kate hartley pointed out in her e-mail earlier today that i hope you've seen and read them all this work is subject to multiple layers of review by the public, other government agencies. the public scrutiny on these deals is so great that there really isn't any-there's no confidential information that's hidden from it that wouldn't at some point be revealed anyway. the work we do is so transparent, so much in the full view of the public, the likelihood it's publicly perceived at some undue influence or unfair advantage is so small, especially when balance against public interest in having me work on these deals. you know, it's not like me going from the planning department to work for a for-profit developer. i'm trying to use city connections to make money again the system or going to work for some big corporate law firm. i'm trying to continue to do the important work i started here in the city. the executive directors report again with all due respect provides no analysis. it gives no weight whatsoever to any of the points i've raised. during all these considerations in denying the wai