and you wrote this slim volume by comparison for the layperson, so what compelled you to go from writing for doctors to writing from laypeople?ed you to go f >> well they said it was very clever to have this treatment program so i would have someone to chronicle what we did. to having elizabeth to work with was amazing so having the book readable is how she made it but there's another reason. first of all i think $100 billion is a lot of money. people who put it up know something about it. and they should know something about it the way it actually happen, nott an imaginary flowery language. second, there's nobody, is very fortunate, is there at the cancer institute before the act was signed. the the work that we did in part led to it, became director of the cancer institute so i ran it. i went out to the biggest cancer center in the country as a physician in chief and then i went to an elite university and was president of the american cancer society and then i got cancer myself. so i could describe the whole thing. given. given the fact that i think the public needed to know and i had

you wrote this relatively slim volume by comparison to the layperson .what compelled you to go from writing for doctors to writing for lay people about this? >> guest: she probably wouldn't say it.she said it was clever of us to develop a mock treatment program so we would have somebody to chronicle what wedid. having this to work with made it easier . that'sthe reason the book is readable , she made it readable but there's another reason. one is first of all, i think $100 billion is a lot of money and the people who put it up i think should know something about it and should know something about it the way it actually happened, not the imaginary flowery language. second is, there was nobody, i'm very fortunate. i was there at the cancer institute before the act was signed. the work we did in part led to it. became director of the cancer institute so i ran it then i went to the biggest cancer center in the country as position in chief then i went to elite university and then i was president of the american cancer society. i had cancer myself as if i didn't know enough about it. so i'm in th

to the layperson watching this, this is real life. it's a cafe in paris or a concert hall or an airport or a train station. it's so terrifying to think that these areas are so vulnerable. >> that's a lot of the key, what makes isis and other organizations so successful. you don't necessarily have to kill thousands. but the psychological effect, the fear, i mean, that's what these groups really trigger. the gut, the fear that makes you not want to go out of your house. then when they do that, they win. >> don, as always, thanks very much. >>> we have much more to get to this morning as we continue to cover this breaking news coming out of brussels in belgium. at least three explosions have rocked that european capital overnight. two at the airport, one on a subway train. many more developments headed we'll bring them to you as soon as we have an opportunity.e me n i56 bill slie i'm renre t rtliawmake ntn toow. t gislion ock the ndion die ovchlottounc. alge indidu u reatgnthei y.>>> we ore,beth h il>>does loo skun dbahomepeisarnd c32n m

not significant perhaps to layperson, law enforcement, you yourself, easily recognize this as a detonatorlove. >> easily recognizable to law enforcement and intelligence personnel and us in the west follow this. the gloved hand tightly grasping of luggage cart, two identical gloves next to each other, it is containing a detonator. if something happens to the person hand is gloved, tackled by police and shot by the police, they let go the bomb detonates. on top of that next to them is guy wearing a mask. this still we've seen is obviously a still. it is taken from a five-minute video. which was taken from a security camera on the ceiling of that room that they were in the a the airport. question, are security cameras there to help the police solve a crime and catch the bad guys after they do their deadly deeds, or is security cameras there so police can watch in real time and stop these things before they happen? so was someone watching this monitor and looking at that as it was happening? or was this on computer chip in somebody's, in a closet? patti ann: yeah. that is the question. you k

just this alone a little that gives me a portal into the layperson who's trying to do well, the labor organization or whomever it happens to be. >> i guess maybe i'm a lone wolf here. i think you over complex a simple issue. is it when some entity or individual decides it's going to go and make a communication, and the cost involved in making the communication is about $2500. they've got to report. now, whether they incur the $2500, i didn't know we had a 12 month-incurred two years ago, but they used what they pay for two years ago to try and influence the public on a given issue, it should be reported. >> when? >> when they initiate to medication. >> that'll were talking about it right now, if i read this, i think it's when two years ago when i paid for the study. i mean, if i read it for the first time that's what screams out to me. at the time incurred. >> but you have amended it and i think that amendment is good. the focus should be a person makes a payment when any expenditure and connection with a communication. or am i oversimplifying? >> nope. >> i think the chair has stated

just this alone a little that gives me a portal into the layperson who's trying to do well, the labor organization or whomever it happens to be. >> i guess maybe i'm a lone wolf here. i think you over complex a simple issue. is it when some entity or individual decides it's going to go and make a communication, and the cost involved in making the communication is about $2500. they've got to report. now, whether they incur the $2500, i didn't know we had a 12 month-incurred two years ago, but they used what they pay for two years ago to try and influence the public on a given issue, it should be reported. >> when? >> when they initiate to medication. >> that'll were talking about it right now, if i read this, i think it's when two years ago when i paid for the study. i mean, if i read it for the first time that's what screams out to me. at the time incurred. >> but you have amended it and i think that amendment is good. the focus should be a person makes a payment when any expenditure and connection with a communication. or am i oversimplifying? >> nope. >> i think the chair has stated

to the layperson watching this, this is real life. it's a cafe in paris or a concert hall or an airport or a train station. it's so terrifying to think that these areas are so vulnerable. >> that's a lot of the key, what makes isis and other organizations so successful. kill thousands. but the psychological effect, the fear, i mean, that's what these groups really trigger. the gut, the fear that makes you not want to go out of your house. win. >> don, as always, thanks very much. >>> we have much more to get to this morning as we continue to cover this breaking news coming out of brussels in belgium. at least three explosions have overnight. two at the airport, one on a subway train. our way. we'll bring them to you as soon as we have an opportunity. breaking. this is a wesh 2 news update. m brett connolly. newsroom, the s office has just identify the victim of a deadly shooting an apopka. a playground at 13th street monday afternoon. several shots were fired into a group of about 40 people. deputies say they' trouble getting informat

and, if i was a layperson like anybody not in politics -- you have to run.are talking about the iranian nuclear test. to point outnt some reaction to the missile test by hillary clinton calling for sanctions after the missile tests. what additional sanctions could be used against them to prevent this." -- this? i'm glad you mentioned secretary clinton. she came out taken a much tougher line than the obama administration on the missile tests and regional aggression. she understands that if she is president, she will inherit a very difficult situation. she does not want to be in a situation where american national powers have been significantly diminished and credibility. she is coming out in signaling that if i am president, i will not let you get away with missile tests and terrorist attacks and supporting torture in syria. about powerful sanctions. sections that could hit the economy. , if they hit the supreme leader's holding company. the supreme leader has a $95 billion holding company. recently been listed under the nuclear deal. that is relisted and san

to the layperson watching this, this is real life. it's a cafe in paris or a concert hall or an airport or a train station. it's so terrifying to think that these areas are so vulnerable. >> that's a lot of the key, what makes isis and other you don't necessarily have to kill thousands. but the psychological effect, the fear, i mean, that's what these groups really trigger. the gut, the fear that makes you house. win. much. >>> we have much more to get to this morning as we continue to cover this breaking news coming out of brussels in belgium. at least three explosions have overnight. two at the airport, one on a subway train. many more developments headed our way. as we have an our bacteria family's been on this cushion for generations. alright kiddos! everybody off the backpack, we made it to the ottoman. i like to watch them clean, but they'll never get me on the mattress! finally there's a disinfectant mist designed for sofas, introducing new lysol max cover. its innovative cap has a 2x wider spray that kills 99.9% of bacteria. m

just this alone a little that gives me a portal into the layperson who's trying to do well, the labor organization or whomever it happens to be. >> i guess maybe i'm a lone wolf here. i think you over complex a simple issue. is it when some entity or individual decides it's going to go and make a communication, and the cost involved in making the communication is about $2500. they've got to report. now, whether they incur the $2500, i didn't know we had a 12 month-incurred two years ago, but they used what they pay for two years ago to try and influence the public on a given issue, it should be reported. >> when? >> when they initiate to medication. >> that'll were talking about it right now, if i read this, i think it's when two years ago when i paid for the study. i mean, if i read it for the first time that's what screams out to me. at the time incurred. >> but you have amended it and i think that amendment is good. the focus should be a person makes a payment when any expenditure and connection with a communication. or am i oversimplifying? >> nope. >> i think the chair has stated

just this alone a little that gives me a portal into the layperson who's trying to do well, the labor organization or whomever it happens to be. >> i guess maybe i'm a lone wolf here. i think you over complex a simple issue. is it when some entity or individual decides it's going to go and make a communication, and the cost involved in making the communication is about $2500. they've got to report. now, whether they incur the $2500, i didn't know we had a 12 month-incurred two years ago, but they used what they pay for two years ago to try and influence the public on a given issue, it should be reported. >> when? >> when they initiate to medication. >> that'll were talking about it right now, if i read this, i think it's when two years ago when i paid for the study. i mean, if i read it for the first time that's what screams out to me. at the time incurred. >> but you have amended it and i think that amendment is good. the focus should be a person makes a payment when any expenditure and connection with a communication. or am i oversimplifying? >> nope. >> i think the chair has stated