is not leading to the best candidate coming out of the debates. i would like smaller group, all of us be herd equally, ask better questions, if we do that we'll get the best nominee to win a election we can't afford to lose. if we continue with this process, i think at the hurt our chances for winning in 2016. >>> thank you for joining us. sorry you didn't get the extra hour of sleep, but hope you enjoy the football game. >> i will. thank you. >>> paul ryan, the party's former vice presidential nominee, takes the top job and is vowing to change the way congress does business. earlier i sat down with to discuss the new plans. you said you wanted party un

we are setting up the mechanisms to do that. i take your question to be a more programmatic question. we are talking about that more. we clearly need to do something significant with that. millions ofipate visits to that site, given where it is. question,technical because we did not get to the research arm of the smithsonian so much, although you mentioned it earlier the cutback in basic resources of the federal government. and how that is perhaps the string future innovations -- destroying future innovations if we don't have that type of funding. talk, if you would, about the astrophysics observatory. one of the lesser-known parts of these missoni and. what it's doing and why basic research funding is so important for someone like that. -- lesser-known parts of the smithsonian. skorton: let me first tackle the conceptual question of basic research. it was brought up earlier in some of the questions raised. we have this view of progress in science as being this linear process, where a mad scientist is sitting somewhere undergroun

a lot of talk about what's the best way to do it. they have the flexibility under dodd-frank to taylor these enhanced prudential regulations for the size of the bank. i have a list of banks, bank holding companies, $10 million and above the comprehensive and capital analyze review process we've been talking about. this is what we hear from our banks as to expense involved in that. governor tur realillo said 1$10 billion and above and you have additional regulations. and mr. tarullo said that is way too low and said something north of 1$100 billion. we considered a committee, i did not vote for it, would have used a different approach. would apply an activities-based approach. what's your view of that? is there a better way to do it? and part of that question is, do you have the authority -- i heard you say earlier you do not have the authority to appropriately taylor these c car process for some smaller and community banks. >> by and large we have considerable ability to taylor what we do to fit the complexity and systemic footprint o

that's what we ought to be doing when you look at it. one of the things is we know what to do. but we don't move ahead and do it. now why would a model of data county, why is it more frequent out of the country. it's all about political will. we need people to want our education system to make sure that we treat the child and recognize the come from a traffic background. they will never absorb the literacy. we need social and emotional learning. we need to be in on this stuff so we can solve these problems if we have the political will. there is no shortage of solutions what is missing is the political will. >> host: the stigma is that they got more weakness and they don't get of the bootstraps. >> guest: there is no constituency here. the perception they don't know if they are anonymous. by the way the rest of us are anonymous which is also killing us because we know we have the perception in this town in the power. many are in long-term recovery and no one knows about it. you've got a fraction of those people to be politically active. >> there is no reason why the tail can fla

findwe need to do is to what would you do to get rid of these guns on the streets that are in the homes that are inadvertently killing youngsters in their homes? what will you do to help us out with that? ,rs. clinton: this is an issue i think we have to address. i understand how politically challenging it is. oureople a day die in country from guns. homicides, suicides, and avoidable accidents, like the gentleman was referring to. it is imperative that people make this a voting issue. i know that we can balance the legitimate rights of gun owners with the right to be safe going to school or going to church. the right to have more control peopleat happens -- going to stores buying guns, people that shouldn't have them. we need universal background checks for real. need to close the gun show loophole. close the online loophole. people are buying guns and ammunition online. you have no idea who they are. some of the mass murderers, that is how they got what they used. we need to close the charleston loophole, it is unfortunately what enabled the young man to get a gun he was not entitled

i will try to do that quickly. so, i will start by reading a little section of the introduction just to talk about what this book is about. so, health advocates start by asking some basic questions. how did products containing certainly inexpensive ingredients sure and water and not much else in the water comes from the tap for the most part, become multibillion-dollar industries and international brand icons x how did products that are essentially candy in liquid form come to be considered acceptable for children as well as adults to drink as a substitute for water? what do soda companies to overtly and covertly to discourage legislators and help officials from focusing on their products as targets of drink less messages? how do these companies promote that brand loyalty so intense that consumers of sodas will take to the streets to defend there in alienable right to drink as much sodas they want? and how do soft drink companies use their own version of the science to promote their products as essential for well-be

>> would i have preferred to be doing something else? certainly. but it is important to me. d when i think about the sacrifices that were made by those who preceded us in order that we might have the freedom that we have now, it's the very least that i can do. >> there's more to chris' interview on our website meetthepressnbc.com including a question on his recollections on the class he took at yale. let me go over to donald trump. he joins me by phone just hours after hosting "saturday night live." so, without further ado, live from new york, it's sunday morning with donald trump. mr. trump, welcome back to "meet the press." >> good morning, chuck. >> let me get your reaction. do you think this matters, what's going on here with dr. carson? >> i feel badly for ben. i've gotten to like ben. it's a tough thing. he writes a book where he went after his mother, wanted to hit her in the head with a hammer, hiting the friend in the face with a padlock, hard in the face, stabbing somebody only to be broken up by a belt buckle, which if you know about belt buckles, they turn and the

>> you know, look. [ laughter ] it's really hard to do this. you start with something, that doesn't necessarily mean you'll stick with it all the way because you get feed pack. he's obviously trying to continue to relate to the republican electorate -- >> jimmy: sounds like he's running a handyman business. should be on the side of a van. >> you know, if i were to advise him i'd say, you know, there's a lot you can do about trying to fix things and maybe they should put a number on the side of the bus. >> jimmy: that would be nice. >> for people to call. >> jimmy: toll-free number. >> like me calling the white house they'd say, what, wait, what do you mean, i don't know if i can get that plumb they are or not. >> jimmy: ben carson is a guy who came out of nowhere and he's made a number of controversial statements. i'll go through quickly. he said evolution is a theory from satan. he said ohm care is like slavery. he said homosexuality is a choice and he knows this because people go into prison straight and come out of prison gay. yesterday he sa

i'm going to do everything i can to make sure every woman in every job gets paid the same... ...as the men who are doing that job. r i'm hillary clinton p [ cheers and applause ] >> jimmy: hello, gang. welcome back. hillary clinton and bob odenkirk and david cross or the way. first, as many of you witnessed earlier tonight on angst bc, we had a new episode of "scandal," a very popular show now but shonda rhimes, creator of the show, originally conceived it as a teen-oriented drama. the teen drama, they never aired till we got ahold of them. we premiered first episode. i'm delighted beyond word to high." >> previously on "scandal high." >> hey. >> i'm openly gay. >> i'm gay too. >> consider yourself unfollowed. >> no! good day to you >> it's election season at scandal high. and with no one else on the playing field, hunter ulysses whitman thought he had the game in the bag. >> vote for me, save a tree. >> vote for me, save a tree. >> until an unexpected interception. >> vote for me, save a tree. >> but this is a tree. >> just -- vote for me, save a tree. >> that's your slogan? burn. >>

emily: are you going to do human testing yourself? pharma will react best if we can come to them with a compound with some data about how it is functioning. there is a much higher likelihood of success if we can actually come with that level of information and help move that forward. emily: so that means you would do human testing? anne: not physically right here, but we would start some of our own clinical research, for sure. emily: there is competition out there. ancestry.com the something similar. do you see google and calico as competition? anne: no, everything we do here is focused on genetics and engaging the consumer and making really engaging products for them. calico is focused on anti-aging, but i always wish all these companies will expand the entire industry, and i want to translate it into meaningful therapeutics, so we can come back and say that hepatitis c has been cured, or that we developed a cure for lupus. my success moment will be when we have that kind of cure, that came because millions of people came together and

they will never be able to manage but what they should be able to do is set to the standards. our dod facilities and other facilities and we let the private sector do what it does best and we audit and make the changes because, again, i don't care what i hear today, i am convinced cannot fix the system that will continue to fail. i yield back. >> i think the administrator along with the thousands of people serving. when problems arise, you must be able to tend to it swiftly and appropriately. we ask they act an appropriate way prior to getting on an airplane. i look forward to the hearing testimony today. we now recognize mr. cummings of maryland. much. -- thank you very againood to have you here on this very critical issue. i would also like to thank mrs. rover. i want to welcome the administrator. when i served at the subcommittee -- as a admiredttee chairman, i the technical expertise and the steady, determined leadership. theuding dealing with deepwater horizon oil spill. i'vesure he remembers -- called the coast guard back again and again to ensure accountability and every

what are you going to do? >> well, someone asked me that the other day and i said i haven't thought about it. he said, haven't thought about it? you've had 30 years of no spare time. you're going to be in a position where you're going to have nothing but spare time. you better be thinking about it. i won't fail retirement. i'll try to stay active, but the colleagues that have been up here, democrats and republicans alike, were very endearing to me. and i apologize, peter, to you and your staff. i'm coming down with my late summer/early autumn cold. >> what are you going to miss most about capitol hill? >> tomorrow, i'm scheduled to go to meet with a judicial conference at the supreme court. we meet with them periodically. i'll miss meeting with them. i will not miss my weekly trek to the airport. i recall, peter, several years some months ago -- actually, it's been some years now. i was being driven to the airport by one of our staffers for rural randolph county. 95 degree day. you can see the sun is my enemy.

we were going to do all new stuff. we didn't know what it would be. that's one reason we didn't want to call it "mr. show." we wanted a new title. in the end, all these great actors, paul tompkins, jay johnston, jill telly, tom kenny -- >> jimmy: all these people have gone on to become famous. >> do all kinds of things. tom is sponlg bob. >> we were lucky -- >> jimmy: that's the voice of sponge upon. not the dirty spongebob you saw outside, walking in. >> that is also tom. and we're excited to work together again. did i mention brian poepain? john ennis. wonderful actors. and writers too. they all came back. we made a really fun show. >> jimmy: well, i'm very excited. it comes out on my birthday, to me. it's very good to see you guys on the show. >> it took a little wrangling to get netflix to do it on your birthday, it was not easy. >> jimmy: can i tell you, i really appreciate it. >> happy birthday to you. >> jimmy: thank you very much. [ cheers and applause ] >> jimmy: bob odenkirk and david cross! "with bob and david" premieres november 13th on net

we want to accomplish? do we want to try to transfer income from one group to another, or do we want to try to increase penetration rates? and i think the bigger bang for your buck is to concentrate on the greater number of people who have access to your network. that leads to the second point that low income households have a very difficult time with up front payments. which is important when it comes to computers. so they got rid of the link-up program, which was up-front funding. there are issues being addressed in this next round of rule making to take care of the fraud and abuse. but moving money from reducing the monthly charge to moving it to the up front will do two things. one, it addresses that issue of the ability to fund up-front payments, and two, it's better targeted. because it would be targeted at people who doesn't have sn't ha. so we think these moves could improve the efficiency of the system, reduce costs. >> i'm sorry to be rude early, but that's me. i said hello, and that was the nicest.

i just want to make sure, i was given a second chance. and i would do everything and give back everything to have them back. i would trade places with them. and any second. so my goal in life is to remember them and speak about them like you are doing, by i'm so grateful, so grateful. and be a belter person cuz i get to live for them and for the rest of my life, they are every day they will be next to me, supporting me. and i will make sure that i do my best to honor them and their family (applause). >> stephen: when did you know that you were going to survive? i assume you were knocked out by the blast. >> i was. i was thrown about 15 to 20 feet. so i came back to it a couple of minutes later. i was in shock. so you kind of-- it comes back to you and are you there laying on the ground. i had an assault backpack that was keeping me up a little bit. and i saw my leg and i realized that i was probably going to lose it. so at that point i just, you know, i assessed the situation, more wounds. and i looked at my leg. i thought i must have stepped on an ied.

that is our intent is to do more with that to engage the staff early on and do work differently in spaces. >> i just want to compliment staff and yourself for such a comprehensive report you brought forth summarizing what happened in the past, what we have not funded in the past, what has to be funding and having all the document in one document for us so thank you very much. >> no public comments request and we can move to item laevl which is other business. >> commissioners any other business that anybody wants to bring up at this point in time? if not we can go to the next item. >> item 12, report back on the october 27, 2015 san francisco general hospital jcc meeting. >> i think generally we reviewed the aneral report that you will be seeing at our next meeting and that included also look ath the environment of care and the performance improvement policy and provision of care policy which you will all see and be prepared to vote for. we did get a update on the rebuild and reminding everybody that november 21 is the ribbon cutting ceremony and more information will come with that. we a

we barely have expertise to do what we are doing today. we have no expertise on content. only thing we ever created was a charlie chat. i would sit and talk to our customers like this when i was ceo and it was a pretty bad show. that is the best we have ever done. betty: have you reinstituted that? charlie: i haven't. the phone is not ringing off the hook to bring back the show. betty: that wraps up this special "titans at the table" conversation with charlie ergen. you can find more episodes of our show on bloomberg.com, along with coverage of today's news and conversation with the world's business leaders. i am betty liu. thank you for watching "titans at the table." ♪ the only way to get better is to challenge yourself, and that's what we're doing at xfinity. we are challenging ourselves to improve every aspect of your experience. and this includes our commitment to being on time. every time. that's why if we're ever late for an appointment, we'll credit your account $20. it's our promise to you. we're doing everything we can to give you the best experience possible. be

i do it to save jobs, and i do it to make money. this the profit. [hip-hop music] ♪ pro-fit is a small group personal training studio located in the town of dyer, indiana. while national gyms offers huge facilities and the latest equipment, small gyms like pro-fit offer a much more personalized service in a less intimidating environment. >> we concentrate on doing one thing because without trainers, you can't get results. >> michael sena has been in the fitness industry for over 35 years... >> change direction. >> first as a body builder, then as a personal trainer. >> i was a personal trainer before there was a personal training industry. i'm a book author, fitness product inventor. it's really been the michael sena show. >> his wife, tina, who owns 50% of the business, is also a personal trainer, as well as a fitness competitor. >> use your core. >> five years ago, the senas spent $75,000, their entire life savings, to build pro-fit. the business has not only drained their bank account... >> i'm really uncomfortable with the fact that we're not se

they have a right to do that. george soros has a right to do that. it's interesting that when other organizations that don't match the ideology start doing that then i think some people take exception and you can't just have one standard for one side and one for the other. >> i am a democrat but not a progressive. some of us still exist. and in fact a lot of us know that the environmental movement is kind of coopted by a lot of marxists who use the environmental movement to get their agenda passed. you probablyy are in the trenches and i am wondering if you can give specific examples of where that's happened where you're producing energy but going against this coalition of arxism and environmentalism. >> i'm going to take a tact here that the environmental movement, you talk about the environmental movement in general it's ban good thing for this country in some respects. okay? when i was a kid, i'm old, when i was a kid people were throwing trash out the window. that's gone now. people are respecting the environment and treat it as something that we

we have to do a better job of to takeg our folks those jobs. >> what do you think you could do from here in washington to help those folks back home? rep. walker: i think the first thing we have to do is bring awareness to these situations. we have to talk about what the problem is. i believe action steps are very important. we launched an initiative where we have people from the ministry communities, business .ommunities we feel it is a very strong action step to break those gaps. that is in the district back in north carolina. >> is it a slightly different approach than the affordable ?are act rep. walker: it is because they -- because it is a long-term solution. i don't know if we have done anything that helps that particular issue or victim. a one-time thing is good and there is a place for that, but how do we look at this from a long-term approach were we can bring a benefit to these communities? are some of the overseas trips you have been on? studyalker: we went to some strategic missile defense shield with the prime minister of japan. one of the thing that concerns me is the kind

it's aifferent thing for to o us do to stop. >> jimmy: what are you going to do? do you have ideas of how you spend the year off that you're going to take? >> i think a lot of chilling out will probably happen. >> chilling, dude. >> jimmy: traveling seems counterproductive, probably, right? >> maybe. maybe, actually. >> maybe a little bit of traveling. we do go to a lot of places. i think i've driven past some of the biggest monuments in the world. but never actually stopped spied them. so it would be nice to go back to them. >> jimmy: can you go places, freely, killsdisguts urself and go somewhere? >> you can't, can you. you have to. >> this guy's so recognizable. >> jimmy: for the potato. >> he blends in sometimes. thanksgiving dinner, he's great. snea in the back. >> jimmy: do you celebrate thanksgiving? >> i in irand? no. >> jimmy: you don't. no. >> we'll be in america this time. >> jimmy: you will be america. >> i'll cook. >> can you cook? >> i'll try. >> he's a chef now. >> we're very thankful. >> jimmy: do you know what the traditional thanksgiving meal is?

so he has to do that. t of monthly bond purchases to go over the current 60 billion euros. he has to come through with that. then, the market is going to say, what next? mr. draghi has said he will do whatever is necessary at this stage so the market starts looking for more and more. that is the problem. i consider quantitative easing is comfortable best comparable to a type of drug addiction. we went through that for many years in the united states without being able to get off. we stopped qb, but then we had to resume again. now we are at zero interest rate and that has become an addiction. side, mr.opean draghi's went to find out that he cannot get off the situation. he has to keep increasing qb more and more and push interest rates to more negative levels without improvement in the economy or a pickup in the inflation rate. keri: this is keri geiger in your. on whatad a wish list you could ask mario draghi and janet yellen to do over the next 30-90 days and what you think needs to be done in order to ki

charlie: forcing people to pay. how dotack that, the funding that they have, the ability to sell the oil? we see a tax on that oil transfer taking place now after paris that did not take place before paris, which is your original question. this is one of the collateral damage questions. paris, there seemed to that, look, we don't want to destroy these oil tankers because that's infrastructure that is going to be necessary to support the people when isis is not there anymore. and it is going to create environmental damage. we did not go after oil wells that isis controls as we did not want to do environmental damage. -- because we did not want to do environmental damage. now we are hitting oil and trucks. maybe we get to the point where we have to also hit oil wells. those are the tough decisions we have to make. charlie: what is your mindset about rules of engagement? to think that they are too restrictive now. do you think they are too restrictive? mr. morell: i think so. the only reason i am positive, charlie, is because

but not paying attention to the standards but also as trars county texas is attempting to do so san francisco county we have a clean slate to start won the greatest minds and open sources to us i suggest we go ahead with that report it was presidential done if a block remaining this it should be removed one person at the meeting not on board was director john e.r. i thought we need to make sure the elections department is on board with the supervisors and the elections commission thank you. >> thank you very much. >> thank you. next speaker, please the commission sets the policy so not just the decision of the director. >> connect. >> good afternoon, commissioners john templeton here in san francisco oxford university of press historian i was the year dr. gilbert gave the presentation about the voting system it is in use ♪ wisconsin and other states primary so as you moved on the expected rfp i hope it would be amended so it does give the opportunity to move into open source as opposed to to repeating the mistakes in the past because the technology is where we had and i think

i think i've been able to do that in my state. that's the kind of leadership that you have to provide if there's going to be sense that special funds, special grants, special incentury tisecentives provided to encourage the rebuilding of troubled regional economies. i think a president can do that. >> governor, you're on a tight schedule. one last brief question and we'll wrap this up. >> with your emphasize on the massachusetts economy in your campaign, as you know that every time plant closes or something in massachusetts, it has the tendency or potential to become a big deal in the campaign. do you see any signs that the massachusetts economy is weakening, and if it did would that be a problem for you? >> let me say this, obviously, one of the things i bring to this campaign is a certain amount of experience. sfrl in dealing with serious economic problems. at the same time i take my responsibilitys as governor very seriously. i am working very hard to make sure that the kind of economic success that my state experience continues

you do not have to be a "modern dad" who's doing 50% of the household. it's whatever suits you, your priorities, your spouse's priorities, and what suits your family. so, if you want to go for that corner office, go for that corner office, but just be clear about what you're getting into and you understand the choices that you're making. and if you want to have more of a shared-care approach with your children and your spouse, well, then that's another set of choices, but at least we're making intentional choices, which is really the key to leading what's a successful balanced life. >> and what kind of conversation do you have with the children so that they understand that they're still number one, if you will, that they're still a very important part of a life or the most important part of a life and not second fiddle to the career? >> sure. well, i think the real important thing is to manage our time both at work and then outside of work, and make sure that we set aside chunks of dedicated family time where more spontaneous things can happen during thos

this is an opportunity to do it. don't get 5 million people watching you any day of the week. >> jamie joins us now. you interviewed him for a long time. not the first candidate to put out a book while they're running. what do you make of this book? >> no other candidate would put out a book like this. >> it's 700 pages of his e-mails as governor. >> they have to cut it down, he had more e-mails and it is authentic for jeb bush. that's what he is about. the problem is, does it tra translate to voters? >> he didn't seem to give any sense that he is going to stop going after marco rubio, though he wouldn't she is going after marco rubio. >> you criticize, but don't criticize. three times he said, would you get paid if you don't show up for work? so, there is no question that nonattack attack is going to keep coming. absolutely. and for the other candidates, as well. >> jamie, thank you so much. appreciate it. good to have you on. >>> joining me now anna navarro supporter of jeb bush and friend with marco rubio. it feels

we so i believe this is going to take us you'll working together we do this everyday we know how to document things and configure them it works all over the country's so strongly recommend we get back on track but we remain committed if so the point we're here we're not letting go but see this through to the end. >> thank you. appreciate that. >> commissioner walker. >> yeah. having heard that i have a strong preference to include our vendors in our current process to help us with coming forward with a list of qualifications or requirements i think that is not a senate thing to include them i agree that testing during the process is mute until we have our requirements agreed on and put in writing to it doesn't make sense to test something. >> shawn please. shawn. >> you know i just wanted to respond to what's been said for the last few minutes and respond for directly to some of the commissioners concerns that were raised actually that was good to hear from the vendors they agree will be layers upon layers and we need to begin the set of requirements the problem is if we

to that? sam: oh yes. for me, doingd was going back to myself, you have to find the kid that was taken by that world, the world of adults and danger, and sexuality, and 12,dness, that when i was it was a thrilling moment. i remember it vividly. youry and take away ingrained snobbery, which is there to some degree and has been there with bond over the aars because it is considered b-movie. there is all that, trying to find a way to view it. charlie: you said you can only ever point the camera at one thing at a time. tendencyink there is a -- charlie: to try to do too much. sam: at the same time. it's a personal thing. some film makers create the kind of whirlwind of energy which is to do with having multiple cameras but i can only concentrate on one thing at a time. if you don't you're going to work faster. you are not really sure what you're looking at. charlie: you are playing roulette with someone else's money. if you bet it all on black, you need to explain why. sam: yes. you knew to be able to explain. not that you